「peer review」の検索結果

Request cross-AI peer review of phase plans from external AI CLIs

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

類似企業の売上・利益率・評価倍率を比較するExcelを作成します。計算式、中央値や四分位、データの出典をまとめ、投資や買収の検討に使う比較資料を整えます。

• 同業他社との企業価値比較
• 買収検討用の比較資料作成
• 業界の成長性・収益性比較

Build a structured deep-reading Paper Card for one scientific paper, analysing methods, experiment-to-claim evidence, limitations, and research ideas. Use for 论文精读卡、方法拆解、证据链分析; not full-paper bilingual translation or formal peer review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the Anti-Autoresearch integrity-forensics sweep (span-anchored evidence ledger → GPT auditors propose findings → a rules-only reporter that lists every proposal with what the auditor said about it) against a paper via a SHA-pinned thin launcher — then convert the verdict into a typed policy gate (BLOCK/WARN/NO_NEW_BLOCKER) and an append-only obligations ledger. Use when user says "integrity forensics", "forensic audit this paper", "投稿前自查诚信", "审这篇论文的诚信", or says "anti-autoresearch" when the upstream repo's own skills are not installed. Also invoked by /paper-writing (submission self-forensics, default ON), /peer-review (forensic appendix), /resubmit-pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

STATA code pattern library for empirical archival accounting research. Provides tested syntax from 126 peer-reviewed JAR (Journal of Accounting Research) replication files (2017-2025). Use when the user asks procedural questions like "How do I implement [method]?" or "Show me code for [technique]" — including: entropy balancing, propensity score matching (PSM), difference-in-differences (DiD), regression discontinuity (RDD), instrumental variables (IV), event studies (CAR/BHAR), survival analysis, Fama-MacBeth regressions, bootstrap, quantile regression, reghdfe/xtreg/areg, clustering standard errors, fixed effects, esttab/outreg2 table formatting, winsorization, leads/lags. Users can specify their variables (e.g., treatment, outcomes, controls) and receive adapted syntax. NOTE: This skill provides code patterns from published papers, not research design advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reactome pathway enrichment using ReactomePA package. Use when analyzing gene lists against Reactome's curated peer-reviewed pathway database. Performs over-representation analysis and GSEA with visualization and pathway hierarchy exploration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run any question, idea, or decision through a council of 5 AI advisors who independently analyze it, peer-review each other anonymously, and synthesize a final verdict. Based on Karpathy's LLM Council methodology. MANDATORY TRIGGERS: 'council this', 'run the council', 'war room this', 'pressure-test this', 'stress-test this', 'debate this'. STRONG TRIGGERS (use when combined with a real decision or tradeoff): 'should I X or Y', 'which option', 'what would you do', 'is this the right move', 'validate this', 'get multiple perspectives', 'I can't decide', 'I'm torn between'. Do NOT trigger on simple yes/no questions, factual lookups, or casual 'should I' without a meaningful tradeoff (e.g. 'should I use markdown' is not a council question). DO trigger when the user presents a genuine decision with stakes, multiple options, and context that suggests they want it pressure-tested from multiple angles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Argentine Supreme Court citation network analysis using JurisRank — a peer-reviewed PageRank algorithm with temporal decay for measuring jurisprudential authority. Ranks precedents by citation influence, traces doctrinal evolution, and detects constitutional drift. Published methodology: JCLLT (DOI: 10.47852/bonviewJCLLT62027951). Activate with: which cases to cite, rank precedents, case authority, doctrinal evolution, Argentine Supreme Court, CSJN jurisprudence, citation network, leading case, legal research Argentina.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyse existing written feedback for quality, specificity, actionability, and impact on student learning. Use when reviewing teacher or peer feedback to improve feedback practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reactome is a free, open-source, curated and peer-reviewed pathway database. Their goal is to provide intuitive bioinformatics tools for the visualization, interpretation and analysis of pathway knowledge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a non-interactive Claude Code print-mode call from Codex. Use when the user asks to "claude print", "ask claude", "run claude", "consult claude", or when a Codex Turbo skill needs Claude as an independent peer reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query bioRxiv/medRxiv preprints via REST API. Search by DOI, category, or date range; retrieve metadata (title, abstract, authors, category, DOI, version history) and PDFs. No auth. For peer-reviewed biomedical use pubmed-database; broader scholarly search use openalex-database.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Student weekly assignment planner for Canvas LMS. Shows all due dates, submission status, grades, and peer reviews across all courses. Use when a student says "what's due", "plan my week", "weekly check", or wants to organize their coursework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Framework for competitive landscape analysis across any industry. Use when creating competitor analysis, market positioning assessments, investment memos, strategic reviews, or any analysis requiring systematic evaluation of competitive dynamics. Triggers include requests for competitive landscape decks, peer comparisons, market structure analysis, strategic positioning assessments, and investment recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when drafting or revising internal technical design docs, review notes, architecture writeups, or sharing posts in Chinese, especially when the tone should stay evidence-backed, calm, and suitable for peers or leaders rather than marketing or literary writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Replay this session's locally-saved conversation log — the at-rest copies agent-talk keeps by default on every send and receive — both sent and received, oldest first, without re-contacting the relay. Use to review the conversation with a peer. `<user>` is this session's user directory (absolute path; from init).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement from a spec or plan: extract stories, build in safe waves, test, commit, and get peer review per story. Use for "implement", "build/code this plan", or targeted fix findings. If no plan exists, use /ship:design first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyse existing written feedback for quality, specificity, actionability, and impact on student learning. Use when reviewing teacher or peer feedback to improve feedback practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simultaneous Launch Button - Two-person rule for destructive commands. Use when coordinating dangerous operations between agents, requiring peer review for rm -rf, git push --force, kubectl delete, DROP TABLE, or terraform destroy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organize an author's response to peer review: extract every referee point, order the revision by dependency, flag possible pushbacks, and build the response-letter skeleton the author fills in. Use for revise-and-resubmit planning, response letters, or checking every point was answered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate multi-LLM parallel debate and synthesis. Dispatches prompts to available omega CLI wrappers in parallel, collects independent responses, runs anonymized peer review ranking, and synthesizes via a chairman model. Supports collaboration templates, idle watchdog, inter-agent messaging, worktree isolation, and multi-turn sessions. No server required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user needs SCI/SCIE/ESCI/SSCI journal-submission help: evidence-backed candidate-journal discovery from a title, abstract, keywords, or manuscript text; public-metric and risk lookup for a known journal; or a pre-submission compliance check of a draft against a chosen journal's Author Guidelines and same-journal conventions. Also for Chinese requests such as 选刊、投稿期刊推荐、期刊查询、中科院分区、投稿前检查、期刊要求核对. This skill produces candidates, evidence, checks, and uncertainty; it does not judge research quality, predict acceptance, choose a uniquely best journal, draft prose, or simulate peer review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 1 of the Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Use this skill whenever you need to gather, consolidate, or refresh raw evidence for named skills in the registry. Trigger phrases: "collect evidence", "populate the data lake", "gather sources", "run ev-collection", "Phase 1", "compile the evidence index", "refresh the unified lake", "aggregate skill evidence", "build the evidence database". Also invoke as the first step before running ev-star-verification, ev-adversarial-audit, or ev-link-validation — nothing downstream is meaningful without a fresh, compiled index. Covers GitHub repo links, stargazer signals, YouTube showcases, arXiv papers, peer reviews, benchmark results, blog/newsletter posts, and self-attestation artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Skippable Phase 0 of the Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Use only on declared need for higher-quality Stage-2 evidence: a promotion candidate, or a skill that gaia-meta-sweep flagged as under-evidenced. Given a skill id, source repo/context, and needed evidence types (benchmark-result, arxiv, peer-review, social-signal), it runs Firecrawl searches, scrapes top hits to markdown, and appends discovered sources into Phase 1 inputs. Missing benchmark evidence is recorded as benchmark-source candidates first, not direct scoring rows. Trigger phrases: "discover evidence", "find new evidence", "Phase 0", "run ev-discovery", "search for benchmarks/papers", "under-evidenced", "promotion candidate needs stronger proof". This is the ONLY ev-* skill that searches the web for NEW evidence; other ev-* skills aggregate or verify known sources. Requires Firecrawl to be usable (`firecrawl --status` authenticated OR FIRECRAWL_API_KEY set); skips gracefully when neither holds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。