「questions」の検索結果

Multi-provider deliberation panel for COMPLEX, multi-view questions — architecture, strategy, market research, and codebase sweeps. Runs a 4-stage deliberation across the provider fleet (diverge → contrarian red-team → adversarial verify → cited synthesis), the same multi-perspective rigour the plan-gate already applies to plan reviews, generalised to arbitrary questions. Use when one model's answer isn't enough and you want convergence THROUGH disagreement + verification, not a single opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US cybersecurity firms — pen-testing/red team, security audits, vCISO, SOC 2 readiness, incident response, managed SOC, IAM, cloud security, and AppSec. Triggers on "find me a pen-testing firm for our SOC 2 audit", "shortlist three vCISO services for our healthcare-tech startup", "we need an incident response retainer", or "pull contact info for these 8 security firm domains", even when described indirectly (we got breached, prepare us for the compliance audit, get us SOC 2 ready). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Skip in-house security hires, "how do I patch CVE-X" or "configure firewall Y" DIY questions, security-product reviews (CrowdStrike vs SentinelOne, etc.), generic security knowledge questions, consumer/personal security advice, non-US firms, individual freelancers and bug-bounty hunters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CTO-level architectural advisor for AI-native development. Use this skill whenever you encounter code design decisions, architecture discussions, system resilience questions, or any work touching: "architecture", "design", "scale", "dependencies", "state", "failure", "blast radius", "refactor", "migrate", "optimize", "resilience", "consistency", "observability", "bottleneck", "coupling", "monolith", "microservices", "distributed", "concurrency", "data flow", "system design", or any prompt suggesting code-first thinking when design-first thinking is needed. This skill integrates with Claude Code to review generated code for architectural soundness, define design systems via design.md, and guide teams toward CTO-level thinking. Trigger aggressively on architectural questions—this is where AI adds the most leverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, monetization strategy, or subscription models. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing', 'price', 'monetization', 'freemium', 'Van Westendorp', 'how much should I charge', 'pricing tiers', 'good-better-best', 'SaaS pricing', 'subscription model', 'free vs paid', 'packaging', 'pricing page', 'annual vs monthly', or is deciding between free and paid models. Make sure to use this whenever someone is making ANY pricing decision — even questions like 'should I charge for this?' or 'is freemium right for us?' or 'my conversion rate is low, is it the price?' are pricing strategy questions. Covers value-based pricing, tier structure, price psychology, and competitor benchmarking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview Question Generator — produces 40-60 questions across behavioral (STAR), technical, culture, situational categories with scoring rubrics and recommended loop structure

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a measured semantic core for a brand through official keyword APIs (Yandex Wordstat for RU, Google Ads Keyword Planner / Bing Webmaster worldwide, autocomplete everywhere), commit it as core.json plus a questions.csv, and hand that straight to an open-geo visibility run. Use when the user wants demand research, a semantic core, keyword volume, or "collect the questions and then measure visibility" — no browser and no manual keyword tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a feature or code change made by Claude is complete and the developer wants to confirm they actually understood it before shipping. Triggers on "handoff", "quiz me", "comprehension check", "did I understand this", "verify I read the code", "test my understanding", or after finishing a feature when the developer wants to take ownership of AI-written code. Also triggers on requests for an interactive or clickable quiz ("interactive mode", "let me answer with the mouse", "mode interactif", "je réponds à la souris"). Quizzes the developer on WHERE the logic lives (file/function) and WHY decisions were made (trade-offs, behavior, debugging), with the number of questions scaled to the size of the change. Multiple-choice questions are clickable by default (asked through `AskUserQuestion`) and fall back to typed answers. Points to file:line on wrong answers, allows one retry, then reveals the answer, and ends with a score plus the weak areas to re-read. Conducts the quiz in the developer's language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up and operate customer workspaces: route customer updates, record meetings, track questions and actions, manage workstreams, and prepare handoffs. Use when creating or maintaining a customer workspace, processing meeting notes or updates, reviewing next actions, or preparing a handoff. Triggers: customer workspace, 顧客ワークスペース, inbox 追加, 議事録管理, 案件更新, 宿題管理, 引き継ぎ.

Generate or improve a company-specific data analysis skill by extracting tribal knowledge from analysts. BOOTSTRAP MODE - → Discovers schemas, asks key questions, generates initial skill with reference files ITERATION MODE - → Loads existing skill, asks targeted questions, appends/updates reference files Use when data analysts want Claude to understand their company's specific data warehouse, terminology, metrics definitions, and common query patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build production-ready analytical SQL queries using CTEs, window functions, aggregations, and data transformations. Translates business questions into well-documented, performant queries. Use when writing reporting queries, building data pipelines, or answering ad-hoc business questions with SQL.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, write, or manage Meta ads and assets: ad copy, campaigns, spend, reports, audiences, catalogs, product feeds, feed refresh schedules, experiments, and policy. Always load for any request to create or write an ad, or to advertise a product or service, even when no platform is named; this includes sensitive or restricted categories. Always load for any question asking what a Meta, Facebook, or Instagram advertising policy means, allows, prohibits, or requires, including a standalone policy-definition question with no account context. Those questions must use ads_policy_tool, never browser search or memory. Load for a specifically named catalog or feed with an upload or refresh-schedule request; use Ads reads to resolve ownership before writing. Generic unnamed feeds need context. Whether an image, claim or piece of copy may be used in an ad is ALWAYS a Meta Ads task — 'can I use this in an ad', 'is it allowed', 'is this against policy', and any rights, likeness, celebrity, logo or trademark question about advertising with an image, including a follow-up about one just generated. Those are ads-policy questions, not general legal ones. An ad request uses the campaign workflow unless explicitly only an image or organic post.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract tacit knowledge through non-obvious microquestions — things only the user knows that can't be found in code, docs, or research. Use when you're about to guess at intent, context, or constraints during SAFEWORD's understanding flow. Also use when user says 'ask me', 'what do you need to know', or when another skill (bdd, brainstorm, debug) needs user context before proceeding. Do NOT use for questions answerable by reading the codebase or searching the web.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Native video analysis using Google Gemini API. Upload and analyze video files — describe scenes, extract text/UI, answer questions about content, transcribe speech, identify objects and actions. Use when: (1) User sends a video file and wants it analyzed, (2) Video summarization or description needed, (3) Extracting text, UI elements, or information from screen recordings, (4) Answering questions about video content, (5) Comparing multiple videos, (6) Analyzing tutorials, demos, or walkthroughs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map the most influential Reddit venues for a brand's AI visibility using Xpoz. Finds which subreddits and threads AI engines actually cite when answering buyer questions, where those questions get asked, and which live threads are worth answering. Use when asked to "get cited by AI through Reddit", "which subreddits matter for my brand", "Reddit influence map", "where should we engage on Reddit", or "why does ChatGPT cite Reddit for my category".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Any live-web task via the Firecrawl CLI — including ordinary web research: searching the web, reading or extracting pages, gathering sources, discovering site URLs, bulk extraction, downloading a site, change alerts, or pages needing clicks/login — web only; local files route to firecrawl-parse. For US legal or regulatory questions use gov; for papers use firecrawl-research-index; for library, API, error, or bug questions use firecrawl-developer-index.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

INTERNAL/HELPER skill — do NOT invoke directly from a user query. This is the shared formatter/poster used by answer-issue-questions and breakdown-issues. It formats a scope GitHub Issue body (label cc-triage-scope, used before code analysis), runs the pre-posting checklist, and executes `gh issue create`. Invoke this skill ONLY from one of the parent skills via the Skill tool, after the parent has finalized the task breakdown. If a user asks to 'create a scope issue' or similar, route them to the appropriate parent skill (/breakdown-issues for fresh breakdowns, /answer-issue-questions for derived sub-tasks) rather than invoking this one directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Relentless one-question-at-a-time interview (tappable options with a recommended answer) that sharpens a requirement, business plan, project plan, proposal, or raw idea through conversation, then writes it up as a brief with a glossary and decision log. Use whenever the user wants their thinking stress-tested or pinned down before acting — trigger phrases include "grill me", "grill this", "詰めて", "詰めたい", "壁打ち", "要件を固めたい", "企画を練りたい", "計画を整理したい", "アイデアをぶつけたい", "突っ込んで", "clarify", "質問して", "何が決まってないか教えて", or when the user describes a plan/idea vaguely and asks what to do next. Do NOT use for reviewing a finished document (use a document-review skill) or when the user just wants an answer, not questions.

Prepares a DRAFT vendor risk screening brief from the material the user provides on one vendor (questionnaire answers, certificates, assurance reports, policies, contract extracts): per screening topic, what a document evidences with reference, date and scope, what is only asserted, what is missing or contradicted, certificate and report details as stated, and ready-to-send questions for the vendor and the internal owners. No web research, no risk rating, tier, score or recommendation. Use when the user asks to "screen this vendor", "review the vendor's questionnaire answers", "check what the vendor's certificate covers", "what is missing from this due diligence pack" or "draft the follow-up questions for the vendor". Do not use for answering a customer's questionnaire about your own organisation, use vendor-security-questionnaire-prefill instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns sustainability or ESG reports the user provides into a DRAFT question pack for reviewers: every quantitative disclosure as stated with unit, period, boundary and page, year-over-year changes computed only from the stated figures with the arithmetic shown, targets with stated and computed progress, restatements and inconsistencies, gaps and specific questions to the report owner. No assurance, accuracy or conformance verdict. Use when the user asks to "prepare review questions on our sustainability report", "what changed year on year in this ESG report", "check the figures in this report before it goes to the board", "find the gaps in this ESG disclosure" or "build a question pack for the report owner". Do not use for reviewing marketing text against environmental-claim rules, use green-claims-review instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares a discovery call brief from what the user has on a prospect (CRM record, inbound form, emails, notes, public material the user supplies): what is known with sources, gaps against the qualification dimensions, hypotheses to test, questions in priority order and what to listen for. Returns a DRAFT Markdown brief in the chat. Use when the user asks to "prep me for the discovery call with <prospect>", "what should I ask on this first call", "intro call brief", "questions for the qualification call" or "what do we know before we speak to them". Do not use for scoring leads against a rubric, use lead-qualification-scorer instead; for an existing customer's account review use account-plan-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares a DRAFT internal audit pack from the audit plan: scope as stated, criteria with clauses quoted from the documents provided, document requests per auditee with due dates, open interview questions per process and role, previous findings to follow up and a readiness checklist. Never pre-judges conformity, writes findings or selects the sample; the lead auditor decides. Use when the user asks to "prepare the internal audit", "build the audit pack from this plan", "draft the document requests and interview questions" or "get us ready for the supplier audit". Do not use for evidence requests built from a control list, use control-evidence-request-pack instead; to chase actions from earlier audits, use corrective-action-tracker. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts answers to the questions in a received RFP, RFQ or tender from the organisation's past responses, answer library, case studies, policies and other documents provided: one row per buyer question with a draft answer marked Reused, Adapted or Missing, its source and date, and a legal or pricing review flag on every answer touching terms, liability, warranties, insurance, data protection or price. Use when the user asks to "draft our RFP response", "answer this tender from our past proposals", "pre-fill the bid questions", "first pass at the RFQ answers" or "reuse our previous bid content". Do not use for writing the buyer's own RFP or requirements, use rfp-requirements-pack instead; for security or due diligence questionnaires use vendor-security-questionnaire-prefill; for scoring received supplier responses use rfp-comparison-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a DRAFT quiz from the training content the user supplies (slide deck, manual, e-learning script, session transcript, procedure): numbered questions with the correct answer, distractors drawn from the content itself, an explanation quoting the source passage with its location, a difficulty tag (Recall, Apply, Analyse) with its basis, and a coverage table showing which sections and objectives each question tests and which are left uncovered. Use when the user asks to "build a quiz from this deck", "write knowledge check questions for this module", "create an assessment from this training", "test understanding of this procedure" or "which sections does this quiz cover". Do not use for a reader-facing question and answer page built from documents, use faq-builder instead; for writing the procedure itself from notes or a walkthrough, use sop-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a DRAFT structured interview scorecard from a job description: five to eight competencies traced to it, past-behaviour and situational evidence questions with probes, four-level rating anchors written as observable behaviours, a blank scoring sheet, a panel plan and the items the hiring manager must confirm. Use when the user asks to "build an interview scorecard for this job description", "write competency questions for this role", "draft the interview guide for the panel", "set up a rating scale for the interviewers", "put together a structured interview kit" or "create a hiring rubric from the JD". Do not use for writing or fixing the job description itself, use job-description-drafter instead; for the new hire's first 90 days, use onboarding-plan-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。