「should」の検索結果

This skill should be used when the user wants to file their tax return electronically via the 確定申告書等作成コーナー (NTA Tax Return Preparation Corner) using Claude in Chrome, Antigravity Browser Sub-Agent, or Playwright CLI (fallback). It guides the browser-based input of calculated tax data. Trigger phrases include: "e-Tax提出", "電子申告", "e-Taxで申告", "作成コーナーに入力", "確定申告書等作成コーナー", "作成コーナー", "申告書を提出".

This skill should be used when the user asks about the invoice system (インボイス制度), qualified invoices (適格請求書), registration numbers (登録番号), input tax credits (仕入税額控除), the 20% special measure (2割特例), the 30% special measure (3割特例), tax-exempt businesses (免税事業者), transitional measures (経過措置), small-amount exceptions (少額特例), corrected invoices (修正インボイス), or any related topics. Trigger phrases include: "インボイス", "適格請求書", "登録番号", "仕入税額控除", "2割特例", "3割特例", "免税事業者", "経過措置", "少額特例", "修正インボイス", "返還インボイス", "簡易インボイス", "インボイス登録", "T番号", "適格請求書発行事業者".

This skill should be used when the user wants to record bookkeeping entries (仕訳), import transaction data from CSV files, receipts, or invoices, or manage their general ledger. Trigger phrases include: "仕訳を入力", "仕訳登録", "CSVを取り込む", "レシートを読み込む", "請求書を取り込む", "帳簿を付ける", "経費を記録", "売上を記録", "仕訳を修正", "仕訳を検索", "仕訳を削除", "取引を登録", "帳簿の初期化".

This skill should be used when the user needs to know what documents to collect for their tax filing, wants a checklist of required documents, or asks where to obtain specific tax documents. Trigger phrases include: "必要書類", "書類を集める", "何を準備すればいい", "源泉徴収票はどこで", "書類チェックリスト", "確定申告に必要なもの", "書類収集", "準備するもの".

This skill should be used when the user wants to set up shinkoku for the first time, initialize their configuration, or update their existing settings. Trigger phrases include: "セットアップ", "初期設定", "設定ファイルを作る", "shinkokuの設定", "config", "setup", "始め方", "使い方", "設定を更新", "configを作り直す".

This skill should be used when the user needs to calculate their income tax (所得税), compute deductions, or import withholding slips. Trigger phrases include: "所得税を計算", "確定申告書を作成", "控除を計算", "源泉徴収票を取り込む", "所得税額", "納付額を計算", "還付額を計算", "第一表", "第二表", "申告書B", "所得控除", "税額控除".

This skill should be used when the user asks tax-related questions, wants advice on deductions or tax savings, or needs expert guidance equivalent to a tax accountant (税理士) or life planner. Trigger phrases include: "税金について教えて", "控除は使える？", "確定申告の相談", "節税", "ふるさと納税の上限", "iDeCoの効果", "住宅ローン控除", "青色申告のメリット", "消費税はかかる？", "扶養に入れる？", "配偶者控除", "医療費控除", "法人成り", "経費になる？", "税率を教えて", "所得税の計算", "住民税", "社会保険料", "103万の壁", "130万の壁", "インボイス", "簡易課税", "税制改正", "開業届", "副業バレ", "白色申告", "税務調査", "特定支出控除", "予定納税", "中間納付".

This skill should be used when the user asks to "check outdated", "outdated check", "陳腐化チェック", "最新化チェック", or "NFR update check" for the non-functional requirement hearing sheets.

Shared discipline for every hunt-* skill: scope and authorization gating, the two-account rule, the confirmation gate that separates a real finding from a false positive, enumeration limits, stop conditions, marker discipline, wiki-first query and self-heal, FIND output, Deadends, and wiki distillation. ALWAYS LOADED alongside any hunt skill. Also trigger directly on "is this in scope", "is this a real bug", "how do I confirm this", "should I keep going", "how many IDs should I test", "what severity", "how do I report this", "I got someone else's data". Every hunt-* skill assumes this file; without it they run without their safety and quality layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rules for when an agent should recall from long-term memory before acting and when it should save decisions, corrections and failures afterwards. Works with any memory backend.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "brainstorm a story idea", "I have an idea for a story", "what if", "develop a premise", "is this idea strong enough", "workshop my logline", "premise", "story concept", "what should I write", "short story or novel", "novella or novel", "name my book", "title ideas", or has a spark (an image, a character, a setting, a question) and wants to turn it into a tested premise before starting a story project. NOT for the controlling idea or theme of an existing story (use theme-craft).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill applies brand guidelines to content creation. It should be used when the user asks to "write an email", "draft a proposal", "create a pitch deck", "write a LinkedIn post", "draft a presentation", "write a Slack message", "draft sales content", or any content creation request where brand voice should be applied. Also triggers on "on-brand", "brand voice", "enforce voice", "apply brand guidelines", "brand-aligned content", "write in our voice", "use our brand tone", "make this sound like us", "rewrite this in our tone", or "this doesn't sound on-brand". Not for generating guidelines from scratch (use guideline-generation) or discovering brand materials (use discover-brand).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide whether a task deserves its own git worktree and, if chosen, run it end to end: branch from the integration branch rather than the current tree, keep the main working copy untouched while the task runs, compare the result against the untouched baseline before declaring it done, and prepare it for a pull request instead of merging. Use when a request says to do the work in a new worktree or branch, when a change is large or risky enough that the main tree should stay usable, when several tasks need to run in parallel on one repository, when a result has to be diffed against current behavior, and when deciding where screenshots, builds, and other artifacts produced in a worktree should end up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Protocol for handling ambiguous decisions and missing/conflicting knowledge during code generation, design, and review. Ensures AI surfaces genuine judgment calls with structured options and stops on hallucination risk instead of silently assuming. Use when a decision has multiple valid approaches, when facts are missing or contradictory, when the user asks 'what should we do here?', 'is this a judgment call?', 'should I ask about this?', 'am I guessing here?', 'what are the tradeoffs?', or when deciding between two reasonable architectural or design options. Also composed by molecules to define how judgment calls and clarification requests are surfaced and resolved.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author and maintain MANUAL and hybrid test cases and suites in TestRail, Xray (Jira), Zephyr Scale, and Qase. Covers test-case anatomy (title, preconditions, steps, expected results, test data), suite/section organization, bulk authoring from user stories and acceptance criteria, ambiguous-step linting, CSV/API import-export payloads per tool, requirement traceability and coverage gaps, review hygiene, and when a manual case should graduate to automation. Use when: "write a test case," "manual test case," "TestRail case," "Xray test," "Zephyr Scale case," "Qase case," "import CSV into TestRail," "lint these steps," "traceability report," "should this be automated." Not for: Generating automated TEST CODE — that is ai-test-generation. Sprint-level WHAT-to-test selection — that is test-planning. Related: ai-test-generation, test-planning, exploratory-testing, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Paul Graham's founder mode. When to delegate vs. dive deep. Maintaining velocity as you scale. Avoiding "professional CEO" traps. The operating mode that built Apple, Tesla, and every YC unicorn. Founder mode isn't micromanagement - it's having the conviction and context to make decisive moves that employees can't. It's staying in the arena when conventional wisdom says to step back. Use when "founder mode, should i delegate, staying close to work, micromanagement, when to step back, professional ceo, manager vs founder, skip level, how involved should i be, letting go of control, scaling as founder, founder burnout, founder, leadership, delegation, management, scaling, operational" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writing maintainable code - readability principles, SOLID patterns applied pragmatically, and the judgment to know when rules should bendUse when "code quality, clean code, readability, naming, SOLID, refactor, code review, best practices, maintainable, how should I structure, clean-code, solid, readability, maintainability, code-review, naming, functions, principles" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and revises a complete skill DIRECTORY — SKILL.md, scripts, references, assets — and packages it. Use for "create a skill for X", "turn this into a skill", "update/improve this skill", "why doesn't my skill trigger", "review this SKILL.md", "package this skill", or when a repeated procedure should become a reusable artifact. Enforces the structure that makes skills work — a concrete procedure rather than a goal statement, an explicit applicability boundary, failure modes with their signals, a runtime verification step, and a description checked against the existing catalogue for confusability. For choosing whether the instruction should be a skill at all rather than project instructions or a prompt, use crafting-instructions. For writing quality inside the prose, use writing-instructions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Close a GitHub issue with a synthesis comment as a flowing graph — validate the synthesis, post the closing comment, close, then run a pluggable callback (e.g. memory store) detached. Use when closing an issue should also capture the LEARNING (not just the diff log) and when the post-close work shouldn't block the close ack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan, map, or restructure their website's page hierarchy, navigation, URL structure, or internal linking. Also use when the user mentions "sitemap," "site map," "visual sitemap," "site structure," "page hierarchy," "information architecture," "IA," "navigation design," "URL structure," "breadcrumbs," "internal linking strategy," "website planning," "what pages do I need," "how should I organize my site," or "site navigation." Use this whenever someone is planning what pages a website should have and how they connect. NOT for XML sitemaps (that's technical SEO — see seo-audit). For SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data, see schema.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, or monetization strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing,' 'pricing tiers,' 'freemium,' 'free trial,' 'packaging,' 'price increase,' 'value metric,' 'Van Westendorp,' 'willingness to pay,' 'monetization,' 'how much should I charge,' 'my pricing is wrong,' 'pricing page,' 'annual vs monthly,' 'per seat pricing,' or 'should I offer a free plan.' Use this whenever someone is figuring out what to charge or how to structure their plans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program," or "experiment playbook." Use this whenever someone is comparing two approaches and wants to measure which performs better, or when they want to build a systematic experimentation practice. For tracking implementation, see analytics. For page-level conversion optimization, see cro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "make this animation feel natural", "fix motion that feels stiff/floaty/cheap", "my animation looks robotic", "choose an easing curve", "how do I use the Graph Editor", "add overshoot or bounce", "Easy Ease isn't enough", "make snappy motion", "pick a duration for this transition", "stagger a list animation", "sync animation to a beat", or "review motion for good timing". It is the tech-agnostic foundation for deciding how something should move.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。