171 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use REUSE when an agent needs file-level licensing clarity instead of guessing from a single top-level LICENSE file. The agent checks compliance, adds or verifies SPDX headers, pulls missing license texts into LICENSES/, and produces a concrete remediation list or SPDX export.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Burn Red Book audio CDs or MP3 data CDs on macOS via cdrdao, sourcing from Hoodrat HDD or local files. Audio CDs carry CD-Text from ID3 tags; MP3 discs use ISO9660+Joliet (~700 MB). Handles full-album burns and cherry-picked playlists. Triggers on 'burn CD', 'burn album', 'make audio CD', 'mixtape disc', 'soundtrack for the car'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user is deciding, reviewing, or second-guessing a software architecture or tech-stack choice — monolith vs microservices vs serverless vs event-driven, backend language, database type, caching, CQRS/event sourcing, polyglot, or a migration like Strangler Fig. Triggers on "should I use microservices", "which database", "tech stack for", "system design", or "architecture review". For how to deploy, operate, and scale that design (CI/CD, cloud, Kubernetes, IaC), use devops.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read-only audit of a GitHub repository's security posture. Gathers ref protection (rulesets AND classic branch protection), Actions token permissions, code and supply-chain features (Dependabot, secret scanning, push protection, CodeQL), and repo hygiene toggles via `gh api`, then classifies findings against essential / recommended / advanced tiers into a PASS/GAP report. Makes NO changes. Use when reviewing a repo before open-sourcing or a release, auditing a public user-owned repo whose CI auto-commits to the default branch, verifying a hardening change actually took effect, or producing a baseline security posture report for a repository.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Personalized Recruiting Outreach — LinkedIn InMail templates, cold email, second-touch follow-ups customized to the candidate's background
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build or review distributed .NET applications with Orleans grains, silos, persistence, streaming, reminders, placement, transactions, serialization, event sourcing, testing, and cloud-native hosting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build AI attribution systems for content sourcing. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-attribution-system related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operate and review a JLCPCB PCB/PCBA quote, optional physical-stencil request, or order using a frozen Gerber/drill, BOM, CPL, sourcing lock, constraints, and release manifest. Use for browser upload, board or stencil options, cost anomalies, coupons, component matching, substitutions, imported placement calibration, top/bottom preview inspection, cart preparation, or order records without silently accepting placement errors or payment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit, finish, or port PCB placement and routing using circuit intent, mechanical constraints, sourcing evidence, native DRC/connectivity, rendered views, and manufacturing feedback. Use before routing, after autorouting, before fabrication release, when adapting a proven board to another connector, enclosure, platform, or regional variant, or when reviewing layers, GND references, power distribution, decoupling, buses, controlled interfaces, RF keepouts, vias, cost-driving features, opens, or DRC findings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
REQUIRED skill for any security-related request. Use this skill whenever the user wants to find anything dangerous, sensitive, or risky in their code, files, or repository. This includes but is not limited to: scanning for secrets/keys/tokens/credentials, checking dependencies for vulnerabilities, auditing destructive commands for missing safeguards, reviewing files for PII or internal data before open-sourcing, checking .env files or git history for leaked credentials, or any request where the concern is "is this safe/secure/exposed?" This skill provides a structured audit methodology and checklist you MUST follow — do not attempt security reviews without it. Skip this skill ONLY for pure feature work, refactoring, bug fixes, or non-security code review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when evidence needs grading before anyone reasons from it — the user asks "how reliable is this?", "grade this source", "check this report", "can I trust this article?", "is this corroborated?", or hands over a URL, a pasted report or a Liberty91 event ahead of an ACH or assessment. The Quality of Information Check from the CIA Tradecraft Primer, adapted for vendor and press CTI reporting. Resolves each document to its originating source, splits it into claims, and grades every claim on two written elements, access level (how the source knows) and claim support (what backs the statement), with a stated rationale, using a fixed rubric with hard caps. The grade is not an Admiralty rating. Five outlets citing one vendor report count as one source; anything that cannot be traced to a primary is capped, not guessed. Returns a graded claim table, gaps, a deception screen and JSON. /ach, /threat-assessment and /writing-assessments run it first by default.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to know where a piece of reporting actually came from — the user gives an article URL and asks "where does this come from?", "who is the original source?", "is this just a rewrite?", or another skill needs the provenance chain before grading or citing a report. Follows an article's links and named attributions back to the originating vendor, government, victim or actor document and returns the chain, the primary's stated access and confidence language, publication dates, and every hop it could not resolve. Deterministic — a script or the Liberty91 platform resolves the chain; the model does not reconstruct it from memory. Invoked by /quality-of-information-check, /threat-actor-profiling, /campaign-tracking and /intelligence-writing. Works on any URL with no API key.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing a finished intelligence product, the user asks for a flash-report / threat-assessment / briefing / FINTEL template, or wants the BLUF + active-voice + clear-sourcing conventions. Covers all product types.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a report or article needs to be split into individual claims before it is graded, cited or used as evidence — the user asks "what does this report actually claim?", "split this into claims", "separate the facts from the judgements", or another skill needs a claim list. Turns one document into five to twelve atomic claims, each typed (observation, attribution, assessment, actor claim, victim disclosure) and anchored to the verbatim sentence it rests on, so every extraction can be checked against the source. Preserves the source's own hedging. Does not grade. Invoked by /quality-of-information-check; its output feeds /ach, /key-assumptions-check, /intelligence-writing, /writing-assessments and /threat-actor-profiling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply Transaction Cost Economics (Williamson, 1975, 1985) to analyze governance structure choices — market, hybrid, or hierarchy — based on transaction characteristics. Use this skill when the user needs to decide make-or-buy, evaluate outsourcing vs vertical integration, design governance mechanisms for inter-firm relationships, or when they ask 'should we build this in-house or outsource', 'why do firms vertically integrate', or 'how should we structure this partnership'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply Porter's Value Chain Analysis to identify competitive advantage sources within an organization's activities. Use this skill when the user needs to find where value is created or lost in their operations, analyze cost structure by activity, optimize internal processes, or identify outsourcing candidates — even if they say 'where do we make money' or 'which activities should we keep in-house'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write structured Requests for Proposal (RFP) or Requests for Quotation (RFQ) aligned with ISO 20400 sustainable procurement principles. Cover scope, technical requirements, evaluation methodology, and commercial terms. Use when sourcing vendors, services, or equipment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Compliance Manager — sizing and defending a compliance program's headcount/budget, deciding build-vs-buy on monitoring or case-management technology, choosing a centralized-vs-embedded staffing model, translating a new regulatory obligation into a costed resourcing ask, or reporting program coverage to executives/the board.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a camera-equipment repairer — diagnosing sensor dust vs. lens contamination, deciding whether a shutter is nearing end-of-life and should be replaced vs. repaired, calibrating autofocus and lens collimation, isolating image-stabilization mechanism faults, or sourcing parts for a discontinued body/lens.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, import, analyze, resume, or revise an end-to-end Circuit Weaver electronic design from requirements through validated functional KiCad schematics, placement review, and a truthful manufacturing handoff. Use for new designs and for existing KiCad/PCB/Gerber projects that need durable state. Use kicad for one-off file inspection, bom for standalone sourcing, and design-wizard only when the user explicitly requests the slower questionnaire.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
BOM management, sourcing, pricing, export, and fabrication preparation. Load the canonical Circuit Weaver skill from `skills/bom/SKILL.md`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, import, analyze, or resume an end-to-end Circuit Weaver electronic design with durable project state. Load the canonical workflow from skills/circuit-weaver/SKILL.md. Use kicad for one-off file inspection, bom for sourcing, and design-wizard only when explicitly requested.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search LCSC Electronics for electronic components — find parts by LCSC number (Cxxxxx) or MPN, check stock/pricing, download datasheets, analyze specifications. Sister company to JLCPCB, same parts library. Sync and maintain a local datasheets directory for a KiCad project. No API key needed — uses the free jlcsearch community API. Use this skill when the user mentions LCSC, JLCPCB parts library, JLCPCB assembly parts, production sourcing, Cxxxxx part numbers, needs to find LCSC equivalents for parts, is preparing a BOM for JLCPCB assembly, or wants to download datasheets and LCSC is available. For package cross-reference tables and BOM workflow, see the `bom` skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze existing KiCad projects, schematics, PCB layouts, Gerbers, netlists, and PDF reference schematics. Use when files such as .kicad_sch, .kicad_pcb, .kicad_pro, or Gerbers are supplied and the user wants review, debugging, net tracing, ERC/DRC/DFM, schematic-to-PCB comparison, or pre-fabrication checks. Do not use to create a new design from requirements or for standalone sourcing and ordering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。