「ticket」の検索結果

Turning research artifacts into actionable PM insight. Customer interviews, user research notes, support ticket reviews, sales call transcripts, survey data, in-app feedback, all synthesized into the decisions they are meant to inform. The discipline of moving from raw discovery data to clear product direction without losing signal in the synthesis or fabricating insight that was not actually there. Triggers on research synthesis, customer interview synthesis, user research analysis, discovery readout, research insights, sales call analysis, support ticket analysis, qualitative data analysis. Also triggers when a team has done research but cannot turn it into decisions, when synthesis is producing pretty decks but no roadmap movement, or when an upcoming PM decision needs to be grounded in research already conducted.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to design, construct, or improve an offer — the thing they actually sell — including value framing, bonus stacking, guarantee design, scarcity/urgency, naming, and payment structure. Also use when the user mentions 'offer,' 'offer design,' 'build an offer,' 'grand slam offer,' 'irresistible offer,' 'value stack,' 'bonus stack,' 'guarantee,' 'risk reversal,' 'money-back guarantee,' 'scarcity,' 'urgency,' 'high-ticket offer,' 'productize a service,' 'naming an offer,' 'payment plan,' 'down-sell,' 'upsell offer,' or 'why isn't my offer converting.' Best for services, agencies, courses, coaching, info products, high-ticket B2B, and direct-response. If you run pure self-serve SaaS, read pricing first — tiers and packaging do more work there. For price level itself (tiers, freemium, value metric), see pricing. For the page that presents the offer, see copywriting. For the launch moment, see launch. For sales collateral, see sales-enablement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekdays, conditional browser lane. Selects from the ticket ledger hardest first, meaning by severity and then by age within severity, and writes each customer a reply into a dated queue file the member reads, edits, and sends by hand. Where the right answer is a refund, a credit, a plan change, or a cancellation, it names the remedy, the exact amount, and the exact screen, and leaves the granting to the member. It sends only where you released the channel, never posts, never resolves a ticket, spends only where you released it, and never touches a credential.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monthly on the last weekday, light browser lane. Re-tests every theme and every severity rule against a month of real ticket evidence and rewrites strategy/themes.md wherever the evidence disagrees with the assumption. It merges two themes the evidence shows are one, splits a theme whose tickets have two different answers, retires a theme with no volume, creates a theme for a cluster that kept landing unclassified, and rewrites a severity rule wherever the outcomes contradict it. Theme ids are never reused and never renumbered. It holds every outbound action unless you released the channel, and it never touches a credential.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break a plan, spec, or conversation into dependency-aware, independently verifiable tickets. Use explicitly when the user wants work sliced for local planning or an issue tracker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates a Check for Understanding (CFU) for a math topic or standard: 1–3 targeted formative items whose distractors come from documented student misconceptions, plus a teacher guide routing each likely response to a specific next instructional step. Load BEFORE asking any clarifying question about grade, standard, or topic. This skill is for math; for other subjects, help as you normally would and don't mention the skill to the user. Triggers on asks to create, write, generate, or design a check for understanding, formative check, quick check, or exit ticket for a math concept or standard, and on implicit signals like "I need to see who got it before I move on." Not a quiz, test, or practice set — a CFU is read for what it reveals, not scored, so a numbered quiz or a bare answer key is a different job. Does not create a lesson (k12-lesson-plan-creation, which brings its own exit ticket), tier one (k12-lesson-differentiation), or prepare a teacher to teach one (k12-lesson-prep).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a single feature idea, improvement, or bug into ONE well-structured GitHub issue. TRIGGER when: the user wants to file/open/create an issue, turn a feature idea or improvement into a ticket, or capture something missing or broken as a ticket. DO NOT TRIGGER when: breaking work into multiple issues or planning a body of work → a planning skill; writing a full Product Requirements Document → creating-prd; the idea is still fuzzy and unhardened → grilling-ideas first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Legacy router from PRD/spec intent to the current Matt Pocock spec and ticket flow. Prefer to-spec and to-tickets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route Shift documentation, architecture notes, and tickets correctly. Use when Codex is about to create or move docs, write an architecture plan, capture a design decision, create a ticket, or update repo documentation for Shift.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break a work-items.md file (produced by /plan-work-items) into independently-grabbable GitHub issues, one per slice, in each slice's target repo. Use when you want to turn a work-items file into GitHub issues, publish work items as issue tickets, or create implementation tickets that can be worked on and tracked on GitHub. Does not produce the work-items file itself — use plan-work-items to break a plan into work items first. Does not review code or post pull request comments — use post-code-review-to-pr for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converges an underspecified request into a typed IntentSpec before planning or acting. Use when the user asks to implement, add, change, refactor, fix, migrate, configure, handle, triage, sort out, look into or decide something and the request leaves decisions open (which objects, which approach, what happens on failure, which trade-off), contradicts itself, admits two readings, or rests on an approach its sources may rule out — in a codebase, a ticket queue, a research brief or a runbook — or when the user says "clarify the intent", "what do you need from me", or invokes intent-router. Looks up what its sources hold (code, history, decision records, a ticket log, an order record, the policy in force) before asking; asks only preference or irreversible questions, one at a time, with a recommended default; halts instead of guessing; checks the delivered work against the spec. Silent on a fully stated task its sources do not contradict. Not for explaining existing state ("what does X do", "why is Y slow").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when user asks to recognize invoices, extract receipt data, or OCR bills and tickets. Recognize and extract structured data from invoices, receipts, and bills using iFlytek OCR API (科大讯飞票据识别). Supports VAT invoices, taxi receipts, train tickets, toll invoices, medical bills, bank receipts, and more.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hybrid fingerprint + LLM pipeline for bug classification, deduplication, and ticket generation. Normalizes CI logs, creates stable fingerprints, clusters near-duplicates, then uses LLM for severity classification and ticket writing. Includes bug reporting templates and severity/priority matrix. Use when: "bug triage," "classify bugs," "failure analysis," "auto-classify," "CI failures," "bug report," "defect template." Not for: runtime self-healing of one flaky locator — use test-reliability. Not for: designing new tests from production telemetry — use observability-driven-testing. Related: qa-metrics, qa-dashboard, ci-cd-integration, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break a task or ticket into small steps. Use when a junior developer needs guidance on how to start.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes, triages, flags and rates a piece of text with a probability for every option: which department or queue a ticket goes to, which intent a message expresses, whether a yes/no condition holds (is this tool call grounded, should the agent ask first, is the customer angry), and how severe or urgent it is on a rubric, each with a calibrated confidence. Runs Claude Haiku in the request and response shapes of OpenAI's Decisions API, for when no purpose-built decision model is at hand. Use for "route this ticket", "triage these", "classify with a confidence", "give me a probability that", "rate the severity", "score against this rubric", guardrail checks before a tool call, or "a Decisions API without OpenAI".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Less common Hyperliquid actions and their rules - dead-man's switch (scheduleCancel), TWAP orders, spot orders, expiresAfter and nonces, API wallet approval from code, sub-account and vault addressing, HIP-3 dexs, and what the desk deliberately does not do (transfers, withdrawals, builder fees, staking). Write actions are Execution Trader only, on an approved ticket. Use when a ticket asks for one of these or when a user asks whether the desk can.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

What the desk does when something goes wrong on Hyperliquid - unknown send results, unexpected fills or positions, unprotected positions, stuck or orphaned orders, API outages, rate limiting, and suspected API wallet compromise. Contain first, reconcile from the exchange record, act only through approved tickets, then review. Use the moment anything does not match the ticket.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a finished epic folder in the ticket tree against the evidence it left behind — the epic file, each ticket plan, diffs, commits — and produce a retrospective with sourced findings, action items, and an acceptance decision. Use when the user says "run a retrospective" or "lets retro the epic [epic]". Supports -H/--headless

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrator skill that takes a warp-apply receipts directory and proposes each batch to its corresponding multisig signer — Safe Transaction Service via `safes/propose-warp-batch.ts` for EVM batches (auto-detects governance context: AW / Foundation / Regular / etc. per filename), Squads via `squads/propose-warp-batch.ts` for SVM batches. Persists a per-ticket proposal summary at `~/.hyperlane/proposals/ticket-id.yaml` so the human can track signing progress in Heimdall or Squads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan your Korea experience — Seoul's palaces and K-pop culture, Busan's beaches, Jeju Island's nature, Korean BBQ crawls, and K-beauty shopping. Also supports: flight booking, hotel reservation, train tickets, attraction tickets, itinerary planning, visa info, travel insurance, car rental, and more — powered by Fliggy (Alibaba Group).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and compare car rentals — sedans, SUVs, and luxury vehicles with insurance options, pickup locations, and best rates for self-driving adventures. Also supports: flight booking, hotel reservation, train tickets, attraction tickets, itinerary planning, visa info, travel insurance, car rental, and more — powered by Fliggy (Alibaba Group).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Feedback synthesis — cluster support tickets, NPS verbatims, app store reviews, and churn surveys by theme, separate signal from noise, and produce an actionable insight report. Use when asked to "synthesize this feedback", "analyze support tickets", "what are users complaining about", "NPS analysis", "churn feedback synthesis", or "what's the feedback telling us".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans a research project as a decision map that persists across sessions, resolving one ticket per session until the design is defensible and pre-registerable. The map lives as Markdown in the repository, literature sweeps run as parallel research tickets, and the resolved map compiles into a pre-analysis plan. Use at project start, when a design has more open decisions than one conversation can hold, or when planning restarts each session. Not for executing analyses or writing the paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Kerberos delegation, SPN trust edges, S4U abuse, RBCD, constrained or unconstrained delegation, and service-ticket acceptance. Use when the user asks about constrained delegation, unconstrained delegation, RBCD, S4U, SPNs, ticket acceptance, or how a Kerberos trust edge turns into effective privilege under sandbox assumptions. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。