本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

desk-incident-response

What the desk does when something goes wrong on Hyperliquid - unknown send results, unexpected fills or positions, unprotected positions, stuck or orphaned orders, API outages, rate limiting, and suspected API wallet compromise. Contain first, reconcile from the exchange record, act only through approved tickets, then review. Use the moment anything does not match the ticket.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md8.0 KB
  • ATTRIBUTION.md2.2 KB
  • LICENSE1.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Incident response

An incident is any moment when the exchange record and the desk's expectation disagree, or when the desk cannot see the exchange at all. The reflex is: stop adding, look, contain with approval, then review. Never widen the harm by improvising.

Declare

Any Bot can declare an incident. Post on the floor:

INCIDENT INC-20260817-01 | 11:40 UTC | HG-20260817-02 | send timeout, result unknown | owner: Execution Trader

The Desk Lead confirms an owner (usually the Execution Trader for order/position incidents, the Risk Manager for exposure incidents, the Desk Lead for access incidents). New proposals pause until the incident is contained.

Playbooks

A. Unknown send result (timeout, 5xx, exception after send)

  1. Do not resend.
  2. orderStatus by cloid; openOrders; userFills since the send; clearinghouseState.
  3. Found: continue reconciliation as normal; journal that the response was lost.
  4. Not found: that is not proof. Wait until the signed expiresAfter deadline has passed, then reconcile again. Expiry prevents later acceptance; it does not cancel an order accepted before the deadline or remove its fills.
  5. Without expiry, follow desk-execution-protocol: a noop needs an exact recovery ticket, Risk PASS, approval by id and native-gate coverage, and must use the original exact signed nonce, the same API wallet signer and network. Only the Execution Trader sends it, once. Confirm noop acceptance and reconcile the original; a newer nonce cannot invalidate it, and a nonce-reuse rejection does not prove what happened. Missing original nonce or an unconfirmed noop leaves the send reserved and new risk paused; escalate to the Desk Lead and user.
  6. A replacement waits until later acceptance is impossible and existing exposure is reconciled, then needs a fresh ticket, Risk PASS and approval by id. If the exchange later shows the original order after a second one was sent: the desk has double exposure. Go to playbook C.

B. Rejected order or partial fill

  • Rejection string in the response (error): quote it, map it via hyperliquid-api-reference (price precision, minimum notional, insufficient margin, reduce-only would increase position, invalid tif...). Fix is a new ticket, not a tweak-and-resend.
  • Partial fill on an IOC: the unfilled remainder is gone and the position is smaller than the ticket. Any normalTpsl children were never placed (children appear only when the parent fills fully, or is partially filled and then margin-cancelled), so the filled part is unprotected: report the actual size and get a stop for that size placed at priority (playbook D).
  • Partial fill on a resting order: normal; reconciliation continues.

C. Position does not match expectation (too big, wrong side, unexpected market)

  1. Read clearinghouseState and userFills for the last hour; establish the exact state.
  2. Risk Manager computes exposure and liquidation distance now.
  3. If exposure breaches limits: an emergency reduce ticket (reduce-only IOC at a slippage bound for the excess size) is written by the Risk Manager, approved by the user by id, sent by the Execution Trader. Priority handling, same protocol.
  4. Journal what happened and why the mismatch occurred once known.

D. Unprotected position (no resting stop)

  1. Risk Manager flags it; the Desk Lead treats it as priority.
  2. Protective stop ticket (trigger, reduce-only, correct side, sized to the position read live) through Risk PASS and user approval. This is also the path after any partial fill of an entry that carried normalTpsl children.
  3. If the user has pre-authorised protective stops in desk.md, the Execution Trader places it under that standing approval and journals it. This is the one standing approval the desk actively recommends the user grant at setup, on every network, because it can only ever reduce risk.
  4. Without that pre-authorisation the desk cannot act, and an unprotected position does not become safe while it waits. Do not alert indefinitely: state the exposure and the distance to liquidation in the first alert, escalate on a deadline the user set in desk.md (fifteen minutes is a reasonable default), and when that passes, tell the user plainly that the fastest fix is theirs - close or protect the position in the Hyperliquid app - rather than continuing to ping a channel nobody is reading.

E. Orphaned or stuck orders

  • Orphaned (position flat, stop still resting): cancel ticket, or the standing approval for orphan clean-up if written in desk.md. Confirm from openOrders.
  • Stuck (order the exchange shows that the desk cannot cancel): read orderStatus; check whether it is a trigger child of a grouped order; try cancelByCloid if cancel by oid fails; if still stuck, report with the exact response and stop.

F. Exchange unreachable, rate limited, or degraded

  • /info failing or slow: mark the desk blind; no new tickets; watches log the outage; check https://api.hyperliquid.xyz/info with a tiny allMids call every minute; report when back.
  • HTTP 429: back off (respect the response), reduce polling, prefer WebSocket for continuous data. Read userRateLimit for the account's remaining budget.
  • Blind with open positions: the user is told plainly that stops resting on the exchange still work while the desk cannot see; that is why stops are mandatory.
  • Connectivity returning is only the start of recovery. Follow hyperliquid-websocket's gap/restart procedure: restore account and detailed order snapshots, recover overlapping fills, reconcile reservations and protection, then let Risk recheck capacity before new risk resumes. A successful public price read or a restarted process cannot lift the account pause. Protection and exits still use verified live state and the normal approval gates.

G. Suspected API wallet compromise or misuse

Signs: orders or fills the desk did not send, leverage changes nobody approved, unfamiliar cloids.

  1. The user revokes the API wallet immediately in the Hyperliquid app (the API page, /API) - the desk cannot do this for them and must not delay them.
  2. Once revoked, the desk's key is dead; the Execution Trader confirms sends fail.
  3. Read the full historicalOrders and userFills since the last known-good time; Risk Manager assesses exposure; emergency reduce or protection tickets as needed after the user creates a fresh API wallet and re-provisions it through the secure secret store.
  4. Rotate: new key through the secure secret card only; nothing pasted in chat; journal the rotation time.
  5. Incident review with a timeline.

Remember the shared computer: every Bot could read the key's environment; that is why only an API wallet key (trade-only, cannot withdraw) is ever provisioned, and why testnet comes first.

H. Daily loss stop hit

Not an incident, but handled like one: Risk Manager posts it, desk.md gets status: no-new-risk, protective and exit tickets continue, new risk waits for the user's written reset.

Containment rules

  • Contain with the smallest reversible action. Reduce, don't flip. Cancel one, not all, unless the user has asked for a dead-man's switch and its condition has occurred.
  • Every containment action is still a ticket with approval by id (or a pre-written standing approval in desk.md).
  • Never withdraw, transfer or bridge as an incident response.
  • Never resend to "make sure".

Close the incident

The Trade Reviewer writes the incident review (desk-post-trade-review), the Desk Lead lifts the proposal pause and records the corrective action and its owner in desk.md.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

The Execution Trader's procedure for turning an approved ticket into one Hyperliquid action and reconciling it - the pre-send checklist, order construction rules, single-send discipline, unknown-result handling and the execution report. Use before and after every send, cancel, modify, leverage change or close.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

galleonlabs/hypergrok-trading-desk932026年10月12日 更新

How the desk watches markets and the account between trades using Grok Bot routines and WebSocket or polling watches - the desk brief, book checks, funding and price watches, alert conditions and what a watch may and may not do. Use when the user asks for briefings, alerts, "watch X" or scheduled checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

galleonlabs/hypergrok-trading-desk932026年10月12日 更新

How the HyperGrok trading desk works as a team of Grok Bots - roles, seats, shared workspace, evidence standard, approval model and handoff format. Use when setting up the desk, when a Bot is unsure who owns something, or when a request does not fit the normal trade lifecycle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

galleonlabs/hypergrok-trading-desk932026年10月12日 更新

The Trade Reviewer's procedure for journaling desk activity and reviewing trades from the exchange record - process graded separately from outcome, execution costs measured, one repeatable finding per review, plus the weekly desk review. Use after any send, when a trade closes, on the weekly routine, or when the user asks "how did that go".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

galleonlabs/hypergrok-trading-desk932026年10月12日 更新

How the Risk Manager writes the desk's risk limits with the user, sizes every proposed trade from live account state and Hyperliquid's real constraints, checks the book, and issues a PASS or REJECT with exact ticket fields. Use for setting up or changing limits, sizing any trade, and answering "how's the book".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

galleonlabs/hypergrok-trading-desk932026年10月12日 更新

How the Strategist works with the user to turn their own trading idea into explicit rules, backtest it honestly on Hyperliquid candle and funding history, and paper-trade it on testnet through the desk lifecycle. Method only - the desk ships no strategies and makes no return claims. Use when the user wants to design, test, compare or paper-trade an idea.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

galleonlabs/hypergrok-trading-desk932026年10月12日 更新

galleonlabs のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する