「infra」の検索結果

Email infrastructure for AI agents. Create accounts, send/receive emails, manage webhooks, and check karma balance via the AgentMail API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects and analyzes Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) security attacks including sniffing, replay attacks, GATT enumeration abuse, and Man-in-the-Middle interception. Uses Ubertooth One and nRF52840 sniffers for packet capture, the bleak Python library for GATT service enumeration, and crackle for BLE encryption cracking. Use when assessing IoT device BLE security, monitoring for BLE-based attacks on wireless infrastructure, or performing authorized BLE penetration testing. Activates for requests involving BLE security assessment, Ubertooth sniffing, GATT enumeration, or BLE replay detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically deobfuscate multi-layer PowerShell malware using AST analysis, dynamic tracing, and tools like PSDecode and PowerDecode to reveal hidden payloads and C2 infrastructure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts authorized wireless network penetration tests to assess the security of WiFi infrastructure by testing for weak encryption protocols, captive portal bypasses, evil twin attacks, WPA2/WPA3 handshake capture, rogue access point detection, and client-side attacks. The tester evaluates wireless authentication, network segmentation, and the effectiveness of wireless intrusion detection systems. Activates for requests involving wireless pentest, WiFi security assessment, WPA2/WPA3 testing, or rogue access point detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Responds to security incidents in cloud environments (AWS, Azure, GCP) by performing identity-based containment, cloud-native log analysis, resource isolation, and forensic evidence acquisition adapted for ephemeral cloud infrastructure. Activates for requests involving cloud incident response, AWS security incident, Azure compromise, GCP breach, cloud forensics, or cloud identity compromise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a structured vulnerability scanning workflow using tools like Nessus, Qualys, and OpenVAS to discover, prioritize, and track remediation of security vulnerabilities across infrastructure. Use when SOC teams need to establish recurring vulnerability assessment processes, integrate scan results with SIEM alerting, and build remediation tracking dashboards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build comprehensive threat actor profiles using open-source intelligence (OSINT) techniques to document adversary motivations, capabilities, infrastructure, and TTPs for proactive defense.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract and analyze Cobalt Strike beacon configuration from PE files and memory dumps to identify C2 infrastructure, malleable profiles, and operator tradecraft.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes malicious Linux ELF (Executable and Linkable Format) binaries including botnets, cryptominers, ransomware, and rootkits targeting Linux servers, containers, and cloud infrastructure. Covers static analysis, dynamic tracing, and reverse engineering of x86_64 and ARM ELF samples. Activates for requests involving Linux malware analysis, ELF binary investigation, Linux server compromise assessment, or container malware analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-language test infrastructure for the Pump SDK — Rust unit/integration/security/performance tests, TypeScript Jest tests, Python fuzz tests, shell test orchestration, Criterion benchmarks, and CI quality gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operational readiness checklist (security, cost, legal, data design, performance, incident response, LLM integration defenses) applied when a change touches deployment, infrastructure, external services, secrets, or user data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Correlate events across multiple log files from different sources, systems, or time periods. Build unified timelines, identify causal relationships between events, and highlight anomalies that span multiple data sources. Supports timezone normalization and gap detection. Use when analyzing logs from multiple systems (frontend, backend, database, infrastructure), investigating distributed system failures, or building event timelines across services. Triggers: "correlate these logs", "build timeline from multiple logs", "cross-system analysis", "find related events across logs", "multi-source log analysis", "distributed trace analysis"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit over-engineered codebases by factoring layers into live obligations, quotienting redundant distinctions, ablating unearned surface, and normalizing survivors while preserving required behavior. Use when change latency or agent difficulty comes from frameworks, plugins, DI, codegen, task runners, config indirection, ORMs, GraphQL, monorepo/infra tooling, or web stacks, or when asked to remove layers. Produces an evidence-backed Reduction Certificate, cuts, migration phases, proof signals, and rollback. Not for one local readability cleanup (use tw-complexity-mitigator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load when the user asks for CTO advice on feature strategy, architecture direction, build-vs-buy, infrastructure, market positioning, roadmap, self-hosting, cost, or organizational tradeoffs; not for reviewing an existing implementation-plan workstream.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load for cross-layer refactors, record/class or value-object migrations, new services/interfaces/repositories, project references, dependency-direction failures, or deciding whether code belongs in Domain, Application, Persistence/Infrastructure, API, or Blazor; not for a local edit wholly inside an established layer pattern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy (2018, OUSD/ODASD(SE)). Use for the Department of Defense's five digital engineering goals — (1) formalize the development, integration, and use of models; (2) provide an enduring authoritative source of truth; (3) incorporate technological innovation; (4) establish supporting infrastructure and environments; (5) transform the culture and workforce — plus their focus areas, the document-to-model and design-build-test→model-analyze-build shifts, model formalisms/provenance, governance and access control of the authoritative source of truth, and the coordinate→plan→pilot→sustain rollout. A vision-and-policy strategy, deliberately non-prescriptive. Does NOT provide a how-to method, tool tutorials, MBSE/SysML mechanics, or implementation-plan content; thin on metrics, acquisition-policy detail, and step-by-step procedure. Excludes the CAC-gated Digital Engineering Body of Knowledge (DEBoK).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals 2.0. Use for prioritized IT/OT baseline cyber goals aligned to NIST CSF 2.0 (including GOVERN), critical-infrastructure hygiene, MSP/supply-chain expectations, and board-friendly outcome language. Covers CPG 2.0 goals only; does not replace full CSF programs, sector-specific goals (SSGs), or CSET tooling detail.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- Mine GitHub, GitLab and git history for identities, infrastructure and leaked credentials using commit author emails, GitHub code search, the commit… Use when investigating a developer or organisation on GitHub, finding leaked API keys, AWS keys or tokens in code, enumerating org members and their personal repos, or recovering secrets deleted from HEAD but still present in history or forks

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- End-to-end passive reconnaissance for a domain, website or IP — builds an asset inventory covering registration, DNS, subdomains, infrastructure, tech stack, history and ownership without sending a single packet to the target. Use when asked to research or profile a domain or website, map what an organisation runs, or investigate a suspicious site without alerting its operator

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- Build an entity-relationship link-analysis graph of an investigation — nodes, typed edges carrying source and confidence, aliases, and temporal validity — to expose shared infrastructure, bridging nodes and the real principal behind a [человек]. Use when an investigation has outgrown a list and needs a graph, or when asked how a set of people, companies and domains connect

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- Enumerate an organisation's subdomains and sibling domains from Certificate Transparency logs and passive DNS, without sending traffic to the target. Use when looking for staging, dev, admin or VPN hosts, mapping the full hostname footprint of a domain, or spotting infrastructure a company forgot it had

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read the system-architect map: a deterministic catalog of everything the setup is made of (vault, import scripts, scheduled tasks, MCP servers, SQLite databases, hooks, skills, dashboards), what is healthy and what fell off. Consult it before changing shared infrastructure and re-scan after. Triggers: "/arch", "/arch broken", "/arch scan", "what broke in the system".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug, patch, and verify failed Agent QA runs from MCP evidence, artifacts, logs, and local code without hiding product or infrastructure defects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。