「bot」の検索結果

Use when the user wants to turn a static scene, character images, aerial map, drawn path, or route-control image into an immersive first-person FPV AI video prompt, especially Seedance/Kling/Runway/Veo style one-shot videos with numbered stop markers, red-line path control, world-map flythroughs, camera route planning, variable character counts, non-human POVs such as drones, pets, robot vacuums, character references, timed interactions, dialogue, spatial audio, and negative constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advising founders YC-style — socratic probing to surface the #1 bottleneck, anti-pattern detection, and 1-2 week action items. Not for brainstorming (Riff) or long-term scenarios (Helm).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic code review skill covering both requesting a review (pre-commit checklist) and receiving and responding to review feedback. Checks code quality, security, test coverage, architectural alignment, and documentation before any code is committed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a lesson that embeds PERMA wellbeing elements alongside academic learning objectives. Use when planning lessons that intentionally support both content mastery and student flourishing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Script a multi-turn tutoring dialogue with branching responses for anticipated student difficulties. Use when designing AI tutors, chatbot interactions, or structured one-to-one support scripts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a multi-round questioning sequence for interrogating AI chatbot answers, tracking how responses shift and distinguishing genuine updates from sycophantic capitulation. Use when teaching students to probe AI critically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to conduct, analyze, or synthesize customer research. Use when the user mentions "customer research," "ICP research," "talk to customers," "analyze transcripts," "customer interviews," "survey analysis," "support ticket analysis," "voice of customer," "VOC," "build personas," "customer personas," "jobs to be done," "JTBD," "what do customers say," "what are customers struggling with," "Reddit mining," "G2 reviews," "review mining," "digital watering holes," "community research," "forum research," "competitor reviews," "customer sentiment," or "find out why customers churn/convert/buy." Use for both analyzing existing research assets AND gathering new research from online sources. For writing copy informed by research, see copywriting. For acting on research to improve pages, see cro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimizes application performance across frontend, backend, queries, and databases. Use when performance requirements exist, when you suspect performance regressions, when Core Web Vitals or load times need improvement, when N+1 query patterns need fixing, or when profiling reveals bottlenecks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits and optimizes websites for search engine visibility (SEO) and AI search citation (GEO), covering technical health, E-E-A-T content scoring, domain authority, structured data, rich results, and entity signals. Use when running SEO audits, diagnosing traffic drops or ranking losses, generating Schema.org JSON-LD, checking Core Web Vitals, crawlability, robots.txt, sitemaps, hreflang, backlinks, planning content strategy or site migrations, fixing indexing issues, or optimizing for AI Overviews, ChatGPT, and Perplexity. NOT for paid ads (PPC/SEM), social media strategy, email marketing, or general web development unrelated to search.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-implementation red-team analysis. Use when a plan is high-risk, critical path, or expensive to reverse. Challenges plans before code is written — finds edge cases, security holes, scalability bottlenecks, error propagation risks, and integration conflicts. Catches flaws at plan time (10x cheaper than post-implementation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a change before it is merged, from little or no input. With nothing typed it reviews the branch you are on, uncommitted work included, against its base, its PR and its ticket, so a developer can check their own work before asking for review. With PR links, repo#N or a branch it reviews someone else's change the same way, several repos at once. It judges the failed CI checks and every Bugbot and reviewer comment, gets a fresh breaker review, traces every other piece of code that uses what changed, proves each finding or marks it unproven, says what the merge needs (a build, env vars, migrations, deploy order) and how to check the deploy, never posts to GitHub, and offers fixes only after the report. Runs only when the user types it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user mentions Zenodo, depositing or publishing research artifacts (datasets, software, papers, posters) to Zenodo, minting a DOI for a dataset/code release, uploading files to a Zenodo record, creating a new version of a Zenodo deposit, or searching Zenodo records. Covers the full Zenodo REST API workflow — create deposition, upload files via the bucket API, set metadata, publish, version, and search — for both production (zenodo.org) and sandbox (sandbox.zenodo.org).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic backlink building for indie founders. Covers 5 channel types ranked by GEO + SEO ROI: Wikipedia (entities), authoritative media (PR), industry reviews (G2/Capterra/Product Hunt), Reddit/Quora discussions, and HARO/Featured.com expert quotes. Designed for 0→1 sites where domain authority is the bottleneck. Aligns with 2026 Google/Bing GEO guidance: backlinks are the strongest brand-authority signal AI search engines use to decide citations. Defaults to dev/B2B link sources; for 2C products (education, consumer apps) authority links differ — see gingiris-seo-geo/references/2c-adaptation.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A reusable Go-to-Market strategy template for both B2B and B2C launches. Covers positioning, messaging, ICP definition, channel selection, and competitive analysis frameworks. By @WeiYipei.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate an /insights-style HTML report across MANY of your agent coding sessions (Claude Code and OpenAI Codex): what you work on, how you use the agent, your wins, your friction points, and concrete fixes to become more effective — precise goal-setting, not trusting output blindly, scoping, context hygiene, right-sizing models. Reads local session history and writes one self-contained report.html. Use when the user asks to "разбери мои сессии", "оцени как я работаю с агентом", "мой insights", "session insights report", "review how I work", "на что обратить внимание", or runs "/mentor", "/mentor claude", "/mentor codex", "/mentor both". Do NOT use for reviewing the CODE produced (that's code-review) or building the agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate performance bottlenecks and validate optimizations without weakening retrieval quality or correctness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews Remix v2 code for caching header misuse, missing server/client split, hydration mismatches (Date, Math.random, locale), prefetch hygiene, and asset bottlenecks. Use when reviewing routes that export headers, use .server.ts/.client.ts, or render dates/IDs in a Remix v2 codebase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rewrite AI-generated developer text to sound human — fix inflated language, filler, tautological docs, and robotic tone. Use after review-ai-writing identifies issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews Elixir code for performance issues including GenServer bottlenecks, memory usage, and concurrency patterns. Use when reviewing high-throughput code or investigating performance issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect AI-generated writing patterns in developer text — docs, docstrings, commit messages, PR descriptions, and code comments. Use when reviewing any text artifact for authenticity and clarity, or when the user mentions ai writing, ai-generated or robotic writing, text that sounds like AI or ChatGPT, or writing quality. Builds on the docs-style core writing principles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when comparing two or more code implementations against a spec or requirements doc. Triggers on "which repo is better", "compare these implementations", "evaluate both solutions", "rank these codebases", or "judge which approach wins". Also covers choosing between competing PRs or vendor submissions solving the same problem. Does NOT review a single codebase for quality — use code review skills instead. Does NOT evaluate strategy docs — use strategy-review. Requires a spec file and 2+ repo paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discoverability shim for the Retail-Agentic-Commerce CVE remediation Codex skill. Use for CVE, BDSA, GHSA, OSV, Dependabot, Black Duck, Snyk, npm, PyPI, or package advisory remediation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dependency vulnerability remediation workflow for this repository. Use when fixing CVE, BDSA, GHSA, OSV, npm, PyPI, Dependabot, Black Duck, Snyk, or other package vulnerability findings, especially when the user asks for minimal package-only updates, validation, commits, branches, or pull requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Belastbaren Produktmarketing-Kontext für Positionierung, Zielgruppen, Botschaften, Einwände und Nachweise erstellen, prüfen und aktualisieren. Nutze diesen Skill, wenn die gemeinsame Grundlage fehlt, auf die sich Texte, Content, Vergleiche und Kampagnen stützen sollen: ICP, Jobs-to-be-Done, Nutzenversprechen, Differenzierung, Preislogik, Einwandbehandlung und Belegklassen. Legt das Ergebnis als `.agents/product-marketing.md` im Projekt ab und kennzeichnet, was belegt, was Anbieterangabe und was Annahme ist. Ersetzt weder Kundenforschung noch Rechtsprüfung.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。