「writing」の検索結果

Use when the user asks to "personalize the email", "add merge tags / dynamic content", "set up conditional blocks per segment", or "make first-name and product-recommendation fields fall back safely"; produces a merge-tag map with per-tag fallbacks, conditional-block rules with per-segment variations, a fallback-safety audit, and a PII guard on what may render, informing the SEND E (Engagement/personalization) dimension. Not for building the segments — use list-segment-builder; not for writing the base copy — use email-creative-builder; not for scoring EQS or running vetoes — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件个性化/合并标签/条件内容块/兜底默认值

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "pre-launch check the landing page", "run a Quality-Score preflight", or "verify ad-to-page message match before launch"; produces an ad↔page continuity report — message-match gaps, above-the-fold check, page-speed read, form-friction count, mobile-render flags — as a pass/fix punch list. Not for redesigning or rewriting the page — use landing-optimizer; not for scoring the account or the RQS — use ad-account-auditor. 落地页体验预检/广告落地页一致性检查

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "register this claim", "log our current offers", or "where is the proof for this figure"; curates claim wording, evidence, disclosures, terms, review dates, and live offers through the append-only claims event stream. Not for scoring claim vetoes — use the relevant auditor; not for writing ad copy — use ad-creative-builder. 广告声明台账/优惠信息登记/证据溯源

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "build the email HTML", "make this email responsive", "fix dark-mode rendering", or "QA the email across clients"; produces the coded HTML build — a responsive table layout, dark-mode + accessibility pass, a client-render matrix, image-block fallbacks, and a plain-text parity check. Not for writing the copy — use email-creative-builder; not for scoring the email or computing EQS — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件HTML/响应式邮件/暗色模式渲染

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define what content a product needs, how it is structured, and who owns it. Use when content itself is the problem. For the words in the interface use `ux-writing` (designer-toolkit); for structural hierarchy use `information-architecture`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write interface copy — microcopy, error messages, empty states, and CTAs. Use when the words are the deliverable. For content structure and ownership, use `content-strategy` (ux-strategy).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a usability study — research questions, methodology, participant criteria, metrics, and facilitation guide. Use when planning the study as a whole. For writing the task scenarios inside it, use `test-scenario` (prototyping-testing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write rationale connecting decisions to user needs, business goals, and principles. Use when a decision needs defending in writing. For a live conversation, use `design-negotiation`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build the project's shared language and bounded contexts before writing code, so names stay consistent and the agent stops paraphrasing domain concepts. Produces a CONTEXT.md glossary and decision records. Use at the start of a project or feature, or when the codebase and the people describing it speak different languages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate conventional commit messages - use when creating commits, writing commit messages, or asking for git commit help

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Startup-tailored AWS architecture advice for non-agent workloads, adjusted to the company's stage (pre-revenue through Series B+), team size, runway, and credits. Not for AI agents: deploying an AI agent on AWS, picking its runtime, or any agentic architecture is agent-advisor. Use when a founder wants guidance or a recommendation rather than code changes: which services to choose, how to plan or review an architecture, how to stretch credits and control cost, or how to prepare architecture for a fundraise or technical diligence. For an interactive discovery flow that scaffolds and writes the architecture into the codebase, use start-building-for-startups. Do not use for: writing or scaffolding code, factual AWS Activate / programs / credits lookups (see knowledge-base-for-startups), a single copy-paste prompt (see prompt-library-for-startups), or migration intent such as GCP-to-AWS, Azure-to-AWS, or Heroku-to-AWS (see the migration skills: `gcp-to-aws`, `azure-to-aws`, `heroku-to-aws`, `llm-to-bedrock`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Best-practice authoring guidance AND a read-only policy gate for AWS Terraform generated by a migration skill. Load during any phase that writes a terraform/ directory — first as the "what to emit" posture rules + security-baseline spec, then after writing as the deterministic policy verdict. Read-only: it reports whether the generated Terraform passes; it never edits .tf files, never touches .phase-status.json, and never decides phase completion. Complements (does not replace) terraform fmt/init/validate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AWS SDK for Python (boto3/botocore) development patterns. You MUST use this skill when writing Python code that uses AWS services via boto3 or botocore. This includes creating service clients or resources, configuring sessions and credentials, handling errors with ClientError, using paginators and waiters, S3 file transfers and presigned URLs, DynamoDB table operations, and any boto3/botocore client configuration. Use this skill whenever Python code imports boto3 or botocore, or when the user asks about AWS operations in Python.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides verified corrections for IAM behaviors that AI agents frequently get wrong — policy evaluation edge cases, trust policy gotchas, STS session limits, Organizations quirks, and SAML/MFA specifics. Also provides structured workflows for IAM role management and baseline policy generation from application source code or a Terraform plan JSON. Covers condition operator safety (ForAnyValue/ForAllValues with Null checks), bucket policy deny patterns (VPC endpoint restrictions, org paths), confused deputy protection, and service role creation for AWS services (Glue, CloudTrail, Lambda, ECS, etc.) with aws:SourceAccount/aws:SourceArn trust conditions. Applies when creating IAM roles, writing IAM or bucket policies, generating policies from application source code or a Terraform plan JSON, working with STS, Organizations, or condition operators, or any task needing a service or execution role. Does not cover non-IAM authorization like Cognito user-pool policies or app-level RBAC.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests Amazon MWAA workflow execution end-to-end: trigger a run and monitor it to completion for Provisioned (Python DAG, via Airflow REST API) and Serverless (YAML workflow, via StartWorkflowRun). Verifies the artifact is deployed and parse-ready, triggers with confirmation, polls to terminal state, and on failure delegates diagnosis to debugging-mwaa-workflow and artifact/redeploy fixes to authoring-mwaa-workflow, then retests up to a capped number of attempts. Triggers on: test my DAG, test my workflow, run my DAG, trigger a test run, does my DAG work, smoke-test the pipeline, verify my workflow runs, execute my DAG to check it. Not applicable to writing or deploying a new workflow (handled by authoring-mwaa-workflow), or for diagnosing why a run failed or root-causing an error (handled by debugging-mwaa-workflow).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AWS SDK for JavaScript v3 development patterns. Use when writing JavaScript or TypeScript code that uses AWS services via @aws-sdk/* packages (aws-sdk-js-v3), or when asked about schemas, runtime validation, serialization, or code generation in the context of the JS/TS AWS SDK.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authors, deploys, and troubleshoots AWS infrastructure using CDK with TypeScript or Python. Covers best practices, stack architecture, and construct patterns. Applies when writing CDK constructs, bootstrapping environments, running cdk deploy/synth/diff, fixing CDK or CloudFormation errors, planning stack structure, importing existing resources, resolving drift, or refactoring stacks without resource replacement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AWS SDK for Swift development patterns. Use when writing Swift code that uses AWS services via aws-sdk-swift package.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entry point and router for every Expo or EAS task. Load this skill first — before writing code and before choosing another expo-* / eas-* skill — when the request, PRD, or spec mentions Expo, EAS, Expo Go, or an expo-* package, or the project has an `expo` dependency in `package.json`. Within that gate it also covers app specs and designs to implement (tabs, stacks, maps, lists, navigation, building from a screenshot), and phrasings like 'implement a mobile app', 'make my app look native', 'add navigation', 'fetch some data', 'upgrade my SDK', 'add Expo to my existing native app', 'ship to the App Store', or 'I'm new to Expo, where do I start'. A fully specified request (SDK pinned, libraries named, layout given) still routes through here — the shared setup rules still apply. Do NOT load it when neither signal is present: a bare React Native project with no `expo` dependency is not Expo work. Detects the real goal, routes to the right expo-* / eas-* skill, and owns the shared setup rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating and writing Expo native modules and views using the Expo Modules API (Swift, Kotlin, TypeScript). Covers module definition DSL, native views, shared objects, config plugins, lifecycle hooks, autolinking, and type system. Use when building or modifying native modules for Expo. Not for migrating an existing Swift module from the definition DSL to the Expo Modules API 2.0 macros; use expo-migrate-module (from the expo-experiments plugin) for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a local repository risk receipt before Claude Code or other AI-agent edits. Use when the user asks to prepare a repository for agent changes, check for risky hooks or credential-writing automation, or run the /agent-preflight command. Trigger with "run agent preflight", "check this repo before agent edits", or "/agent-preflight".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create narrow, version-pinned Adobe SDK and REST adapters with typed contracts, redaction, bounded polling, and compatibility evidence. Use when writing or upgrading integration code. Trigger with "Adobe SDK patterns", "wrap Adobe API", or "review Adobe client".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Postgres best practices maintained by Supabase, for Postgres running anywhere. Load this skill BEFORE writing or changing anything that lives in a Postgres database: creating or altering tables and columns (including choosing column types), schema design, migrations and declarative schema files, RLS policies and the tests that verify them, indexes, triggers, database functions, queues and scheduled jobs (pg_cron, pgmq), vector/semantic search (pgvector), and restoring dumps (pg_restore) or importing data. Also load it when diagnosing slow queries, high CPU, timeouts, EXPLAIN plans, connection exhaustion, locking, bloat, or rows visible to the wrong user or tenant. This is not just a performance guide — schema, migration, security, and SQL authoring tasks need these rules too, even for a one-column change or a single query.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorous, defensible email-spoofability verdict and SPF supply-chain risk analysis computed from published DNS alone. Deepens the record-level SPF/DMARC/DKIM/BIMI/MTA-STS/DNSSEC fetch recipes in the offensive-osint arsenal (§16.14) with the reasoning that section doesn't do: a priority-ordered composite verdict for whether an attacker can actually land header-From-spoofed mail in an inbox, and by which vector (exact-domain vs subdomain) — grounded in the single most-misunderstood distinction in email security: the envelope MAIL FROM that SPF authenticates vs the visible header From: that only DMARC governs. Explains precisely why SPF -all/~all alone is NOT spoof-proof without DMARC enforcement, and why SPF +all bypasses DMARC even under p=reject pct=100. Covers RFC 7208 §4.6.4's 10-DNS-lookup / 2-void-lookup PermError fail-open condition with a runnable stdlib-only lookup-counter script, plus the SPF-include-takeover supply-chain vector (an attacker re-registering a dead include inherits SPF-pass authority over the victim domain) with strict transient-vs-NXDOMAIN discrimination discipline so a temporary SERVFAIL is never mistaken for a takeover lead. Fully passive: DNS TXT reads only, no mail sent, no RCPT TO probe, no API keys. Use when auditing a domain's real spoofing resistance (not just its published records), explaining to a client why 'we have SPF -all' does not mean they're covered, investigating an SPF PermError or an unusually long include chain, evaluating a dead SPF include as a takeover lead, or writing a defensible spoofability finding for a deliverable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。