4,629 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when a tool-calling agent does not call a tool, sends wrong arguments, loops without stopping, or needs a function schema. Guides a four-branch diagnosis and five-step schema repair. Do not use for framework-specific, MCP-server, or production-observability questions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Graph-informed mutation testing triage. Parses codebases with Trailmark, runs mutation testing and necessist, then uses survived mutants, unnecessary test statements, and call graph data to identify false positives, missing test coverage, and fuzzing targets. Use when triaging survived mutants, analyzing mutation testing results, identifying test gaps, finding fuzzing targets from weak tests, running mutation frameworks (including circomvent and cairo-mutants), or using necessist.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scans Substrate/Polkadot pallets for 7 critical vulnerabilities including arithmetic overflow, panic DoS, incorrect weights, and bad origin checks. Use when auditing Substrate runtimes or FRAME pallets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic code maturity assessment using Trail of Bits' 9-category framework. Analyzes codebase for arithmetic safety, auditing practices, access controls, complexity, decentralization, documentation, MEV risks, low-level code, and testing, then produces a scorecard with evidence-based ratings and a priority-ordered roadmap. Use when assessing or scoring the maturity of a smart contract or blockchain codebase, producing a maturity scorecard or evaluation, or judging how mature, well-tested, or well-documented such a project is against a rubric.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a threat model for a target codebase. Three modes: "interview" walks an application owner through the four-question framework and produces a threat model from their answers; "bootstrap" derives a threat model from the code plus past vulnerabilities (CVEs, git history, pentest reports) when no owner is available; "bootstrap-then-interview" chains the two when both owner and codebase are present. All write THREAT_MODEL.md in a shared schema. Use when asked to "threat model", "build a threat model", "map the attack surface", or "what should we be worried about in this codebase".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create UI mockups at three fidelity levels — ASCII wireframes for quick iteration, standalone HTML mockups for delivery with requirements, and live prototypes for interaction testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deauthentication and disassociation attacks against 802.11 networks — targeted single-client deauth for handshake capture, broadcast deauth for DoS (with authorization), action-frame attacks bypassing 802.11w (PMF), beacon flooding, mdk4 / aireplay-ng tooling, and rate-limit / PMF-aware operation. Use to coerce client reconnection (handshake capture, evil-twin roaming), as targeted DoS, or to test PMF posture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LoRaWAN and sub-GHz (433 / 868 / 915 MHz) attack methodology — LoRaWAN ABP/OTAA join attack, network/session key reuse, frame counter replay, downlink injection on TTN/Helium-style networks, sub-GHz protocol replay (KeeLoq garage doors, fixed-code remotes, TPMS spoofing, smart plug telemetry), HackRF / RTL-SDR / Flipper Zero workflows, signal analysis with Inspectrum / Universal Radio Hacker, and reconstruction of proprietary packet formats. Use for LoRaWAN deployments (smart cities, asset tracking, industrial telemetry), or any wireless device using the unlicensed 433/868/915 MHz bands (garage openers, doorbells, IoT sensors, RC equipment).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Insecure deserialization exploitation across Java, PHP, .NET, Python, Node.js, and Ruby. Covers gadget chain construction with ysoserial/phpggc/ysoserial.net, ObjectInputStream and BinaryFormatter sink identification, pickle __reduce__ RCE, phar:// wrapper abuse, Jackson polymorphic typing, Json.NET TypeNameHandling, ViewState tampering, node-serialize IIFE injection, Ruby Marshal.load and YAML.load gadgets, framework-specific chains for Spring/Hibernate/Laravel/Symfony, modern attack surfaces including Kubernetes admission webhooks and message queue consumers, WAF bypass through encoding layers and content-type manipulation, and serialVersionUID/JMX/RMI vectors. Activate when the engagement involves deserialization sinks, serialized data in cookies or request bodies, gadget chain development, magic method abuse, ysoserial payload generation, or any review of marshalling and unmarshalling logic in target applications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive CI/CD pipeline exploitation methodology covering GitHub Actions injection vectors (expression injection via PR titles and issue bodies, workflow_run event abuse, GITHUB_TOKEN over-scoping, composite action supply chain compromise), Jenkins attack paths (Groovy sandbox escapes, script console remote code execution, Java remoting deserialization, credential store dumping, shared library injection), GitLab CI exploitation (YAML anchor injection, runner registration token abuse, CI variable extraction, protected branch bypass via merge request pipelines), and Azure DevOps pipeline agent compromise with service connection theft. Includes artifact poisoning techniques across all platforms, tooling guidance for gato and jenkins-attack-framework, and maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1195.002 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain). Covers enumeration of pipeline configurations, privilege escalation from contributor to code execution, lateral movement through pipeline trust boundaries, and persistence via modified workflow definitions. Each technique section provides working exploitation code, detection indicators, and defensive countermeasures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate and normalize 2D sprite animations. Use when the user asks for full-strip generation from approved source frames, consistent anchor and scale normalization, or preview assets for browser-game animation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design KPI frameworks, metric definitions, targets, guardrails, and measurement plans for product or business decisions. Use when success metrics, drivers, guardrails, targets, or the measurement approach need to be defined or improved.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Motion / animation context for the `use_figma` MCP tool — animating Figma nodes via manual keyframes, animation styles, easing, and timeline duration. Load alongside figma-use whenever a task involves adding, editing, or inspecting animation on a node.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Integrate data visualizations into React and Next.js applications. Use when the user needs chart components, UML-like or architecture diagram components, React integration patterns, Next.js client or server boundaries, hydration-safe rendering, lazy loading, framework-aware performance, scroll-driven visual stories, or export guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Choose a prioritization framework based on stage, team context, and stakeholder needs. Use when deciding between RICE, ICE, value/effort, or another scoring approach.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a six-frame storyboard that shows a user's journey from problem to solution. Use when you need a fast narrative for alignment, concept reviews, or demos.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Understand the PM-to-Director transition through altitude and horizon thinking. Use when diagnosing scope, time-horizon, or leadership-level gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Frame an epic as a testable hypothesis with target user, expected outcome, and validation method. Use when defining a major initiative before roadmap, discovery, or delivery planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build agents and multi-agent systems with the Swarms framework — the Agent class, tools, autonomous loops, memory, and the 15+ multi-agent architectures (SequentialWorkflow, ConcurrentWorkflow, GraphWorkflow, HierarchicalSwarm, SwarmRouter, and more). Use whenever writing, reviewing, or debugging code that imports `swarms`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Use when the user explicitly requests security best practices guidance, a security review or report, or secure-by-default coding help. Supports Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, and Go. Do NOT use for general code review, debugging, threat modeling (use security-threat-model), or non-security tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to build data enrichment workflows, score leads against ICP, set up Clay waterfalls, or improve contact data quality. Also use when the user mentions 'enrichment,' 'data enrichment,' 'Clay,' 'waterfall enrichment,' 'ICP scoring,' 'lead scoring,' 'intent data,' 'contact verification,' 'Apollo,' 'ZoomInfo,' or 'data quality.' This skill covers lead enrichment waterfalls, ICP scoring frameworks, and contact verification systems. Do NOT use for technical implementation, code review, or software architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to create UGC ad campaigns, recruit UGC creators, generate AI UGC content, or scale with user-generated content. Also use when the user mentions 'UGC,' 'user-generated content,' 'creator ads,' 'Spark Ads,' 'whitelisting,' 'AI UGC,' 'Arcads,' 'Creatify,' 'creator brief,' or 'UGC testing.' This skill covers the UGC growth framework from creator recruitment through AI-powered scaling. Do NOT use for technical implementation, code review, or software architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Technology-agnostic guidance for modular systems: bounded contexts, clear boundaries, composability, state isolation, explicit contracts, failure containment, scaffolding workflows, split/merge criteria, sub-units inside a context, and compliance review signals. Use when designing or reviewing module structure, service boundaries, package layout, cross-cutting dependencies, "how should we split this?", modularity assessments, coupling between domains, greenfield context design, or architecture discussions without assuming a specific framework, language, or repository layout. Do NOT use for executing the full Patterns 1–5 repo decomposition pipeline or per-pattern inventories (use modular-decomposition), phased extraction roadmaps as the main deliverable (use decomposition-planning-roadmap), or end-to-end legacy migration strategy (use legacy-migration-planner).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when planning legacy system migrations, codebase modernization, monolith decomposition, microservices consolidation, cross-language rewrites, or framework upgrades. Invoke for strangler fig pattern, incremental migration strategy, or refactoring roadmaps. Do NOT use for domain analysis (use domain-analysis), component sizing (use component-identification-sizing), or step-by-step decomposition plans (use decomposition-planning-roadmap).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。