1.6万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Tests associations between categorical variables in clinical data using chi-square, Fisher's exact, Boschloo, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel, and modern McNemar variants with calibrated confidence intervals (Wilson, Newcombe, Miettinen-Nurminen). Use when analyzing categorical outcomes, paired binary endpoints, or testing treatment-outcome independence in confirmatory or exploratory clinical trials.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identifies differentially bound ChIP-seq regions between conditions using DiffBind, csaw (sliding windows), DESeq2/edgeR/PyDESeq2 on count matrices, NormR (control-aware), or MAnorm2. Distinguishes three distinct normalization problems (composition bias, trended bias, global shifts) and matches each to its appropriate fix including spike-in scaling. Use when comparing ChIP-seq binding between experimental conditions, choosing normalization for global vs local changes, integrating spike-in data, or reconciling DiffBind/DESeq2 disagreement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Segments the genome into chromatin states from combinatorial histone modification and chromatin factor ChIP-seq data. Uses ChromHMM (multivariate HMM on binarized signal, v1.27), Segway (Dynamic Bayesian Network on continuous signal), EpiSegMix (flexible-distribution HMM with duration modeling, 2024), EpiLogos (multi-biosample visualization), IDEAS (cell-type-aware joint), and full-stack ChromHMM (Vu Ernst 2022) for cross-cell-type segmentations. Handles state-count selection (15 vs 18 vs 25 states), binarization choice, OverlapEnrichment / NeighborhoodEnrichment downstream analysis, and cross-biosample integration. Use when learning chromatin states from a histone mark panel, characterizing learned states by genomic feature enrichment, or comparing chromatin landscapes across cell types.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses ChIP-seq quality across antibody specificity, fragmentation, enrichment, replicate concordance, and library complexity. Computes FRiP, NSC/RSC (phantompeakqualtools), library complexity (NRF/PBC1/PBC2), deepTools plotFingerprint (JS distance, AUC, synthetic JS), ChIPQC, IDR with ENCODE Nself/Nt rules, and detects hyper-ChIPable artifacts. Use when validating an antibody, diagnosing failed peak calls, deciding whether to proceed with downstream analysis, grading against ENCODE thresholds, or auditing replicate concordance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Calls ChIP-seq peaks with MACS3, MACS2, HOMER, or SPP across narrow (TF) and broad (histone) modes. Handles input control matching, fragment-size modeling vs --nomodel, effective genome size, ENCODE-style IDR vs naive overlap, hyper-ChIPable artifacts, and aligner-specific shifts. Use when calling peaks from ChIP-seq alignments, choosing between narrow vs broad mode for a histone mark, deciding model vs nomodel for low-depth data, applying ENCODE pseudoreplicate IDR, or reconciling MACS vs HOMER vs SPP results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs structure-based virtual screening using AutoDock Vina, SMINA, GNINA (CNN scoring), and DiffDock-L hybrid workflows with explicit choice rules across rigid vs flexible docking, cross-docking vs self-docking, binding-site detection (P2Rank, fpocket), receptor preparation (PDB2PQR, PROPKA), ligand preparation (meeko, OpenBabel), and ultralarge-library screening (ZINC22, Enamine REAL). Use when screening chemical libraries against a protein target to find candidate binders, ranking docking poses, or selecting a docking workflow for a specific scenario.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs 3D shape-based similarity searching using ROCS (OpenEye), USRCAT (ultra-fast), Open3DAlign (RDKit), ESPSim (electrostatic), and ShaEP with explicit handling of Tanimoto-Combo (shape + color), shape vs ECFP4 complementarity, conformer-ensemble searching, alignment optimization, and scaffold hopping. Use when searching for shape-mimicking compounds with different scaffolds, identifying bioisosteric replacements, prospective scaffold hopping, or expanding hit series beyond 2D similarity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds QSAR / QSPR models using chemprop D-MPNN, MolFormer, Uni-Mol, ChemBERTa, random forest baselines, and Gaussian processes with explicit handling of OECD 5 principles, applicability domain (kNN, leverage, conformal prediction, Mahalanobis), scaffold-balanced splits, ensemble uncertainty, calibration (Platt, isotonic), feature importance (SHAP, atomic attribution), and prospective validation. Use when building target-specific predictive models from in-house bioassay data, ADMET endpoints, or selectivity profiles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs ML-based protein-ligand pose prediction and scoring using DiffDock-L (diffusion-based), Boltz-1 / Boltz-2 (foundation model with affinity), Chai-1, AlphaFold3 ligand, EquiBind, TANKBind, NeuralPLexer, and hybrid workflows (DiffDock pose + GNINA rescore + PoseBusters QC). Explicit handling of when ML beats classical docking, when classical beats ML, the PB-invalid pose problem, and rescoring as the standard production hybrid. Use when modern docking is needed: foundation-model ligand-pose prediction, AI rescoring of classical poses, or scaffold-hopping in cross-docking scenarios.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a differential-ready consensus peakset from per-replicate ATAC-seq peaks using iterative overlap removal, fixed-width re-centering, and majority-rule overlap. Use when generating a stable peak coordinate system for downstream differential accessibility, ML feature engineering, cross-sample comparison, or fixed-width peak counts; covers Corces 2018 iterative overlap (501 bp), DiffBind summit re-centering, and ENCODE consistency rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trim multiple sequence alignments using ClipKIT, trimAl, BMGE, Divvier, or HMMcleaner with mode selection guidance per downstream goal. Use when removing unreliable columns or contaminating residues before phylogenetic inference, HMM building, or selection analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses RNA-seq data quality specifically for alternative splicing analysis. QC layers include experimental design audit (library prep, read length, depth, replicates), STAR 2-pass cohort-style alignment, junction saturation curves and discovery plateau detection, novel-vs-known junction ratio diagnostics, junction-overhang distribution, splice-site strength scoring (MaxEntScan intrinsic + SpliceAI context-aware), strandedness verification, GENCODE basic vs comprehensive choice, and rRNA contamination screening. Splicing analysis is more demanding than DGE on read length, depth, library prep, alignment strategy, and annotation choice — failures silently bias PSI estimates and inflate novel-junction false positives. Use when evaluating data suitability for splicing analysis, troubleshooting low event detection, or designing sequencing experiments where AS is a primary endpoint.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Call accessible chromatin regions from ATAC-seq BAM files using MACS3, MACS2, Genrich, or HMMRATAC. Use when identifying open chromatin from aligned ATAC-seq, choosing between point-source vs HMM peak callers, applying ENCODE-style pseudoreplicate IDR, removing blacklist regions, or fixing 501bp consensus peaks for downstream differential analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify differentially accessible chromatin regions across conditions using DiffBind, csaw, DESeq2, or edgeR. Use when comparing ATAC-seq accessibility between treatment groups, choosing between consensus-peak vs sliding-window approaches, picking the correct normalization (full library vs reads-in-peaks), correcting batch with SVA/RUVseq, or interpreting log2FC and FDR thresholds in a chromatin context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect transcription factor binding footprints in ATAC-seq using TOBIAS, HINT-ATAC, Wellington, or scprinter. Use when identifying bound TF sites within accessible regions, correcting Tn5 insertion bias before footprinting, choosing between cleavage-based and aggregate-based footprinters, or comparing differential TF activity between conditions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Process and analyze single-cell ATAC-seq data with Signac, ArchR, SnapATAC2, or Cell Ranger ATAC. Use when handling 10X scATAC or 10X Multiome (paired RNA+ATAC) data, performing per-cell QC, choosing between ArchR/Signac/SnapATAC2 ecosystems, building per-cluster consensus peaksets, integrating with paired scRNA-seq, doublet detection (AMULET vs ArchR vs scDblFinder), or running pseudobulk differential accessibility per cluster.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add MAUI DevFlow to a .NET MAUI project with agent package references, MauiProgram.cs registration, Blazor WebView support, GTK variants, Central Package Management guidance, and verification commands. USE FOR: first-time DevFlow setup, reviewing what files to edit, choosing DevFlow packages, or continuing after `maui devflow init` installs skills. DO NOT USE FOR: troubleshooting an already-integrated app that cannot connect, iterative app debugging, UI inspection, or generic MAUI build failures (use maui-devflow-debug). INVOKES: maui devflow CLI and dotnet CLI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks the cost of pulling a Motor Vehicle Record (MVR) in a specific state, or wants to compare MVR fees across multiple states, or is budgeting annual compliance costs for a multi-state fleet. Reference the canonical fee table below; flag that fees change (re-verify with state DMV before annual budget planning).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to understand when electronic records are acceptable to FMCSA inspectors. Covers PDF, original-format, and search-ability requirements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks about hazardous materials (hazmat) transportation under 49 CFR 171-180 — placarding requirements, segregation tables, hazmat employee training (49 CFR 172 Subpart H), Hazmat Safety Permit (HMSP), shipping papers, packaging groups, emergency response phone, security plans, hazmat endorsement on CDL, and bulk vs non-bulk distinctions. Cite specific 49 CFR section.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks about commercial driver drug & alcohol testing under 49 CFR 382 + 40 — the six testing reasons (pre-employment, random, post-accident, reasonable suspicion, return-to-duty, follow-up), MRO process, SAP/return-to-duty process, post-accident triggers, random selection rates, what panels are tested, refusal definitions, or testing programs and consortiums. Cite specific 49 CFR 382 or 40 subsection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to understand what CSA data the public sees about your carrier and how that affects business. Covers SAFER, accessibility, and what's hidden vs visible.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when a crash has been incorrectly classified as DOT-recordable when it shouldn't be. Covers the § 390.5 criteria, common misclassifications, and challenge process.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a carrier (asset-based, brokerage, or 3PL) asks how to respond to a shipper RFP / RFQ — bid packaging, lane analysis, rate strategy, SOPs/SOWs, qualifications response, insurance compliance, EDI requirements, and how to win competitive bids without leaving margin on the table.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。