「all」の検索結果

Call the free Agnes text model API for chat completions, streaming answers, coding help, tool-calling experiments, and OpenAI-compatible text generation. Use when the user asks for 免费文本, 免费的文本模型, free text API, Agnes text, Agnes-2.0-Flash, free LLM calls, or wants to use a free chat/completion model through an Agent skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-agent self-inspection of your AI-agent stack. Audits skills, MCP servers, hooks, plugins, commands, credentials, and memory files across Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, and NanoClaw. Produces a structured inventory and narrative briefing with cross-ecosystem risk analysis. Use when the user asks to audit their own setup, check what they have installed, review their agent stack security posture, or understand cross-tool interactions. Use when a user has accumulated skills/plugins/MCP servers over time and wants visibility into their attack surface. Use after installing new skills or plugins. Do NOT use for vetting external code before install (that is repo-forensics). Do NOT use for incident response during active attacks. Do NOT use for fixing or patching vulnerabilities (forensify is read-only).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test AI/LLM features that ship in your product. Covers prompt regression testing, response quality evaluation, tool-call validation, hallucination and RAG grounding checks, nondeterministic-output strategies, red-team/safety scans, eval frameworks, and agent-as-target injection (indirect injection via tool output / RAG / scan reports, self-propagating payloads, data exfiltration via an agent) plus a bundled detector for untrusted content. Use when: "test our LLM feature," "prompt regression test," "eval framework," "hallucination test," "RAG grounding," "nondeterministic output," "AI feature testing," "red-team our chatbot," "indirect prompt injection," "agent reading untrusted tool output," "production AI quality." Not for: using AI to generate your own test code — use ai-test-generation. Not for: classifying CI failures with AI — use ai-bug-triage. Not for: EU AI Act / GDPR conformity of an AI feature — use compliance-testing. Not for: canary/flag rollout of an AI feature — use testing-in-production. Related: ai-test-generation, ai-qa-review, api-testing, compliance-testing, security-testing, risk-based-testing, test-data-management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when authoring reusable, idempotent MATLAB scripts that build System Composer architecture models via the architecture-modeling API — `systemcomposer.createModel`, `addComponent`, `addPort`, `setInterface`, `connect(srcPort, dstPort)`, interface dictionaries (.sldd) with `addInterface`/`addElement`, profiles/stereotypes with `Profile.createProfile` and `addStereotype`, or `systemcomposer.allocation.createAllocationSet`. Also trigger when debugging these APIs (connections that don't appear, interfaces that don't resolve, profile save errors, `createAllocationSet` signature-mismatch errors). Do NOT trigger for ad-hoc structural edits to an already-built model (adding one SubSystem, rewiring a port) — use `building-simulink-models` with `model_edit` for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides parallel exploration of multiple implementation approaches using git worktrees. Use when facing decisions with multiple valid paths. Triggers on: explore options, compare approaches, parallel exploration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when introducing a new internal API while old callers still exist. Migrate callers and delete the old API in the same wave instead of preserving compatibility layers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The fallback workflow for authoring custom HyperFrames video compositions at any length or format — longer or multi-scene pieces, brand / sizzle reels, montages, title cards, static loops, and freeform compositions. Input- and length-agnostic. If a specialized workflow clearly fits the input — a marketed product, a website, a topic explainer, a GitHub PR, existing footage, a short motion graphic, or a Remotion port — prefer it (see /hyperframes); use this only as the general fallback when none fit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unified multi-platform paid media audit with parallel execution. Spawns scored audits for Google Ads, Meta Ads, and Microsoft Ads simultaneously, merges results into a budget-weighted aggregate health score (A-F), adds cross-platform analysis (budget allocation, tracking consistency, creative alignment, attribution overlap), and produces a prioritized action plan. Optionally generates a client-ready deck via pro-deck-builder. Use when the user asks for a full paid media audit, cross-platform review, or multi-channel ad assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DALL-E 3 API for AI image generation — text-to-image, image editing, and variations via OpenAI. Use when generating images from text prompts, creating product visuals, illustrating content, or editing images with an inpainting mask.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects attacks from server logs and blocks malicious IPs with CrowdSec, an open-source, crowd-sourced alternative to fail2ban. Use when a user asks to block brute force attempts, protect SSH or a web server, set up a community blocklist firewall, add a WAF, or install CrowdSec with Docker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write CI/CD pipelines as code with Dagger — portable, cacheable, container-based pipelines that run locally and in any CI system. Use when someone asks to "write CI pipeline in TypeScript", "portable CI/CD", "run GitHub Actions locally", "Dagger pipeline", "CI as code", "containerized build pipeline", or "test my CI locally before pushing". Covers Dagger SDK (TypeScript/Python), pipeline composition, caching, secrets, and multi-stage builds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The specialized craft of writing copy that sells—headlines that stop thumbs, body copy that persuades, CTAs that convert. This is copywriting specifically tuned for advertising: paid media, performance marketing, direct response. Ad copy is different from content writing. Every word costs money (CPM/CPC). Every character competes for attention. There's no time for warm-up—you have one chance to hook, persuade, and convert. The best ad copy feels effortless but is engineered word by word. In the age of AI-generated creative at scale, ad copywriting becomes both more important (you need more variations) and more challenging (everyone has access to the same tools). The differentiation is in the strategy, the insight, and the craft that AI assists but doesn't replace. Use when "ad copy, headline, ad text, CTA, call to action, Facebook ad, Google ad, ad variations, direct response, performance copy, primary text, ad headline, ad-copy, headlines, direct-response, performance, conversion, cta, advertising" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Accessibility isn't a feature - it's a fundamental quality of good software. 1 in 4 adults has a disability. Many more have temporary impairments or situational limitations. Your users include people who can't see, can't hear, can't use a mouse, or can't process information the way you do. This skill covers WCAG guidelines, ARIA patterns, keyboard navigation, screen reader compatibility, and automated testing. Key insight: accessible code is better code. The constraints of accessibility lead to simpler, more semantic, more maintainable implementations. 2025 lesson: Accessibility lawsuits are at an all-time high. "We'll add it later" is both ethically wrong and legally risky. Start accessible, stay accessible. Use when "accessibility, a11y, wcag, aria, screen reader, keyboard navigation, focus trap, alt text, color contrast, skip link, accessible, accessibility, a11y, wcag, aria, screen-reader, keyboard, inclusive, semantic-html" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive expertise in ERC-4337 account abstraction, smart contract wallets, paymasters, bundlers, and user operation handling. Covers social recovery, session keys, gas sponsorship, and wallet SDKs. Use when "account abstraction, ERC-4337, smart wallet, paymaster, bundler, user operation, gasless transaction, session keys, social recovery, smart account, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Citation-integrity forensics: is every reference real, correctly attributed, and used in a context the cited work actually supports? Catches hallucinated references (no paper at the claimed arXiv id/DOI/venue, fabricated authors/year), metadata drift (wrong year/venue/version), and wrong-context citations (a real paper cited for a claim it never makes — or argues against). A hot zone for machine-generated papers. Decidable at L0 (text + canonical sources). Span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json); the executor gathers canonical facts (DBLP / arXiv / DOI), then one FRESH cross-model thread per cited key proposes findings; reviewer != adjudicator. Emits citation-forensics.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "citation forensics", "check the references", "hallucinated citations", "wrong-context citation", "verify references", "引用核对".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transparent, itemized impressions of AI-generated WRITING STYLE — the repo's ONLY non-integrity track. Two passes: a deterministic defensive-hedge density screen (tools/check_ai_style.py, AIS-DEFENSIVE-HEDGE) plus a fresh cross-model GROSS-cases-only semantic pass over the 13 AIS-* style tells (broken narrative arc, LLM phrase tics, jargon-stuffing, invented codenames, clause/formula walls, gratuitous pseudocode, bullet overuse, bold-module spam, restatement loops, focus drift, single-style figures, appendix dumping). Every finding is named, LOCATED, span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json), carries not_integrity_finding:true + false_positive_risk:high + an fp_case, and gets ZERO verdict weight: the adjudicator forces it to info, excludes it from overall_verdict, and renders it in a SEPARATE report section. NOT an AI-text classifier — no scores, no "this is AI-written", no authorship probability; a paper can be CLEAN_GIVEN_EVIDENCE and still list many. Emits ai-style-impressions.findings.json; computes NO verdict; if a tell is actually substantive it routes to the integrity auditor. Triggers: "AI style", "vibe check", "writing fingerprint", "AI 文风", "vibe paper".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Universal Web Scraper workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs AI-driven data extraction from 55+ Actors across all major platforms. This skill automatically selects the best Actor for your task and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Universal Web Scraper workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs AI-driven data extraction from 55+ Actors across all major platforms. This skill automatically selects the best Actor for your task and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Web 线上展览开发 (虚拟展厅) (Web 线上展览 / 虚拟展厅开发 (从业者/工程视角) — 用 web 技术开发线上展览、虚拟展厅、云展会、数字展馆，覆盖 3D 空间、全景漫游、WebXR、文博数字化、营销云展厅、3D 商品展示等形态。覆盖: (a) 技术栈 — 3D web(Three.js / React Three Fiber / Babylon.js / Google model-viewer / WebGL / WebGPU)、全景(Pannellum / Marzipano / Photo Sphere Viewer / krpano / 720云)、WebXR(WebXR Device API / A-Frame)、资产管线(glTF·GLB / Draco / Meshopt / KTX2 纹理压缩 / gltf-transform / LOD); (b) 自研 vs SaaS 平台选型(国内: 众趣 / 酷雷曼 / 比目鱼 / 会鸽 / 3DVista; 海外: Matterport / Kuula / Artsteps / Spatial); (c) 性能优化(大场景加载 / 模型轻量化 / draw call / 移动端 / 首屏 / 显存)——web 3D 第一性难题; (d) 策展与导览(动线设计 / 热点 hotspot / 语音讲解 / 交互); (e) 文博数字化(IIIF / 数字孪生 / 高清文物) 与 会展·电商商业化(营销云展厅 / 数据埋点 / 线索转化); (f) 部署(CDN / 流式加载 / 跨端兼容 / WebGL 降级)。学派分歧: 自研 Three.js vs SaaS 平台、真 3D 重场景 vs 720 全景轻量、WebGL vs WebGPU、文博考据派 vs 营销转化派、沉浸优先 vs 加载优先。不含: 线下展陈 / 展台搭建、原生 VR App(非 web)、通用 3D 游戏开发、纯 3D 建模教程。) Master OS — automated mastery of Web 线上展览 / 虚拟展厅开发 (从业者/工程视角) — 用 web 技术开发线上展览、虚拟展厅、云展会、数字展馆，覆盖 3D 空间、全景漫游、WebXR、文博数字化、营销云展厅、3D 商品展示等形态。覆盖: (a) 技术栈 — 3D web(Three.js / React Three Fiber / Babylon.js / Google model-viewer / WebGL / WebGPU)、全景(Pannellum / Marzipano / Photo Sphere Viewer / krpano / 720云)、WebXR(WebXR Device API / A-Frame)、资产管线(glTF·GLB / Draco / Meshopt / KTX2 纹理压缩 / gltf-transform / LOD); (b) 自研 vs SaaS 平台选型(国内: 众趣 / 酷雷曼 / 比目鱼 / 会鸽 / 3DVista; 海外: Matterport / Kuula / Artsteps / Spatial); (c) 性能优化(大场景加载 / 模型轻量化 / draw call / 移动端 / 首屏 / 显存)——web 3D 第一性难题; (d) 策展与导览(动线设计 / 热点 hotspot / 语音讲解 / 交互); (e) 文博数字化(IIIF / 数字孪生 / 高清文物) 与 会展·电商商业化(营销云展厅 / 数据埋点 / 线索转化); (f) 部署(CDN / 流式加载 / 跨端兼容 / WebGL 降级)。学派分歧: 自研 Three.js vs SaaS 平台、真 3D 重场景 vs 720 全景轻量、WebGL vs WebGPU、文博考据派 vs 营销转化派、沉浸优先 vs 加载优先。不含: 线下展陈 / 展台搭建、原生 VR App(非 web)、通用 3D 游戏开发、纯 3D 建模教程。: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on Web 线上展览 / 虚拟展厅开发 (从业者/工程视角) — 用 web 技术开发线上展览、虚拟展厅、云展会、数字展馆，覆盖 3D 空间、全景漫游、WebXR、文博数字化、营销云展厅、3D 商品展示等形态。覆盖: (a) 技术栈 — 3D web(Three.js / React Three Fiber / Babylon.js / Google model-viewer / WebGL / WebGPU)、全景(Pannellum / Marzipano / Photo Sphere Viewer / krpano / 720云)、WebXR(WebXR Device API / A-Frame)、资产管线(glTF·GLB / Draco / Meshopt / KTX2 纹理压缩 / gltf-transform / LOD); (b) 自研 vs SaaS 平台选型(国内: 众趣 / 酷雷曼 / 比目鱼 / 会鸽 / 3DVista; 海外: Matterport / Kuula / Artsteps / Spatial); (c) 性能优化(大场景加载 / 模型轻量化 / draw call / 移动端 / 首屏 / 显存)——web 3D 第一性难题; (d) 策展与导览(动线设计 / 热点 hotspot / 语音讲解 / 交互); (e) 文博数字化(IIIF / 数字孪生 / 高清文物) 与 会展·电商商业化(营销云展厅 / 数据埋点 / 线索转化); (f) 部署(CDN / 流式加载 / 跨端兼容 / WebGL 降级)。学派分歧: 自研 Three.js vs SaaS 平台、真 3D 重场景 vs 720 全景轻量、WebGL vs WebGPU、文博考据派 vs 营销转化派、沉浸优先 vs 加载优先。不含: 线下展陈 / 展台搭建、原生 VR App(非 web)、通用 3D 游戏开发、纯 3D 建模教程。 problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「线上展览」「虚拟展厅」「web 线上展览」「云展厅」「数字展馆」

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

语音转文字 (ASR) (语音转文字 (ASR / 语音识别 / Speech-to-Text) 应用工程 (从业者视角) — 选型、集成、优化语音转文字能力，尤其面向移动端、低成本、快速识别的场景。覆盖: (a) 引擎/API 地图 — 云端 API(OpenAI gpt-4o-transcribe / Whisper API、Deepgram、AssemblyAI、Google / Azure / AWS Transcribe、讯飞、字节火山、阿里、腾讯、百度) vs 开源模型(Whisper / faster-whisper / whisper.cpp / distil-whisper、NVIDIA NeMo Parakeet / Canary、阿里 FunASR / Paraformer / SenseVoice、Moonshine、Vosk、Kaldi / k2 / icefall) vs 端侧·移动 SDK(whisper.cpp + CoreML / Metal、iOS Speech framework、Android SpeechRecognizer、Picovoice、SenseVoice 端侧); (b) 准确率(WER / CER) × 延迟(RTF / 流式) × 成本 三角权衡与选型决策树; (c) 成本优化 playbook — 端侧免费 / 批量折扣 / VAD 裁静音 / 量化(int8 / ggml) / 蒸馏 / 自托管 break-even; (d) 移动端集成 — 端侧 vs 云、流式 vs 批量、断点检测(endpointing)、隐私 / 离线; (e) 后处理 — 标点 / 数字规整(ITN) / 说话人分离(diarization) / 时间戳。学派分歧: 云 API vs 端侧自托管、通用大模型(Whisper) vs 专用流式(RNN-T / Conformer)、闭源 API vs 开源、准确率派 vs 成本派、英文优先 vs 中文 ASR(FunASR / SenseVoice / 讯飞)。不含: 文字转语音(TTS / 语音合成，方向相反)、声纹识别 / 说话人验证为主业、语音 agent / 对话式 AI、ASR 模型训练科研深水区。) Master OS — automated mastery of 语音转文字 (ASR / 语音识别 / Speech-to-Text) 应用工程 (从业者视角) — 选型、集成、优化语音转文字能力，尤其面向移动端、低成本、快速识别的场景。覆盖: (a) 引擎/API 地图 — 云端 API(OpenAI gpt-4o-transcribe / Whisper API、Deepgram、AssemblyAI、Google / Azure / AWS Transcribe、讯飞、字节火山、阿里、腾讯、百度) vs 开源模型(Whisper / faster-whisper / whisper.cpp / distil-whisper、NVIDIA NeMo Parakeet / Canary、阿里 FunASR / Paraformer / SenseVoice、Moonshine、Vosk、Kaldi / k2 / icefall) vs 端侧·移动 SDK(whisper.cpp + CoreML / Metal、iOS Speech framework、Android SpeechRecognizer、Picovoice、SenseVoice 端侧); (b) 准确率(WER / CER) × 延迟(RTF / 流式) × 成本 三角权衡与选型决策树; (c) 成本优化 playbook — 端侧免费 / 批量折扣 / VAD 裁静音 / 量化(int8 / ggml) / 蒸馏 / 自托管 break-even; (d) 移动端集成 — 端侧 vs 云、流式 vs 批量、断点检测(endpointing)、隐私 / 离线; (e) 后处理 — 标点 / 数字规整(ITN) / 说话人分离(diarization) / 时间戳。学派分歧: 云 API vs 端侧自托管、通用大模型(Whisper) vs 专用流式(RNN-T / Conformer)、闭源 API vs 开源、准确率派 vs 成本派、英文优先 vs 中文 ASR(FunASR / SenseVoice / 讯飞)。不含: 文字转语音(TTS / 语音合成，方向相反)、声纹识别 / 说话人验证为主业、语音 agent / 对话式 AI、ASR 模型训练科研深水区。: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on 语音转文字 (ASR / 语音识别 / Speech-to-Text) 应用工程 (从业者视角) — 选型、集成、优化语音转文字能力，尤其面向移动端、低成本、快速识别的场景。覆盖: (a) 引擎/API 地图 — 云端 API(OpenAI gpt-4o-transcribe / Whisper API、Deepgram、AssemblyAI、Google / Azure / AWS Transcribe、讯飞、字节火山、阿里、腾讯、百度) vs 开源模型(Whisper / faster-whisper / whisper.cpp / distil-whisper、NVIDIA NeMo Parakeet / Canary、阿里 FunASR / Paraformer / SenseVoice、Moonshine、Vosk、Kaldi / k2 / icefall) vs 端侧·移动 SDK(whisper.cpp + CoreML / Metal、iOS Speech framework、Android SpeechRecognizer、Picovoice、SenseVoice 端侧); (b) 准确率(WER / CER) × 延迟(RTF / 流式) × 成本 三角权衡与选型决策树; (c) 成本优化 playbook — 端侧免费 / 批量折扣 / VAD 裁静音 / 量化(int8 / ggml) / 蒸馏 / 自托管 break-even; (d) 移动端集成 — 端侧 vs 云、流式 vs 批量、断点检测(endpointing)、隐私 / 离线; (e) 后处理 — 标点 / 数字规整(ITN) / 说话人分离(diarization) / 时间戳。学派分歧: 云 API vs 端侧自托管、通用大模型(Whisper) vs 专用流式(RNN-T / Conformer)、闭源 API vs 开源、准确率派 vs 成本派、英文优先 vs 中文 ASR(FunASR / SenseVoice / 讯飞)。不含: 文字转语音(TTS / 语音合成，方向相反)、声纹识别 / 说话人验证为主业、语音 agent / 对话式 AI、ASR 模型训练科研深水区。 problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「语音转文字」「语音识别」「asr」「speech to text」「stt」

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

侍酒师与葡萄酒 (侍酒师 / 葡萄酒 (Sommelier & Wine) — 葡萄酒鉴赏 + 侍酒服务的职业认知操作系统，从业者/侍酒师/学习者视角。覆盖: (a) 两大认证体系张力 — WSET (Wine & Spirit Education Trust, 英国, 知识+SAT 系统化品鉴方法, Diploma/L4 笔试导向) vs Court of Master Sommeliers (CMS, 美/英, 服务+盲品演绎法+理论三位一体, MS 头衔), 外加 Institute of Masters of Wine (MW, 学术研究+论文) 与 UC Davis 葡萄酒学/葡萄栽培学学院派; (b) 盲品 = 纯 tacit 校准技能 — 演绎品鉴网格 (deductive tasting: 看色/闻香/品味 → 结构线索 calculated structure → 推断品种/产区/年份/酒龄), WSET SAT vs CMS deductive grid 两套方法论; (c) 第一性张力 — codifiable 理论层 (产区/品种/酒法/风土/酿造/葡萄栽培) ⇄ tacit 校准层 (品鉴味觉记忆/盲品/侍酒服务), 这行的核心矛盾是「可背诵的知识」与「不可言传的味觉」之间; (d) 旧世界 vs 新世界框架 — 旧世界以风土/法定产区为组织原则 (AOC/DOCG/QbA 分级法), 新世界以品种为标签; 风土 (terroir) 是核心组织概念; (e) 侍酒服务/酒店层 — 餐厅 floor 的配餐 (food pairing)、醒酒/侍酒温度、酒单与酒窖管理、by-the-glass 与饮品项目经济学、盲品 service exam; (f) 葡萄酒商业层 — 三级分销体系 (美国 three-tier)、定价/配额 (allocation)、期酒 (en primeur)、投资酒 (Liv-ex) 与拍卖; (g) 智识/品味演进 — 帕克百分制 (Robert Parker / Wine Advocate 100-point) vs Jancis Robinson 20 分制散文派; 经典派 vs 现代派酿造; 自然酒/低干预 (natural/minimal-intervention) vs 传统技术派. 学派分歧: WSET 知识体系派 vs CMS 服务盲品派、旧世界风土派 vs 新世界品种/技术派、自然酒派 vs 传统派、百分制点评派 vs 散文叙述派、经典平衡派 vs 浓郁现代派. 不含: 家庭自酿 DIY 套件、纯调酒/鸡尾酒/烈酒、葡萄园重型农机工程、酒精成瘾/公共卫生政策、酒类电商运营纯营销。) Master OS — automated mastery of 侍酒师 / 葡萄酒 (Sommelier & Wine) — 葡萄酒鉴赏 + 侍酒服务的职业认知操作系统，从业者/侍酒师/学习者视角。覆盖: (a) 两大认证体系张力 — WSET (Wine & Spirit Education Trust, 英国, 知识+SAT 系统化品鉴方法, Diploma/L4 笔试导向) vs Court of Master Sommeliers (CMS, 美/英, 服务+盲品演绎法+理论三位一体, MS 头衔), 外加 Institute of Masters of Wine (MW, 学术研究+论文) 与 UC Davis 葡萄酒学/葡萄栽培学学院派; (b) 盲品 = 纯 tacit 校准技能 — 演绎品鉴网格 (deductive tasting: 看色/闻香/品味 → 结构线索 calculated structure → 推断品种/产区/年份/酒龄), WSET SAT vs CMS deductive grid 两套方法论; (c) 第一性张力 — codifiable 理论层 (产区/品种/酒法/风土/酿造/葡萄栽培) ⇄ tacit 校准层 (品鉴味觉记忆/盲品/侍酒服务), 这行的核心矛盾是「可背诵的知识」与「不可言传的味觉」之间; (d) 旧世界 vs 新世界框架 — 旧世界以风土/法定产区为组织原则 (AOC/DOCG/QbA 分级法), 新世界以品种为标签; 风土 (terroir) 是核心组织概念; (e) 侍酒服务/酒店层 — 餐厅 floor 的配餐 (food pairing)、醒酒/侍酒温度、酒单与酒窖管理、by-the-glass 与饮品项目经济学、盲品 service exam; (f) 葡萄酒商业层 — 三级分销体系 (美国 three-tier)、定价/配额 (allocation)、期酒 (en primeur)、投资酒 (Liv-ex) 与拍卖; (g) 智识/品味演进 — 帕克百分制 (Robert Parker / Wine Advocate 100-point) vs Jancis Robinson 20 分制散文派; 经典派 vs 现代派酿造; 自然酒/低干预 (natural/minimal-intervention) vs 传统技术派. 学派分歧: WSET 知识体系派 vs CMS 服务盲品派、旧世界风土派 vs 新世界品种/技术派、自然酒派 vs 传统派、百分制点评派 vs 散文叙述派、经典平衡派 vs 浓郁现代派. 不含: 家庭自酿 DIY 套件、纯调酒/鸡尾酒/烈酒、葡萄园重型农机工程、酒精成瘾/公共卫生政策、酒类电商运营纯营销。: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on 侍酒师 / 葡萄酒 (Sommelier & Wine) — 葡萄酒鉴赏 + 侍酒服务的职业认知操作系统，从业者/侍酒师/学习者视角。覆盖: (a) 两大认证体系张力 — WSET (Wine & Spirit Education Trust, 英国, 知识+SAT 系统化品鉴方法, Diploma/L4 笔试导向) vs Court of Master Sommeliers (CMS, 美/英, 服务+盲品演绎法+理论三位一体, MS 头衔), 外加 Institute of Masters of Wine (MW, 学术研究+论文) 与 UC Davis 葡萄酒学/葡萄栽培学学院派; (b) 盲品 = 纯 tacit 校准技能 — 演绎品鉴网格 (deductive tasting: 看色/闻香/品味 → 结构线索 calculated structure → 推断品种/产区/年份/酒龄), WSET SAT vs CMS deductive grid 两套方法论; (c) 第一性张力 — codifiable 理论层 (产区/品种/酒法/风土/酿造/葡萄栽培) ⇄ tacit 校准层 (品鉴味觉记忆/盲品/侍酒服务), 这行的核心矛盾是「可背诵的知识」与「不可言传的味觉」之间; (d) 旧世界 vs 新世界框架 — 旧世界以风土/法定产区为组织原则 (AOC/DOCG/QbA 分级法), 新世界以品种为标签; 风土 (terroir) 是核心组织概念; (e) 侍酒服务/酒店层 — 餐厅 floor 的配餐 (food pairing)、醒酒/侍酒温度、酒单与酒窖管理、by-the-glass 与饮品项目经济学、盲品 service exam; (f) 葡萄酒商业层 — 三级分销体系 (美国 three-tier)、定价/配额 (allocation)、期酒 (en primeur)、投资酒 (Liv-ex) 与拍卖; (g) 智识/品味演进 — 帕克百分制 (Robert Parker / Wine Advocate 100-point) vs Jancis Robinson 20 分制散文派; 经典派 vs 现代派酿造; 自然酒/低干预 (natural/minimal-intervention) vs 传统技术派. 学派分歧: WSET 知识体系派 vs CMS 服务盲品派、旧世界风土派 vs 新世界品种/技术派、自然酒派 vs 传统派、百分制点评派 vs 散文叙述派、经典平衡派 vs 浓郁现代派. 不含: 家庭自酿 DIY 套件、纯调酒/鸡尾酒/烈酒、葡萄园重型农机工程、酒精成瘾/公共卫生政策、酒类电商运营纯营销。 problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「侍酒师」「sommelier」「葡萄酒」「wine」「盲品」

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

K12 体育培训 (K12 / 青少年体育培训 (从业者视角) — 面向 3-18 岁青少年的校外体育培训生意，政策改革驱动的高增长赛道。覆盖: (a) 业态分层 — 少儿体适能 (3-12 岁基础运动能力/感统/协调) vs 专项培训 (篮球/游泳/跳绳/羽毛球/网球/击剑/武术等单项技能) vs 中考体育备考 (初中冲刺，按各地体育中考考纲提分); (b) 政策脊椎 — 双减 (2021 教育部「双减」: 学科类压减、非学科类规范) 把体育从「兴趣班」推成刚需，体育中考分值改革 (云南/北京/各省把分值提到 50-100 分) 制造确定性需求，《国家学生体质健康标准》+《义务教育体育与健康课程标准 (2022 版)》是教学纲领; (c) 单店模型与连锁扩张 — 坪效/师生比/续费率/转介绍率/课消，直营 vs 加盟，社区店 vs Mall 店 vs 进校 (课后服务/课后三点半); (d) 教研与师资 — 课程体系标准化 (分龄分级)、教练认证 (社会体育指导员/各单项协会教练员/中国少儿体适能等)、教练「能打 ≠ 能教」断层; (e) 运营 SOP — 招生获客 (地推/社群/试听转化)、排课与场地利用率、家长沟通与续费、安全与运动损伤防控/保险; (f) 中考体育教研 — 考纲拆解 (耐力跑/跳绳/引体/坐位体前屈/球类技能)、提分训练计划、体测数据追踪。学派分歧: 体适能通识派 vs 专项技能派、中考应试提分派 vs 长期运动素养派、直营重模型 vs 加盟轻扩张、进校 (toB/课后服务) vs 校外门店 (toC)、引进体系 (如美国 SPARK/体适能认证) vs 本土自研课程。不含: 竞技体校/专业运动员青训选材深水区、成人健身/私教 (见 personal-trainer)、学科类教培、纯体育用品零售。) Master OS — automated mastery of K12 / 青少年体育培训 (从业者视角) — 面向 3-18 岁青少年的校外体育培训生意，政策改革驱动的高增长赛道。覆盖: (a) 业态分层 — 少儿体适能 (3-12 岁基础运动能力/感统/协调) vs 专项培训 (篮球/游泳/跳绳/羽毛球/网球/击剑/武术等单项技能) vs 中考体育备考 (初中冲刺，按各地体育中考考纲提分); (b) 政策脊椎 — 双减 (2021 教育部「双减」: 学科类压减、非学科类规范) 把体育从「兴趣班」推成刚需，体育中考分值改革 (云南/北京/各省把分值提到 50-100 分) 制造确定性需求，《国家学生体质健康标准》+《义务教育体育与健康课程标准 (2022 版)》是教学纲领; (c) 单店模型与连锁扩张 — 坪效/师生比/续费率/转介绍率/课消，直营 vs 加盟，社区店 vs Mall 店 vs 进校 (课后服务/课后三点半); (d) 教研与师资 — 课程体系标准化 (分龄分级)、教练认证 (社会体育指导员/各单项协会教练员/中国少儿体适能等)、教练「能打 ≠ 能教」断层; (e) 运营 SOP — 招生获客 (地推/社群/试听转化)、排课与场地利用率、家长沟通与续费、安全与运动损伤防控/保险; (f) 中考体育教研 — 考纲拆解 (耐力跑/跳绳/引体/坐位体前屈/球类技能)、提分训练计划、体测数据追踪。学派分歧: 体适能通识派 vs 专项技能派、中考应试提分派 vs 长期运动素养派、直营重模型 vs 加盟轻扩张、进校 (toB/课后服务) vs 校外门店 (toC)、引进体系 (如美国 SPARK/体适能认证) vs 本土自研课程。不含: 竞技体校/专业运动员青训选材深水区、成人健身/私教 (见 personal-trainer)、学科类教培、纯体育用品零售。: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on K12 / 青少年体育培训 (从业者视角) — 面向 3-18 岁青少年的校外体育培训生意，政策改革驱动的高增长赛道。覆盖: (a) 业态分层 — 少儿体适能 (3-12 岁基础运动能力/感统/协调) vs 专项培训 (篮球/游泳/跳绳/羽毛球/网球/击剑/武术等单项技能) vs 中考体育备考 (初中冲刺，按各地体育中考考纲提分); (b) 政策脊椎 — 双减 (2021 教育部「双减」: 学科类压减、非学科类规范) 把体育从「兴趣班」推成刚需，体育中考分值改革 (云南/北京/各省把分值提到 50-100 分) 制造确定性需求，《国家学生体质健康标准》+《义务教育体育与健康课程标准 (2022 版)》是教学纲领; (c) 单店模型与连锁扩张 — 坪效/师生比/续费率/转介绍率/课消，直营 vs 加盟，社区店 vs Mall 店 vs 进校 (课后服务/课后三点半); (d) 教研与师资 — 课程体系标准化 (分龄分级)、教练认证 (社会体育指导员/各单项协会教练员/中国少儿体适能等)、教练「能打 ≠ 能教」断层; (e) 运营 SOP — 招生获客 (地推/社群/试听转化)、排课与场地利用率、家长沟通与续费、安全与运动损伤防控/保险; (f) 中考体育教研 — 考纲拆解 (耐力跑/跳绳/引体/坐位体前屈/球类技能)、提分训练计划、体测数据追踪。学派分歧: 体适能通识派 vs 专项技能派、中考应试提分派 vs 长期运动素养派、直营重模型 vs 加盟轻扩张、进校 (toB/课后服务) vs 校外门店 (toC)、引进体系 (如美国 SPARK/体适能认证) vs 本土自研课程。不含: 竞技体校/专业运动员青训选材深水区、成人健身/私教 (见 personal-trainer)、学科类教培、纯体育用品零售。 problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「K12 体育培训」「青少年体育培训」「少儿体适能」「中考体育」「体育中考」

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

摄影 (摄影 (Photography) — 以静态影像为产出的视觉创作 + 服务行业：从看见 → 用光 → 构图 → 拍摄 → 后期 → 交付的认知操作系统，覆盖商业摄影 (commercial: 产品/广告/电商/美食)、人像摄影 (portrait: 影楼/写真/婚礼/时尚/环境人像)、纪实与街头摄影 (documentary/photojournalism/street)，以及与之贯通的风光、新闻、艺术摄影。面向职业摄影师 / 助理 / 修图师 / 想转职业的资深爱好者 / 服务这行的人 (器材厂商、图库、后期外包、影楼运营)。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **光 (light is the craft — 看光、控光、塑光：硬光/柔光、方向、色温、光比、布光是摄影第一性) ⇄ 器材 (gear — 相机/镜头/灯具迷信, 'GAS' gear-acquisition-syndrome, 'the best camera is the one you have with you' — 器材不是摄影)**; **决定性瞬间/抓取 (decisive moment, Cartier-Bresson, 等待与预判, 纪实/街头不可重来) ⇄ 构建/导演 (constructed/directed, 商业与人像是布光摆姿造光的'制造'而非'捕获')**; **前期/拍对 (get it right in camera, 曝光/白平衡/构图当场拍对) ⇄ 后期/暗房 (post/darkroom, Ansel Adams 'negative is the score, print is the performance' — RAW 冲洗/调色/修图是创作一半)**; **作者性/艺术表达 (vision, personal voice, 'photograph what you feel not what you see') ⇄ 服务性/商业交付 (client brief, 影楼标准化出片, 'shoot the brief not your ego', 摄影是生意)**; **真实/未操纵 (truth, photojournalism ethics, 不过度 PS, 新闻摄影伦理) ⇄ 修饰/理想化 (retouch, 商业人像液化磨皮, 广告的'谎言')**; **决定性技术参数 (曝光三角 aperture/shutter/ISO, 景深, 互易律) ⇄ 看见/眼力 (seeing, 'photography is about seeing not cameras', 构图/光感是 tacit 眼力)**; **胶片/慢/不可见 (film, 慢工, 不可即时回看, 暗房) ⇄ 数码/即时/海量 (digital, chimping, 连拍, 后期无限)**; AI 对摄影的冲击 ('是不是摄影'、生成式填充/换天/AI 修图、真实性危机); (b) 核心工作流 / pipeline (最标准、最易蒸高质量+CLI 化) — 通用链: 看光选光 → 曝光三角决策 (光圈定景深/快门定动静/ISO 兜底) → 测光与曝光 (评价/点测光, 向右曝光 ETTR, 直方图, 区域系统) → 构图 (三分法/引导线/框架/负空间/前景) → 对焦 → 拍摄 → 选片 culling → RAW 后期 (Lightroom/Capture One: 曝光/白平衡/色调曲线/HSL/局部) → 精修 retouch (Photoshop: 频率分离/液化/D&B) → 调色 grading → 输出交付 (色彩管理/sRGB/打印/图库上传); 子流派 SOP: 影棚商业布光 (主光/辅光/轮廓光/背景光, 三点布光, 光质修饰器 softbox/beauty-dish/grid)、婚礼/纪实一天流程、街头扫街、产品/电商台面、人像引导摆姿 posing & direction; (c) 工具栈 — 相机系统 (无反主导: Sony A 系 / Canon R / Nikon Z / 富士 X&GFX / 徕卡 M; 中画幅 Phase One/Hasselblad/GFX 商业; 残幅 vs 全幅 vs 中幅)、镜头 (大三元, 定焦 vs 变焦, 35/50/85 人像三剑客, 微距, 移轴)、灯具 (机顶闪 Godox/Profoto, 影室灯, 常亮 LED, 持续光 vs 闪光)、修饰器 (柔光箱/反光伞/束光筒/雷达罩/旗板)、测光/附件 (测光表, 灰卡, 三脚架, 滤镜 ND/CPL/渐变)、后期软件 (Adobe Lightroom Classic/CC 主导, Capture One 商业/影室, Photoshop 精修, DxO PhotoLab/PureRAW 降噪, Capture One vs Lightroom 之争, 国产: 醒图/泼辣 Polarr/Snapseed 移动端, RawTherapee/Darktable 开源, AI: Lightroom 生成式/Photoshop Generative Fill/Topaz Photo AI/Gigapixel/Luminar Neo)、色彩管理 (X-Rite/Calibrite 校色仪, ICC, 显示器)、图库/交付 (Pixieset/图虫/500px/视觉中国/Getty/Adobe Stock, 客片在线选片); (d) 知识正典 — Ansel Adams 'The Camera / The Negative / The Print' 三部曲 + 区域系统 (Zone System)、Henri Cartier-Bresson 'The Decisive Moment'、Michael Freeman 'The Photographer's Eye' (构图) 'The Photographer's Mind'、Bryan Peterson 'Understanding Exposure' (曝光入门圣经)、Scott Kelby 'Digital Photography Book' 系列 + Lightroom/Photoshop 书、Joe McNally 'The Hot Shoe Diaries / Sketching Light' (闪光灯)、Light Science & Magic (布光科学经典教材)、Roland Barthes 'Camera Lucida' (摄影哲学)、Susan Sontag 'On Photography'、John Szarkowski 'The Photographer's Eye'、National Geographic 摄影指南、Robert Capa / Sebastião Salgado / Steve McCurry (纪实)、Annie Leibovitz / Richard Avedon / Peter Lindbergh (人像/时尚)、Galen Rowell / Ansel Adams (风光); (e) figures/流派 — 风光/系统派 (Ansel Adams 区域系统奠基、Galen Rowell 探险风光、Marc Adamus); 决定性瞬间/纪实街头派 (Henri Cartier-Bresson 奠基、Robert Capa 战地、Sebastião Salgado 社会纪实、Steve McCurry、Vivian Maier、Daido Moriyama、森山大道/荒木经惟 日本派、Vivian Maier); 人像/时尚派 (Richard Avedon、Annie Leibovitz、Peter Lindbergh、Platon、Joey L、Lindsay Adler 时尚布光); 布光/教育派 (Joe McNally、Zack Arias 'one light'、Profoto/strobist David Hobby 'Strobist' 闪光灯启蒙博客、Karl Taylor 商业布光教学); 商业/广告派 (Chase Jarvis 'CreativeLive'创办+'best camera'、Joel Grimes、Tim Wallace 汽车); 后期/修图派 (Pratik Naik、Aaron Nace 'Phlearn'); 街头当代派 (Eric Kim 街头博客、Joel Meyerowitz、Saul Leiter 色彩街头); 中文圈 (李涛 'photoshop教学'、宁思潇潇 器材评测、thomas 'Thomas看看世界' 风光后期、阿刘 风光、668 人像); 哲学/批评 (Susan Sontag、Roland Barthes、John Szarkowski MoMA); (f) 行业话术/黑话 — 曝光三角 exposure triangle / 光圈 aperture f-stop / 快门 shutter speed / 感光度 ISO / 景深 DoF depth of field / 焦段 focal length / 等效 / 全画幅 full-frame vs 残幅 crop / 大三元 / 定焦 prime / 互易律 reciprocity / 向右曝光 ETTR / 直方图 histogram / 高光溢出 clipping / 动态范围 dynamic range / 宽容度 / 白平衡 WB

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GitHub 解封 — 账号封禁/限制/恢复的领域操作系统。覆盖：(a) GitHub 官方政策体系 (TOS / 可接受使用政策 / Trust & Safety 执行模式 / 公开申诉路径 / 受制裁地区解读)；(b) 封号原因诊断学 (spam / abuse / 制裁误标 / 2FA 丢失 / ToS 违规 / 账号劫持误判 / ban evasion 等子类型 + 症状→原因映射 + 自我分诊压测)；(c) 申诉实操 craft (写一封能让 T&S 快速判误伤的英文申诉信 + 升级阶梯 + 法务介入边界 + Don'ts)；(d) 制裁与合规硬边界 (OFAC SDN 名单 / 哪些国家或地区真不可达 / VPN 误判路径 / 中国大陆不是美国制裁地区的反复重申)；(e) 中国大陆开发者特别处境 (sanctioned region 误标 + SMS 验证不支持 +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab 备用迁移 + 私有自托管 Gitea/Forgejo)；(f) 真实案例库 (~30+ 公开案例分类拆解：误伤 / 真违规 / 制裁误标三类各自赔率与申诉成功路径)。伦理锚绝不软化：不教 ban evasion / 不教撒谎式申诉 / 真违规承认改进 / 丢 2FA 无恢复因子则诚实告知 / 中国制裁误标靠申诉不靠换 VPN / 申诉 6 个月窗口必算清 / 约 3% (业内估) 真违规恢复 vs 约 79% (业内估) 误伤申诉成功率分层标。 (GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: false-positive / genuine violation / sanctions mis-flag, each with win-rate and appeal success path). Ethical anchors absolutely not softened: do NOT teach ban evasion (creating new accounts turns a temp ban into a permanent one — the single biggest mistake); do NOT teach social engineering or lying in appeals (misuse + actually confirms violation); genuine violations: admit + improve beats denial; lost 2FA + no recovery factor → do not pretend recovery is possible; China sanctioned-region mis-flag → fix via appeal, not repeated VPN switching; appeal form 6-month window must be counted carefully; historical 约 3% (业内估) genuine-violation recovery vs 约 79% (业内估) false-positive appeal success rate stratification must be honestly labeled. Anti-samples (explicitly describe harm, never endorse): developer permabanned for ban evasion / open-source team org-banned for personal attacks in public issues / cases where repeated VPN switching escalated risk-control severity.) Master OS — automated mastery of GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: fa

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。