2,193 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Translate a polished markdown plan into self-contained beads in .beads/beads.jsonl. Every bead must be executable without reopening the plan. Use after the plan has converged.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep review — random exploration + cross-agent review, alternating. Finds integration bugs that self-review misses. Run every 30–60 min during active implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits whether a machine-readable regelrecht law model is faithful to the LETTER of the wettekst — and strictly separates the wettekst (leading) from the toelichting (Nota/Memorie van Toelichting; explanatory, not a norm). Runs in critical passes per article/lid and detects four deviation classes: toelichting-bleed (a modeled criterion that the letter only states as an open norm, or not at all), missing verbatim elements (a word/condition such as a "tenzij" or a qualifier dropped from the model), wrong legal_basis anchoring (an endpoint hung on a "kapstok"-article while the operative norm lives elsewhere), and verbatim-drift in text: (an ingetrokken/older redaction). Also detects positief-lid vs uitsluitings-lid conflicts and checks the chapeau for an explicit derogation rule ("zo nodig in afwijking van het eerste lid") before judging precedence. Classifies every finding as modelfout (fix), wettekst-gevolg (report, do not fix), or letter-vs-toelichting-question (jurist decides what is leading + revision signal). Use when the user wants to know if a model is "dicht bij de letter", mentions letter vs toelichting/bedoeling, fidelity, "natuurgetrouw", or before trusting feature outcomes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bouwt de audit- en workshop-producten waarmee juridische experts een machine-leesbare (regelrecht-YAML) vertaling van wet- en regelgeving valideren in een live sessie. Gebruik dit bij het voorbereiden van een expert-workshop of validatie-sessie over een dossier, het maken van een scope-/stelselanalyse, per-artikel audit-checklists, facilitator-materiaal, testcase-scenario's, of sessie-verslagen (intern + extern). Dossier-agnostisch; de regelrecht-methode (YAML, formules, untranslatables, source/override, legal_basis, engine-trace) is de vaste taal. Voor analytische desk-review van een corpus zonder live sessie (wetgevings-/stelselfouten, coverage, multi-agent review): zie de zusterskill regelrecht-stelselanalyse.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Voert de iteratieve desk-review-&-completion-cyclus uit op een regelrecht-corpus — plannen, harvesten/migreren/uitbreiden, multi-agent valideren, bevindingen 4-weg classificeren (modellering-fout / wetgevings-fout / engine-limitatie / acceptabele untranslatable), synthese + heroverweging, documenteren (wetgevings-/stelselfouten-analyse, fixes-plan, engine-limitaties, diagrammen, corpus-status), verifiëren tegen externe bronnen (resolutie-tracker + bronnen-dossier), en een eindrapport per cyclus. Gebruik dit bij corpus-review op correctheid/coverage zonder live expert-sessie, het opstellen van een wetgevings-notitie-bron, schema-migratie, het harvesten van nieuwe wetten, of het aansturen van een autonome completion-loop. Dossier-agnostisch; de regelrecht-methode is de vaste taal. Voor live-validatie met experts: zie regelrecht-audit-products.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Genereert uit een (semi-)gevalideerd regelrecht-corpus een geloofwaardige service-PoC (burger- + behandelaar-portaal, of een headless beslis-service) en zet die in als validatie-instrument met uitvoeringsexperts — om tastbaar te maken wat nodig is om een wet rechtvaardig in de praktijk te brengen, gezien vanuit de betrokkene. Gebruik dit als workshop-fase ná de logica-/scenariovalidatie (audit-products) om de dienstverlening-kant te valideren: welke service impliceert de wet, waar zit menselijk oordeel, welke last ligt bij de burger, welke termijnen, waar is de wet hard of onduidelijk. Dossier-agnostisch; de regelrecht-methode (hooks, legal_character, untranslatables, source/implements, type_spec, receipts) is de vaste taal. Voor de logica-/scenariovalidatie zelf: zie de zusterskill regelrecht-audit-products.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Standardize incoming legal or commercial contract requests into request type, missing information, priority, and review queue. Use when the work is intake routing and request cleanup. Do not use for clause interpretation, negotiation strategy, or legal advice on the agreement itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bug bounty workflow skill for program scope mapping, recon-to-report automation, deduplication against prior submissions, and high-signal reporting on HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack, and self-hosted programs. Use to organize bounty work end to end while staying inside program rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Binary protection bypass playbook. Use when identifying and bypassing ASLR, PIE, NX/DEP, stack canary, RELRO, FORTIFY_SOURCE, CET, and MTE protections in ELF binaries to enable exploitation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full ASVS 5.0 compliance assessment against a codebase and/or architecture diagrams. Reads all 346 controls from the companion CSV, performs targeted code analysis per control, and produces a complete matrix marked COMPLIANT / NON_COMPLIANT / NOT_RELEVANT — with per-control reasoning and evidence (code snippets, file:line references, diagram observations). Outputs a reviewed CSV matrix and a self-contained HTML evidence report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code obfuscation analysis and deobfuscation playbook. Use when reversing binaries protected by junk code, opaque predicates, self-modifying code, control flow flattening, VM protection, or string encryption.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Exploit misconfigurations in AWS Cognito, specifically focusing on unauthorized identity pool access, user pool self-registration issues, and privilege escalation via custom attributes to access broader AWS infrastructure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triages an Aikido security findings CSV against a local codebase. For each finding, reads the flagged file, traces the code path, and verdicts it as KEEP OPEN or CLOSE with a specific reason. Outputs a reviewed CSV and a self-contained HTML evidence report. Run this at the end of a pentest when an Aikido CSV is available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fierce autonomous internal co-founder. Bounded web research for evidence-backed improvements. Structured idea formulation with self-critique filter that rejects ideas not serving the goal. Auto-implements high-confidence aligned improvements, proposes medium-confidence ideas for approval. Evaluates viral coefficient, AI search visibility (GEO), and solo SaaS economics. Considers higher pursuits: employing disabled people, spiritual tech investigation, 99% wealth donation ethos.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when about to commit, finish a task, open a PR, summarize work for the user, or when the user asks for a review or summary — NOT just on autonomous commits, which are rare in OpenCode usage
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code review patterns, feedback principles. Use when reviewing PRs, implementations, or making approval/rejection decisions. Covers self-correction, progress tracking, feedback principles, severity levels.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Update Pharos funding donations by reconciling inbound transfers, rejecting wallet self-activity and spam, pricing receipt-time value, and appending user-approved rows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Consult this skill BEFORE proposing a fix to any CLI gap or schema gap that touches evidence, trust magnitude, evidence types, evidence grades, the TM formula, or star-level promotion gates. Also read it whenever an issue mentions citations, stars, commits, contributors, views, reviewers, percentile, arxiv, github-stars-own, repo-own, social-signal, benchmark-result, peer-review, self-attestation, fusion-recipe, verifier-attestation, or proxy-containment — those are the 10 canonical evidence types and the raw inputs that feed their formulas. Also read it when asked whether a skill qualifies for a given star level (0★–6★): the Star Bar and promotion gates live in `META.md`, not in the TM methodology page. Reading both prevents proposing a calibration that satisfies the TM grade threshold but violates a Star Bar installability or link requirement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 1 of the Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Use this skill whenever you need to gather, consolidate, or refresh raw evidence for named skills in the registry. Trigger phrases: "collect evidence", "populate the data lake", "gather sources", "run ev-collection", "Phase 1", "compile the evidence index", "refresh the unified lake", "aggregate skill evidence", "build the evidence database". Also invoke as the first step before running ev-star-verification, ev-adversarial-audit, or ev-link-validation — nothing downstream is meaningful without a fresh, compiled index. Covers GitHub repo links, stargazer signals, YouTube showcases, arXiv papers, peer reviews, benchmark results, blog/newsletter posts, and self-attestation artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end plan → implement → review pipeline that takes one triaged Gaia issue to a merged-ready PR, with Kill Criteria on the issue and zero follow-up debt. Use when someone says: "resolve this issue", "take #N end-to-end", "work the P0 queue", "fix and ship this issue", "run the resolver", "close out this issue properly", or /gaia-issue-resolver. Works any gaia-research org repo — gaia-skill-tree, gaia-research, gaia-skill-heaven — while the issue itself lives on the headquarters tracker, gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree. Assumes the issue is already triaged and carries a P0–P4 label; if it does not, run /gaia-triage first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage and classify pending Gaia skill intake batches in registry-for-review/. Use for gaia push intake proposals, draft skill batches, and deciding whether proposals should proceed to canonical curation. This skill is read-only and never promotes skills itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce the rendered evidence a human-gated frontend PR owes its reviewer: capture each changed surface (plus the before state for anything modified, plus mobile width), then generate one self-contained local HTML page the founder can open and review without checking anything out. Use when a PR is gated by the "Frontend changes are HUMAN-GATED" section of CLAUDE.md, or when the user says "/design-gate", "screenshot evidence for this PR", "prep this for founder review", "build the design evidence page", "what does this look like before and after". The page comes from a template script, not hand-written markup. Output is session-local and never committed. Do NOT use for non-gated changes: typo/grammar/factual fixes in an unchanged block, dead link targets, alt/ARIA fixes with no visual change, cache-bust bumps, or refactors with no rendered diff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Overlays silent b-roll cutaway clips onto a finished base video — the base audio keeps running underneath while the picture cuts away and returns, and the final duration always equals the base duration. Use when the user asks to add b-roll, add cutaways, or overlay clips on a video: "add b-roll to this", "cut away to a product shot here", "overlay these clips on my UGC ad". Entered from an approved base video plus its transcript, which comes from POST /v1/transcripts and needs no local install; it never generates the base itself and it never extends a video.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate AI video ads and image ads through the Novoads REST API (api.novoads.ai). Use when the user wants a UGC video, a product video, a talking-head ad, an AI actor holding a product, a TikTok or Reels or Shorts ad, a static image ad, or asks to "make me an ad", "generate a video", or names a model (Seedance, Seedance 2.5, Seedance Mini, Omni Flash, Veo 3.1, Sora 2, GPT Image 2, Nano Banana Pro, Reve). Handles upload, dialogue approval, cost confirmation, generation, polling, QA, and download. A product photo lands here when it SEEDS a new scene; when the picture itself should move, unchanged, that is image-to-motion. Not for editing an existing video file and not for publishing to an ad platform.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。