「ak sk」の検索結果

Test quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow execution, poor readability. Triggers when: user asks about test quality, shares test files for review, or expresses frustration: "tests keep breaking whenever I change anything", "our tests take forever", "tests pass but bugs still reach production", or "we have too many mocks". Do NOT trigger for: writing new tests from scratch (use the regular test-writing workflow) or testing framework/syntax questions — this skill reviews an existing suite for structural quality problems, not individual test authoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Continues interrupted Codex work only after read-codex-history verifies rollout identity and fork/compaction lineage — restores the original outcome, unfulfilled requests, and the next action. Use when given a Codex Session ID, asked to pick up a prior Codex run, told Codex was interrupted, fused, compacted or stuck, or asked to take over without `codex resume`. Not for a conversation Codex already natively resumed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Two pipelines ending at a scanner-look PDF. (1) Phone photos of paper documents (contracts, stamped certificates, receipts, forms, handwritten notes) → clean scanner-quality PDF: perspective rectification + noteshrink whitening + A4 assembly + mandatory whole-document check. Trigger: "把照片 做成扫描件", "photos to scanned PDF", "make this look scanned", "手机拍的 文档转 PDF", "盖章文件扫描", replacing pages in an existing scanned PDF, any CamScanner-like request. (2) A digital document with no signature yet (rendered docx/PDF, confirmation form, contract draft) → make it look hand-signed and scanned: synthesize a handwriting-style signature, composite it onto the signature line, apply the same scan-look post-processing. Trigger: "帮我做个手写签名", "生成签名盖到这份文件上", "做成签过字的扫描件", "synthesize a signature", any request for a document that needs to look signed without a real photographed signature. Do NOT hand-roll levels/contrast enhancement for scan-look — tried and rejected twice; this skill's pipeline is the proven one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transforms raw meeting transcripts into structured, evidence-based meeting minutes — merges multiple versions without losing content, reviews existing minutes against the transcript for missing items, and identifies anonymous speakers (Speaker 1/2/3, 发言人1). Triggers on 会议纪要, 会议记录, 整理纪要, 妙记转纪要, "write meeting minutes", "merge these minutes". Not for fixing ASR/STT errors first (use transcript-fixer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Continues interrupted Claude Code work after local history is read and reconciled — reconstructs the original outcome, unfulfilled requests, and the next action. Use when given a Claude Code Session ID, asked to pick up prior Claude work, told a run was interrupted or compacted, or asked to take over without `claude --resume`. Not for Codex sessions (use continue-codex-work).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a conference talk proposal / CFP submission for a tech or developer conference. Use when asked to submit to a CFP, propose a talk, or write a session abstract. Produces a compelling title, abstract, audience takeaways, an outline, and the speaker pitch — tuned to what selection committees actually look for.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a creator's sponsorship media kit and brand-deal outreach — the one-pager brands ask for, plus a pitch email and a rate card. Use when asked to make a media kit, pitch a brand, land a sponsorship, write a brand-deal email, or set creator rates. Produces a structured media kit (audience, stats, offerings, past work), a personalised outreach email, and a defensible rate card. The creator side of a sponsorship — distinct from a brand briefing a creator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a candidate's research brief on a company before an application or interview. Use when asked to research a company for a job, prep a company brief before an interview, or understand a prospective employer fast. Produces a one-page brief — what they do & how they make money, recent news & trajectory, product & competitors, likely challenges, culture signals, and smart questions to ask.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to compare two annual reports, put two companies from the same sector side by side, or check whether two companies' adjusted numbers mean the same thing. Takes two uploaded annual reports from one sector and compares them on five ratios computed with identical definitions from audited figures, flagging every place the companies define a metric differently. Produces a page-referenced comparison table, a definitions-differ section (adjusted vs statutory, inside vs outside the audited statements), and three questions to ask before believing either company's highlights. Educational, not financial advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spot a bad client before you sign — the warning signs of the projects that turn into unpaid, scope-creeping nightmares, and how to screen, price, or decline them. Use when asked is this client a red flag, should I take this client, screening a difficult client, or how to avoid bad clients. Produces a read on the warning signs present (haggling, vagueness, disrespect, urgency, unrealistic expectations), what each predicts, screening questions to ask before committing, protective terms if you proceed anyway, and how to decline gracefully — so you avoid the clients who cost more than they pay.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a human changelog from the REAL commit history — read the actual commit range via the GitHub connector, not a template. Use when asked to write the changelog for this release, what changed since the last tag, draft release notes from my commits, or summarise this range for users in Cowork. Reads commits/PRs between two refs via the GitHub connector, groups them into user-facing changes (features / fixes / breaking), translates commit-speak into human benefit, and produces a changelog artifact ready for the release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write changelogs and release notes readers actually benefit from — changes translated to so-whats, grouped by reader impact (breaking first, gifts second, plumbing last), with the upgrade path stated and the marketing kept honest. Use when asked write the release notes, turn this commit list into a changelog, announce this update to users, or why does nobody read our changelogs. Produces the impact-grouped changelog, the so-what translations, the breaking-changes block with migration steps, and the two-audience split when needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write the band agreement before the money or the breakup arrives — who owns the songs, how money splits (writing vs performing distinguished), who owns the name, what happens when someone quits, and the decision rules for offers — decided while everyone still shares a van. Use when a band asks 'how should we split money', 'who owns our songs', 'our drummer quit, what happens', or is about to record/release/sign anything. Produces a plain-language band agreement and the meeting script to agree it. Not legal advice — it's the conversation that makes the lawyer cheap later.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check whether a raise, more hours, or a new job could cost you more in lost benefits than you gain — the 'benefits cliff' — before you accept it. Use when asked will a raise hurt my benefits, benefits cliff, if I make more will I lose my food stamps or medicaid, or should I take more hours. Produces a plain map of which benefits phase out at what income (and which cut off suddenly vs. taper), a rough read on whether a specific income change helps or hurts net, the ones with hard cliffs to watch (childcare, Medicaid, housing), the moves that soften a cliff, and where to get a real benefits screening. Not financial/benefits advice; points to a benefits counselor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design the archive layer that keeps current workspaces lean without losing history — what moves, when, to where, findable-by-search, with the project-close ritual that makes archiving automatic instead of aspirational. Use when asked set up an archiving system, our workspace is drowning in old projects, when should things get archived, or make history findable without cluttering today. Produces the archive triggers, the destination structure, the findability rules, and the close-out ritual.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write an API versioning strategy document for a service or API platform. Use when asked to define versioning policy, plan API deprecation, classify breaking changes, or document version lifecycle. Produces a complete versioning strategy with breaking-change classification table, deprecation timeline, migration guide template, and client communication template.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Present a design to a client so they can make a decision rather than react to a picture — the brief restated, the moves explained against it, the options with their trade-offs, and a specific decision requested. Use when asked to present a design to a client, prepare a design review meeting, present concept options, or when a client keeps changing their mind after sign-off. Produces the presentation structure, the brief-to-design traceability, the options with honest trade-offs, the cost and programme position, and the decision record that makes sign-off stick.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess whether and how someone can safely stay in their own home as they age — the home hazards, the support gaps, and the modifications and services that make it work. Use when asked can my parent stay in their home safely, aging in place assessment, is it safe for them to live alone, or what do we need for them to stay home. Produces a room-by-room safety read (fall hazards, accessibility), an honest look at the daily-living and support gaps, the modifications and services that could close them, warning signs that home may no longer be safe, and how to raise it respectfully — helping a family make a clear-eyed, dignity-preserving decision. Not medical advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure vague opportunities and unclear briefs into actionable one-page problem statements. Use when asked to clarify a vague brief, frame an undefined problem, make sense of an unclear opportunity, or when the user says 'we need to figure out what to do about X' or 'I've been asked to look into Y'. Produces a structured problem brief with reframed questions, scoped boundaries, and a minimum viable research plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JLCPCB PCB fabrication and assembly — BOM/CPL generation, basic vs extended parts, assembly constraints, design rules, ordering workflow. Use with KiCad for JLCPCB manufacturing. Use this skill when the user mentions JLCPCB, wants to order PCBs or assembled boards, needs prototype bare PCBs and stencils, wants to know JLCPCB design rules and capabilities, or is asking about PCB manufacturing costs or turnaround times. For gerber/CPL export, stencil ordering, and BOM management, see the `bom` skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users master the art of public speaking by decomposing the skill into manageable components, leveraging storytelling frameworks, and utilizing professional acting techniques for executive presence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users master the art of making high-stakes, irreversible decisions by using structured frameworks to reduce cognitive bias and maintain organizational momentum.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks the openkb chat to make a deck / slide presentation / PPT / slides / 演示稿 / 幻灯片 from their compiled KB content. Generates a polished single-file HTML deck in the Editorial Monocle visual direction (warm cream background, serif type, brick-red accent) — designed to be opened in a browser, full-screened, and shared. Does NOT apply to generating skills (that's `openkb skill new`), long-form research reports, or interactive prototypes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS invoke this skill before anything hard to undo gets agreed to - a contract, a purchase, a migration, a launch, a price change, a reorganisation - and whenever the user asks "what could go wrong", "what are we missing", "poke holes in this", or for a premortem or a red team, in any language. Assumes the decision already failed and works backwards to find out why, in a fresh agent that had no hand in making it. Sweeps nine areas and shows what each produced, including the empty ones. Ends on one verdict: go ahead, go but fix these first, try it small first, think again, do not do this.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。