「llm」の検索結果

Benchmark LLM reference recommendation capabilities by verifying every cited paper against Crossref, PubMed, arXiv, and DBLP. Measures hallucination rate, per-field accuracy (title/author/year/DOI), discipline breakdown, and year constraint compliance. Supports tool-augmented (ReAct + web search) mode. Use when the user asks to evaluate, benchmark, or compare models on academic reference hallucination, literature recommendation quality, or citation accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants help with academic papers or citations but it's unclear which specific workflow fits — reviewing a paper, checking a BibTeX file for fake references, or benchmarking multiple LLMs on reference-recommendation accuracy. Also use when the user mentions paper review, peer review, BibTeX verification, citation checking, reference hallucination, or academic literature accuracy and hasn't specified which of those three tasks they mean. This skill is the entry router for the academic-eval suite: it asks one diagnostic question then routes to the right sub-skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to compare or benchmark multiple LLMs/agents arena-style but it's unclear which specific workflow fits — a general-purpose win-rate comparison on a custom task, or a benchmark specifically about reference/citation hallucination rate. Also use when the user mentions model arena, agent arena, pairwise model comparison, win-rate ranking, or comparing models on a task and hasn't specified whether that task is generic or about citation accuracy. This skill is the entry router for the arena-eval suite: it asks one diagnostic question when needed, then recommends the workflow or workflows needed to cover the request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Benchmark LLM reference recommendation capabilities by verifying every cited paper against Crossref, PubMed, arXiv, and DBLP. Measures hallucination rate, per-field accuracy (title/author/year/DOI), discipline breakdown, and year constraint compliance. Supports tool-augmented (ReAct + web search) mode. Use when the user asks to evaluate, benchmark, or compare models on academic reference hallucination, literature recommendation quality, or citation accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and redesign AI-generated feedback for pedagogical quality, timing, and learning impact. Use when building or reviewing automated feedback in digital learning tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use and read this skill immediately if the user request is in any way related to SEO or a site's organic search or AI search presence. That includes site audits, rankings, keyword research, competitors, backlinks, click or traffic changes, indexing problems, crawling, redirects, sitemaps, metadata, structured data, Core Web Vitals, internal links, content opportunities, programmatic SEO, local search, Search Console or Google Analytics questions, Google update impact, llms.txt, AI search visibility in ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, or Google AI Overviews, and client SEO reporting. Routes to evidence-backed local reports through the SEO CLI and MCP server.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick the right LLM for LEGAL RESEARCH & ANALYSIS — issue-spotting, rule application, case/statute analysis, memos, and multi-step agentic research. Vendor-neutral routing grounded in mid-2026 benchmarks (Vals AI LegalBench across 124 models; Harvey Legal Agent Benchmark for agentic work). Asks up to 4 quick questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model for legal research / case analysis / a memo", "best AI for legal reasoning", "route this research task", or is starting legal analysis without a fixed model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick the right LLM for CONTRACT REVIEW — reviewing an existing agreement for risk, deviations from standard, missing protections, and internal contradictions, and proposing redlines. Vendor-neutral routing grounded in mid-2026 legal benchmarks. Contract review is a COMPOSITE skill (extraction + reasoning + redlining + conflict-detection), so this routes by the dominant sub-task. Asks up to 4 quick questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/ language), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model to review this contract / NDA / MSA", "best AI to redline", "route this contract review", or is about to review an agreement without a fixed model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick the right LLM for CONTRACT DRAFTING — generating, redlining, or rewriting contract language from instructions. Vendor-neutral routing grounded in mid-2026 legal benchmarks (legalbenchmarks.ai Contract Drafting). Asks up to 4 quick questions (cost, speed, accuracy/ stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model should I use to draft this clause/agreement", "best AI for drafting contracts", "route this drafting task", or is about to generate/redline contract text and hasn't fixed a model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick the right LLM for LEGAL TRANSLATION — translating contracts, statutes, case law, and legal correspondence across languages, including Arabic/MENA. Vendor-neutral routing triangulated from mid-2026 evidence (WMT25 human eval, SwiLTra-Bench legal-MT, multilingual-reasoning proxies, ArabLegalEval). There is NO clean legal-translation leaderboard, so this vertical is directional and treats human legal-linguist review as mandatory. Asks up to 4 quick questions (language pair, cost, speed, privacy/certification), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model to translate this contract/statute", "best AI for legal translation", "translate this legal doc to/from Arabic", or is about to machine-translate legal text without a fixed model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick the right LLM for LEGAL INFO EXTRACTION — pulling facts, clauses, dates, parties, obligations, and structured fields out of contracts and legal documents. Vendor-neutral routing grounded in mid-2026 benchmarks (legalbenchmarks.ai Info Extraction; CUAD/MAUD/ACORD). Asks up to 4 quick questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model should I use to extract clauses/data from these documents", "best AI for contract data extraction", "route this extraction task", or is about to pull structured fields from legal docs without a fixed model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes any legal task to the right LLM, like OpenRouter but for legal work and grounded in benchmarks instead of brand loyalty. Built from mid-2026 legal evals (legalbenchmarks.ai, Vals AI × Stanford LegalBench across 124 models, Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark, the Atticus Project's CUAD/MAUD/ACORD) plus translation evidence (WMT25, SwiLTra-Bench, ArabLegalEval). Covers five verticals: contract drafting, info extraction, legal research, contract review, and legal translation (including Arabic/MENA). Each asks up to four questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then returns a primary model, a fallback, what to avoid, and what a human must verify. Core principle: capability is not controllability, so every route ends with a verification step. Not legal advice; a lawyer owns the output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Les LLM écrivent du juridique qui ressemble à du juridique sans en être. Formules creuses, attributions vagues, hedging systématique, latin décoratif : un praticien repère ces tics en trois lignes. Un juge aussi. LawyerScrib est un skill pour Claude Code et Cursor qui nettoie ces traces. Il scanne 17 patterns typiques de l'écriture IA appliquée au droit français (conclusions, consultations, notes, mails, actes) et réécrit chaque passage pour retrouver le ton d'un avocat qui argumente, pas d'un modèle qui rédige. Le résultat : un texte engagé, précis, avec des références sourcées et une position claire. Pas un texte neutre qui "reste à disposition pour tout complément".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user wants an AI governance, legal-risk, privacy, compliance, procurement, or vendor-risk review of an internal AI use case, an AI product feature, an LLM workflow, or a third-party AI vendor. The skill asks intake and clarifying questions first when facts or evidence are missing, identifies required documentation and missing evidence, maps the use case to AI governance frameworks and applicable legal domains, and produces a preliminary or final governance review with scorecards, findings, owners, remediation actions, and follow-up questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) compliance advisor — business threshold analysis, consumer rights fulfillment (access, delete, correct, opt-out of sale/sharing, limit SPI, ADMT opt-out), privacy notice drafting, service provider vs. contractor vs. third-party classification, sensitive personal information (SPI) handling, data minimization, opt-out mechanisms (including GPC), cybersecurity audits and risk assessments (live since Jan 1, 2026), ADMT obligations (effective 2026, deadline Jan 1, 2027), CPPA enforcement (Disney $2.75M, PlayOn $1.1M, Ford $375K), penalty exposure, GDPR comparison, and gap assessments for businesses operating in or targeting California residents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When you want to capture into, compile, query, lint, or connect your personal Second Brain. Wraps the Karpathy LLM Wiki schema (Obsidian or any markdown vault) — raw/ (unprocessed sources), wiki/ (AI-compiled interlinked topic pages), outputs/ (generated artifacts). Tool-agnostic in design but defaults to a vault at ${SECOND_BRAIN_VAULT:-$HOME/Documents/SecondBrain}/. Six modes — capture (drop something into raw/), compile (process unprocessed raw files into wiki pages, update INDEX.md), query (answer a question from the wiki, save to outputs/), lint (orphans / contradictions / stale / unprocessed raw / topic gaps), connect (suggest new wikilinks between pages), search (quick lookup). Triggers on "/second-brain," "/sb," "capture this," "save this to my brain," "compile the wiki," "process raw notes," "query my wiki," "ask my brain," "lint the wiki," "find connections," "search my notes." Complements deep-research (external corpus) — this is the internal corpus.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

用于对抗样本、模型提取、提示注入、成员推断、训练投毒、LoRA 滥用、LLM 越狱等 AI/ML 相关 CTF 题;触发名:ctf-ai-ml

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the ComfyUI agent locally for FREE with no subscription, no API key, and fully offline, using our gemma4 models fine-tuned on the comfyui-mcp tool suite via Ollama. Use when the user asks about running locally, running for free, offline use, avoiding API costs, Ollama setup, or which local model to pick.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

On-device LLM integration using Apple's Foundation Models framework. Use when implementing AI text generation, structured output, or tool calling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert knowledge for Azure API Management development including troubleshooting, best practices, decision making, architecture & design patterns, limits & quotas, security, configuration, integrations & coding patterns, and deployment. Use when configuring APIM gateways, policies, VNets, self-hosted gateways, or AI/LLM-backed APIs, and other Azure API Management related development tasks. Not for Azure App Service (use azure-app-service), Azure Functions (use azure-functions), Azure Logic Apps (use azure-logic-apps), Azure Service Bus (use azure-service-bus).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides guidance for writing, optimizing, and benchmarking Triton kernels for Intel XPU GPUs (Battlemage/Arc Pro B50) using the Xe-Forge optimization framework. Includes an LLM-driven trial-loop workflow (analyze, validate, benchmark, profile, finalize), XPU-specific patterns (tensor descriptors, GRF mode, tile swizzling), KernelBench fused kernels, and Flash Attention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brand Registry enrollment guide — eligibility, application, benefits, A+ Content access, brand protection tools

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vine review program strategy — enrollment, product selection, timing, review quality maximization

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。