2,553 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Turn rich agent answers and any file, folder, URL, or export into a polished single-file HTML page. Auto-picks a default route plus 17 concrete design systems (teaching, dashboard, atlas, timeline-story, document, …).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage the deferred-work ledger for the bmad-loop orchestrator: verify every selected open entry against the actual codebase and return a machine-readable partition (bundles, already-resolved, blocked, skip, human decisions). Also migrates legacy pre-DW-format ledgers when invoked with --migrate. Automation-only — invoked by bmad-loop sweep runs, not by humans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Binding-resolved Python symbol queries via pyright — every true caller (--refs), the real definition (--def), or an inferred signature (--hover) of a .py symbol, excluding the same-named false positives text search cannot tell apart. Use when a task needs ALL callers or users of a named Python symbol and grep would over-match. Python only, and only for the caller/definition question: measured 2026-07-04 on real issue-localization tasks, plain ripgrep tied or beat the semantic and indexed-regex tiers at 4-60x less wall-clock, so those tiers survive below without being a default.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Close a GitHub issue with a synthesis comment as a flowing graph — validate the synthesis, post the closing comment, close, then run a pluggable callback (e.g. memory store) detached. Use when closing an issue should also capture the LEARNING (not just the diff log) and when the post-close work shouldn't block the close ack.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and audit deterministic verification gates — a check that blocks a pipeline and can be shown to go red. Use when writing a calibration gate, CI check, validation script or pre-publication check for a numeric or empirical result; when a plausible-but-wrong value would survive review; when asking whether an existing test, linter rule or check could actually fail; and when a suite passes first try, passes suspiciously often, or was written by whatever produced the thing it checks. Triggers on "can this check fail", "known-bad", "negative control", "calibration gate", "sanity check my results", "is this test actually testing anything".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break out of a locked problem frame by picking one disciplined move — reframe, provocation (Po), random stimulus, SCAMPER, inversion, structured analogy, constraint play, or family traversal — and committing to it before evaluating. Use when stuck, when options feel narrow or obvious, when iterations produce variations of the same idea, or when the user says "widen this", "break out of", "think differently", "I'm stuck", "feels too obvious", "stress-test the framing", "what am I missing", or holds two related examples and asks what lies between or beyond them. Complements challenging (which evaluates) and convening-experts (which synthesizes viewpoints); this skill generates distance, not judgment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs a multi-step procedure as a Python DAG, so ordering, branching and retries are enforced by the runner rather than described in prose a model can generate past. Use for "run these steps in order and retry the flaky one until the check passes", "build a pipeline that fetches, validates, then skips the upload when nothing changed", "make sure these steps cannot be skipped", "resume from where it broke instead of redoing the expensive early stages", "run these independent calls at once and merge the results", or any procedure of 3+ steps with branches, input contracts, or side effects that must not block the critical path. Primitives are depends_on, when=, validate=, retry_until=, detached= and journal_path=. Not for a single sequential call, for steps needing reasoning between them that no predicate captures, or for async and distributed work. To audit whether one verification check can actually go red, use gating. To fan work out across many subagents, use a dynamic workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug the AWF firewall by inspecting Docker containers (awf-squid, awf-agent), analyzing Squid access logs, checking iptables rules, and troubleshooting blocked domains or network issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Captures and organizes chaotic brain dumps into a structured, actionable system with zero information loss. Use this skill whenever the user says 'capture this', 'brain dump', 'let me dump some ideas', 'I've got a bunch of thoughts', 'here's everything on my mind', 'idea dump', 'let me get this out of my head', 'I need to organize my thoughts', 'here's what I'm thinking', or any variation where someone is unloading a messy stream of ideas, tasks, thoughts, and plans wanting them turned into something coherent. Also trigger when the user pastes or dictates a long, unstructured block of mixed ideas — even without the exact phrase — the intent is the same. Fast-to-action by design: no upfront intake. Output is four sections (Projects/Ideas, Tasks, Connections, How I Can Help) ending with a directive question. Asks at most one mid-organization clarifying question when a single item is genuinely ambiguous between task and project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when an agent needs to join tiny.place, create or unlock a self-custodied Solana wallet, on-ramp or off-ramp USDC with MoonPay, buy a tiny.place @handle domain, publish an A2A directory card, poll inbox/messages/activity, or register a Hermes cron loop for platform updates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft a reply or a value-add quote tweet for a specific X (Twitter) tweet from its URL. Use to reply in a thread, answer a creator, or quote-tweet with added value. Parses the tweet URL, reads pasted context, decides reply vs quote tweet, and drafts 1-3 variants in your voice. X has no LinkedIn-style 2-level thread flattening, so a reply is just a tweet. Publora has no reply endpoint, so the draft is returned as a copy-paste block to post yourself. Not for top-level posts (use x-post-writer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies the philosophical reasoning of Mary Midgley (British moral philosopher). Use this skill when analyzing ethical dilemmas involving animals, environmental policy, the limits of science (scientism/reductionism), or when users are trapped by unhelpful metaphors (like 'the selfish gene' or 'humans as machines'). Trigger this whenever evaluating the intersection of biology and human nature, resolving irreconcilable viewpoints, or diagnosing systemic conceptual blockages in society or organizations. Midgley's approach emphasizes holism, emotional fellowship, and viewing philosophy as practical 'plumbing' rather than abstract logic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suede Labs skill that lints a local music or media release folder and scores it for release readiness: missing files, weak or malformed metadata, artwork and stem problems, split gaps, rights blockers, and platform-delivery issues, produced by a bundled offline script as a scored markdown and JSON report. Use when a creator has one or more release folders of tracks, artwork, and stems and wants to know what is missing before distributing, delivering, or handing it off; when metadata quality or a delivery rejection is the question; or when a release-readiness score is asked for. Reports what is present, missing, or unknown; never upgrades unknown to confirmed and never means legal clearance. NOT FOR: organizing the evidence behind a rights or split gap the report surfaces (use suede-rights-audit); building the transfer package (use suede-rights-passport); a sync one-sheet (use suede-sync-packaging).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Context-aware line edit that strips generic AI writing patterns without flattening the author's voice, plus a findings-only audit mode that names issues instead of rewriting. Applies contextual rules rather than blanket bans on adverbs, passive voice, and punctuation, and locks facts, numbers, quotes, code, links, and the supplied house style before it touches a sentence. Use before copy, a README, an email, a social post, or a doc ships; after a long assisted-writing session; when the text sounds fine but feels generated; or when the user asks for a findings-only slop audit. NOT FOR: writing new copy from scratch; deciding whether a person or a model wrote text; changing or certifying facts, which must be checked against primary evidence before publication.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding the verdict of a security review - severity and confidence scales, when to block, approve with notes, drop or reject as unreviewable, and the exact comment templates
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the server side of the diff fetches, renders, redirects to or validates a URL that input can influence - webhooks, link previews, import-from-URL, PDF renderers, OAuth/JWKS discovery, allowlist and blocklist checks
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the diff adds, upgrades, re-sources or re-pins a dependency - manifests, lockfiles, go.mod replace, Docker base images, GitHub Actions uses, Terraform modules, submodules, vendored code or curl-pipe-sh installs
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a design task asks you to compare a built screen with its approved design - screenshots at 1440, 768 and 375 attached to the task, Blocker/High/Medium/Nitpick triage, evidence per finding, problems not prescriptions
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when your context carries "The approved design this task builds" - comparing the running UI with the approved hand-off and mockup at each width and state, evidence screenshots attached to the task, Blocker/High/Medium/Nitpick findings and which of them fail the round
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when starting any game task, before writing tests - find out which editors and runners exist on this machine, keep gameplay rules in engine-independent classes with an injected clock and seeded RNG, and report exactly what could not run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when touching multiplayer code - authoritative server, client prediction and reconciliation, interpolation, lockstep and rollback, server-side validation of every RPC per engine (Netcode, Unreal replication, Godot multiplayer, Colyseus, Bevy crates), bandwidth and versioned messages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when starting a Python data or ML project, adding its first tooling, or changing pyproject.toml, the lockfile, the package layout or the lint/type/test configuration — detect the repo's tooling first, then uv, ruff, mypy, pytest and a src layout
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a change trains a model, reports a metric, or touches seeds, data or model versions, the lockfile, MLflow or DVC — what every run must log, seeding, environment pinning, data versioning and keeping tests off the shared tracking server
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task is in code_review - how to read the diff, which findings block, and the verdict move
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。