Supply Chain and Dependency Review

Overview

A dependency is code you run without reviewing it. A diff that adds or changes one asks the reviewer to vouch for code that is not in the diff. You cannot read it all; you can check whether it is known-bad, misspelled, newly hijacked, or able to run code at install time. OWASP Top 10:2025 lists this as A03 Software Supply Chain Failures.

Core principle: judge the dependency change by evidence — advisories, identity, provenance. Unavailable data is never evidence of risk, and an absent measurement is never a clean verdict.

1. Find Every Dependency Change

git diff --name-only "$base" | grep -E 'package(-lock)?\.json|pnpm-lock|yarn\.lock|bun\.lock|go\.(mod|sum)|pom\.xml|\.gradle(\.kts)?|libs\.versions\.toml|requirements.*\.txt|pyproject\.toml|poetry\.lock|uv\.lock|Pipfile|Cargo\.(toml|lock)|Gemfile|Podfile|Package\.resolved|pubspec|\.csproj|packages\.lock\.json|Dockerfile|\.github/workflows|\.terraform\.lock\.hcl|\.gitmodules'
git diff "$base" -- package-lock.json | grep -E '^\+\s+"(node_modules/[^"]+|version|resolved|integrity|hasInstallScript)"'

Also: curl … | sh and wget … | bash in scripts and Dockerfiles, new uses: lines, FROM lines, replace directives, git URLs in manifests, vendored directories.

2. Advisories — Version-Matched

Query OSV for each new or changed name@version. fetch_url is GET-only, so the query goes through run_terminal (a network read, not project code):

curl -s https://api.osv.dev/v1/query \
  -d '{"package":{"name":"lodash","ecosystem":"npm"},"version":"4.17.20"}'

Ecosystem names: npm, PyPI, Go, Maven, crates.io, RubyGems, NuGet, Packagist, Pub. Details of one advisory: fetch_url https://api.osv.dev/v1/vulns/<id>. A cross-check with publish dates and advisory keys: fetch_url https://api.deps.dev/v3/systems/npm/packages/<url-encoded name>/versions/<version>.

Then judge it:

• MAL-… id (OpenSSF malicious packages) → the package is malware: block.
• Critical/high advisory with a fixed version available, on a dependency this diff added or changed → block, naming the fixed version.
• Critical/high with no fix yet, or an advisory whose vulnerable function or config is clearly not used → a non-blocking note.
• A pre-existing vulnerable dependency the diff did not touch → not this review.
• For Go, govulncheck (if installed — read-only-security-scanners) reports whether the vulnerable symbol is actually reachable.

3. Identity — Typosquats, Slopsquats, Confusion

• Typosquat: one edit from a popular name (reqeusts, lodahs, crossenv), a swapped scope (@type/node for @types/node), a separator change (python-dateutil vs dateutil).
• Slopsquat: a name an AI assistant invented that someone then registered. Tells: the package was first published days ago, has one version, no repository link, few or no dependents, and the diff's code uses it in a way that matches its name too neatly. Check the registry page or deps.dev package history.
• Dependency confusion: an internal package name that the build can also resolve from the public registry — pip --extra-index-url (both indexes searched), unscoped npm names with no registry pin in .npmrc, Maven/Gradle repository order putting a public repo before the private one.

A likely typosquat or confusion vector on a new dependency → block.

4. Install-Time Code Execution

• npm: "hasInstallScript": true in package-lock.json for a new package; preinstall/install/postinstall in its manifest.
• Python: an sdist-only release (no wheel) runs setup.py / build backends at install.
• Gradle/Maven plugins, Cargo build.rs, CocoaPods prepare_command.

Not a block by itself — many legitimate packages compile native code — but it turns any identity doubt into a block, and it is why you never install the dependency to look at it.

5. Provenance, Pinning and Drift

• Lockfile drift: a manifest change without a lockfile change (CI resolves something nobody reviewed); a lockfile change with no manifest change; resolved URLs pointing off the registry; an integrity field removed; ranges widened to *, latest or >=.
• Source swaps: a dependency moved to a fork, a git branch or a personal registry; a replace in go.mod pointing at a fork; an http:// Maven repository or allowInsecureProtocol.
• Pin by digest: third-party GitHub Actions by full commit SHA, base images by @sha256:. Tags are mutable: tj-actions/changed-files tags were repointed to a secret-dumping commit in March 2025 (CVE-2025-30066), and in March 2026 76 of 77 aquasecurity/trivy-action tags and all setup-trivy tags were force-pushed to credential-stealing code alongside a malicious Trivy v0.69.4 release (CVE-2026-33634). An unpinned third-party action is a note; one pinned to a tag known to be compromised is a block.
• Maintainer health: archived upstream, single maintainer with a recent ownership transfer, a new major published by a new account. Signals for a note or for deeper checking — never a block alone.

Severity Guide

Malicious package, likely typosquat, or dependency-confusion vector → CRITICAL. Critical/high advisory with a fix on a new or changed dependency → HIGH (block). Unpinned action, missing lockfile update, abandoned upstream → MEDIUM note.

Common Mistakes

• Running npm install, pip install or go get to inspect a package — that executes it.
• Reporting "outdated version" with no advisory.
• Blocking on an advisory for a dev-only tool that never ships, or for a vulnerable function the code cannot reach — say why it does not apply instead.
• Treating "deps.dev returned nothing" as "the package is fine" or as "the package is suspicious".
• Re-reporting pre-existing vulnerable dependencies on every review.

Red Flags

• A new package whose name is a near-miss of one already in the manifest.
• resolved pointing at a non-registry host, or git+https / tarball URLs in a lockfile.
• --extra-index-url added to a pip config, requirements.txt or Dockerfile.
• curl | sh of an unpinned URL in a Dockerfile or CI step.
• uses: some-org/some-action@main (or @v1) in a workflow that has secrets or write permissions.

References (names and links only)

OWASP Top 10:2025 A03 Software Supply Chain Failures · OSV API · deps.dev API · OpenSSF malicious-packages · OpenSSF Scorecard · CVE-2025-30066, CVE-2026-33634