「research」の検索結果

Search and read public Reddit posts, subreddits, and comments via the unauthenticated JSON API. Safe read-only access with SSRF-prevention hostname allowlist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when monitoring online forums (Reddit, HN, ProductHunt) for recurring user pain points, feature requests, and unmet needs. Invoke for market research, pain-point discovery, trend detection, and competitive intelligence. Designed for scheduled execution via CronCreate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research what's genuinely new about a topic in a recent time window. Use when the user asks what's new, recent, or trending on a subject and wants a source-grounded brief rather than a quick lookup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent Brain /brain-research: the decision depends on external evidence or unfamiliar domain context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search the web and fetch page contents with Keenable AI — web search, page extraction, point-in-time queries, prompt-driven content extraction. Use when searching the web for current information, fetching webpage contents, extracting specific data from URLs, or researching topics with citations. Triggers on: web search, search the web, fetch page, read URL, find pages about, current information, Keenable, keen search, research with sources, look up, latest news, find information, check online, what is, who is.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search, post, monitor, and archive on Twitter/X via five tools: the official hosted X MCP server (full-archive search, trends, bookmarks, Articles via xurl bridge), x-search CLI (cost-tracked API v2 research with calendar-day windows, volume counts, multi-query fan-out, feeds, watchlists, posting), xurl (official CLI for any endpoint incl. media/DMs), bird CLI (free session-based reads/writes, frozen at 0.8.0), and Smaug bookmark archival. Triggers on: search tweets, tweets from today, what did X tweet, latest tweets from, tweet volume, expand a Twitter query, check Twitter for, post a tweet, tweet this, post to X, reply on Twitter, full-archive search, what's trending, check mentions, my mentions, timeline, DMs, monitor account, research topic on Twitter, my bookmarks, archive bookmarks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically gather comprehensive travel itinerary requirements through structured discovery questions, MCP-powered research (Perplexity, Exa), and expert detail gathering. Use when users request travel planning, itinerary creation, or trip assistance requiring deep research and personalized requirements gathering. Outputs detailed requirements specification with day-by-day itineraries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research the etymology of a word by tracing proto-language roots, identifying cognates across language families, documenting semantic drift with dated attestations, and flagging folk etymologies. Use when investigating word origins, comparing cognate sets across related languages, charting historical meaning changes, or debunking popular but unsupported origin stories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Redact reverse-engineering findings for public disclosure while preserving methodology, generalizable patterns, and teaching value. Covers the private-vs-public repo split, deny-list pattern maintenance, orphan-commit publish pattern that prevents `git log` leaks, category-based redaction calibration (methodology/pattern/version-finding/internal), and the `check-redaction.sh`-style CI gate that blocks merges when a deny-listed pattern appears. Use when publishing findings about a CLI harness you don't own, when preparing upstream proposals to an unrelated project, or when archiving a private research repo for public reference.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Git-native issue tracking (beads), coding guidelines, knowledge injection, and spec-driven planning for AI agents. Drop-in replacement for bd/Beads with simpler architecture. Use for: tracking issues/beads with dependencies, creating bugs/features/tasks, planning specs, implementing features from specs, code reviews, committing code, creating PRs, loading coding guidelines (TypeScript, Python, TDD, golden testing, Convex, monorepo patterns), code cleanup, research briefs, architecture docs, agent handoffs, and checking out third-party library source code. Invoke when user mentions: tbd, beads, bd, shortcuts, issues, bugs, tasks, features, epics, todo, tracking, specs, planning, implementation, validation, guidelines, templates, commit, PR, pull request, code review, testing, TDD, test-driven, golden testing, snapshot testing, TypeScript, Python, Convex, monorepo, cleanup, dead code, refactor, handoff, research, architecture, labels, search, checkout library, source code review, or any workflow shortcut.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit recent high-relevance papers from a target venue to identify claim-relevant experimental evidence gaps after core P0 results exist. Use for venue completeness and reviewer-risk analysis; not for redefining the research question or running experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Direct a claim-driven research experiment project from post-Idea intake through method realization, prioritized evidence collection, Human Gates, and Evidence Freeze. Use for scientific planning, state transitions, queues, budgets, or recovery; not for running code or independently auditing results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate and scientifically interpret completed research runs, including negative, null, boundary, confounded, failed, and inconclusive outcomes. Use after execution to assess evidence and claim impact; not to edit methods or schedule experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tested reasoning approaches for Claude prompts — 18 variants across 6 categories (Analytical, Strategic, Creative, Technical, Research, Comparative). Use when the user wants a specific reasoning template — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or combining reasoning instructions for a prompt. Trigger on: "give me the Root Cause Diagnosis approach," "show me the reasoning template for," "I need the Evidence Synthesis method," "show me analytical reasoning options," "combine reasoning approaches for," "show me all reasoning variants." Also use when a prompt produces shallow output and the fix is a reasoning upgrade. Provides 18 tested approaches for analytical, strategic, creative, technical, research, and comparison tasks. If the user is unsure which reasoning method fits, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available. Do NOT use for project-level audits — use rootnode-project-audit if available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply WIT (Writing Is Thinking) as a human–LLM collaborative scientific reasoning skill for scientific question formulation, finding-driven research planning, next-experiment selection, Results or Discussion review, claim–evidence and reviewer stress tests, manuscript logic audits, deadline closure, and researcher growth. Use when the user invokes WIT or asks for these question-driven scientific reasoning workflows; do not use for generic copyediting, summarization, or literature search alone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes research papers (PDF/arXiv URL) and converts them into executable code. Automatically activated upon requests for paper replication, algorithm implementation, or research reproduction. Responds to requests like "Implement this paper", "paper2code", "Convert paper to code".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

実装タスクを受け取ったとき、5つの専門エージェントチームでコードベースを調査・議論し、 AI 間の合意形成を経て Plan Mode で実装計画を作成する。 不明点はユーザーに質問し、完璧な計画を立ててから実装する。 バグ修正・新機能・リファクタリング・設定変更など、あらゆる実装タスクに対応。 Use when: 実装を始める前に調査が必要なとき、影響範囲が不明なとき、 複数ファイルにまたがる変更をするとき、慎重に計画を立ててから実装したいとき。 Triggers: "調査してから実装", "team plan", "まず調査", "影響範囲を調べて", "計画を立ててから", "plan before implement", "コードベースを調査して実装", "research first", "調査→計画→実装"

Produce a truthful Japanese App Store metadata pack and app-name shortlist in twelve minutes without a multi-agent research round. Use for a live launch sprint, fallback ASO copy, app naming under a hard deadline, or when local product evidence is available but market research is intentionally deferred.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Developer reference for Senpai's retired direct-GitHub experiment logging workflow. Use only when auditing or migrating legacy research tracks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coach the user through a rigorous, repository-grounded interview to create or improve program.md. Use when a target repository lacks program.md, its goals, metrics, data, or guardrails are unclear, or the user asks to be grilled about an autoresearch setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or improve a Senpai target repository's program.md. Use this skill whenever the user wants to point Senpai at a fresh ML or research target repository, define the research objective, primary metric, benchmark contract, allowed edit boundaries, W&B reporting contract, or prepare a repo for autonomous advisor/student experiment loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep research powered by Exa. Use for lead generation, literature reviews, deep dives, competitive analysis, or any query where one search falls short, including phrases like 'research this', 'find everything about', 'find me all', or 'deep dive on'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research a question across web and academic sources and produce a cited report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research 3–5 confirmed same-industry or cross-industry websites and translate their brand narrative, page architecture, art direction, and visual-system evidence into one reusable Visual Reference Brief. Use when strong references are scarce, a site needs brand-led or premium positioning, a page lacks a narrative spine, or a key module lacks a credible design precedent. Do not create page content, a Design System, UI directions, HTML, or a permanent brand gallery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。