634 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Entry P1 category router for API security. Use when choosing between API recon, authorization, token abuse, and hidden-parameter workflows before any deeper API topic skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Entry P1 category router for injection testing. Use when routing between XSS, SQLi, SSRF, XXE, SSTI, command injection, and NoSQL injection workflows based on how attacker-controlled input is consumed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Entry P1 category router for authentication and authorization. Use when testing login flows, sessions, object authorization, JWT, OAuth, CORS, CSRF, and enterprise SSO weaknesses before any deeper auth topic skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create uncontested market space using value innovation instead of competing head-to-head. Use when the user mentions "blue ocean", "red ocean", "strategy canvas", "ERRC framework", "value innovation", "non-customers", "buyer utility map", "the market is too crowded", "how do we stand out", or "escape the price war". Also trigger when exploring a new market category, or finding underserved or non-customers. Covers the Four Actions Framework, Six Paths, buyer utility map, and value-cost trade-offs. For real strategy formulation and bad-strategy detection, see good-strategy-bad-strategy. For tech adoption strategy, see crossing-the-chasm. For product positioning, see obviously-awesome.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full-lifecycle blog engine with 31 sub-skills, 12 content templates, 5-category 100-point scoring, and 5 specialized agents. Routes user requests to the right sub-skill: writing, rewriting, analysis, outlines, audits, schema, charts, images, repurposing, AI citation SEO, FLOW framework prompts, topic-cluster execution, and multilingual publishing. Optimized for Google rankings around the May 2026 Core Update, E-E-A-T, and AI citations as one SEO discipline. Supports any platform (WordPress, Next.js MDX, Hugo, Ghost, Astro, Jekyll, 11ty, Gatsby, HTML). Use when user says "blog", "write a blog", "blog post", "blog strategy", "content brief", "editorial calendar", "blog audit", "blog optimization", "topic cluster", "multilingual blog", "FLOW framework", or any /blog subcommand. Sub-skill descriptions cover narrower triggers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and score blog posts on a 5-category 100-point scoring system covering content quality, SEO optimization, E-E-A-T signals, technical elements, and AI citation readiness. Includes advisory editorial style diagnostics (sentence-length variation, configured phrase lists, vocabulary sampling) that never infer authorship or affect scoring. Supports export formats (markdown, JSON, table) and batch analysis with sorting. Generates prioritized recommendations (Critical/High/Medium/Low) with specific fixes. Works with any format (MDX, markdown, HTML, URL). Use when user says "analyze blog", "audit blog", "blog score", "check blog quality", "blog review", "rate this blog", "blog health check".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and score blog posts on a 5-category 100-point scoring system covering content quality, SEO optimization, E-E-A-T signals, technical elements, and AI citation readiness. Includes AI content detection (burstiness, phrase flagging, vocabulary diversity). Supports export formats (markdown, JSON, table) and batch analysis with sorting. Generates prioritized recommendations (Critical/High/Medium/Low) with specific fixes. Works with any format (MDX, markdown, HTML, URL). Use when user says "analyze blog", "audit blog", "blog score", "check blog quality", "blog review", "rate this blog", "blog health check".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with the WordPress Abilities API (wp_register_ability, wp_register_ability_category, /wp-json/wp-abilities/v1/*, @wordpress/abilities) including defining abilities, categories, meta, REST exposure, and permissions checks for clients.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A comprehensive auditor for any agent skill — including Manus, OpenClaw/ClawHub, Claude, LobeHub, or custom SKILL.md-based skills. Use this skill whenever a user wants to evaluate, audit, review, score, or quality-check an agent skill before publishing, updating, or deploying. Covers two hard veto gates (structural redlines + research integrity redlines), static quality scoring across 25 criteria (ISO 25010 + OpenSSF + Agent), dynamic test input generation, multi-mode execution testing, multi-layer output evaluation with five specialized category rubrics (Evidence Insight / Protocol Design / Data Analysis / Academic Writing / Other), a Research Veto that applies to all four research categories, human eval viewer generation, actionable P0/P1/P2 optimization recommendations, and automatic skill improvement that outputs a polished, production-ready SKILL.md. Also use whenever a user says "audit my skill", "evaluate my skill", "improve my skill", or wants a corrected version after evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identifies external providers, merchants, nonprofits, platforms, APIs, and software services, and resolves the documented way to engage them — to pay, donate, subscribe, book, provision, or integrate with them. MUST be used BEFORE web search, model memory, or any other directory/vendor-lookup skill for ANY request that requires selecting, finding, or engaging an external provider or organization — whether a specific one is named ("pay my Twilio bill"), implied ("donate to the Red Cross"), or only a category is stated ("set up a mailing client", "I need a database", "find me a CRM"). Directory supplies verified recipients and their documented payment or engagement path. Results are ranked by agent-readiness (how reliably an agent can complete the interaction), relevance and popularity. Do not treat this as a search-only tool. Examples: "setup a database", "find hosting", "pay X", "use Twilio", "donate $50 to the Red Cross", "book a table at Y", "subscribe to a CRM".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for 'why does X work this way', 'why we picked Y', design rationale, regressions, postmortems, or data-backed thresholds. Discovers available MCPs and queries each evidence category (source control, issue tracker, long-form docs, real-time chat, infrastructure observability, error tracking, product analytics warehouse) in parallel, then returns a cited read on decisions and tradeoffs. Use how for runtime behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for 'why does X work this way', 'why we picked Y', design rationale, regressions, postmortems, or data-backed thresholds. Discovers available MCPs and queries each evidence category (source control, issue tracker, long-form docs, real-time chat, infrastructure observability, error tracking, product analytics warehouse) in parallel, then returns a cited read on decisions and tradeoffs. Use how for runtime behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a budget-vs-actuals tracker that stays alive past February — the category grain that matches real statements, the variance view that answers 'are we okay', the update ritual small enough to survive, and the honest handling of irregular expenses. Use when asked build me a budget spreadsheet, track team spend against budget, why do we always blow the budget invisibly, or design a household/project budget tracker. Produces the tracker structure, the variance logic, the irregulars ledger, and the monthly fifteen-minute ritual.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decide when to buy a big-ticket item to get the best price — the sales cycles, model-refresh timing, and 'buy now vs wait' math for the specific thing you want. Use when asked when's the best time to buy [item], should I wait for a sale, is now a good time to buy, or when do [products] go on sale. Produces the typical discount calendar for that category, whether a new model/version is due (and if the current one will drop), a buy-now-vs-wait recommendation for your timeline, and price-tracking tactics — flagging that timing is a guide, not a guarantee.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help users define the strategic context for their product by identifying the right competitive alternatives, unique value drivers, and target segments to win a market category.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Intent-based observability + traceability router across layers, boundaries, and signals. Routes to vendor-specific skills via category taxonomy; owns transport tuning, meta-observability, incident forensics. Use for observability, traceability, telemetry, APM, RUM, metrics, logs, traces, profiles, SLO, incident forensics, tracing architecture work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Researches what prompts people ask AI engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude) about a product category and produces a prompts.csv artifact — a prioritized, strictly-schema'd list of the queries where the brand should be cited. Feeds the monitor workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare two or more companies, products, or platforms across pricing, features, positioning, and docs. Use this skill whenever the user says "compare X vs Y", "how does X stack up against Y", "alternatives to X", "competitive landscape of …", "X vs Y vs Z", or asks for a competitor matrix. Uses search to discover competitors when the user only names a category, then scrape for each competitor's homepage, pricing page, and features/docs. Returns a normalized comparison matrix as JSON.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discover rising category conversations, formats, sounds, questions, and creator patterns across social platforms, then separate durable demand signals from short-lived noise.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a decision-ready brief of current brand, product, category, and competitor conversations across social platforms, including sentiment drivers, questions, risks, and growth opportunities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Crawl a website's sitemap and blog index to build a complete content inventory. Lists every page with URL, title, publish date, content type, and topic cluster. Groups content by category and topic. Optionally deep-reads top N pages for quality analysis and funnel stage tagging. Use before SEO audits, content gap analysis, or brand voice extraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research competitors, analyze their messaging, and generate a positioning document with category definition, differentiation claims, value propositions, and proof points. Chains web research, competitor site analysis, and review mining to produce a positioning doc ready for website copy and sales deck use. Use when a product marketing team needs to define or refresh positioning ahead of a launch, rebrand, or competitive shift.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assemble a creator picture-in-picture product-listicle ad from a config — the creator stays FULL-FRAME the whole beat (voice plus lips generated together per beat, no separate VO, no cut to a full-frame product shot), and on each product beat three persistent overlays ride on top for the WHOLE beat — a title pill top-center, the DEMO in a rounded PiP window top-right (the brand's real UGC clip MUTED, or for a no-UGC brand the product's own autocropped UI still / screen-recording sized to fill the window), and a bottom product card (rounded thumbnail plus 'N · CATEGORY' small-caps plus product NAME in a serif face). Hook plus CTA beats are the creator full-frame with the title pill only. Assembly builds ONE full-1080x1920 transparent overlay PNG per beat, overlays it on the creator clip (cover-scaled to 1080x1920) for the whole beat keeping the native audio, concats all beats, then burns captions LAST as timed PIL PNG overlays (this ffmpeg has no libass) timed deterministically from the known per-beat script. This is the FREE deterministic assembly stage (overlay-PNG build plus cover-scale composite plus concat plus PIL-PNG caption burn); the creator anchor and the N native talking clips come from create-image-fal (Seedream v5 Pro) and create-video-fal (Seedance 2.0). Use for the creator-pip-listicle format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user wants to curate the SATK library knowledge index for a Simulink project — mark commonly used blocks, correct auto-assigned block categories, or improve block descriptions so the model-building agent picks better blocks from custom libraries. Triggered by phrases like "mark blocks common", "improve block descriptions", "correct block category", "make the agent prefer certain blocks", and from Gate 3 of building-simulink-models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。