「clarity」の検索結果

Audit and rewrite a TikTok profile for 2026: photo, name (searchable), username, bio (80 chars, niche clarity is everything), link (unlocks at 1k followers, plus a pre-1k workaround), up to 3 pinned videos as proof, and one-line positioning. A profile visit follows a video, so the bio must instantly answer "what do I get if I follow". Triggers on "review my TikTok profile", "fix my TikTok bio", "what to pin on TikTok", "profile audit", "niche bio". Not for writing a video script (use tt-hook-scripter).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews Python code across type safety, error handling, security, performance, modern patterns, design clarity, typed-boundary compliance, test quality, and documentation. Use when performing code review, PR review, pre-merge quality checks, or assessing Python for security vulnerabilities, bare except clauses, Any usage outside boundaries, or missing input validation at system boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review documentation for quality, clarity, SEO, and technical correctness. Optimized for Docus/Nuxt Content but works with any Markdown documentation. Use when asked to: "review docs", "check documentation", "audit docs", "validate documentation", "improve docs quality", "analyze documentation", "check my docs", "review my documentation pages", "validate MDC syntax", "check for SEO issues", "analyze doc structure". Provides actionable recommendations categorized by priority (Critical, Important, Nice-to-have).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Initialize or improve AGENTS.md files that define how coding agents operate in a repo. Use when asked to set up or replace an agent init command (Codex, Claude), standardize multi-agent behavior, or audit an existing AGENTS.md for clarity, commands, boundaries, and repo-specific context. For Claude Code, also create CLAUDE.md as a symlink to AGENTS.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Contribute documentation improvements to an OSS repo. Identifies doc gaps, studies the docs system, and verifies accuracy against source code. Use when contributing documentation to an open source project, fixing outdated setup instructions, adding missing API docs, or improving README clarity. Not for writing docs for your own project — this is for contributing docs to someone else's repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prompt engineering standards and context engineering principles for AI agents based on Anthropic best practices. Covers clarity, structure, progressive discovery, and optimization for signal-to-noise ratio.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and refine GitHub Well-Architected Framework (WAF) documentation under the content/ folder for clarity, precision, consistency, and publication readiness. Use this when reviewing pull requests, markdown files, or draft content in content/ to ensure guidance is unambiguous, readable, and aligned with editorial standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate, rank, and gate a reusable hook bank — sourced pains × named hook formula families, scored on clarity/specificity/curiosity/proof-backing, gated at the 10/16 ad threshold, delivered in 3 lengths with per-hook provenance and downstream routing. Use when "hook bank", "generate hooks", "hook generator", "write hooks for", "ad hooks", "scroll stoppers", "opening lines", "hook ideas", "first 3 seconds", "hook matrix", "I need 50 hooks", or any request to batch-produce attention-openers for ads, social, or video.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use apko to build small OCI images from declarative package manifests when supply-chain clarity and minimal contents matter more than a conventional Dockerfile flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use REUSE when an agent needs file-level licensing clarity instead of guessing from a single top-level LICENSE file. The agent checks compliance, adds or verifies SPDX headers, pulls missing license texts into LICENSES/, and produces a concrete remediation list or SPDX export.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rates any SKILL.md on a 0-100 scale across 10 dimensions with a SHIP / REWORK / SCRAP verdict. Evaluates trigger precision, instruction clarity, output predictability, edge case coverage, anti-hallucination guardrails, developer experience, composability, open-source readiness, wow factor, and real-world utility. No flattery — calibrated against Anthropic's own skill-creator rubric. Use this skill whenever someone says "score this skill", "rate my skill", "is this skill good", "skill review", "skill audit", "roast my SKILL.md", "grade this", "will this skill work", "evaluate my skill", "how good is this", or pastes a SKILL.md and asks for feedback. Also trigger when comparing two skills, benchmarking a skill collection, or asking "what's wrong with this skill" — even without the word "score".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user says 'audit my conversion rate', 'cro check', 'find conversion leaks', or asks what is hurting conversion before a paid campaign or after a redesign. Scores six friction dimensions: above-the-fold clarity, CTA hierarchy, form length, social proof, speed, trust signals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a raw product idea into build-ready docs — one doc per EPIC with locked decisions, exact API contracts, a story-by-story priority plan, and an execute.md handoff Claude can build from across sessions. Gets the clarity by interrogating the user through a roster of expert personas that grill, counter, and refuse to flatter. Use to ideate, validate, scope, architect, or plan a product, feature, startup, or app before any code is written. Invoke by persona name or acronym to summon one expert, or with no argument to run the full lifecycle end to end.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing the imp codebase for structural debt, dead code, god-objects/files, duplication, flag sprawl, or deciding whether a cleanup is worth shipping - "structure audit", "tech debt", "is this still used", "dead code", "refactor for clarity", "should we split this file", "remove this flag", "file size gate red", "alloc sites gate red". Do NOT use for build/test mechanics (building-and-testing), perf/kernel work (benchmark-cuda / sm120-cuda-expert), or output quality (check-degeneration).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidelines for structuring and documenting Jupyter notebooks for reproducibility and clarity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sets the AI to act as an expert in HTML, Tailwind CSS, and vanilla JavaScript, focusing on clarity and readability for all HTML, JS, and CSS files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collaborative document creation via a structured three-stage workflow. Use for writing specs, PRDs, design docs, proposals, RFCs, and any long-form document where quality and clarity matter. Brainstorms 5-20 options per section, builds iteratively, and tests with reader sub-agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve how interfaces use photos, screenshots, icons, illustrations, and user-uploaded media so visuals support clarity instead of undermining it. Use when the user mentions images, screenshots, background photos, hero images, icon sizing, user-uploaded media, crops, overlays, or image readability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, structure, or improve form interfaces for clarity, completion rates, and user confidence. Use when the user asks to build a form, redesign a form flow, improve form conversion, add multi-step forms, fix form UX, or structure field layouts and validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prevents premature execution on ambiguous requests. Analyzes request clarity using 5W1H decomposition, surfaces hidden assumptions, and generates structured clarifying questions before work begins. Use at the start of any non-trivial task, or when a request could be interpreted multiple ways. Triggers on "뭘 원하는건지", "요구사항 정리", "clarify", "what exactly", "scope", "requirements", "정확히 뭘", "before we start".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates and scores Claude prompts and system prompts using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics. Trigger on: "review my prompt," "score this prompt," "rate my prompt," "evaluate this prompt," "improve my prompt," "what's wrong with my prompt." Also trigger on: "why isn't my prompt working," "my prompt produces bad output," "help me fix this prompt," "is this prompt any good." Scorecard covers Objective Clarity, Context Specificity, Reasoning Fit, Output Precision, Behavioral Calibration, and Architectural Efficiency, plus a five-question Output Evaluation Rubric for assessing actual output. Also use when the user pastes a system prompt and asks for feedback. Activate whenever structured quality assessment of a single prompt is the primary need. Do NOT use for project-level audits involving Custom Instructions architecture, knowledge file organization, or multi-file Project structure (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a B2B SaaS product needs upstream positioning or messaging clarity — defining who it's for, the category, competitive alternatives, differentiation, value props, strategic narrative, or a messaging hierarchy. Triggers include "my messaging isn't working," "we sound like everyone else," repositioning, or auditing an existing positioning doc. Use before homepage, deck, or sales-narrative work. Not for writing the final copy (use copywriter-skill) or running the sales process (use sales-skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs to write, rewrite, review, or critique commercial copy meant to drive a reader toward action — landing pages, hero sections, headlines, email (cold outreach, nurture, promo, launch), CTAs, microcopy, product descriptions, value propositions, ads, or taglines. Also for copy audits, clarity checks, conversion reviews, or choosing a framework (AIDA, PAS, BAB, FAB, 4U's). Applies even when the user just says "write me an email" or "review this page." Not for channel/budget strategy (use channel-expert) or pricing structure (use pricing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cultivate defensive situational awareness, threat assessment, and mental clarity under pressure. Covers the Cooper color code awareness system, body language reading and intent detection, verbal de-escalation, moving mindfulness in public spaces, combat focus and the OODA loop, rapid grounding techniques for acute stress, context-specific integration, and ongoing review and refinement of awareness skills. Use when entering unfamiliar or potentially hostile environments, needing to assess a situation for safety, de-escalating a verbal confrontation, or integrating awareness practice into daily movement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。