「cost analysis」の検索結果

Run a structured 5-day process to prototype, test, and validate product ideas with real users. Use when the user mentions "design sprint", "validate before we build", "rapid prototype", "test with users", or "should we build this". Also trigger when a team is stuck in endless debate over a high-stakes product decision, or wants to de-risk a costly idea before investing in development. Covers mapping, sketching, deciding, prototyping, and testing across Monday-Friday. For ongoing experimentation and MVPs, see lean-startup. For customer job analysis, see jobs-to-be-done. For non-leading user interviews, see mom-test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add file-based observability, tracing, and run analysis to LLM/agent experiments — per-turn transcripts, tool calls and results, reasoning traces, token/cost accounting, per-episode artifacts, plus terminal viewers and a run-comparison report. Platform-agnostic: one small adapter covers OpenAI, Gemini/Vertex, Anthropic, LiteLLM, Tinker, vLLM, or any custom inference stack, and the same tooling then works unchanged. Use this skill whenever the user wants observability, tracing, logging, or run tracking for model experiments; asks why an agent failed a task or wants to replay/debug/diff an episode; wants to compare models, arms, or ablations; wants to instrument a new folder, repo, or platform ("add observability here", "do the same for Tinker/Gemini/OpenAI"); wants to import or tie in existing experiment results so old runs show up alongside new ones; or wants eval runner scripts where many models share one protocol. Reach for this even when they only say "log what the model is doing", "I can't tell what happened in this run", or "set up traces for this experiment".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans, runs, and optimizes paid acquisition across search, social, and display — account structure, targeting, creative, bidding, budget, and the analysis that says whether to scale or stop. Use this to set up or restructure campaigns, write and iterate ad creative, diagnose rising costs or falling performance, decide budget allocation, or judge whether a channel is working.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, create, and configure production-ready Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) clusters. Covers Day-0 checklist, SKU selection (Automatic vs Standard), networking options (private API server, Azure CNI Overlay, egress configuration), security, and operations (autoscaling, upgrade strategy, cost analysis). WHEN: create AKS environment, provision AKS, enable AKS observability, design AKS networking, choose AKS SKU, secure AKS, optimize AKS, AKS spot nodes, AKS cluster-autoscaler, rightsize AKS pod, pod rightsizing, over-provisioned AKS pod, pod resource requests and limits, Vertical Pod Autoscaler, VPA recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a blameless postmortem for an incident caused by an AI agent or LLM feature — hallucinated facts shipped to users, runaway tool use, prompt injection, cost blowouts, or wrong actions taken autonomously. Use when asked to write up an AI incident, analyse why an agent did something wrong, or produce corrective actions after an LLM failure. Produces a structured postmortem with trace reconstruction, a root-cause layer analysis, and corrective actions including a permanent regression case. For non-AI production incidents use incident-postmortem.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walmart profit margin calculator for sellers. Calculate cost breakdowns including WFS fulfillment, storage fees, and referral fees. Includes comparison with Amazon FBA and lower competition advantage analysis. No API key required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

App stack advisor — essential apps by business stage, cost optimization, performance impact analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Export Claude Code session and analytics data in JSON, CSV, or Markdown formats. Supports exporting sessions, events, costs, and analytics for external analysis or reporting. Use for data backup or integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find the decisions in a pipeline that do not need the expensive model and propose the gate for each: a rule, a classic classifier, or a small model, with fail-closed routing. Use when the user asks to cut model costs or latency, says the big model handles everything, or wants a triage / routing / filter layer in front of an agent. Analysis plus an optional baseline scaffold. Do NOT use for auditing context layout (context-audit) or for building eval suites (evals-bootstrap).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Form optimization for lead capture, contact, demo request, application, and checkout forms. Covers field-cost analysis, multi-step form design, validation UX, mobile optimization, and A/B testing frameworks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pull Google Ads performance data and generate reports. Use when asked about ad campaign performance, keyword costs, quality scores, ROAS, conversion tracking, or ad spend analysis. Trigger phrases: "google ads", "adwords", "campaign performance", "ad spend", "quality score", "CPC report", "ROAS", "ad conversion", "keyword performance", "google ads report".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full trip planning orchestration. Combines flight search, hotel search, and points optimization into one cost analysis. Use when the user says "plan a trip" or wants the complete picture for a destination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute autonomous multi-step research using Google Gemini Deep Research Agent. Use for: market analysis, competitive landscaping, literature reviews, technical research, due diligence. Takes 2-10 minutes but produces detailed, cited reports. Costs $2-5 per task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger for: Labor-Hour IGCE, LH estimate, Time-and-Materials IGCE, T&M estimate, burdened hourly rate, burden multiplier, labor-category ceiling hours, materials estimate, proposed LH/T&M rate validation, price-reasonableness memo, or fair-and-reasonable analysis. Build auditable LH/T&M estimates using BLS OEWS wages, explicit burden multipliers, GSA CALC+ positioning, GSA Per Diem travel, and separately priced T&M materials. Do NOT use for FFP, cost-reimbursement, grants, or cooperative agreements. Requires the bls-oews, gsa-calc, and gsa-perdiem MCP servers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Real-time tax liability analysis for active crypto traders with proportional cost basis, gain classification, and tax-aware trading signals

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "review architecture", "Well-Architected review", "check bestpractices", "security assessment",or "cost optimization analysis".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reusable prompt templates for construction AI tasks: cost estimation, schedule analysis, document processing, BIM queries. Structured prompts for consistent results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

What-if analysis for construction projects: model different scenarios and their cost/schedule/resource impacts. Compare alternatives and optimize decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform value engineering analysis using CWICR data. Identify cost-saving alternatives while maintaining function and quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and predict construction change orders using ML. Classify change order types, predict costs and schedule impacts, identify patterns, and optimize approval workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical due diligence for M&A, investment, or acquisition. Reads a target company's codebase and generates a comprehensive tech DD report with architecture assessment, tech debt quantification, scalability analysis, security posture, team capability inference, build system quality, test coverage, deployment maturity, and open source license risks. Outputs tech-dd-report.md formatted like a real investment memo with risk ratings, remediation costs, and go/no-go recommendation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates which SaaS tools can be replaced with AI agents. Takes a list of current SaaS subscriptions with costs, assesses replacement feasibility, estimates build vs buy economics, identifies Claude+MCP alternatives, and generates a comprehensive replacement plan with priority matrix, ROI analysis, implementation timeline, and risk assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research and advise on the best way to approach a software project, including architecture, tech stack, implementation strategy, pricing/operating-cost tradeoffs, benchmark research, and comparisons with similar real-world projects. Use before building, mid-build, or after completion when the user asks for project strategy, optimal approach, research comparables, similar projects, stack selection, vendor/service choice, repo analysis, architecture critique, implementation feedback, or a prioritized improvement plan. Avoid for narrow single-bug debugging or isolated file edits unless the user asks for broader project direction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, diagnose, and verify performance budgets, latency targets, load tests, capacity estimates, bottleneck analysis, caching strategy, query efficiency, queue throughput, and regression gates. Use when a feature may be slow, a system must scale, a performance regression is suspected, or release readiness depends on throughput, cost, memory, CPU, or response time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。