「criteria」の検索結果

AIエージェントに任せる開発を、完了条件の定義、作業分割、実装前後の評価で進め、難易度に応じたモデル選択と費用・時間の記録まで整理するスキル。

• AIエージェントに任せる開発の計画
• 大きな変更を検証可能な作業に分けたいとき
• 実装前後の評価を比較したいとき

Parallelを使い、Web検索や詳しい調査、企業一覧への情報追加を進めます。ページ内容の抽出、条件に合う企業の発見、継続的な変化の監視も扱うスキル。

• Web調査でサービスを比較したいとき
• 企業一覧に所在地や売上を追加したいとき
• 条件に合う企業を集めたいとき

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce QA acceptance criteria and a manual validation plan for a feature change — golden path, edge cases, error states, performance limits, and explicit pass/fail evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the SPARC Specification phase — gather requirements, define acceptance criteria, identify constraints, and store the spec in memory

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks an AI team run against its acceptance criteria using the evidence bundle. Use when the user asks whether the work is done or correct, or before completing a run. Separates verified evidence from agent claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing a blog, news site, or YMYL content site for trust signals, drafting editorial policy page content, or evaluating whether a site meets Google's quality rater trustworthiness criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Supports research proposal preparation and review for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan NSTC, including opportunity-specific requirements, aims, review criteria, budgets, broader impacts, forms, and resubmissions. Use for investigator-authored grant development, compliance matrices, and proposal critiques.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Queries the 1000 Genomes Project dataset (3,202 whole-genome-sequenced individuals, GRCh38) at the level of individual participants. Use when a question is about individuals or variants in the 1000 Genomes Project cohort: which individuals carry variants matching specific criteria in a gene or region, which individuals are homozygous-reference at a position, which variants exist in the dataset or carried by specified individuals in a gene or region, the relatedness between two specified individuals. Variants are returned with 1000 Genomes allele frequencies (AF), gnomAD v4.1 exome and genome AF, AlphaMissense score, and HGVSp annotations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans, executes, and documents validation, verification, and transfer of analytical procedures under the governing framework - ICH Q2(R2) and Q14, USP <1220>/<1225>/<1226>, ICH M10 bioanalytical, CLSI EP, or ISO/IEC 17025. Use for HPLC, LC-MS/MS, GC, CE, ICP-MS, dissolution, qNMR, qPCR, NIR, and ligand binding or cell-based assays whenever the question is whether a procedure is fit for its intended purpose. Triggers include "method validation", "analytical method validation", "AMV", "validation protocol", "acceptance criteria", "linearity", "reportable range", "accuracy and precision", "repeatability", "intermediate precision", "recovery", "LOD", "LOQ", "detection limit", "quantitation limit", "specificity", "robustness", "method transfer", "method comparison", "Deming", "Passing-Bablok", "Bland-Altman", "equivalence testing", "OOS investigation", "ICH Q2", "Q2(R2)", "Q14", "USP 1225", "ICH M10", "incurred sample reanalysis", "ISR", "CLSI EP", and any request to show that an assay works.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage open pull requests from external contributors to prisma/orm and produce a per-PR verdict with evidence. Use when a maintainer asks to triage, evaluate, assess, or review the queue of incoming contributor PRs, to decide whether a fork PR is safe to run CI on, to check whether a PR is in scope for its version line, or to find stale contributor PRs. Applies the criteria in docs/oss/pr-triage.md. Read-only by default — it reports verdicts and does not close PRs, post comments, or approve workflow runs unless the maintainer asks for that separately.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve AI application with evaluation-driven development. Define eval criteria, instrument the application, build golden datasets, observe and evaluate application runs, analyze results, and produce a concrete action plan for improvements. ALWAYS USE THIS SKILL when the user asks to set up QA, add tests, add evals, evaluate, benchmark, fix wrong behaviors, improve quality, or do quality assurance for any Python project that calls an LLM model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quickly screen inbound deal flow — CIMs, teasers, and broker materials — against the fund's investment criteria. Extracts key deal metrics, runs a pass/fail framework, and outputs a one-page screening memo. Use when reviewing new deal flow, triaging inbound materials, or deciding whether to take a first call. Triggers on "screen this deal", "review this CIM", "should we look at this", "triage this teaser", or "deal screening".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate and publish a project status artifact — an opinionated, tabbed status page for a project too big for one update (overview & success criteria, the workstream sequence, next steps, plus background, plan, risks & open questions, and decisions/FAQ when they earn a tab) — published with the built-in Artifact tool to a default-private claude.ai page the user can share with teammates. Use when a piece of work spans several workstreams and you want a shareable overview kept current. Each artifact is backed by a small per-project config in the plugin data dir, so refreshing it re-gathers live state, redeploys the same URL, and reports only the delta. For software projects whose workstreams are PRs, also read swe.md (the X.Y PR-numbering convention; pulling PR state with gh/git; a per-PR detail block). Needs the built-in Artifact tool (claude.ai login). Not for single-PR changes or public docs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Goal-driven finance research workflow: attach a research-only objective, track criteria, and add evidence while avoiding live trading execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Supply-chain bottleneck arbitrage. Given a super-trend (AI infra, energy transition, defense, semiconductor reshoring, space economy), decompose its physical supply chain down to Layer 2/3 choke points (optics, lasers, InP/SOI substrates, IC substrates, probe cards, specialty fiberglass...) and surface under-the-radar listed companies sitting on each bottleneck. Scores each link on 6 scarcity criteria, applies mandatory valuation gates (PS/PE/safety-margin) via the financial_rigor tool, and Munger-style reverse-validates. Outputs a ranked bottleneck opportunity board. Use when the user wants hidden beneficiaries of a structural trend rather than already-priced leaders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a structured SOC escalation matrix defining severity tiers, response SLAs, tiered escalation paths, and notification procedures for security incidents, using context-driven criteria that combine business risk, asset criticality, and data sensitivity. Use when designing or revising how a SOC triages and escalates incidents across analyst tiers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and documents structured incident response playbooks with step-by-step procedures per incident type, decision trees, escalation criteria, RACI matrices, and SOAR platform integration, aligned to NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL. Use when creating or maturing an IR program, documenting response runbooks for a new incident type, or designing SOAR playbooks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find leads matching criteria and bulk-add them to an Apollo outreach sequence. Handles enrichment, contact creation, deduplication, and enrollment in one flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Makes sure no inbound lead goes unanswered. Watches web forms, the shared inbox, and the CRM for new inquiries, qualifies each one against the owner's criteria, drafts a reply in the owner's voice with real meeting times for the owner to approve and send, routes anything hot to a human right away, and logs the whole thing to the CRM. Never sends on its own. Built to run on a schedule so overnight inquiries are drafted and sorted by morning, and works from forwarded or pasted inquiries when no connector is available. Use this whenever the owner is worried about inbound leads or response time — including phrasings like "leads are going cold," "did anyone answer that inquiry," "I keep missing form submissions," "nothing falls through the cracks," "handle my inbound," "respond to this lead," or "we lose people because nobody gets back fast enough." Reach for it for a single unanswered inquiry as readily as for a standing setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build targeted account or contact lists using Common Room's Prospector. Triggers on 'find companies that match [criteria]', 'build a prospect list', 'find contacts at [type of company]', 'show me companies hiring [role]', or any list-building request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a feature spec or PRD from a problem statement or feature idea. Use when turning a vague idea or user request into a structured document, scoping a feature with goals and non-goals, defining success metrics and acceptance criteria, or breaking a big ask into a phased spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。