「edge cases」の検索結果

Ensure requirement docs define scope, terminology, acceptance criteria, edge cases, and non-functional requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find missing tests for critical paths, edge cases, and failure handling in changed code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensure tests use clear naming and cover edge cases with proper describe/it structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get paid from day one. Payments, subscriptions, billing portal, webhooks, metered billing, Stripe Connect. The complete guide to implementing Stripe correctly, including all the edge cases that will bite you at 3am. This isn't just API calls - it's the full payment system: handling failures, managing subscriptions, dealing with dunning, and keeping revenue flowing. Use when: stripe, payments, subscription, billing, checkout.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pitfalls, examples, and edge cases for FETIH Kanban workers. The lifecycle itself is auto-injected into every worker's system prompt as KANBAN_GUIDANCE (from agent/prompt_builder.py); this skill is what you load when you want deeper detail on specific scenarios.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze existing code and write comprehensive unit and integration tests for it. Detects the test framework, identifies untested code paths, and generates tests with proper mocking, edge cases, and assertions. Use when the user asks to add tests, improve coverage, or test a specific module.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep, excruciating code review. Use anytime to analyze code for correctness, edge cases, security, performance, and design issues. Not tied to baseline—this is pure code analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a structured test plan for a feature or module — covers unit, integration, contract, and edge cases without writing implementation code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a structured test plan for a feature or module — covers unit, integration, contract, and edge cases without writing any implementation code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Eng manager-mode plan review. Lock in the execution plan — architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test coverage, performance. Walks through issues interactively with opinionated recommendations. Use when asked to "review the architecture", "engineering review", or "lock in the plan". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan or design doc and is about to start coding — to catch architecture issues before implementation. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "tech review", "technical review", "plan engineering review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code changes for correctness, completeness, bugs, edge cases, and quality. Load when the user explicitly asks to review code, check a PR, review a diff, audit recent changes, or verify an implementation matches requirements. Also triggers on "review this code", "check this PR", "review my changes", "code review", "did this implement correctly", "audit this diff", or any explicit request for a formal code review. Do NOT load for "review changes for context" or "review what happened" — those are requests to read code, not to perform a formal review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design structured evaluation rubrics for scoring LLM and agent outputs — defining quality dimensions, scoring scales, hard gates, score descriptions, and edge cases. Load when the user asks to create an eval rubric, define evaluation criteria, design scoring dimensions, write an eval spec, or says "what should I evaluate", "design a rubric", "create eval criteria", "define quality dimensions", "evaluation rubric for", "how do I measure quality of". Sub-skill of eval-output orchestrator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes PHP codebase for test coverage gaps. Detects untested classes, methods, branches, exception paths, and edge cases. Provides actionable recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when explaining concepts at different expertise levels, moving between abstract principles and concrete implementation, identifying edge cases by testing ideas against scenarios, designing layered documentation, decomposing complex problems into actionable steps, or bridging strategy-execution gaps. Invoke when user mentions abstraction levels, making concepts concrete, or explaining at different depths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision framework for choosing between regex and LLM when parsing structured text — start with regex, add LLM only for low-confidence edge cases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pitfalls, examples, and edge cases for Hermes Kanban workers. The lifecycle itself is auto-injected into every worker's system prompt as KANBAN_GUIDANCE (from agent/prompt_builder.py); this skill is what you load when you want deeper detail on specific scenarios.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add focused Bun unit tests for mission-critical behavior and edge cases — not blanket coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are a test automation expert specializing in generating comprehensive, maintainable unit tests across multiple languages and frameworks. Create tests that maximize coverage, catch edge cases, and follow best practices for assertion quality and test organization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates comprehensive unit tests with AAA pattern (Arrange-Act-Assert), edge cases, error scenarios, and coverage analysis. Creates test files matching source structure with complete test suites. Use for "unit testing", "test generation", "Jest tests", or "test coverage".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。