「how」の検索結果

Define a brand's verbal identity — tone, voice, writing style, vocabulary, and messaging rules. Use when the user says "brand voice", "tone of voice", "how should we write", "writing guidelines", "copy style guide", "brand language", "verbal identity", "how should the brand sound", "tone guide", "our copy doesn't sound right", "copywriter guidelines", "voice and tone", or when onboarding a copywriter or content team. Also use when the user has a brand strategy and wants to define how the brand communicates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze how competitors present their brand — identity, messaging, positioning, voice, and visual style — to find gaps and opportunities. Use when the user says "competitor brand analysis", "analyze competitor brands", "how do competitors position themselves", "competitor messaging", "competitor identity", "what are competitors saying", "benchmark competitors", "competitive brand landscape", "how do we compare to competitors", "competitive audit", or wants to understand the brand landscape before defining their own position.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Estimate pages needed for topical authority. Go/no-go decision before investing months in content. Triggers on: "how much content do I need", "topical authority estimate", "content moat", "how many articles", "content gap analysis", "can I compete in this niche", "content investment calculator", "is this niche worth the effort", "SEO feasibility", "how many pages to rank", "content volume needed", "competitive content analysis", "moat calculation", "authority gap", "should I invest in this niche".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision protocol for wrapping a REST / GraphQL / RPC API as a tool an LLM agent can call. The load-bearing premise: the *tool surface* is an LM-friendly subset of the *API surface* — one tool per user intent, not one per endpoint. Activates when a coder agent must expose an external HTTP API to a model (function calling, tool_use, MCP, LangChain `@tool`, CrewAI `BaseTool`). Encodes the *what to surface, how to name, how to shape, how to fail* — not any single framework's API. ~80% of agent tools in production are HTTP wrappers; this is the SOP for getting them right.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit how a brand appears in AI-powered search (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini). Use when user mentions "AI search," "how do I show up in ChatGPT," "AI discoverability," "AEO," "LLM visibility," or wants to understand their brand's AI presence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and rewrite your LinkedIn profile to attract the right people. Scores each section, rewrites headline and about copy, and includes an AI visibility checklist so you show up in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude search. Use when someone says "optimize my LinkedIn," "LinkedIn profile help," "rewrite my about section," or "how do I show up in AI search."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a career question into a decision brief the PM can act on this week - a career plan, a promotion case, a stay-or-leave verdict, a job-search system, or an offer-negotiation script. Use when someone says 'how do I get promoted', 'should I leave my job', 'job search', 'I got laid off', 'negotiate my offer', 'career plan', 'IC or manager', 'next role', 'am I stuck', 'how do I stay relevant with AI' or 'how do I break into PM'. Draws on 188 Lenny's Podcast guests including Phyl Terry, Nikhyl Singhal and Deb Liu.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sets up how you and your team build and work with AI agents, and produces an Agent Workflow Charter (agent lanes, plan-mode loop, autonomy ladder with promotion criteria, rules file, review policy, security rules, rollout plan). Use when you ask 'how should we work with Claude Code / Codex / Cursor', 'how many agents should I run', 'should the agent be autonomous', 'plan mode', 'CLAUDE.md', 'AI-native team', 'roll out AI to my team', or 'my agent keeps screwing up'. Draws on 110 Lenny's Podcast guests incl. Claire Vo, Boris Cherny and Aishwarya Naresh Reganti.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Report how much of the session's context window remains. Use when the user asks "how much context is left", "check the context level", "how full is the context window", or "is context running low".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagrams and checkable docs from a codebase. Draws ERDs, C4 context/container/component views, API endpoint catalogues, lifecycle/state machines, and service-to-service call maps as a validated JSON spec plus a standalone HTML viewer, with Mermaid export. Imports OpenAPI, GraphQL SDL and Prisma; otherwise reads the code (NestJS, TypeORM, Express) and writes the spec. Use for: database diagram, ERD, data model, table relationships, C4 or architecture diagram, system context, API map, endpoint list, "show me the endpoints", status flow, state machine, allowed transitions, "what happens after X is approved", how services call each other, microservice map, Mermaid diagram. Also writes documentation as a fact graph: each statement carries its source and a computed confidence, and a drift check fails CI when the code moves. Use to document a system, write architecture or onboarding docs, or explain how a system works.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shared discipline for every hunt-* skill: scope and authorization gating, the two-account rule, the confirmation gate that separates a real finding from a false positive, enumeration limits, stop conditions, marker discipline, wiki-first query and self-heal, FIND output, Deadends, and wiki distillation. ALWAYS LOADED alongside any hunt skill. Also trigger directly on "is this in scope", "is this a real bug", "how do I confirm this", "should I keep going", "how many IDs should I test", "what severity", "how do I report this", "I got someone else's data". Every hunt-* skill assumes this file; without it they run without their safety and quality layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show Honey's benchmark scoreboard — the committed quality and token results per task tier (code, user-facing, agent-to-agent) from bench/. Reports only the reproducible committed figures, never invents per-repo numbers. Use when asked how much Honey saves, how it compares to Caveman / Ponytail / no-skill baseline, or for the headline numbers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, audit, or implement application structured logging architecture from repository evidence. Use when a user asks whether or where to add logs, how to choose or migrate a logger, how to standardize events/fields/levels/redaction, how to add HTTP access or panic logs, or why production logs cannot answer an incident question. Do not use merely to tail platform logs or to design a full metrics, tracing, SLO, and incident-management program.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walks a person through code changes one step at a time in conversation, starting at the entry point and following the flow that changes, showing a small chunk per step and explaining it in plain language. Defaults to the current branch's changes, and walks the code from the perspective of any context provided instead — a file, directory, symbol, pull request, plan, or ticket. Use when someone wants to be walked through, taught, paced through, or shown around code or a branch step by step, or to learn how a change works before reviewing or extending it. Stops after every step and waits, so the learner sets the pace. Paces through code that already exists and builds nothing — to build new work while being paced through it, use pairing. Does not produce a written overview to read alone — use code-overview. Does not review code quality — use code-review. Does not diagnose bugs — use investigate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author a HyperFrames slideshow — a presentation, pitch deck, or interactive deck with discrete slides, fragment reveals, branching, hotspot navigation, and built-in presenter mode with speaker notes; also converts an existing page into a deck. Output is a navigable deck, not a rendered MP4. If the user didn't explicitly ask for a slideshow, confirm before authoring. Unclear → /hyperframes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

An agent makes an animated film of an average session with its own user, beginning to end, told with that user's real messages: whatever their routine is (code, writing, data, design, video). The agent sits at a desk in a room decorated from what it knows about the user, and the monitor shows their kind of work. Requests glide in as paper planes and unfold. Corrections are a 3D cartoon mallet that bonks, then turns to show the words on its face. Praise is a butterfly towing the words on a ribbon. The agent types each reply onto a sheet, folds it and throws it back. The film opens with the agent asleep until the monitor boots: "Initiating session with <name>". The agent composes its own orchestral score, cued to every action. p5.brush watercolour, rendered in HyperFrames. Trigger on: "a video of our session", "animate a session with me", "session story", "show what working with me is like", "make a film about me and my agent".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit how AI search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude) describe and recommend your product, then propose fixes. Triggers on requests to audit AI search visibility, improve AEO/GEO, check ChatGPT/Perplexity coverage, or when user asks "do we show up in AI search?", "AEO audit", "generative engine optimization", "AI discoverability", "how does ChatGPT describe us?", "Perplexity ranking". Outputs GTM-AEO-* entries and a Coverage Matrix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Symfony UX frontend stack -- decision tree and orchestrator for choosing between Stimulus, Turbo, TwigComponent, LiveComponent, UX Icons, and UX Map. Use when the user is unsure which tool fits, wants to combine multiple UX packages, or asks a general frontend architecture question in Symfony. Also trigger when the user asks "which UX package should I use", "how to make this interactive", "should I use Stimulus or LiveComponent", "how to structure my Symfony frontend", "what is the difference between Turbo and LiveComponent", "should this be a Frame or a LiveComponent", "how do these UX packages work together", "what is the Symfony way to do frontend". Do NOT trigger when the user clearly names a specific tool (stimulus, turbo, twig-component, live-component, ux-icons, ux-map) -- defer to the specialized skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans a controlled experiment (A/B test) so its result can be trusted: writes the hypothesis, picks one primary metric and the guardrails, computes sample size and run time, specifies how visitors are assigned and when exposure is logged, and reads out the result with a confidence interval. Use when someone says "set up an A/B test", "split test this page", "how many visitors do I need", "how long should the experiment run", "is this result significant", "can I stop the test early", or wants to test a headline, price, layout or onboarding change against the current version.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in presenting technical work to non-technical audiences. Covers demo preparation, storytelling for demos, handling failures gracefully, and making work visible and impressive. Understands that perception is reality and great work undemoed is invisible work. Use when "demo, present, show stakeholders, demo day, showcase, walkthrough, show and tell, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks how code works, wants to understand architecture, trace execution flows, or explore unfamiliar parts of the codebase. Examples: "How does X work?", "What calls this function?", "Show me the auth flow"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

影视编剧 (Scriptwriting / Screenwriting) — 为电影 / 电视 / 流媒体剧集写戏剧蓝本的从业者认知操作系统: 决定「讲什么故事、人物是谁为何转变、场景如何被戏剧化、主题为何重要」的学科 —— 区别于导演 (调度 / 视觉实现)、制片 (融资 / 排期)、小说 (无格式 / 场景 / 视觉动作约束)。覆盖 (a) 故事与结构理论 (亚里士多德《诗学》情节 / 人物 / 思想 + 突转 peripeteia / 发现 anagnorisis + 净化 catharsis; Syd Field 范式 / 三幕 / 情节点; Freytag 金字塔; Egri 前提; McKee《故事》掌控性理念 / 鸿沟 / 价值正负转变 / 激励事件 / 渐进式复杂化; Truby《故事剖析》22 步 + 道德论证; Vogler/Campbell 英雄之旅; Blake Snyder《救猫咪》15 拍节拍表; Dan Harmon 故事环; John Yorke 五幕《进入森林》; Frank Daniel 八序列法; 起承转合东亚戏剧结构), (b) 人物 (想要 vs 需要 / 外在目标 vs 内在缺失, 人物弧光 正 / 负 / 平, flaw-wound-ghost 创伤背景, 主动 vs 被动主角的能动性, Egri 三维人物 生理 / 社会 / 心理, 反派是主角的镜子, 群像与关系网, 人物在压力下的选择中显形), (c) 对白 (潜台词 subtext, 对白即动作与冲突而非信息, 避免太直白 on the nose, 人物独特声口, 信息植入 exposition, Mamet/Sorkin 意图-阻碍式对白, 展示而非告知, 中文剧台词工艺), (d) 场景与序列工艺 (场景是有目标 / 冲突 / 转折的微型故事, 场景价值充能与转折点, 晚进早出, 八序列法, set piece, 转场, 场景头 / 动作行 / 括号提示 格式工艺), (e) 主题与前提 (掌控性理念 / 前提, 主题是被戏剧化的论证而非说教, 道德论证 Truby, 主题统一性, 这到底在讲什么), (f) 类型 (类型惯例是对观众的承诺, Snyder 10 类故事, 颠覆 vs 尊重套路, 类型片 vs 文艺片, 中国类型 主旋律 / 古装 / 年代 / 悬疑 / 甜宠 / 都市 / 军旅 / 历史正剧), (g) 格式与工业流程 (好莱坞剧本格式与 Final Draft, logline 一句话故事, treatment 故事大纲, 节拍表, 分场 / 分集大纲, spec 原创剧本 vs 委托, pitch, coverage, 美剧编剧室与 showrunner 制; 中国 大纲→人物小传→分集大纲→剧本, 长剧集 40 集结构, 网络电影 / 网大, 分账剧, 平台定制剧, 微短剧竖屏短剧), (h) 改稿与开发 (写作就是改写, 改稿 / 润色 / 推倒重写, 处理意见 / 改稿意见, 片方与平台 notes, 杀死你的宝贝, 围读, 开发地狱), (i) 改编 (IP改编 小说 / 漫画 / 游戏改编, 忠于精神而非字句, 压缩, 中国网文 IP 热), (j) 中国影视编剧产业现实 (审查 / 广电总局约束, 备案 / 立项, 平台定制剧 爱优腾芒, 分账, 编剧维权 署名权 / 欠薪 / 枪手, 注水剧, 流量 + 大IP 资本逻辑 vs 原创工艺, 导演中心制 vs 编剧话语权), (k) 编剧职业与工艺生涯 (spec vs 委托, 编剧 vs 编审 / 策划, 单兵 vs 编剧室, 在开发链条中的位置, WGA 与署名仲裁规范, 入行, 中国编剧地位与权益)。跨 电影 / 美剧流媒体 / 中国电影与长剧集。不含 导演 / 摄影 / 制片 / 融资 / 表演 / 电影理论批评为终点 / 泛小说写作 / 纪录片 / 新闻 —— 本 skill 是「戏剧化编剧」工艺: 故事 / 人物 / 场景 / 对白 / 主题 / 结构 / 格式 与围绕它们的产业流程。 (Scriptwriting / Screenwriting for film & TV (影视编剧) — the cognitive operating system of practitioners who write the dramatic blueprint of films, television, and streaming series: the discipline of deciding WHAT story is told, WHO the characters are and why they change, HOW the scenes are dramatized, and WHY it matters thematically — distinct from directing (staging/visual realization), producing (financing/scheduling), and prose fiction (which has no format/scene/visual-action constraints). Covers (a) story & structure theory (Aristotle's Poetics — plot/character/thought + reversal peripeteia/recognition anagnorisis + catharsis; Syd Field's paradigm/three-act/plot points; Freytag's pyramid; Lajos Egri's premise; Robert McKee's Story — controlling idea/the gap/value charge/inciting incident/progressive complications; John Truby's 22 steps & moral argument; Christopher Vogler/Joseph Campbell hero's journey; Blake Snyder's Save the Cat 15-beat sheet; Dan Harmon's story circle; John Yorke's 5-act Into the Woods; Frank Daniel's 8-sequence method; 起承转合 East-Asian dramatic structure), (b) character (want vs need/external goal vs internal lack, character arc positive/negative/flat, 人物弧光, flaw-wound-ghost backstory, agency active vs passive protagonist, Egri's 3-dimensional character physiology/sociology/psychology, antagonist as the protagonist's mirror, ensemble & relationship webs, character revealed through choice under pressure), (c) dialogue (subtext 潜台词, dialogue as action & conflict not information, 'on the nose' avoidance, distinct character voice, exposition handling, Mamet/Sorkin intention-obstacle dialogue, show-don't-tell, 台词 craft in Chinese drama), (d) scene & sequence craft (scene as a mini-story with goal/conflict/turn, scene value charge & turning point, enter-late-leave-early, the 8-sequence method, set pieces, transitions, slug line/action line/parenthetical format craft), (e) theme & premise (controlling idea/premise/前提, theme as dramatized argument not message, moral argument Truby, thematic unity, 'what is this really about'), (f) genre (genre conventions as audience promise, Snyder's 10 story types, subverting vs honoring tropes, 类型片 vs 文艺片, Chinese genres 主旋律/古装/年代/悬疑/甜宠/都市/军旅/历史正剧), (g) format & industry process (Holly

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user needs marketing ideas, inspiration, or strategies for their SaaS or software product. Also use when the user asks for 'marketing ideas,' 'growth ideas,' 'how to market,' 'marketing strategies,' 'marketing tactics,' 'ways to promote,' 'ideas to grow,' 'what else can I try,' 'I don't know how to market this,' 'brainstorm marketing,' or 'what marketing should I do.' Use this as a starting point whenever someone is stuck or looking for inspiration on how to grow. For specific channel execution, see the relevant skill (ads, social, emails, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks what an American/British TV show or movie line, catchphrase, idiom, or slang means — "这句美剧台词什么意思", "XX 是什么梗", "老友记里那句…", "为什么这么说", "这个口头语怎么用", "what does 'X' mean in this show", or pastes a subtitle line / screenshot / SRT and wants the spoken English explained. Explains meaning, origin (why people say it), tone & offensiveness, when you can/can't use it, natural Chinese equivalent, examples, scene context, how to respond, and logs it to a personal 生词本. Triggers — "美剧口头语", "台词什么意思", "这是什么梗", "/wjs-explaining-tv-slang".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。