523 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Communicate design's contribution to business and user outcomes in stakeholder language. Use when reporting results upward. For choosing the metrics in the first place, use `metrics-definition` (ux-strategy).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map functional, emotional, and social jobs with outcome expectations. Use when reframing decisions around motivation rather than features. For who the user is, use `user-persona`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Facilitate a structured team critique — framing, feedback rules, and actionable outcomes. Use when running a session with people in the room. For a solo expert review, use `heuristic-evaluation` (prototyping-testing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build empowered product teams using discovery and delivery dual-track. Use when the user mentions "product discovery", "empowered teams", "feature factory", "opportunity assessment", "product vision", "product strategy", "what should we build", or "our roadmap is just a feature list". Also trigger when restructuring teams away from output-driven models, or deciding what to build next based on outcomes. Covers discovery techniques, team structure, opportunity assessment, vision/strategy, and continuous delivery. For customer interviews, see mom-test. For ongoing discovery systems, see continuous-discovery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply lean thinking to UX: hypothesis-driven design, collaborative sketching, and rapid experiments instead of heavy deliverables. Use when the user mentions "Lean UX", "design hypothesis", "outcome over output", "design studio method", "assumption mapping", "lightweight research", "too much design documentation", or "get the team designing together". Also trigger when reducing design-documentation overhead, getting cross-functional teams to co-design, or running fast usability experiments. Covers hypothesis statements, MVPs for UX, and cross-functional collaboration. For Build-Measure-Learn, see lean-startup. For usability audits, see ux-heuristics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a weekly cadence of customer touchpoints using Opportunity Solution Trees, assumption mapping, and interview snapshots. Use when the user mentions "continuous discovery", "opportunity solution tree", "weekly interviews", "assumption testing", "discovery habits", "product trio", "outcome-based roadmap", "how do I talk to customers regularly", "we keep building things nobody uses", or "connect research to the roadmap". Also trigger when setting up regular customer feedback loops, prioritizing which experiments to run, or tying discovery insights to delivery work. Covers experience mapping, co-creation, and prioritizing opportunities. For interview technique, see mom-test. For team structure, see inspired-product.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end orchestrated workflow that runs a task the way Fable ran sessions - parallel evidence subagents, one committed plan, surgical execution with an intent gate, adversarial verification agents, honest outcome-first report. Use for non-trivial multi-step tasks when the user says "/fable-loop", "run the fable loop", or "do this the way Fable would". For the rules alone without orchestration, use fable-method; for large multi-phase projects, prefer the GSD workflow and use this inside phases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and runs hiring — role definition, sourcing, interview loop design, structured evaluation, and the decision itself. Use this to open a role, write a job description or scorecard, design an interview process, prepare interview questions, calibrate a hiring decision, or diagnose why a hiring process produces poor outcomes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits a website, app, onboarding flow, or design for usability, conversion, and product problems, tying every finding to a business outcome and a severity. Use this to review an interface, diagnose low conversion or activation, find where users drop off, get structured product feedback, or decide which UX fixes to ship first. For raising visual quality rather than finding problems, use `interface-craft`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decides what content to make and why — topic territory, format mix, cadence, and how content connects to a business outcome rather than to traffic. Use this to plan a content program, choose topics, build an editorial calendar, decide which formats and platforms to commit to, or diagnose why content is producing audience but not results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates PI(E)COS structure (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes, Study Design) from Meta-analysis or study titles. Use when the user wants to extract these elements from a title.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). ...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when drafting patient discharge summaries, creating personalized discharge instructions, simulating post-discharge outcomes, reducing hospital readmissions, or optimizing care transitions. Generates AI-enhanced discharge documentation with digital twin predictions for improved patient safety.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates complete two-sample Mendelian randomization research designs from a user-provided outcome, exposure or exposure family, and robustness direction. Use when a study centers on summary-statistics causal inference with instrument selection, harmonization, IVW-primary estimation, complementary estimators, sensitivity analyses, optional multivariable upgrades, and conservative evidence interpretation. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs a structured real-world evidence study using EHR, claims, or registry data, with explicit handling of time zero, eligibility windows, exposure definitions, outcome windows, censoring, confounding control, and target-trial-emulation logic. Use this skill when the user needs study-type design and protocol framing for an observational clinical study based on routine-care data. Do not invent database fields, follow-up completeness, linkage, coding validity, or causal identifiability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates complete Mendelian randomization study designs from a user-provided exposure and outcome direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a Mendelian randomization study — even if phrased as "help me write a paper on X", "design an MR study for Y", or "I want to test whether A causally affects B using GWAS". Covers core two-sample MR design, optional bidirectional follow-up, optional multivariable MR, IV selection logic, ancestry alignment, harmonization, IVW as the default primary estimator, weighted median / MR-Egger / MR-PRESSO / leave-one-out sensitivity analyses, Steiger directionality, heterogeneity / pleiotropy checks, and explicit claim-boundary control. Always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, method rationale, validation ladder, figure plan, minimal executable version, and strictly verified literature guidance with no fabricated references.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates complete comparative network-toxicology research designs from a user-provided exposure pair, shared toxic phenotype, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on two related exposures under one outcome and needs target collection, shared-vs-specific target decomposition, enrichment, PPI hub prioritization, docking, optional transcriptomic cross-checks, and conservative mechanistic synthesis. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs retrospective or prospective clinical cohort study protocols for biomedical and clinical research. Always use this skill when the user needs a cohort-based study plan rather than a general study idea, evidence summary, or mechanistic experiment design. Focus on cohort appropriateness, enrollment logic, baseline time-zero definition, follow-up structure, endpoint definition, variable collection, confounding control, and a coherent primary statistical analysis line. Do not invent data availability, follow-up completeness, outcome ascertainment quality, sample size adequacy, or causal interpretability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when assessing how well a survival model's predicted probabilities agree with observed outcomes by fitting a Cox model and generating bootstrap calibration curves at one or more prediction horizons from a clinical CSV file. NOT for: nomogram construction, univariate Cox screening, ROC analysis, or decision-curve analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when constructing a prognosis nomogram from survival-related clinical predictors, exporting the nomogram bundle and C-index table, and optionally rendering the final nomogram PDF. NOT for: univariate/multivariable Cox feature screening, calibration curves, ROC analysis, decision-curve analysis, or non-survival outcomes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when evaluating diagnostic biomarker performance from case-control expression data with logistic regression and ROC curves, exporting coefficient and AUC tables together with a ROC PDF. NOT for: survival analysis, time-to-event outcomes, multiclass classification, calibration curves, decision-curve analysis, or nomogram construction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when selecting predictive genes or other molecular features from bulk expression matrices for binary case-vs-control classification with elastic net logistic regression, including coefficient path and cross-validation plots. Trigger keywords: elastic net, glmnet, feature selection, binary classification, lambda.min, lambda.1se. NOT for: survival/Cox modeling, multiclass outcomes, single-cell data, or non-expression tables.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when evaluating the clinical utility of a binary prediction model from a single clinical CSV file by fitting a logistic decision-curve model, plotting decision and clinical-impact curves, and exporting summary outputs. NOT for: survival calibration, ROC-only discrimination analysis, nomogram construction, or time-to-event outcomes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when validating an existing prognostic risk signature on an external bulk expression cohort with survival outcomes, producing risk scores, Kaplan-Meier curves, risk distribution plots, heatmap, and time-dependent ROC curves. NOT for: model training, feature selection, nomogram construction, calibration analysis, or single-cell data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。