「protect」の検索結果

Sub-skill de agent-ready-cloudflare: Implement OAuth Protected Resource Metadata

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Estate Planning & Legacy Protection for the Owens family. Tracks wills, trusts, beneficiary designations, life insurance, survivor benefits, and powers of attorney. Ensures Lindsey and the kids are protected if something happens to Tory. Triggers on: "Estate plan", "Will", "Life insurance", "Beneficiaries", "What happens if", "Legacy", "Survivor benefits", "Power of attorney", "Trust", "Estate check", "Beneficiary audit", "SGLI", "FSGLI", "Dependent education", "Chapter 35". The only estate plan that fails worse than a bad one is no plan at all.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Contracts, commercial law, and intellectual property essentials for founders, managers, and knowledge workers. Covers the elements of contract formation, common contract types, property rights, consumer protection, employment law basics, and the four IP regimes — patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets. Use when drafting or reviewing an agreement, protecting an invention or brand, evaluating a licensing deal, or understanding regulatory exposure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for DPAPI masterkeys, vault blobs, browser credential stores, protected secrets, domain backup keys, and secret-to-acceptance replay chains. Use when the user asks to inspect DPAPI blobs or masterkeys, recover browser or vault credentials, trace DPAPI context or backup-key use, or explain how protected Windows secrets become accepted access or privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focuses on routing, CSRF protection, context handling, and template usage within the internal handlers directory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rate limiting for serverless and edge apps with the @upstash/ratelimit TypeScript/JavaScript SDK backed by Upstash Redis. Use when adding a rate limiter or throttling to an API route, Next.js middleware, Vercel Edge, Cloudflare Workers, or any HTTP endpoint; returning 429 Too Many Requests; choosing between fixed window, sliding window, and token bucket algorithms; limiting per user, IP, API key, or tenant with prefixes and custom keys; protecting login, signup, form, or AI endpoints from abuse, bots, and brute force; using deny lists, ephemeral caching, analytics, timeouts, and multi-region rate limits; or estimating the Redis command cost of rate limiting. Also use when the user says rate limit, rate-limiting, throttle, quota, request limits, or traffic protection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code obfuscation analysis and deobfuscation playbook. Use when reversing binaries protected by junk code, opaque predicates, self-modifying code, control flow flattening, VM protection, or string encryption.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Customs and Border Protection officer — scoring a shipment or traveler for secondary-inspection referral, evaluating a manifest discrepancy for contraband risk, deciding whether a traveler is admissible under immigration law, structuring a seizure or penalty referral, or triaging a primary-inspection queue under time pressure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Control AdGuard Home DNS filtering via HTTP API. Use when managing blocklists/allowlists, checking domain filtering status, toggling protection, or clearing DNS cache. Supports blocking/allowing domains, viewing statistics, and protecting/disabling DNS filtering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shopify/DTC brand protection toolkit. Detect counterfeit stores, unauthorized resellers, and trademark violations. Includes DMCA takedown templates, domain monitoring, and social media infringement detection. No API key required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-powered calendar management and agent-based scheduling coordination. Covers calendar APIs (Google Calendar, CalDAV/iCal), AI scheduling assistants (Reclaim, Clockwise, Motion, Cal.com), building custom calendar agents with MCP, multi-calendar merging, timezone management, focus block protection, meeting fatigue detection, and agent-to-agent meeting negotiation protocols. Activate on: "calendar agent", "AI scheduling", "calendar coordination", "meeting scheduling", "calendar API", "focus time protection", "calendar optimization", "Google Calendar MCP", "Reclaim", "Clockwise", "Motion", "Cal.com", "smart scheduling", "calendar-aware agent", "timezone scheduling", "agent negotiation meetings". NOT for: manual calendar UI component design (use form-validation-architect), project management scheduling or Gantt charts (use project-management-guru-adhd), general time-tracking or pomodoro apps (use adhd-daily-planner for time-awareness), building the agent itself from scratch (use agent-creator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level power systems covering power generation, transmission, distribution, power flow analysis, fault analysis, protection, and power electronics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive agent-flow setup. Scans the repo read-only, proposes AGENTS.md, DOCS_INDEX.md and CONTEXT_MANIFEST.json with a confidence marker per claim, asks the user for protected paths and risk boundaries, writes each file only after approval. Use when setting up agent-flow, when context files are missing, or when asked to write an AGENTS.md, onboard a repo for AI agents or set protected paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects and responds to OAuth token theft and replay attacks in cloud environments, focusing on Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD) token protection, conditional access policies, and sign-in anomaly detection. Covers access token theft, refresh token replay, Primary Refresh Token (PRT) abuse, and pass-the-cookie attacks. Activates for requests involving OAuth token theft detection, token replay prevention, Azure AD conditional access token protection, or cloud identity attack investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploying Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access for SASE-based zero trust network access using GlobalProtect agents, ZTNA Connectors, security policy enforcement, and integration with Strata Cloud Manager for unified security management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Intel CHIPSEC to assess platform firmware configuration, SPI flash write protection, BIOS lock, SMM/SMRR, and Secure Boot variable state, dump SPI flash, and triage UEFI variables for firmware-level threats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-37 Revision 2, the Risk Management Framework (RMF) for information systems and organizations. Use for the seven RMF steps (Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor) and their tasks; the three-tier organization-wide risk model; authorization boundaries; the requirements-to-controls relationship; security categorization (FIPS 199/200 high-water mark) and control selection/tailoring (SP 800-53/53B baselines); assessment, the authorization decision and risk acceptance, continuous monitoring and ongoing authorization; the security/privacy distinction; and supply chain risk management. This is the security-and-privacy-risk-governance edge of systems engineering — it governs how much protection and whether to accept residual risk, complementing the disciplines that decide how protection is built. Does NOT reproduce the SP 800-53 control catalog or its baselines, the FIPS impact tables, or the ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 process text; it names and routes to them rather than restating them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads a project or processing description and returns a DRAFT data protection impact assessment pack: processing description, necessity and proportionality questions, a risk table with blank rating cells, mitigations to consider and open questions. Never rates risk, determines the lawful basis or judges adequacy; the DPO assesses and signs. Works from descriptions, never personal data. Use when the user asks to "start a DPIA for the new monitoring tool", "draft a data protection impact assessment", "scaffold a DPIA from this processing description" or "what would the DPO need for a DPIA on this". Do not use for redacting or de-identifying a document, use document-deidentification-pass instead; do not use for working out what data an incident exposed, use data-incident-impact-brief instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Flags where a P&ID draft raises a process safety question and points to the candidate evidence an engineer would review (HAZOP register, relief study, SIL assessment, isolation philosophy), as questions and quoted passages with UNKNOWN for missing documents, plus safety functions, relief devices and isolation requirements carried over as stated. Never rates, sizes, classifies, resolves or declares protection adequate. Use when the user asks to "write the process safety flags", "produce the process safety section of the P&ID enrichment", "list which protection questions this P&ID raises" or "map the HAZOP and relief study evidence to the draft" after gate G2, once the piping and instrumentation sections exist. Do not use for proposing loops, alarms or trips from the control philosophy, use instrumentation-and-control-enrichment instead; do not use for checking identifiers, use tagging-and-numbering. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

差分が「その差分自身を審査するレビュー基準・品質ゲート」を弱めていないかを diff-time で検出する。Check 1 レビュールールの削除・弱体化（.river/rules.md / .river/rules.d/*）、Check 2 実行時コンフィグの閾値・ゲート緩和（.river-review.{json,yaml,yml} の review.severity 引き下げ / exclude 拡大 / memory.suppressionEnabled 無効化 / selection.skills.exclude 追加）、Check 3 suppression entry の新規追加、Check 4 lint・静的解析設定からのルール削除や無効化、Check 5 branch protection・required check の緩和、の 5 Check を対象とし、これらが機能変更と同一 PR に混在し、かつ意図の宣言が無い場合に指摘する。report-only。workflow の permissions / action pin は gha-workflow-security、既存 suppression entry の使い分けは suppression-feedback、設定ファイルの一般的妥当性は config-json、.only / .skip / @ts-ignore / @ts-nocheck は heuristic-review.mjs の決定論検出器、リファクタと機能追加の混在は behavior-structure-separation へ委譲する

Add or define specific fields in a collection's readSchema. Use when fields are missing from materialization field selection, pruned by complexity limit, need type refinement, need to be protected from future inference changes, or need to be required for downstream consumers. Use when user says "missing fields", "pruned fields", "field not showing up", "complexity limit", "define field in read schema", "restrict field type", or "protect field from inference".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add redaction annotations to sensitive fields in schemas to block or hash PII. Use when configuring GDPR/HIPAA compliance, protecting credentials, or blocking internal fields from materializations. Use when user says "protect PII", "hide sensitive data", "hash field", "redact field", "GDPR compliance", "don't capture field", "remove field from Estuary", or "prevent Estuary from capturing field".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Understand anti-reversing, obfuscation, and protection techniques encountered during software analysis. Use when analyzing protected binaries, bypassing anti-debugging for authorized analysis, or u...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Aqua — aqua Security platform analysis. Covers container runtime protection, image assurance policies, compliance frameworks, vulnerability management, workload protection, and registry scanning. Use when analyzing container security posture, reviewing image compliance, investigating runtime alerts, or auditing security policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。