2,726 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Rigorous self-assessment checklist before marking any task as complete. Use when about to claim task completion, before final commit, when user asks "is it done?", or when transitioning from implementation to reporting. Prevents premature completion claims by requiring evidence for every assertion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Launches and configures the standalone presubmit CLI, an API-driven adversarial peer-review pipeline with 30-plus stages, including Red Team finders, Blue Team defence, verification cascade, legal pass, and copyedit, producing one consolidated report on disk. Verifies installation and API key, chooses the output location and smoke, standard, or custom mode, launches the run, and reports the result path. Use when the user asks to run presubmit, wants a deep unattended pre-submission audit, or needs a math or replication-code audit. Everyday self-audits go to paper-review-lite, and external refereeing to journal-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write-time code quality enforcement using Plankton — auto-formatting, linting, and Claude-powered fixes on every file edit via hooks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interactive installer for Everything Claude Code — guides users through selecting and installing skills and rules to user-level or project-level directories, verifies paths, and optionally optimizes installed files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trace every user-facing button/touchpoint through its full state change sequence to find bugs where functions individually work but cancel each other out, produce wrong final state, or leave the UI in an inconsistent state. Use when: systematic debugging found no bugs but users report broken buttons, or after any major refactor touching shared state stores.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use Slopwatch to detect LLM reward hacking in .NET code changes. Run after every code modification to catch disabled tests, suppressed warnings, empty catch blocks, and other shortcuts that mask real problems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cache Playwright browser binaries in CI/CD pipelines (GitHub Actions, Azure DevOps) to avoid 1-2 minute download overhead on every build.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Memory is the cornerstone of intelligent agents. Without it, every interaction starts from zero. This skill covers the architecture of agent memory: short-term (context window), long-term (vector stores), and the cognitive architectures that organize them. Key insight: Memory isn't just storage - it's retrieval. A million stored facts mean nothing if you can't find the right one. Chunking, embedding, and retrieval strategies determine whether your agent remembers or forgets. The field is fragm
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a structured session handoff when context is running low or work is pausing. Deep context mining, self-validation, multi-file splitting. Captures everything the next session needs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a product messaging library from your positioning, your website and customer evidence: a description, the status quo and alternatives, pain points with their knock-on consequences, capabilities, functional, emotional and social benefits, branded features, the cost of doing nothing, common objections with responses, and core messaging blocks (tagline, elevator pitch, value props, proof, per-audience lines). Every claim sourced. Triggers: "product messaging", "messaging library", "messaging framework", "value props", "capabilities and benefits", "what are our differentiators in words". Run after /positioning. Not for choosing the position itself (use /positioning).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds an ideal customer profile from evidence: case studies, testimonials, customer logos, solutions pages, reviews and any sales notes you have. Produces market sizing layers, firmographic segments, a champion and an economic buyer persona, a negative ICP, intent signals, customer proof points and a voice-of-customer section in the buyers' own words, every claim sourced. Triggers: "ICP research", "ideal customer profile", "who are our customers", "customer segments", "buyer personas", "who should we target". Run after /company-context. Not for competitor analysis (use /competitor-research) or call transcript patterns (use /win-loss).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Researches a company from its website and public sources and writes a company profile: what it sells, who buys it, traction, funding, team, hiring, tech stack, key people, red flags and the gaps you still need to fill, every claim tagged with a source and a confidence level. Use it as the first file in a marketing context folder, or to prep a discovery call or qualify a prospect. Triggers: "company research", "company background", "company context for", "qualify this prospect", "discovery call prep", "account brief", or a company URL handed over for research. Not for competitor analysis (use /competitor-research) or customer profiles (use /icp-research).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Develop positioning strategy with anchor, differentiators, status-quo alternatives, and a positioning statement. Reads from marketing/icp/ICP.md + marketing/competitors/aggregate.md. Writes to marketing/positioning/positioning.md as the canonical positioning every downstream skill reads. Triggers - "positioning", "category definition", "how do we position", "positioning strategy", "anchor + differentiators"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract voice patterns from existing content (website, blog, social, sales-call transcripts) and codify into voice rules. Produces voice analysis + voice guidelines (rules per pattern + violation pattern + fix template). Writes to marketing/brand/brand-voice.md as the canonical voice rules every content skill reads. Triggers - "tone of voice", "brand voice", "voice guidelines", "TOV audit", "writing rules", "extract voice"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a 10-component messaging library from your positioning + ICP + competitor aggregate. Produces positioning statement, value propositions, key differentiators, taglines, CTA variants, proof points, messaging hierarchy, status-quo alternatives. Writes to marketing/messaging/messaging.md as the canonical messaging library every downstream content / paid / outbound / lifecycle skill reads. Triggers - "product messaging", "messaging library", "value props", "messaging framework", "build messaging", "messaging components"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build structured ICP documentation by scraping case studies, testimonials, and solutions pages from your website. Produces firmographics, champion + economic buyer personas, pain points, decision criteria, anti-ICP, customer proof points, and voice-of-customer synthesis. Writes to marketing/icp/ICP.md as the canonical ICP every downstream skill reads. Triggers - "icp research", "ideal customer profile", "persona research", "customer segments", "who are our customers", "build ICP"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesize multiple per-competitor research files (produced by /competitor-research) into a single canonical threat matrix. Writes to marketing/competitors/aggregate.md as the locked canonical version every downstream skill reads. Triggers - "competitor aggregate", "synthesize competitors", "competitor matrix", "threat matrix", "lock competitor canonical"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test an uncertain Anabasis v2 path at the smallest real layer that can decide it, before a paid round is asked to: one fact from a log or a dry run, a walk of one value across the layers a change touches, a replay of every recorded log through this tree's readers, a whole round rehearsed on a seeded copy of a campaign with a script in each model seat (`bun run runs seed`, `bun run runs rehearse`), or one live seat from a seed. Use when the operator asks whether a change will work in the real system, to simulate or rehearse a round, to stand again in a position a past run stood in, what a campaign of a given size can read, or what a kill or a stop leaves behind. Not for reading a finished run (whole-run-investigation) or starting a paid one (run-management).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Skeptical analysis and critique of claims, plans, and code without taking anyone at face value. Use when the user says "don't trust me", wants adversarial review, red-teaming, assumption checking, or verification that generated or proposed code is actually correct. Triggers on skepticism, critique everything, verify claims, challenge assumptions, red team, devil's advocate, prove it, smell test.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the oncall handoff for a rotation window — the whole handoff, not just a document: build the summary (what the incoming oncall needs first, what's still open, incidents with impact numbers, alert and page counts, hygiene suggestions, every number traceable to a source), post it for the outgoing oncall to correct, walk the incoming oncall through the open items in the thread, update the list as they respond, and note when they acknowledge. Runs mainly in the team's standing oncall / monitoring channel, normally as a scheduled routine firing at rotation change so the report is waiting when the shift turns over; can also be run by hand and works from an incident channel. Use when a handoff routine fires, or on "handoff", "hand over", "oncall summary", "weekly oncall report", "what happened this shift / this week". Re-running for the same window updates the report rather than duplicating it. Unattended runs carry a run-summary block and at least one chart.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Post a sitrep (situation report) for a live incident, in its incident channel: a short fixed-layout update for people who haven't read the whole channel — the current picture and what moved since the previous update. Use on "sitrep", "status update", "where are we", "what's the latest", "catch me up", "summarize the incident so far", when asked to keep posting on a schedule ("post a sitrep every hour until resolved"), or when the oncall memory sets an update cadence for this severity and the incident owner asks Claude to keep it. Reads the channel, alert thread and findings posted, re-reads the one key signal, and writes: status line, TL;DR, impact, what changed since the last sitrep, what's in progress and who has it, what's needed, when the next update comes, one chart. Facts come only from what people said or Claude read first-hand; cause and recovery time are never guessed. Fits one phone screen. Not investigation (`incident-investigate`) or the write-up afterwards (`incident-postmortem`).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate an alert, page, or production symptom in an incident channel or a team's oncall / monitoring channel, and report findings a human can verify. Ordinary conversation and chatter are not alerts; leave those alone. Use when an alert or page lands, when error rate, latency or saturation is up, when someone asks "why is X broken", "investigate", "what changed", "root cause this", pastes a monitor, dashboard, trace or error-tracker link, or reports production trouble; also by default when an alert lands in a covered channel unasked. Feed-level asks land here too ("which alerts matter", "triage today's alerts"), plus the scheduled alert-review routine and the ticket path ("customer X can't check out"). Runs a fast first pass posted as a short interim update with a TL;DR, every finding carrying the query or link to verify it, then proposes the fix and — with connector access and confirmation — carries it out, never unattended. Afterwards `incident-postmortem` writes it up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Take a change through a pull request in the pnpm repository — opening it, then staying with it after every push until CI is green and the review round is quiet. Use when opening a PR, after pushing to one, when a check fails, or when review comments arrive.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The branded entry point to ServiceGraph — use whenever the user explicitly names **ServiceGraph** — "use ServiceGraph to…", "what datasets does ServiceGraph have", "search ServiceGraph for…", "look this up in ServiceGraph", "pull contacts from ServiceGraph for these domains", "how many credits do I have on ServiceGraph". ServiceGraph is a multi-dataset platform of metrics-enriched business data for founders — where to launch, who to email, who to hire. This skill explains how to drive the API (api.servicegraph.co / mcp.servicegraph.co) against ANY dataset — discover what datasets exist, discover a dataset's schema and filters, search free brief rows, and unlock contact + metric detail with credits. Dataset-agnostic by design — it discovers everything through the API and never assumes which datasets or fields exist. When the user describes an intent WITHOUT naming ServiceGraph (e.g. "find a PR agency in NY"), defer to the matching specific skill (find-pr-agency, find-marketing-agency, find-law-firm, …); this skill is for explicit ServiceGraph requests and for datasets no specific skill covers yet. Skip non-US firms, consumer/personal services, and individual freelancers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。