本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

messaging

Builds a product messaging library from your positioning, your website and customer evidence: a description, the status quo and alternatives, pain points with their knock-on consequences, capabilities, functional, emotional and social benefits, branded features, the cost of doing nothing, common objections with responses, and core messaging blocks (tagline, elevator pitch, value props, proof, per-audience lines). Every claim sourced. Triggers: "product messaging", "messaging library", "messaging framework", "value props", "capabilities and benefits", "what are our differentiators in words". Run after /positioning. Not for choosing the position itself (use /positioning).

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md5.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Messaging

Turn the position into the words people will actually use: on the website, in sales calls, in emails and ads. The library links each pain to a capability, each capability to a benefit, and each benefit to proof, so any writer can pull a line and know it holds up.

When to use it

  • Right after /positioning is agreed.
  • Before rewriting the website, a sales deck or a launch.
  • When sales, marketing and product describe the product three different ways.

Don't use it to choose the position (/positioning), or for a single-feature question you can answer directly.

Inputs

Required: the website URL and the exact product name. Confirm the name if it's ambiguous.

Recommended: read these first if they exist:

  • context/positioning/, the primary input, which frames everything
  • context/icp/ for pains and voice of customer
  • context/competitors/ for the status quo and contrasts
  • context/win-loss/ for real objections
  • context/brand/ for tone of voice

Also useful: internal docs and customer quotes. If positioning is missing, say so and offer /positioning first.

Paths. Write to context/messaging/MMYY-messaging.md. Agency or consultant? Swap context/ for clients/<client>/context/ throughout.

Tools. Page fetching for the site; web search for reviews, testimonials and comparison pages. Exa or Firecrawl if you have them.

Steps

  1. Validate inputs and load the upstream context.
  2. Research. Fetch at least five core pages (home, features, pricing, customers, about) with URLs and dates. Search reviews and testimonials. Record branded feature names exactly as the company writes them.
  3. Extract the ten components, in order:
    1. Description. What it is, in one or two sentences, using the positioning.
    2. Status quo and alternatives. Doing it by hand, plus at least one named alternative.
    3. Pain points. Each with a consequence chain: the first-order problem, what it causes, what that costs the business.
    4. Capabilities. What the product does about each pain.
    5. Functional benefits. The outcome, each backed by a verbatim customer quote or marked "not available".
    6. Emotional and social benefits. Two of each: how the buyer feels, and how they look to their boss and team.
    7. Features. The branded names that deliver each capability.
    8. Cost of inaction. What not acting costs per week or month, in numbers where you can.
    9. Objections. 3 to 5, each with its root cause and a response that acknowledges, reframes and gives evidence.
    10. Core messaging blocks. A tagline of 7 words or fewer, a one-sentence elevator pitch, a 3-bullet value prop, a lead proof point, and one line per audience segment.
  4. Link it up. Every pain points to a capability, every capability to a feature and a benefit.
  5. Verify. Check each claim against its source. Quotes are verbatim. Tag confidence [VERIFIED], [INFERRED], [ESTIMATED] or [UNAVAILABLE]. For a client-facing library, aim for at least 60% verified and no more than 10% estimated.
  6. Write the data gaps and how to fill each one.
  7. Hand off to /funnel-strategy, and to any copy work.

Output shape

Title it # Product messaging library: [Product]. Open with a TLDR and one block of open questions. Then the ten components in order, a data gaps section, and a source list with URLs and access dates.

What good looks like

  • All ten components present, or marked "not available" with a reason.
  • No pain point stops at the first-order problem.
  • The cost of inaction has a number, not an adjective.
  • The tagline and pitch match the agreed position. If they don't, flag it rather than drifting.
  • A seller could answer the top three objections using only this file.

Mistakes to avoid

  • Feature lists dressed up as benefits.
  • Invented customer quotes or made-up metrics.
  • Messaging that contradicts the positioning because a line sounded better.
  • Buzzwords where a plain verb would do.
  • Repeating the same caveat in every component. Say it once.

Chain

Step 9 of the suggested chain: /company-context → /icp-research → /competitor-research → /win-loss → /expert-pov → /tov-guidelines → /brand-kit → /positioning → messaging → /funnel-strategy → /goals.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

brand-kit

無料

Extracts a company's visual identity from screenshots (best) or its website (fallback) and writes a DESIGN.md brand file: machine-readable tokens for colours, typography, spacing, corner radius and logo usage, plus short prose explaining how and when to use each, and a list of do's and don'ts. Any later page, deck, carousel or ad can read the tokens instead of guessing. Triggers: "brand kit", "brand guidelines", "extract our brand", "design tokens", "colours and fonts from", "visual identity", "DESIGN.md". Not for tone of voice (use /tov-guidelines) or messaging (use /messaging).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house632026年10月14日 更新

Researches a company from its website and public sources and writes a company profile: what it sells, who buys it, traction, funding, team, hiring, tech stack, key people, red flags and the gaps you still need to fill, every claim tagged with a source and a confidence level. Use it as the first file in a marketing context folder, or to prep a discovery call or qualify a prospect. Triggers: "company research", "company background", "company context for", "qualify this prospect", "discovery call prep", "account brief", or a company URL handed over for research. Not for competitor analysis (use /competitor-research) or customer profiles (use /icp-research).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house632026年10月14日 更新

Researches one B2B SaaS competitor across 13 dimensions (company, product, ICP, pricing, reviews, content, launches, search and AI visibility, tech stack, hiring, go-to-market, social, paid ads) and writes a sourced dossier with an executive summary, a threat level, strengths and weaknesses, and a data gaps section. Run it once per competitor, then compare. Triggers: "competitor analysis", "competitor research on", "what is [competitor] doing", "compare us to", "competitive landscape", "battlecard prep". Run after /company-context and /icp-research. Not for researching your own company (use /company-context).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house632026年10月14日 更新

Draws out a founder's or expert's point of view: what they believe about their market that others don't, the hot takes they'd defend, the stories behind them, and their taste. Generates interview questions, works from answers, a live call or existing content, and ends with ranked One Big Idea candidates for thought leadership and positioning. Triggers: "expert POV", "founder POV", "one big idea", "OBI", "contrarian beliefs", "what makes our founder different", "thought leadership foundation", "founder interview questions". Feeds /positioning and /tov-guidelines. Not for writing posts or articles, and not for brand voice rules (use /tov-guidelines).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house632026年10月14日 更新

Works out a company's go-to-market motion (product-led, sales-led or hybrid) from its website and pricing, then maps the funnel stage by stage: a definition, strategy, leading inputs the team controls, lagging outputs with targets, cadence and owner for each stage, MQL, SQL and PQL criteria, post-sale stages, closed-lost re-entry paths and backward funnel maths from a revenue target. Triggers: "funnel strategy", "funnel stages", "pipeline stages", "PLG vs SLG", "lead qualification criteria", "map our sales process", "how do leads flow". Feeds /goals. Not for setting the target itself (use /goals).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house632026年10月14日 更新

goals

無料

Turns a target someone has already committed to (a board plan, an annual plan, a contract) into a plan the team can measure: KPIs in three tiers with a guardrail for each, a baseline from real data, monthly pacing with lag and seasonality, and two or three channels chosen from how your ICP actually searches and buys. Writes context/goals/MMYY-scope.md and context/goals/measurement.md. It never invents the target. Triggers: "set our goals", "what are our KPIs", "revenue target and pacing", "which channels and what targets", "write the scope file", "are we on track". Run after /funnel-strategy. Not for designing funnel stages (use /funnel-strategy).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

matteotitta/repo-structure-in-house632026年10月14日 更新

matteotitta のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する