「manage」の検索結果

新しいプロジェクトまたは既存リポジトリに Claude 用の kickoff 文脈を導入するスキル。 テンプレートとリポジトリ証跡、ユーザー入力をもとに `CLAUDE.md`、`docs/PROJECT_BRIEF.md`、 `docs/SKILL_ROUTING.md`、`docs/QUALITY_GATES.md`、`docs/TEST_STRATEGY.md`、 `docs/DECISION_LOG.md`、`docs/HIDDEN_CONTRACT_REGISTER.md`、 `docs/CROSS_MODULE_CONSISTENCY_MATRIX.md`、`.claude/rules/*`、 `.claude/commands/project-kickoff.md` を必要に応じて作成・更新する。 Use when starting a new project, retrofitting AI project context into an existing repository, bootstrapping Claude memory, or standardizing kickoff documents, rules, and slash-command scaffolding. Distinct from project-manager / project-plan-creator (which plan work), and from completion-quality-gate-designer / hidden-contract-investigator / safe-by-default-architect / cross-module-consistency-auditor / production-parity-test-designer (which deeply refine individual artifacts after bootstrap).

DAMA-DMBOK（Data Management Body of Knowledge）準拠のデータマネジメントスキル。 11の知識領域（データガバナンス、データ品質、メタデータ管理、MDM等）を網羅し、 データ戦略策定から具体的な改善施策まで支援する。 Use when: データ戦略策定、データガバナンス構築、データ品質改善、データカタログ作成、 MDM導入、DX推進、データ移行プロジェクト、データ成熟度評価。 Triggers: "データガバナンス", "データ品質", "データカタログ", "メタデータ管理", "MDM", "データ戦略", "DMBOK", "データ成熟度", "データリネージ"

Explain a topic like I'm a 5 year old, as a single HTML artifact built from big pictures and very few words. Use this whenever the user asks for a dead-simple explanation of how something works, says "ELI5", "explain like I'm five", "簡単に説明して", "図で説明して", "初心者向けに", "素人にもわかるように", wants to explain a concept to a non-technical manager, customer, or family member, or asks for a visual explainer — even if they don't say "ELI5" explicitly.

Use this skill when creating executive-level briefing materials, board reports, management meeting presentations, or investor briefings. This skill provides the "So What? / Why Now? / What Next?" framework, data visualization guidelines optimized for executives, and professional templates for rapid document creation. Triggers include "create board report", "executive summary", "management meeting materials", "investor presentation", "one-page summary", or requests to communicate complex information to senior leadership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

IPA非機能要求グレード2018（可用性・性能拡張性・運用保守性・移行性・セキュリティ・システム環境）の記入済み要件を入力として、運用設計書を生成する。非機能要件定義が完了しているプロジェクトの運用設計フェーズで使用する。Do NOT use for 非機能要件の定義自体（requirement-managementを使用すること）。Do NOT use for 業界調査やヒアリングから始める運用設計（operations-designを使用すること）。

運用設計コンサルタントとして、対象業界の調査とヒアリングに基づきITIL 4・SRE・DevOpsベストプラクティスの運用設計書を作成する。新規サービスの運用設計、既存システムの運用改善、運用移管の準備に使用する。Do NOT use for ソフトウェアの機能要求の定義（requirement-managementを使用すること）。

大規模システムリプレース・移行プロジェクトについて、マルチベンダー管理に長けたPMOの視点で「見落とされがちな潜在リスク」を洗い出す。正常系設計や特定ベンダーの担当範囲内には現れにくい「ベンダー間の隙間」「業務影響」「異常系」の死角を、4視点の分析フレームワークで特定し、Backlog起票用のリスク表とキラークエスチョンを生成する。要件定義・運用設計・負荷試験フェーズ特化フレームワークへの切替にも対応。総合テスト終盤・移行リハーサル前・負荷試験計画時のリスク総ざらいに使用する。Do NOT use for 個別インシデントの根本原因分析（incident-rca）、要求の追加・変更・矛盾検証（requirement-management）、運用設計書そのものの新規作成（operations-design）。

【非推奨】設計書を永続化しない運用へ移行したため非推奨。設計は実装時にPR本文とGitHubコメントへ記載し、要求の管理は requirement-management を使用すること。既存の docs/sdd/design/ を保守・参照する場合にのみ使用する。アーキテクチャ設計、コンポーネント定義、API設計、データベーススキーマのMarkdown文書を作成・編集する。Do NOT use for 新規プロジェクトの設計（設計はPR本文に記載すること）。

Knowledge pack reconstructed from JSP 815 Defence Safety Management System V1.3 (Ministry of Defence, Open Government Licence v3.0): the SMS Framework, all 12 Elements with their Expectations and Performance Statement themes, and Annexes A to F plus H. Covers the Defence Safety Function and which JSP applies, leadership and safety culture, organisation and SEMS applicability, legislation and exemption certificates, risk assessment and safety cases, supervision and contracting, competence and letters of delegation, equipment and infrastructure safety, performance and incident management, and assurance, audit, and the ISO 45001 clause mapping. SCOPE LIMITS: single-source (JSP 815 V1.3 with Annex H V1.2); carries no DEF-STAN 00-051 or DEF-STAN 00-970 content, no JSP 375, JSP 816; acquisition safety policy is in jsp-376, no Annex G (Assurance Toolkit), and no ISO 45001 text (clause numbers only). This pack is reconstructed reference notes, not MOD guidance, and has no official status.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

METAINFORMANT rules for directory projects/hymenoptera_amalgkit/doc/03_data_management. Use when editing, adding tests, or reviewing code under this path. Read the linked AGENTS.md first; use uv only, write outputs to output/, real implementations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0. Use for cybersecurity risk management, GOVERN, IDENTIFY, PROTECT, DETECT, RESPOND, RECOVER, Organizational Profiles, CSF Tiers, supply chain risk, enterprise risk management, incident response. Covers the CSF 2.0 document only; does not cover specific SP 800-53 controls, NIST RMF system authorization steps, or sector-specific regulations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-37 Revision 2, the Risk Management Framework (RMF) for information systems and organizations. Use for the seven RMF steps (Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor) and their tasks; the three-tier organization-wide risk model; authorization boundaries; the requirements-to-controls relationship; security categorization (FIPS 199/200 high-water mark) and control selection/tailoring (SP 800-53/53B baselines); assessment, the authorization decision and risk acceptance, continuous monitoring and ongoing authorization; the security/privacy distinction; and supply chain risk management. This is the security-and-privacy-risk-governance edge of systems engineering — it governs how much protection and whether to accept residual risk, complementing the disciplines that decide how protection is built. Does NOT reproduce the SP 800-53 control catalog or its baselines, the FIPS impact tables, or the ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 process text; it names and routes to them rather than restating them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide (GAO-16-89G, 2015). Use for building, assessing, or auditing a program's integrated master schedule (IMS): the ten best practices of a reliable schedule (capture, sequence, resource, duration, traceability, valid critical path, reasonable total float, schedule risk analysis, updating, baseline), the four characteristics (comprehensive, well-constructed, credible, controlled), critical path method arithmetic (forward/backward pass, total float), schedule risk analysis (Monte Carlo, contingency), statusing and baseline control, and the Appendix II audit triad. Scheduling/time-management oriented: it is the authority on schedule reliability, but it is NOT a cost-estimating guide, a full SE process model, an agile guide, or a risk-management framework — see sibling packs (gao-cost, dau-se-guidebook, nasa-schedule, nasa-risk) for those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA AMS Lifecycle V&V Guidelines (verification and validation), Version 3.0, dated April 2017. Use for applying verification and validation across the FAA Acquisition Management System (AMS) lifecycle: the verify-vs-validate distinction (built right vs. right thing), the work-product/component/product tiers, the nine V&V planning elements, the four method catalogs (Appendix C), decision-point-gated V&V (SASP, CRD, Investment Analysis, Solution Implementation, In-Service Management), the Appendix B document checklists (PRD/APB/ISPD/PMP), and the DT/OT/IOA test triad. Scope limits: this is an FAA acquisition-V&V doctrine, NOT a general SE process model, requirements-engineering manual, or test-design textbook. It borrows its core V&V definitions from CMMI v1.2 (SEI, paraphrased) and presumes the surrounding AMS lifecycle (see the FAA SEM pack); its phase tables are policy snapshots as of April 2017 and it is thin on detailed test methods, tool specifics, and anything outside FAA acquisition governance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA Requirements Engineering Management Handbook (DOT/FAA/AR-08/32). Use for writing requirements for real-time, embedded control systems — the avionics/medical slant — via the Handbook's eleven recommended practices: system overview and boundary (monitored/controlled variables), operational concepts (use cases), environmental assumptions, change-tolerant functional architecture (dependency diagrams), safety-driven architecture revision (FHA/PSSA/fault tree), system modes, detailed behavior and performance requirements (ideal value + tolerance + latency), the four-variable model bridge to software requirements (MON/CON/NAT/REQ, IN'/REQ'/OUT', DO-178B mapping), subsystem allocation, and rationale. Carries the Isolette Thermostat and Flight Control System worked examples. Slanted toward control systems with sensors and actuators; thin on information-system / enterprise / agile requirements, on requirements-management tooling, and on the formal-methods internals of SCR/RSML/SpecTRM (it names them, does not re-teach them). Does not reproduce the IEEE/DO-178B/ARP standards it cites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from FAA-HDBK-006D (2020), the FAA's System Reliability, Maintainability, and Availability (RMA) Handbook for National Airspace System (NAS) hardware and software. Use for RMA figures of merit (MTBF, MTBO, MTTR, the availability variants), the bathtub curve and probability distributions, the four-stage RMA lifecycle mapped to the FAA Acquisition Management System (AMS), the six-task RMA technical-management/acquisition process, service-thread criticality and the NAS-RD severity-to-target table, the RMA analysis toolbox (RBD, FMEA/FMECA, FTA, Ishikawa, Monte Carlo, Bayesian, FRACAS, ALT, reliability-growth/recovery tests), software reliability (early prediction + reliability growth), and tailorable example RMA requirements for a Program Requirements Document. Scope limits: it is FAA/NAS-specific guidance (not a requirement, by its own statement), centred on hardware-plus-software availability — it brackets out human/service/facility/communications availability, names but does not reproduce the math derivations or external standards (MIL-STDs, IEEE 1633, RTCA DO-178C/DO-278A, SAE JA1011), is thin on detailed worked numerical examples and on safety-case method, and predates any current revision beyond 006D.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the DoD Systems Engineering Guidebook (OUSD R&E, February 2022). Use for the DoD SE process model — the 16 SE processes (8 technical management + 8 technical) mapped to ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, the event-driven technical reviews and audits across the Major Capability Acquisition life cycle (ASR, SRR, SFR, PDR, CDR, SVR/FCA, PRR, PCA), the Systems Engineering Plan (SEP), risk/issue/opportunity management, TPMs and leading indicators, system-of-systems and digital engineering, and the 24 design considerations (RAM, system safety, HSI, system security engineering, MOSA, supportability, etc.). Acquisition-program oriented: thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting law, and non-DoD or commercial life cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA Risk Management Handbook (NASA/SP-2011-3422). Use for risk-informed decision making, continuous risk management, performance commitments, risk scenario diagrams, risk disposition types, risk burn-down schedules, objectives hierarchies, deliberation and alternative selection, risk driver identification, and RM planning for space and safety-critical programmes. Does not cover domain-specific PRA methods (fault trees, event trees) in procedural depth — see NASA PRA Procedures Guide for those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Akademisches Studien- und Fristenmanagement mit Quellenprüfung, Datenschutz und realistischer Handlungsplanung.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a DRAFT 30-60-90 day onboarding plan for a new hire from the role, the team context and the systems list: phase outcomes traced to the role, activities with a named owner and due window, an access and equipment request table, learning items, manager checkpoints and the items the manager must confirm. Use when the user asks to "build an onboarding plan for our new hire", "draft the induction plan for this role", "write a first 90 days plan", "put together a new starter plan with owners", "create a ramp plan from this job description" or "plan the integration of an internal mover". Do not use for writing the job description itself, use job-description-drafter instead; for interview questions or a scorecard, use interview-scorecard-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares a changed HR policy with the version it replaces and drafts a clause-by-clause change log, a plain-language DRAFT employee briefing, a manager FAQ answered only from the policy text with clause references, and a list of open questions the people team must settle before release. Use when the user asks to explain, announce, summarise or brief a policy change, a new policy version or an updated handbook section, or says "what changed in the leave policy", "brief managers on the new handbook section" or "compare the old and new versions of this policy". Do not use for a single announcement with no version comparison, use announcement-drafter instead; for an FAQ from documents that are not a policy change, use faq-builder; for contract clauses, use clause-comparison-table. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares a DRAFT management-of-change intake record from a change description (email, meeting note, marked-up drawing or request form): what changes from what to what and where, the identifiers named, the candidate affected documents matched against the register, the disciplines to consult with the reason for each, and the numbered questions reviewers must answer, with UNKNOWN wherever the description is silent. Prepares the record only: never approves, classifies the change, decides replacement in kind or makes any hazard or safety judgement. Use when the user asks to "raise an MoC for this", "prepare the change request intake", "which documents does this change touch", "who needs to review this change" or "draft the MoC form from this email". Do not use for tracking who owes information to whom across disciplines, use interface-register-builder instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage Railway projects, services, deployments, environments, variables, and deployment logs via Railway's public GraphQL API — one endpoint, relay-style pagination, two token flavors (account vs project), typed mutations for deploys and env vars. Use when the user wants to deploy, check service status, manage env vars, or read deployment logs programmatically without the Railway MCP installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage Cloudflare DNS zones, Workers, Pages, R2, KV, D1, and analytics via REST API. Use when the user wants to query DNS, deploy a Worker, list R2 buckets, manage KV namespaces, run D1 queries, or check analytics without the Cloudflare MCP installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。