「decisions」の検索結果

Guides generic vs trait object decisions in Rust. Use when choosing between static and dynamic dispatch, designing traits, handling E0277/E0038, or deciding between enum and dyn Trait.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep reasoning mode for complex problems requiring maximum cognitive depth. Use when facing difficult architectural decisions, complex debugging, multi-step problem solving, or situations requiring careful analysis before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill encodes Emil Kowalski's philosophy on UI polish, component design, animation decisions, and the invisible details that make software feel great.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in CONTEXT.md and the decisions in docs/adr/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more testable and AI-navigable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write or revise AI-learning-notes article pages in "寫文章模式" when the user asks for articles, technical articles, blog posts, bilingual versions, article formatting consistency, shared article-base alignment, responsive layout, summary/TOC decisions, contrast, or publishing-flow compatibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think through the consequences of consequences — not just what happens immediately, but what happens next, and next after that, across time. Load when a decision looks obviously good or obviously bad on initial read, when the user is optimising for a short-term outcome that might create a long-term problem, when unintended consequences are a concern, or when deep-thinking diagnoses a second-order frame. Triggers on "what are the downstream effects", "what happens after that", "unintended consequences", "think ahead on this", "long-term vs short-term", or "what comes after that". Based on Howard Marks second-level thinking and Farnam Street mental models. Most powerful for decisions with delayed consequences or systemic effects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract actionable patterns, architecture decisions, code conventions, and skill-relevant insights from GitHub/GitLab repositories. Assess repo credibility, run the full security scan pipeline, and apply findings to existing skills, new skills, or the current project. Load when the user asks to learn from a repo, extract patterns from a codebase, study a repository, or analyze a repo for reusable techniques. Also triggers on "learn from this repo", "learn from this repository", "what can we learn from this codebase", "extract patterns from this repo", "study this repo".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit project and global memory for bloat, stale decisions, duplicates, contradictions, unsafe content, missing provenance, broken routing, and over-budget global files. Load when the user asks to audit memory, clean memory, check memory health, or verify memory quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Record durable project decisions with rationale, alternatives, assumptions, status, and revisit triggers. Load when the user says record this decision, we decided, decision log, why did we choose, revisit this later, or capture architectural/process rationale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a Product Soul document — the strategic north star that sits above any PRD or feature spec. Captures the product's reason for existing across five lenses: user, business, strategy, product-market fit, and GTM distribution. Load when the user asks to write a product soul, product strategy doc, product north star, product positioning doc, product one-pager, or "why we exist" document. Also triggers on "write the soul of this product", "product strategy document", "what is this product really about", "capture the product vision", or when an agent needs strategic context before making product decisions. The output is docs/product-soul.md — a living document that brainstorming, prd-writing, and inversion can reference for grounding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compress bloated project or global memory while preserving decisions, rationale, revisit triggers, provenance, and active user preferences. Load when memory exceeds budget, global memory is too large, session logs are repetitive, or before appending to an over-budget memory file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build the smallest, highest-signal context package for an AI coding task — goal, constraints, repo facts, boundaries, and a verification plan. Load when prompts are underspecified, the agent is missing key files or decisions, the user says "use the right context", "here's the repo", or when work is drifting due to missing constraints. Also triggers on "context engineering", "gather context", "what do you need from me", "before you start". Not for cross-session continuity (use memory-startup/memory-recall).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn meeting transcripts or rough notes into crisp summaries with decisions, risks, and owner-tagged action items; use for Zoom/Meet/Teams transcripts, call notes, or long meeting chats to generate share-ready outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive patterns for creating, maintaining, and managing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that capture the context and rationale behind significant technical decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A hybrid memory system that provides persistent, searchable knowledge management for AI agents (Architecture, Patterns, Decisions).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extracts and assigns COSMIC v3.4 mutational signatures (84 SBS / 11 DBS / 18 ID / 24 CN / 16 SV) from somatic VCFs using SigProfilerSuite, MutationalPatterns, MuSiCal mvNMF, SigNet, or HRDetect. Use when characterizing DNA-damage etiology (BRCA1/2 HRD, MMR-D, POLE, APOBEC3A, UV, tobacco, aflatoxin, 5-FU/SBS17b, platinum, colibactin SBS88), routing PARP inhibitor decisions, or auditing de novo extraction vs refit choice for cohort size.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The gate and path for any question an agent wants Arman to decide. Use when about to ask him anything, ending a turn on a question for him, writing 'needs Arman's decision', marking work blocked on him, or on /ask-arman. NOT for a step only he can perform (use a guided session).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PHP Standards Recommendations (PSR) overview knowledge base. Provides comprehensive reference for all accepted PSRs including PSR-1,3,4,6,7,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,20. Use for PSR selection decisions and compliance audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GRASP principles knowledge base for PHP 8.5 projects. Provides quick reference for 9 responsibility assignment patterns (Information Expert, Creator, Controller, Low Coupling, High Cohesion, Polymorphism, Pure Fabrication, Indirection, Protected Variations). Use for architecture audits and design decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze context and decide on continuation via Stop hook. Use when determining if work should continue, analyzing completion status, making continuation decisions, or implementing the Two-Claude pattern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply timeless programming wisdom from "97 Things Every Programmer Should Know" when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code. Use for design decisions, code quality checks, professional development guidance, testing strategies, and workflow optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[31] ANALYZE. Universal deep thinking methodology for any situation requiring quality reasoning. Use when solving problems, debugging, making decisions, analyzing code, planning, reviewing, or anytime you need thorough thinking instead of surface-level responses. Triggers on "think deeply", "analyze thoroughly", "reason carefully", "deep thinking", "understand completely", or any task requiring careful thought.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。