「info」の検索結果

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Efficiently extract and convert the contents of any local file—such as PDF, DOCX, DOC, ODT, RTF, XLSX, XLS, or HTML—into clean, well-formatted markdown saved to disk. Use this skill whenever the user requests to parse, read, or extract information from a file on their computer, including phrases like “parse this PDF”, “convert this document”, “read this file”, “extract text from”, or when a local file path (not a URL) is provided. This skill offers advanced options like generating AI-powered summaries and answering questions based on the file's content. Prefer this tool over `scrape` when handling local files to deliver precise, structured outputs for downstream tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-powered autonomous data extraction that navigates complex sites and returns structured JSON. Use this skill when the user wants structured data from websites, needs to extract pricing tiers, product listings, directory entries, or any data as JSON with a schema. Triggers on "extract structured data", "get all the products", "pull pricing info", "extract as JSON", or when the user provides a JSON schema for website data. More powerful than simple scraping for multi-page structured extraction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run AI agent tasks on a Volcengine (火山引擎) cloud phone via the Mobile Use Agent OpenAPI. Use when the user asks to drive, automate, operate, or test an Android app on a cloud phone for enterprise use cases (e.g. reply to WeCom customer messages, add leads in a CRM, clock in on DingTalk, check invoicing stats, query inventory in a supply-chain app, ship e-commerce orders, approve OA requests) or personal ones (open 小红书 and search, place an order, check nearby places on a map), or to check status, fetch result, cancel, or list a Mobile Use run. Requires one-time setup to store Volcengine AK/SK locally; ProductId and PodId can be saved as a default device during setup, the user prompt is provided per run. Supports optional GPS injection (GpsInfo) with user consent (auto-asked only for location-related tasks).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to write a threat / risk / vulnerability assessment, or wants the appropriate template for each type. Distinct structures and section ordering per assessment kind. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Confidence is capped by the weakest load-bearing claim, and at Moderate when the evidence is ungraded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks about Russian state-sponsored cyber operations or specific actors (APT28/Fancy Bear, Sandworm, Cozy Bear/APT29, Turla, GRU-affiliated hacktivist fronts like CARR/NoName057), wartime ICS/OT campaigns, or pro-RU information operations. Self-updating knowledge cell.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to know where a piece of reporting actually came from — the user gives an article URL and asks "where does this come from?", "who is the original source?", "is this just a rewrite?", or another skill needs the provenance chain before grading or citing a report. Follows an article's links and named attributions back to the originating vendor, government, victim or actor document and returns the chain, the primary's stated access and confidence language, publication dates, and every hop it could not resolve. Deterministic — a script or the Liberty91 platform resolves the chain; the model does not reconstruct it from memory. Invoked by /quality-of-information-check, /threat-actor-profiling, /campaign-tracking and /intelligence-writing. Works on any URL with no API key.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

STIX 2.1 bundle creation reference. Object types, relationships, and JSON templates for structured threat intelligence sharing. Includes the per-claim mapping of evidence grades (access level and claim support) from /quality-of-information-check to STIX confidence, and the reverse mapping on import.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured threat assessment methodology. Intent + Capability + Opportunity = Threat Level. Use when formally evaluating a threat. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Confidence is capped by the weakest load-bearing claim, and at Moderate when the evidence is ungraded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Peer review checklist and quality standards for intelligence products, plus schema validation for graded evidence items and claim tables from /quality-of-information-check and /claim-extraction. Rejects outputs that break the evidence schema or the grading caps. Loaded by the quality-reviewer agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

IOC export formats and procedures. CSV, STIX 2.1, OpenIOC, MISP. Handles format conversion and packaging, and carries per-claim evidence grades (access level and claim support) from /quality-of-information-check into each format (STIX confidence, MISP attribute tags).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need Liberty91 platform intelligence — what actually happened (deduplicated Threat Events with every source, Admiralty reliability/credibility and verification stage), whether an IOC is already known to your account, the canonical threat library (actors, malware, vulnerabilities, clusters, ATT&CK TTPs), alert matches, or which of your customer organizations an occurrence affects — or when you need to push intelligence back: ingesting your own report, generating an intelligence package, or uploading an organization document. Also supplies event provenance fields, when the platform returns them, and Threat Library alias resolution to /source-provenance and /quality-of-information-check. Two-way, first-party integration. Commonly invoked by /ip-investigation and friends, /ioc-enrichment-workflow, /threat-actor-profiling, /campaign-tracking and /vulnerability-intelligence. Reads $LIBERTY91_API_KEY.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a report or article needs to be split into individual claims before it is graded, cited or used as evidence — the user asks "what does this report actually claim?", "split this into claims", "separate the facts from the judgements", or another skill needs a claim list. Turns one document into five to twelve atomic claims, each typed (observation, attribution, assessment, actor claim, victim disclosure) and anchored to the verbatim sentence it rests on, so every extraction can be checked against the source. Preserves the source's own hedging. Does not grade. Invoked by /quality-of-information-check; its output feeds /ach, /key-assumptions-check, /intelligence-writing, /writing-assessments and /threat-actor-profiling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analysis of Competing Hypotheses — structured technique for evaluating multiple explanations against evidence. Use when facing ambiguous attribution or multiple plausible scenarios. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Runs on ungraded evidence when asked, labelled as such, unweighted, and capped at Moderate confidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in CONTEXT.md and the decisions in docs/adr/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more testable and AI-navigable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Visual context analyzer for AI agents. Provides screenshots, accessibility scans, DOM snapshots, and element descriptions for web pages. Use when you need to see what a web page looks like, analyze accessibility issues, inspect DOM structure, or get detailed element information. Triggers on requests like "take a screenshot", "check accessibility", "what does this page look like", "analyze the UI", "inspect this element", or any visual/UI analysis task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive element picker for web pages. Opens a browser with click-to-select UI overlay. Use when you need to let users visually select DOM elements, identify element selectors, or get detailed element information interactively. Triggers on "select an element", "pick element", "let me choose", "which element", or any interactive element selection task. Integrates with agent-eyes for visual context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automates browser interactions for web testing, form filling, screenshots, and data extraction. Use when the user needs to navigate websites, interact with web pages, fill forms, take screenshots, test web applications, or extract information from web pages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent-native design engine that makes AI do more useful work: route the prompt, fork a template, weave IFQ ambient craft, verify the artifact, and only install export tooling when requested. One prompt -> shippable HTML, with optional MP4 / GIF / PPTX / PDF / SVG. Triggers include prototype, hi-fi mockup, slide deck, motion demo, infographic, dashboard, whitepaper, changelog, business card, social cover, brand from scratch, design critique, mp4/gif export, 60fps, keynote, PPTX, A-vs-B benchmark. Do not use for production web apps, SEO-critical sites, backend systems, or pure copy edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create bulletproof Terms of Service and Privacy Policy documents for SaaS applications. Infers company information from codebase/marketing site, conducts comprehensive audits, drafts documents, then asks user ONLY for missing details at the end. Minimizes user interaction. Use when the user needs to draft, review, or update legal documents (ToS, Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, legal pages). Triggers on requests for legal documents, terms drafting, privacy policy creation, "cover our bases legally", liability protection, or legal compliance for software products.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a website needs a broad audit covering UX, conversion, content, SEO, technical correctness, and information hierarchy before changes are planned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mosaic environment-sensitive areas (tenant name, user avatar, subscription name / ID, resource group, internal hostnames) on Azure Portal screenshots before publishing to blogs, Qiita, Medium, slides, or demos. Use when sanitizing screenshots, masking env info, or preparing portal captures for public sharing. Keywords: Azure Portal, screenshot, mask, mosaic, sanitize, tenant, subscription, public publishing, blur, redact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize oversized agent instruction files using progressive disclosure. Handles CLAUDE.md (Claude Code), AGENTS.md (OpenAI Codex / GitHub Copilot agents), and copilot-instructions.md (GitHub Copilot). Auto-detects all three formats in your repo, analyzes content tiers, creates sub-documents using each format's native mechanism, and rewrites the main file with zero information loss. Triggers: optimize CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md too long, reduce copilot-instructions.md, agent instructions file too large, shrink context file, apply progressive disclosure, instructions file bloated

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply pecking order theory (Myers and Majluf, 1984) to analyze how information asymmetry drives financing hierarchy decisions. Use this skill when the user needs to explain why firms prefer internal over external financing, interpret equity issuance as a negative signal, evaluate capital raising decisions, or when they ask 'why did the stock drop on the equity offering', 'should we use debt or equity', or 'why do firms hoard cash'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。