「quality」の検索結果

Use this skill AUTOMATICALLY before writing any Higgsfield prompt. Query the memory databases for relevant past failures and pre-apply known fixes before the user even hits generate. Triggers include: any request to write a Higgsfield prompt, any use of the higgsfield-prompt skill, any mention of generating a video or image on Higgsfield, any MCSLA prompt construction. This skill should run SILENTLY in the background — don't announce it, just apply what's known. If the databases are empty, skip silently and proceed with normal prompt generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user mentions GPT Image 2.0 or GPT Image 2.5, gpt-image-2, gpt-image-2.5, gpt_image_2_5, GPT-Image-2 prompts, the Flare / Sunburst variants, a transparent-background image, or wants to generate an image with GPT Image 2.0 or 2.5. Covers when to prefer GPT Image 2.5 over 2.0 (transparent background, xhigh/max quality, extra aspect ratios — from platform and OpenAI facts), the CLI-vs-MCP disagreement on gpt_image_2, the three-format prompt taxonomy (Format A structured JSON for UI mockups and layout-dense images; Format B dense cinematic prose for single-subject scenes; Format C auto-derive meta-prompt for theme-only concepts), per-format craft patterns, output conventions, the 6-item pre-delivery checklist, and cross-surface workflow context (companion static-ads-workflow.md for ad recreation; higgsfield-marketing-studio cross-surface-workflow.md §3 for ms_image / DTC Ads Higgsfield-native alternative).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit affiliate blog posts and landing pages for SEO issues. Triggers on: "audit my blog post for SEO", "check my SEO", "SEO review", "improve my rankings", "SEO checklist", "on-page SEO audit", "keyword optimization check", "why isn't my page ranking", "SEO score", "content quality audit", "check my meta tags", "internal linking audit", "quick SEO wins".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate multiple diverse solutions in parallel and select the best. Use for architecture decisions, code generation with multiple valid approaches, or creative tasks where exploring alternatives improves quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to switch the GSD model profile for agents: quality, balanced, budget, or inherit. Runs the gsd-tools config-set-model-profile command and shows its output verbatim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for a visual or UI quality review of frontend code that already shipped, or passes a phase number. Produces {phase_num}-UI-REVIEW.md with a graded 1-4 assessment across six pillars.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need a quick read on one subsystem instead of a full /gsd-map-codebase run, or the user asks to scan tech, arch, quality, or concerns. Spawns one mapper agent and writes targeted docs into .planning/codebase/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after a phase's code is written, or when the user asks to review changed files for bugs, security issues, or quality. Spawns the gsd-code-reviewer agent at quick, standard, or deep depth and writes the phase REVIEW.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after every code change, after writing tests, or before marking a task complete, and when the user says verify, quality gate, or audit code. Runs a 7-category mechanical check for TDZ, import, dead code, and mock leakage bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to review a PR, MR, branch, or diff, audit changed files, or check code quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architecture quality critique dimensions for peer review. Load when invoking solution-architect-reviewer or performing self-review of architecture documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Database security (encryption, access control, injection prevention), data governance (lineage, quality, MDM), and compliance frameworks (GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architecture quality critique dimensions for peer review. Load when performing architecture document reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Selects a quality-vs-token-consumption profile (lean, standard, thorough, exhaustive, custom, inherit) and persists it globally (~/.nwave/global-config.json) or per-project (.nwave/des-config.json). Use when tuning how much rigor wave commands apply.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Emotional design and delight patterns for product owners. Load when designing onboarding flows, empty states, first-run experiences, or evaluating the emotional quality of an interface.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Property-based testing strategies, mutation testing, shrinking, and combined PBT+mutation workflow for test quality validation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviewer critique dimensions for peer review - implementation bias detection, test quality validation, completeness checks, and priority validation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dispatches an expert reviewer agent to critique workflow artifacts. Use when a roadmap, implementation, or step needs quality review before proceeding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the Refactoring Priority Premise (RPP) levels L1-L6 for systematic code refactoring. Use when improving code quality through structured refactoring passes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research output templates, distillation workflow, and quality standards for evidence-driven research

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review dimensions and scoring for root cause analysis quality assessment

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality dimensions and review checklist for devop reviews

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs feature-scoped mutation testing to validate test suite quality. Use after implementation to verify tests catch real bugs (kill rate >= 80%).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。