「should」の検索結果

[1-2 sentence description of what this skill does]. Triggers on [specific phrases/contexts that should activate this skill]. Outputs [what the skill produces].

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define monitoring strategy, metrics collection, and alerting thresholds during PRD v0.8 Deployment & Ops. Triggers on requests to set up monitoring, define alerts, or when user asks "what should we monitor?", "alerting strategy", "observability", "metrics", "SLOs", "dashboards", "monitoring setup". Outputs MON- entries with monitoring rules and alert configurations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design the changelog as a distribution surface bridging engineering releases (DEP-/FEA-) to marketing channels (GTM-) during PRD v0.8 Deployment & Ops. Triggers on requests to set up a changelog system, publish releases, or when user asks "how should we publish releases?", "changelog as marketing", "release notes", "Stripe-style changelog", "what to do with our release notes", "ship and tell". Outputs MON-CHG-* changelog entries and per-channel formats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select and validate pricing model for PRD v0.3 Commercial Model. Triggers on requests to set pricing, choose monetization model, design pricing tiers, validate willingness to pay, or when user asks "how much should we charge?", "what pricing model?", "freemium vs paid?", "how to structure tiers?", "price point?". Consumes Competitive Landscape (CFD-) and Product Type (BR-) from v0.2. Outputs BR- entries for pricing rules, tier boundaries, and competitive positioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user says "/council", "council", "deliberate", "multi-perspective decision", "트레이드오프 분석", "위원회 소집", "여러 관점으로 검토", or wants deep multi-perspective deliberation with tradeoff mapping. Combines tribunal (structured adversarial review), agent-council (external LLM opinions), dev-scan (community sentiment), and step-back (meta-level review) into a unified decision-making committee. Uses Agent Teams for real peer-to-peer debate with iterative step-back moderation loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user says "/ultrawork", "ultrawork", or wants to run the full specify → execute pipeline automatically with a single command. Automated end-to-end workflow that chains specify and execute skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user wants to verify their changes before pushing, or update the project's rule checklists. Phase 1: validate changed files against .hoyeon/rules/ checklists and report PASS/WARN. Phase 2 (conditional): propose rule additions when unmatched patterns are detected. Essential before git push. Trigger phrases: "check", "checklist", "verify changes", "what did I miss", "pre-push check", "cascading changes", "any more changes needed", "update checklist", "update rules", "rules update", "체크", "체크리스트", "변경 확인", "빠뜨린 거 없나", "push 전 확인", "뭐 더 건드려야 해?", "연쇄 변경 확인", "규칙 갱신".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze session", "evaluate skill execution", "check session logs", provides a session ID with a skill path, or wants to verify that a skill executed correctly in a past session. Post-hoc analysis of Claude Code sessions to validate skill/agent/hook behavior against SKILL.md specifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user says "/tribunal", "tribunal", "review this", "3-way review", "risk-value-feasibility check", or wants multi-perspective adversarial review. Also triggered by: "트리뷰널", "리뷰 해줘", "3관점 리뷰", "위험성 검토". Runs 3 agents (Risk/Value/Feasibility) in parallel and synthesizes a verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "find references", "참고할 만한 거", "similar implementation", "오픈소스 있나", "how others do this", "레퍼런스 찾아줘", or needs to find existing patterns (internal) and open-source examples (external) for implementing a feature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks about "technical decision", "what to use", "A vs B", "comparison analysis", "library selection", "architecture decision", "which one to use", "tradeoffs", "tech selection", "implementation approach", or needs deep analysis for technical decisions. Provides systematic multi-source research and synthesized recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user says "/compound", "compound this", "document learnings", "save what we learned", or after completing a PR. Extracts knowledge from PR context and saves to docs/learnings/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for "how does X work", code walkthroughs before changing something, and placement / ownership / layering questions ("where should this live", "which package owns this", "is this the right layer"). Explains subsystem architecture, runtime flow, onboarding mental models. Can critique architecture. Use why for motivation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when tempted to ask 'should I do X?' on reversible work. Proceed, present the result, let the human course-correct after the fact; reserve confirmation for irreversible actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to start or reposition a Xiaohongshu account but is asking "what should I post" before clarifying monetization, timing, personal IP direction, or trust path. Trigger phrases: "小红书定位", "不知道做什么赛道", "怎么变现", "个人IP", "账号方向", "XHS positioning", "monetization first". Do not use for drafting a specific post; use topic or copy skills after positioning is clear.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to start or reposition a Xiaohongshu account but is asking "what should I post" before clarifying monetization, timing, personal IP direction, or trust path. Trigger phrases: "小红书定位", "不知道做什么赛道", "怎么变现", "个人IP", "账号方向", "XHS positioning", "monetization first". Do not use for drafting a specific post; use topic or copy skills after positioning is clear.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs the public interface of a module before any implementation exists: writes the caller scenarios first, produces three candidates with genuinely different shapes, type-checks each one against the scenarios, scores them on measurable criteria and records the decision. Use when someone says "design the API for this module", "what should this signature look like", "compare interface options", "this function is awkward to call", "show me alternatives before I build it", or is about to add a module, library entry point, endpoint or command that other code will depend on.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans, researches and writes comparison pages: "[rival] alternatives", "[product] vs [rival]", "[rival A] vs [rival B]" and switching guides. Builds each page from a ledger of sourced, dated facts and ends with an honest verdict on who should choose which product. Use when someone asks for an "alternative page", a "vs page", a "competitor comparison", "comparison landing pages", "why us instead of them", or wants existing comparison pages checked for outdated prices and claims that cannot be backed up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits and reorganises what an AI coding agent carries in its context window: instruction files, path-scoped rules, skills, subagents, hooks and the running conversation. Use when someone says "the agent ignores our CLAUDE.md", "set this repo up for Claude Code / Codex / Cursor", "my AGENTS.md is too long", "quality drops in long sessions", "it keeps inventing APIs", "what should go in a skill versus the rules file", or asks how to hand work to a subagent. Grounded in the documented loading behaviour of Claude Code, with the equivalents for Codex, Gemini CLI and Cursor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides a founder from real decisions to a short set of written company values that people can act on: collects incidents, tests each candidate value, writes it as a trade-off with behaviors and a story, and wires it into hiring, feedback and promotion. Use when someone asks to "define our company values", "write a values document", "our values are generic, fix them", "turn our values into interview questions", "what should our culture be before we hire", or wants to check whether the team lives the values it has. Produces VALUES.md, an evidence log and an interview kit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a content strategy a small team can execute: audience needs backed by counted evidence, an audit of what is already published, a topic map with one page per search intent, a scored backlog, a 90-day calendar sized to real capacity, and the numbers that will show whether it worked. Use when someone asks "what should we write about", "plan our blog", "content strategy", "content plan for next quarter", "topic clusters", "content audit", "our blog traffic is falling", or wants a pile of content ideas turned into a prioritised plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans a controlled experiment (A/B test) so its result can be trusted: writes the hypothesis, picks one primary metric and the guardrails, computes sample size and run time, specifies how visitors are assigned and when exposure is logged, and reads out the result with a confidence interval. Use when someone says "set up an A/B test", "split test this page", "how many visitors do I need", "how long should the experiment run", "is this result significant", "can I stop the test early", or wants to test a headline, price, layout or onboarding change against the current version.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Core marketing principles for startups. Covers positioning, messaging, channels, and growth. Focus on what works for resource-constrained teams. Battle scars included: I've watched startups burn $1M on Instagram ads because "that's where competitors are", seen "growth hacks" destroy brand trust overnight, and advised founders who scaled marketing before finding product-market fit. Contrarian take: Most startup marketing advice is backwards. The best marketing doesn't feel like marketing. Distribution comes before product features. And your first 100 customers should never come from paid ads. Use when "marketing strategy, positioning, messaging, customer acquisition, growth channels, brand, go-to-market, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical decision-making frameworks - trade-off evaluation, reversibility analysis, and second-order thinking for better engineering choicesUse when "should we, which is better, trade-off, decision, choose between, versus, pros and cons, what if we, is it worth, evaluate options, decisions, trade-offs, architecture, adr, reversibility, strategy, planning, risk" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。