「assess」の検索結果

60-Second Restaurant Snapshot — quick assessment without subagents with grade, top 3 fixes, and CTA to full audit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Online presence audit — Google Business Profile completeness, Yelp listing quality, website assessment, online ordering setup, third-party platform presence

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Risk Assessment & Position Sizing — volatility profile (beta/ATR/HV), historical drawdowns, correlation analysis, liquidity risk, position sizing tables (fixed %, volatility-adjusted, Kelly Criterion), and VaR estimates. Returns Risk Score (0-100, higher = safer). Triggered by "trade risk <TICKER>".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investment Thesis Generator — complete institutional-quality thesis with bull/bear cases (3-5 reasons each with evidence), catalyst timeline, entry/exit strategy with specific price levels, position sizing tables, timeframe classification, and asymmetry assessment. Triggered by "trade thesis <TICKER>".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

60-Second Stock Snapshot — fast assessment with signal (BUY/HOLD/SELL/AVOID), key bullish/bearish factors, and key levels. No subagents. Terminal output only. Triggered by "trade quick <TICKER>" or "quick look at <TICKER>".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits brand/ files for completeness, consistency, and freshness. Use when the agent or user wants to review brand files, audit marketing docs, check brand consistency, verify brand health, or assess what's missing from brand memory. Produces a structured audit report with per-file scores, cross-file contradiction detection, staleness flags, and recommended next skills to run. This is the quality gate for the brand memory system. Also use when someone says 'check my brand', 'brand audit', 'what's missing', 'is my brand ready', 'brand health', 'review my marketing docs', or before running any campaign to verify brand foundations are solid.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Employer Brand Audit — Glassdoor/Indeed review analysis, LinkedIn company page assessment, career site evaluation, employee testimonials, competitiveness vs other employers

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

60-Second Role Snapshot — quick assessment without subagents with grade, top 3 fixes, and CTA to full analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit mobile applications (iOS and Android) against RAAM 1.1 (Luxembourg Mobile Accessibility Assessment Framework). Use when reviewing existing mobile app code for accessibility compliance, generating audit reports, checking conformance levels, or preparing for Luxembourg accessibility certification. Covers all 15 themes with platform-specific test procedures. Default target: Level AA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develop accessible mobile applications (iOS and Android) conforming to RAAM 1.1 (Luxembourg Mobile Accessibility Assessment Framework, based on EN 301 549 v3.2.1 / WCAG 2.1). Use when building native mobile apps, React Native, Flutter, or any mobile UI that must meet Luxembourg accessibility law. Covers all 15 RAAM themes with platform-specific code guidance. Default conformance target: Level AA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RED-GREEN-MUTATE-KILL MUTANTS-REFACTOR workflow for writing production code. Use before ANY production code change - new features, bug fixes, or behavior changes. Triggers on starting implementation work of any kind. Covers the cycle itself - failing test first, minimum code to pass, mutation verification, refactor assessment. For how to write good tests, see testing. For the refactoring step in detail, see refactoring. TDD is non-negotiable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculates CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) score for .NET methods, classes, or files. Use when the user asks to assess test quality, identify risky untested code, compute CRAP scores, or evaluate whether complex methods have sufficient test coverage. Requires code coverage data (Cobertura XML) and cyclomatic complexity analysis. DO NOT USE FOR: writing tests, general test execution unrelated to coverage/CRAP analysis, or general code coverage reporting without CRAP context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess organizational AI maturity. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-maturity-model related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit existing business processes to identify AI automation opportunities. TRIGGERS - Use when user wants to find AI opportunities, audit processes for automation, or assess AI readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit an existing Quarkus + LangChain4j project against this stack's agentic conventions — a read-only conformance or gap-analysis review. Use when the user asks to audit, review, check, assess, or validate a Quarkus project against the LangChain4j agentic conventions, or wants to know whether an existing project conforms to (or is ready to adopt) this stack. User-invoked only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a dogfooding session for hyalo — build from source, exercise the CLI against real knowledgebases (own KB, MDN, GitHub Docs, VS Code docs), find bugs, verify recent fixes, assess UX, measure performance, and write a structured report. Use this skill whenever the user says /dogfood, "dogfood", "run a dogfood session", "test hyalo against real data", or wants to exercise hyalo on real knowledgebases to find issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use as the default entry point for any CTI request that doesn't name a specific skill. Activates when a user asks to investigate an indicator, profile a threat actor, write an assessment, enrich IOCs, or build detection rules, and when a user asks where a report or article comes from, how reliable it is, to grade a source, check a report, or split a report into claims, or pastes a bare article URL. Routes to the right investigation, provenance, grading or analysis skill, then auto-applies rigor skills (source rating, TLP, confidence, likelihood) on the output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to answer "which attacker techniques do our controls actually stop, and how well?", "what controls should I have for this threat?", or "what telemetry should I collect to detect it?" — joining a customer's or your own security control baseline to ATT&CK techniques using a public, versioned evidence base of 9,545 control-to-technique mappings from six sources. Produces four ranked lists (addressed strongly, addressed weakly, real gaps, and techniques no control anywhere addresses). Use for control gap analysis, security programme prioritisation, board reporting on coverage, or the Resistance Strength side of a FAIR risk assessment. Invoke after /threat-actor-profiling or /lookup-liberty91 has produced a technique list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing a finished intelligence product, the user asks for a flash-report / threat-assessment / briefing / FINTEL template, or wants the BLUF + active-voice + clear-sourcing conventions. Covers all product types.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when challenging a prevailing analytical judgment, the user asks "what is the opposing case?" / "argue the other side" / "play devil's advocate", or wants an assessment stress-tested before release. Takes the team's own lead judgment and builds the strongest case that it is wrong. A contrarian technique. It does not model what an adversary would do next, which is Red Team Analysis. Formerly /red-team-analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restate requirements, assess risks, and create a step-by-step implementation plan with Vertical Slices (Tracer Bullets).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifying and validating cross-site scripting vulnerabilities using Burp Suite's scanner, intruder, and repeater tools during authorized security assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates structured cyber threat intelligence reports at strategic, operational, and tactical levels tailored to specific audiences including executives, security operations teams, and technical analysts. Use when producing finished intelligence products from raw collection data, creating sector threat briefings, or delivering post-incident intelligence assessments. Activates for requests involving CTI report writing, threat briefings, intelligence products, finished intelligence, or executive security reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Intercepts and analyzes HTTP/HTTPS traffic from mobile applications using Burp Suite proxy to identify insecure API communications, authentication flaws, data leakage, and server-side vulnerabilities. Use when performing mobile application penetration testing, assessing API security, or evaluating client-server communication patterns. Activates for requests involving mobile traffic interception, Burp Suite mobile proxy, API security testing, or mobile HTTPS analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。