2,102 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Proactive bug-hunting workflow. Assesses codebase risk through complexity, coverage, and structural analysis, then spawns focused investigators that write reproducing tests to validate suspected bugs. Thoroughness over speed. Advisory only — produces findings and proposes tickets; does not implement fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive test suite review across five phases. Surveys unit coverage, integration coverage, E2E (browser) coverage for webapps, fuzz coverage, and test quality — in that order. Advisory only — produces findings and proposes tickets; does not implement test changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Checks and fixes Chinese copywriting with autocorrect-backed workflows for text and single-file Markdown/TXT inputs. Use when user asks to normalize Chinese punctuation, spacing, or full-width/half-width usage. Also triggers for "校对", "检查排版", "中英文空格", "全角半角". Does not rewrite document structure, product claims, or UI messaging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify that browser profiles are actually isolated from one another instead of assuming it - confirm each profile's timezone agrees with its own exit IP, that WebRTC exposes only the proxy, that canvas and WebGL hashes stay identical across relaunches of one profile, and that no two profiles share a persona, a cookie jar, or an address. Use when several of your own accounts or test identities run from one machine and the setup needs checking, when a profile tested clean but something still looks off, when choosing which detection suites to run (CreepJS, whoer, browserleaks WebRTC, pixelscan, liarjs), when auditing what a vendor runtime does with API and proxy credentials, or when asking which layers browser isolation cannot cover at all. Also for 'profile isolation check', 'fingerprint consistency test', 'timezone mismatch', 'WebRTC leak', 'canvas hash unstable', 'account association', 'temporary profile', '防关联', '多账号', '隔离自检'. The SDK is anti-detect-browser; MCP is browser-mcp-agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create reproducible, cross-platform development environments with Flox — a declarative environment manager built on Nix. ALWAYS use this skill when the user needs to: set up a project with system-level dependencies (compilers, databases, native libraries like openssl, libvips, BLAS, LAPACK); configure reproducible toolchains for Python, Node.js, Rust, Go, C/C++, Java, Ruby, Elixir, PHP, or any language; manage environments that must work identically across macOS and Linux; pin exact package versions for a team; run local services (PostgreSQL, Redis, Kafka) alongside development tools; onboard new developers with a single command; or solve 'works on my machine' problems. Especially valuable for AI-assisted and vibe coding — Flox lets agents install tools into a project-scoped environment without sudo, system pollution, or sandbox restrictions, and the resulting environment is committed to the repo so anyone can reproduce it instantly. Use this skill even if the user doesn't mention Flox — if they describe needing reproducible, declarative, cross-platform dev environments with system packages, this is the right tool. Also use when the user mentions .flox/, manifest.toml, flox activate, or FloxHub.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pick the right library for a given frontend task from a curated, opinionated list — numbers, OTP inputs, charts, command menus, virtualization, drag and drop, toasts, state, styling, and more. Only runs when explicitly invoked; it does not trigger on its own.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build multiple genuinely different versions of a UI piece you describe, rendered behind a visual picker so you can flip through them live and promote the one that feels right. Only runs when explicitly invoked; it does not trigger on its own.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Survey a codebase's animation and motion code as a senior motion advisor, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the animations", "audit the motion", "make this app feel better", or wants a roadmap of animation fixes rather than a review of a single diff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Premium UI/UX design audit and refinement skill. Conducts systematic visual audits of existing apps and produces phased, implementation-ready design plans. Use this skill whenever the user asks to audit a UI, improve an app's visual design, make an interface feel more polished or premium, review design consistency, fix visual hierarchy, or refine spacing/typography/color. Also trigger when the user says "design review", "make it look better", "UI polish", "visual refinement", "design pass", "audit the design", or references making an app feel more professional. This skill is purely visual — it does not touch functionality, logic, or features. It elevates what exists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search a codebase or UI for places that don't animate but should, and reject everything that shouldn't. Read-only; it proposes motion with exact values, it does not implement it. Use when the user asks "what could be animated here?" or wants to "make this feel more alive". For fixing existing animations, use improve-animations or review-animations instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Professional typography rules for UI design, web applications, software interfaces, and all screen-based text. Enforces timeless typographic correctness that LLMs consistently get wrong: proper quote marks, dashes, spacing, hierarchy, and layout. ENFORCEMENT MODE: When generating ANY HTML, CSS, React, JSX, or UI code containing visible text, auto-apply every rule in this skill silently — do not ask, do not explain, just produce correct typography. AUDIT MODE: When reviewing or improving existing interfaces or legacy code, flag violations and provide fixes. Trigger on: any HTML/CSS/React artifact creation, "build a landing page", "create a component", "design a UI", "fix the typography", "make this look professional", "review this layout", web design, presentation design, dashboard creation, document generation, or any task producing visible text for humans. Even if the user doesn't mention typography, apply these rules whenever generating UI output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic QA testing for web applications, desktop apps, and workflows. Three tiers: QUICK (critical/high severity only — 5 min), STANDARD (+ medium severity — 15 min), EXHAUSTIVE (+ cosmetic — 30+ min). Tests user flows, finds bugs, reports with severity classification, and optionally auto-fixes with atomic commits. Produces before/after health scores and ship-readiness summary. Use when user says "test this", "QA", "find bugs", "does this work?", or "is it ready to ship?". Voice triggers: "quality check", "run QA", "test the app". For report-only (no fixes), use with --report-only flag.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search and analyze Reddit discussions for market research, product feedback, and community insights using Xpoz. Use when asked to "search Reddit", "what does Reddit think about X", "Reddit feedback on X", "subreddit analysis", or "Reddit market research".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map the most influential Reddit venues for a brand's AI visibility using Xpoz. Finds which subreddits and threads AI engines actually cite when answering buyer questions, where those questions get asked, and which live threads are worth answering. Use when asked to "get cited by AI through Reddit", "which subreddits matter for my brand", "Reddit influence map", "where should we engage on Reddit", or "why does ChatGPT cite Reddit for my category".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One-shot GEO visibility check for a brand using Xpoz. Runs the buyer questions that matter through Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini, and reports where the brand appears, who wins instead, and which surfaces the answers are assembled from. Use when asked to "check my AI visibility", "does ChatGPT recommend us", "GEO audit", "where do we show up in AI answers", or "who wins our category in AI answers".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a one-shot buying-intent lead scan across Reddit, Twitter/X, Instagram, and TikTok using Xpoz. Finds fresh posts from people actively looking for what a product does or frustrated with its competitors, classifies and prioritizes them, and reports where to engage and who to reach. Use when asked to "find leads", "who is asking for a tool like mine", "find people complaining about [COMPETITOR]", "buying-intent scan", or "social selling opportunities".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
塔罗牌占星：把「抽三张塔罗牌」与「西方占星本命盘」合为一次解读。 用户带着一个具体问题来 → 抽三张牌（可复现的 seed）→ 若愿意提供生日，则用脚本 确定性地排出星座与星盘 → 用黄金黎明的塔罗↔占星对应把两者接起来（牌落在黄道哪一旬， 你的哪颗行星正站在那里）→ 给出一张交叉对照表、对所问之事的审慎取向与可执行建议。 塔罗层：牌阵位置语义、牌与牌的组合叙事、元素尊贵、正逆位、直觉对话、治疗性解读。 占星层：本命盘、相位与宫位、必然尊贵、行运盘推运、比较盘/组合盘（合盘）、太阳弧推运。 当用户说：塔罗、塔罗牌、抽牌、抽三张牌、占卜、算一卦（西洋）、牌阵、正逆位、 星盘、本命盘、星座、上升星座、月亮星座、占星、行运、流年、合盘、比较盘、 太阳弧、推运、我该不该……、这段关系会怎样、我适不适合换工作 时使用。 English triggers: "tarot", "tarot reading", "draw three cards", "what do the cards say", "spread", "reversed card", "natal chart", "birth chart", "astrology", "rising sign", "transits", "synastry", "composite chart", "solar arc", "progressions", "should I take this job", "what does my chart say". 内置离线脚本：抽牌洗牌（可复现 seed）、本命盘（行星/四轴/宫位/相位/元素统计）、 必然尊贵、牌↔盘共鸣、元素数字统计、行运盘、比较盘+组合盘、太阳弧+次限推运。 边界：要**周公解梦**请用 `zhougong-dream-interpretation`；要**四柱八字**请用 `bazi`； 要**中式黄历择日/测吉凶**请用 `zhanshi-jixiong`。本技能只做西洋塔罗与西洋占星。 即使用户只是随口说「帮我抽张牌看看」「我最近水逆吗」，也应主动使用本技能。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, analyze, and optimize cold outbound email campaigns on Instantly. Handles end-to-end ICP definition, expert panel scoring (recursive to 90+), sequence copywriting, infrastructure audit, capacity planning, and an implementation/strategy doc for human review. Use when asked to build cold outbound sequences, optimize cold email, audit an outbound motion, write sales sequences, or design cold email campaigns. Supports "start from scratch" and "optimize existing" modes. Execution skill — it produces copy, math, and a doc; it does not auto-send. Requires Instantly for audit/send features.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when adversarially reviewing a document that makes formal or technical claims — math derivations, physics papers, statistical analyses, benchmark reports, whitepapers. Inventories every equation and quantitative claim, verifies each AS NAMED in the text (never a paraphrase or a neighboring statement), and classifies VERIFIED / REFUTED / UNVERIFIABLE / VACUOUS. Triggers on "check this paper", "verify these claims", "is this derivation right", "review this proof", "audit this benchmark", "does the math hold up". For source-code review see code-review-and-quality; for skill/agent library audits see skill-library-review; for content quality scoring see content-ops.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when tuning the numbers in a game — economy curves, progression rates, difficulty pacing, drop tables, win/loss odds, time-to-X targets, and currency velocities. Triggers on "balance pass", "tune the economy", "progression curve", "difficulty curve", "drop rate", "XP curve", "TTK", "time-to-content", "balance the economy", "spreadsheet model", "economy sim", or a system spec from game-systems-designer with `TBD` placeholders. Produces an economy spreadsheet, balance pass plan, sim outputs, and per-system balance tables. Stops at the numbers — does not change system rules or pricing. For systems design see game-systems-designer; for store catalog see iap-manager.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to measure command execution time or optimize a feedback loop. Records explicit measurements and recommends faster alternatives such as unit tests versus integration tests. It is opt-in; it does not run on every command.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。