1,957 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
XP-style plan review that identifies gaps, hidden assumptions, and critical misses. Triggers on 'review the plan', 'check the plan', 'audit the plan'. Reviews plans for YAGNI violations, missing feedback loops, and over-engineering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a language-agnostic ghost package (spec + portable tests) from an existing repo by extracting SPEC.md, exhaustive tests.yaml (operations and/or scenarios), INSTALL.md, README.md, VERIFY.md, and upstream LICENSE files with provenance and regeneration instructions. Use when prompts say "/tw-ghost", "ghostify this repo", "spec-ify/spec-package this library", "ghost library", or ask to extract portable spec/tests for libraries or tool-using agent loops (scenario testing); do not use for implementation work or editing skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design verification strategy: diagnose observability, select oracle families, map to loop tiers, surface blind spots. Use after ln-plan when frontier items or scoped slices need oracle design — especially for LLM, visual, or compositional work — or when verification coverage has drifted.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scientific debugging for bugs, flakes, failures, and performance regressions. Use when something is broken, throwing, failing, slow, nondeterministic, or when the user says diagnose/debug this. Builds a trusted repro loop, tests falsifiable hypotheses, installs a regression oracle, and routes durable findings back into ln-* planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the FAA System Safety Handbook (Dec 30, 2000). Use for system safety as a specialty within systems engineering: the five-step safety risk management process (mandated by FAA Order 8040.4 and the AMS), the severity-by-likelihood risk matrix and acceptance bands, the Safety Order of Precedence, system-description models (5M, SHEL(L)), the hazard-analysis activities (PHL/PHA/RHA/SSHA/SHA/O&SHA/HHA), integrated system hazard analysis, the analysis techniques (FTA, FMEA/FMECA, Fault Hazard, Common Cause, Sneak Circuit, Energy Trace), closed-loop hazard tracking (Safety Action Record), and the specialty domains the handbook covers — acquisition-lifecycle safety and contracting (OSA/CSA/SSPP/ISSPP), software safety (control-capability ranking, SHCM, DO-178B), test & evaluation safety, facilities safety, commercial launch safety (AST licensing, expected casualty, MPL/DAMP), system safety training, and Operational Risk Management (ORM) with human/organizational factors. Scope limits: this is a year-2000 FAA how-to; it predates the modern FAA/ICAO Safety Management System (SMS) and Just Culture regulatory frameworks, and many cited orders, advisory circulars, and launch-licensing rules have since been restructured. It is FAA/NAS-centric, leans on MIL-STD-882C, and does not define the SE life-cycle processes themselves (use nasa-npr-7123 / dau-se-guidebook) or reproduce third-party standard text (MIL-STD-882, DO-178B, ISO/IEC/IEEE).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the Expanded Guidance for NASA Systems Engineering (NASA/SP-2016-6105-SUPPL, Volume 1, March 2016) — the practitioner-depth supplement to the NASA SE Handbook. Use for the load-bearing mechanics the handbook compresses: the SE Engine's per-phase cadence and the iterative-vs-recursive distinction, the AS9100 crosswalk, life-cycle tailoring vs. customization and the Compliance Matrix, the recursive system-design consistency loop (ConOps vs. Operations Concept, requirement flow/type/ownership, successive refinement), product realization (verify/qualify/accept/certify cardinality, protoflight, 'test the way we fly' coverage, two-form transition), and the crosscutting technical-management procedures (six-step scheduling, cost-estimating method selection, JCL, interface document family, RIDM/CRM, CM baselines, EVM arithmetic, MOE/MOP/KPP/TPM, the three required leading indicators, and the decision-analysis method catalog). This is the DEPTH layer — it deliberately does NOT restate the base definitions; pair it with the nasa-se-handbook pack. Scope: NASA space-flight SE practice (Vol 1 Practices); thin on the Vol 2 process-appendix detail, on non-NASA/commercial life cycles, and on software-engineering methodology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extrahiert aus einem Chatverlauf (aktuelle Session oder Transkript-Dateien) einen wiederverwendbaren Skill — oder verbessert einen sehr ähnlichen existierenden Skill, statt ein Duplikat zu erzeugen. Nutze diesen Skill bei „mach daraus einen Skill", „das sollten wir als Skill festhalten", „extrahiere Skills aus diesem/alten Chatverläufen", „diese Arbeitsweise wiederverwendbar machen", oder bei `/skill-extract`. Deckt auch Bulk-Läufe über viele alte Transkripte ab (mit Datenreduktion über Subagenten). Für wiederkehrende AUTOMATISIERUNGEN (Cron/Schedule/Loop) stattdessen den Schwester-Skill workflow-extract nutzen.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systemneutrale Automatisierung für lösungsorientierten Community Outreach und Repo-Recommender in Foren, Reddit und Plattformen nach dem Human-in-the-Loop-Prinzip (EU AI Act konform).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automated software development pipeline. Scans projects, prioritizes tasks, analyzes code, and orchestrates development loops. Zero dependencies (Python stdlib only).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a DRAFT change-communication plan from a change description: audience map, key messages per audience traced to the description, channels, sequence with dates or day offsets, owners, feedback loop and open questions, plus drafts of the first messages for the sponsor to approve. Use when the user asks to "plan the comms for this change", "who needs to hear about this and when", "draft the announcement sequence", "build a communication plan for the rollout", "write the first message to managers about this change" or "how do we tell people about this". Do not use for a clause-by-clause comparison of a changed HR policy with its previous version, use policy-change-briefing instead; for a new hire's first weeks, use onboarding-plan-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Flags where a P&ID draft raises a process safety question and points to the candidate evidence an engineer would review (HAZOP register, relief study, SIL assessment, isolation philosophy), as questions and quoted passages with UNKNOWN for missing documents, plus safety functions, relief devices and isolation requirements carried over as stated. Never rates, sizes, classifies, resolves or declares protection adequate. Use when the user asks to "write the process safety flags", "produce the process safety section of the P&ID enrichment", "list which protection questions this P&ID raises" or "map the HAZOP and relief study evidence to the draft" after gate G2, once the piping and instrumentation sections exist. Do not use for proposing loops, alarms or trips from the control philosophy, use instrumentation-and-control-enrichment instead; do not use for checking identifiers, use tagging-and-numbering. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Proposes the piping content a P&ID adds to an accepted PFD process model: line inventory with off-page continuity and required ancillary lines, line identification elements per the project line numbering procedure, connection items at nozzles matched to a quoted schedule, per quoted standards, specification break questions and observations. Every proposal cites its source and revision; no source, no proposal; never sizes a line or selects a class. Use when the user asks to "run the piping enrichment", "start the discipline enrichment", "list the lines the P&ID adds to this PFD" or "fill the line identifiers from the numbering procedure" after gate G2. Do not use for instruments, loops or instrument tags, use instrumentation-and-control-enrichment instead; do not use before gate G2, use process-model-check. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an always-on Telegram watch loop under a separate assistant account using MCP push tools. Mode 1 answers when the assistant account is mentioned in team chats, with actionable vault-grounded advice; mode 2 ambiently watches designated chats and pings on salient events. Triggers: "/telegram-watch", "start the telegram watch".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Keep serialized build-in-public content continuous: read one canon file of season, arcs, beats and loops and say which narrative beat to advance next, so episodes chain into a series. Pairs with the episode adapter, which does the writing. Triggers: "/reality-show", "season state", "what arcs are open".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mine the day's sessions for the owner's intentions, cluster them into distinct ones, store them, and write two or three detailed posts with an explicit ask per channel, plus a loop tracking who answered. Drafts only. Triggers: "/intention", "mine today's intentions", "intention posts".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a daily accountability loop grounded in the owner's identity layer in the vault: a morning kick (mirror, one rock for the day, known-pitfall guard) or an evening review (what moved, what slipped, tomorrow's rock). Triggers: "/coach", "morning review", "evening review", "keep me on track".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a complete but efficient Nature-style Chinese PPTX presentation from a remote-sensing, Earth-observation, geospatial AI, or broader scientific paper, preprint, PDF, article text, abstract, figure legends, or reading notes. Use this skill whenever the user asks to make slides/PPT/PPTX for journal club, group meeting, paper sharing, thesis seminar, lab meeting, department report, or academic presentation from a remote-sensing research paper. It identifies the paper type and argument, selects only the figures needed for the story, writes Chinese slide content and speaker notes, creates the actual .pptx deck, and runs an explicit self-review/corrective revision loop focused on figure quality, text overflow prevention, and non-template visual design before delivery. Also trigger on general academic-presentation requests even without the word "Nature", such as turning a paper into slides, building an academic talk deck, conference/defense presentations, and Chinese phrasings like 论文做PPT、遥感论文汇报、组会PPT、文献汇报、学术汇报、做幻灯片、讲paper、读书报告PPT.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building custom agent backends, implementing the AG-UI protocol, debugging streaming issues, or understanding how agents communicate with frontends. Covers event types, SSE transport, AbstractAgent/HttpAgent patterns, state synchronization, tool calls, and human-in-the-loop flows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Wraps every action item in the JetFormBuilder action editor with custom UI via the 'jet.fb.action.item' wp.hooks filter — the wrapper renders on top of (or alongside) the original action editor for each action and can read/write that action's settings and events array. Use to add quick toggles or panels to every action without modifying each action's own editor — e.g. a TRUE/FALSE/Always button group that drives which custom event the action responds to, a "run once per session" toggle, an inline label override, any visual shortcut over the action's persisted state. Triggers on mentions of "jet.fb.action.item", "useLoopedAction", "useActionsEdit", "useActions", "ActionItemWrapper", "ActionItemBody", "decorate every action", "per-action toggle", or "visual control over action events".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep security audit for WordPress plugin/theme PHP code, covering issues beyond the basic sanitize/escape/nonce checklist — PHP object injection (unserialize), SSRF in remote requests, CSRF on state-changing GET handlers, mass assignment via $_POST loops, insecure file include / template injection, mail header injection, ZipSlip in archive extraction, type-juggling in auth comparisons, and TOCTOU race patterns in option/meta locks. Use after or alongside wp-security-audit when reviewing complex plugins, REST APIs, integrations that fetch remote URLs, file processors, or any code that handles uploads, archives, or self-rolled auth tokens.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remove signs of AI-generated code from a codebase while preserving behavior. Use when editing or reviewing code to make it read like a human engineer on this team wrote it. Works through a test-guarded detect-modify-verify loop: pin down the functional contract and edge cases first, write or run tests as a safety net, then rewrite AI tells (redundant comments, emoji, verbose names, reflexive try/except, defensive null-guards, over-decomposition, speculative abstraction, dead code, non-idiomatic constructs, hallucinated dependencies) and re-verify after every change. The tests decide whether a defensive block is slop or a real safeguard.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Schedule AI agent runs with cron, loops, or external clocks while avoiding unsafe tight autonomous timers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route a goal through acc's scored-memory loop via acc_act(runtime="solve"); deliberate any returned brain_frame and submit via continue.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find and fix WCAG 2.2 accessibility issues. Two modes — report (sweep a codebase or page, produce a prioritized written report, no edits) and fix (audit→edit→verify loop on a target). Prefers di
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。