8,113 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Allocate a finite budget or headcount across competing initiatives by return and strategic fit. Use when asked to allocate budget, decide where to invest, build a funding/portfolio plan, or make trade-offs across initiatives under a cap. Produces a capital-allocation plan — initiatives scored by expected return × strategic fit per dollar, a funded/unfunded split against the cap, the cut line, and the reasoning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Get your attention back with a 30-day protocol that assumes you'll break it — a screen-time ledger without moralizing, friction engineering (what to delete, grayscale, where the phone sleeps), planned relapses, and honest replacement activities for the boredom that shows up on day 3. Use when someone says 'my screen time is 7 hours', 'I want a dumbphone', 'digital detox', 'I can't read books anymore', or 'my attention span is gone'. Produces the ledger, a personal friction plan, and the 30-day protocol with expected failure points.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan an apprentice's or new laborer's first week so they're useful by Friday and safe from hour one — day-by-day teaching order, the safety non-negotiables stated before anything else, what they're allowed to touch unsupervised, and the check-out conversation that decides week two. Use when a tradesperson says 'my apprentice starts Monday', 'how do I train the new guy', or 'the apprentice is useless and I don't have time to teach'. Produces a first-week plan, a can/can't-touch list, and the Friday review script.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Surface the hidden assumptions a plan or belief rests on, then test what happens when each one is wrong. Use when asked what am I assuming here, check my assumptions, what if I'm wrong about, or stress-test my thinking. Produces the unstated assumptions your conclusion depends on (ranked by how load-bearing they are), a flip of each to see which one breaking would change everything, and the cheapest way to check the riskiest ones — because the assumption you didn't know you were making is what sinks plans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit whether the organisation's AI spend actually paid — measured against baselines, not vendor math or vibes. Use when a CFO asks what the AI tools returned, when renewing AI contracts, when consolidating overlapping AI subscriptions, or to build the measurement plan before the next spend. Produces an ROI audit with per-tool verdicts (keep/consolidate/cut), the honest-measurement method behind each number, and a baseline plan for whatever can't be scored yet. To forecast ROI before an investment use roi-estimator; this skill measures what already happened.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a club, PTA, or association AGM that finishes on time and holds up later — the notice and agenda done right, a quorum plan, minutes that capture decisions not conversations, elections without awkwardness, and the follow-up that makes decisions real. Use when a volunteer says 'I have to run the AGM', 'what goes in the agenda', 'nobody comes to our meetings', or 'our elections are a mess'. Produces the notice, agenda, chair's script, minutes template, and quorum rescue plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a skill's recommendations into real, executed actions — open the tickets, file the issues, post the updates — safely: dry-run preview, risk-classified, approval-gated, then recorded back to the brain. Use when asked to act on a plan, file tickets from a checklist, create issues from a PRD, execute the recommended next steps, or wire a skill's output into GitHub/Linear/Slack. Produces a dry-run actions plan with per-action risk, executes only after approval via the connected action MCP, and logs what was done. Nothing acts silently.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Keep a change small and in the existing idiom - size the plan and weigh smaller alternatives before writing it, reuse the mechanism that already owns the behavior instead of adding a parallel one, and simplify the diff before handoff. Use when planning any change beyond a few lines, before readying a PR, or when reviewing agent-written code for bloat.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help users establish a multi-layered planning system that balances strategic alignment with operational agility across annual, quarterly, and weekly horizons.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help users plan, coordinate, and execute product launches that cut through market noise. This guide covers everything from internal alignment and GACCS briefs to community engagement and viral mechanics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and implement OpenMeld PostgreSQL business persistence, schemas and migrations, transactions, Hyperdrive access, and data cutover. Use for the shared relational database transition or PostgreSQL work; not for unrelated D1 performance fixes or OpenConnector's upstream database.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when executing a written implementation plan with independent tasks in the current session where delegation beats inline coordination cost; otherwise inline. Ad-hoc 2+ tasks without a plan use dispatching-parallel-agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you have an approved spec or written requirements for a multi-step task that needs a durable plan document before touching code. Small, single-owner, or fast-path tasks do not need this skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when facing 2+ independent tasks without a written plan, with no conflicting shared mutable state or sequential dependencies, where parallel delegation beats inline cost; otherwise inline. Planned tasks use subagent-driven-development.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break large features into independently verifiable, human-reviewable slices under a feature directory in specs/. Use for risky or multi-step feature work that needs upfront questioning, API seams, browser-playable checkpoints, HTML visualizations, screenshot gates, staged implementation plans, recursive fog-of-war reslicing, or proactive research into reference implementations/best practices before slicing. Pairs with your project's verification harness and screenshot gates (the browser checkpoints), [refactor-clean](../refactor-clean/SKILL.md) (review the materialized spec so the plan describes one-owner architecture, not the feature bolted on), [screenshot-critique](../../visual/screenshot-critique/SKILL.md) and [compare-screenshots](../../visual/compare-screenshots/SKILL.md) (the visual gates), and a code-review pass (audit each slice before it lands).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Product manager that decomposes requirements into actionable tasks with priorities and dependencies. Use for planning, requirements, specification, scope, prioritization, task breakdown, and ISO 21500, ISO 31000, or ISO 38500-aligned planning recommendations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create an offline HTML explanation of a code change (diff, PR, branch) or of a topic, system, or question. Use when a visual walkthrough document is requested.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Record a decision, document existing code, or file a supplied research material. Modes: document decision (ADR, RFC, or rule), document code (spec, doc, guide, or scenario for existing behavior), document research (only when a finished report or one external material is already in hand). Use for 'we decided', 'record this decision', 'document why we chose X', 'make it our standard', 'draft an RFC', 'should we switch to Y' proposals, 'resolve the RFC', 'we accepted the proposal', 'document the auth module', 'capture how the payment system works', reference material, how-to instructions, or a user flow with examples over an existing spec. Name the type inside the subject to skip the type question. Planning a feature or an intended user journey → /archcore:plan. Checking docs against code or docs health → /archcore:review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find how a rollout plan could fail before committing to it. Use when: asked what could go wrong or to poke holes in a plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use CALL-E from Codex through the calle CLI. Use for CALL-E setup checks, authentication recovery, phone call planning, planned call execution, and call status checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Shape a request into one end-to-end slice with observable behavior; review write scope and reversible decisions. Use when: planning, breaking down or scoping a change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SERP-based semantic topic clustering for content architecture planning. Groups keywords by actual Google SERP overlap (not text similarity), designs hub-and-spoke content clusters with internal link matrices, and generates interactive visualizations. Optionally executes content creation if claude-blog is installed. Use when user says "topic cluster", "content cluster", "semantic clustering", "pillar page", "hub and spoke", "content architecture", "keyword grouping", or "cluster plan".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。