Validate MSX memory mapping in EMULATORS, including 16 KB pages, primary slot selection through PPI port
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
2,010 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Validate MSX memory mapping in EMULATORS, including 16 KB pages, primary slot selection through PPI port
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate Commodore 64 memory map, PLA/bank switching, 6510 port $0000/$0001 behavior, VIC bank selection, color RAM, ROM/RAM overlays, cartridge mapping, and mirrored I/O in the EMULATORS C64 namespace. Use when Codex reviews or edits C64 memory, PLA, CPU-visible address decoding, VIC-visible memory, color memory, char ROM, cartridge, expansion I/O, or mapped chip register behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate general MSX system emulation in EMULATORS, including BIOS-facing behavior, Z80/VDP interrupt wiring, standard I/O ports, PPI 8255 ports
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate and implement Sinclair ZX Spectrum 48K ROM-visible behavior in the EMULATORS repository, including reset and restart vectors, IM1/NMI handling, keyboard scanning and repeat, beeper and tape routines, screen/printer output, channels and streams, BASIC tokenization and execution, expression evaluation, memory movement, system variables, calculator stack, floating-point formats, ROM traps, localized ROM selection, and firmware/hardware timing contracts. Use when Codex reviews or edits ZX Spectrum ROM loading, KERNAL-style traps, keyboard, tape, screen, printer, BASIC files, tokens, system variables, startup, interrupts, or compatibility tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate Commodore 64 SID 6581/8580 sound emulation in EMULATORS, including $D400-$D7FF register decoding, voices, frequency, pulse width, control bits, ADSR/envelope behavior, oscillator sync/ring/noise/test, filters, volume DAC/sample clicks, paddles, read-only registers, mirrors, and reSID integration. Use when Codex reviews or edits SID, Sound, audio wrapper, register, filter, waveform, envelope, or mapped SID behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate and implement Sinclair ZX80 video emulation in the EMULATORS repository, including CPU-driven display generation, display-file execution, Z80 M1/refresh/HALT/INT interactions, character and inverse-video fetches, line counter and shift register behavior, horizontal and vertical sync, collapsed display files, PAL timing, flicker, and cassette/video coupling. Use when Codex reviews or edits namespace ZX81 code for the /mZX80 model, especially ULA, ULARegisters, MemoryVideoCode, Memory, PortManager, Screen, CPU interrupt timing, raster, or video tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate and implement Sinclair ZX81 video emulation in the EMULATORS repository for /mZX811, /mZX812, and /mZX813, including ULA character generation, Z80 display-file execution, M1/refresh/HALT/INT behavior, scanline timing, HSYNC/VSYNC, NMI generator and WAIT synchronization, SLOW and FAST modes, PAL/NTSC margins, collapsed display files, inverse video, high-resolution techniques, ROM-version interactions, and ULA revision boundaries. Use when Codex reviews or edits namespace ZX81 ULA, ULARegisters, MemoryVideoCode, Memory, PortManager, Screen, CPU interrupt timing, raster, ROM-specific video flow, or ZX81 video tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SOP for formal mathematical domain modeling. Trigger when: - Creating new formal models or applying mathematical lenses to analyze existing specifications. - Navigating phases: Identify, Select, Construct, Validate, Record, Connect. - Prompt contains: /form, form workflow, categorical, coalgebraic, linear logic, information-theoretic, validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AID methodology phase gate enforcement. Ensures work follows correct 6-phase order (Discovery -> PRD -> Tech Spec -> Impl Plan -> Dev -> QA & Ship). Enforces gates, validates transitions. Use before any work to check the current phase and refuse work belonging to a later phase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, revise, and validate publication-ready academic paper figures and tables. Use for LaTeX tables, related-work comparison tables, result tables, notation/dataset/taxonomy tables, precise source-data-driven experiment plots from CSV/JSON/logs, generated conceptual figures such as system overviews/pipelines/architectures/threat models, captions, artifact specs, source-data traceability, and paper-ready PDF/SVG/PNG/LaTeX exports. Do not use for prose-only paper writing, self-review, reviewer response, rebuttal drafting, or external literature-management workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate all JSON-LD scripts in Astro pages — check parsability, @context, @type, and Layout.astro auto-inject compatibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build, install, validate, and debug custom Exasol virtual schema adapters. Covers source-specific JDBC dialect implementation with `virtual-schema-common-jdbc` including `SqlDialect`, metadata reader behavior, type mapping, and pushdown capabilities, custom document-file adapter code boundaries, custom adapter properties, JAR packaging, BucketFS deployment, adapter script setup, `EXPLAIN VIRTUAL` validation, and adapter-side remote debugging workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to process one to 99 local exact 2:1 equirectangular panorama images with Realsee Argus, producing depth maps, a merged GLB point cloud, camera poses, optional intrinsics, and a validated local output index. Trigger for Argus panorama reconstruction, Argus ZIP input, or explicit Argus start/status/collect lifecycle requests. Do not trigger for panorama editing or stitching, arbitrary-photo 3D generation, existing GLB inspection, or research-only questions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Microsoft Entra ID tenant reconnaissance, token acquisition and manipulation, and federation backdoor testing with the AADInternals PowerShell toolkit to validate identity-attack resilience.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runtime iOS app security testing with Objection (Frida): inspect keychain and filesystem data, explore app internals at runtime, and validate/bypass client-side protections during authorized mobile assessments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the project's validation pipeline (lint → format → typecheck → unit tests) with auto-fixes, then optionally stage and write a Conventional Commit. Use before committing, when asked to "check", "validate", "run the workflow", or "get this commit-ready".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate CycloneDX 1.7 and/or SPDX 2.3 SBOMs for the repo, optionally cosign-signed, optionally cross-validated against syft output. Use when producing an SBOM for compliance, attaching to a release artefact, integrating with an SBOM registry, or satisfying a customer attestation request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply a set of Rosetta Stone attribute mappings to a Narrative dataset by wrapping them in a one-shot workflow that calls the `CreateRosettaStoneMappingsIfNotExist` task. Consumes the structured output of `/generate-rosetta-stone-mappings`, normalizes the generator's snake_case to the workflow task's camelCase, re-validates every expression against the dataset's current schema, gates on user approval, submits via `narrative_workflows_create`, polls the triggered run, and reports per-mapping created / conflict / failed. Use when: "apply these mappings to dataset N", "create the Rosetta Stone mappings I just generated", "push the mappings I saved earlier to <dataset>", "productionize this mapping list", "submit the suggested_mappings array". (narrative-common)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a dataset or access rule before it joins an identity-graph build (access rules behave like datasets in NQL here). Enumerates failure modes (hub identifiers, high-degree nodes, suspicious values, over-connected identifiers), tests hypotheses in parallel, quantifies damage by rows / edges / entities, and proposes minimal filters ranked by severity. When issues are found, returns a validated `CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW` NQL the caller can run to produce a graph-ready clean source; if the data passes, says so and recommends it unchanged. Plans and authors the clean-view NQL; does not execute it. Use when: "audit this dataset before the graph build", "find bad edges in <source>", "check identity data quality", "recommend filters for the graph build", "quantify damage from <identifier_type>", "pre-graph DQ". (narrative-identity)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Record the statements a journal requires and a reader checks — authors with their CRediT contributions, ethics approval that names the body and the reference number, how consent was taken, funding with grant numbers, conflicts of interest, data availability with an address or a reason, and the use of generative AI — as a validated record that the submission folder prints and the manuscript never carries. Use when a run is heading for submission, when an author asks who should be listed, when consent, approval or data sharing has to be stated, or when the venue's AI policy comes up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Choose the design and the numbers a research run can honestly claim — write the structured METHOD RECORD (databases, date of access, search string, criteria, screening counts) that r0 validates, pick the claim strength a design can actually carry, record a statistic as data rather than prose, route to the reporting guideline the design owes, and decide what to preregister. Use when a run's question, design, search or statistics have to be settled before the writing, or when a claim needs a strength or a number attached to it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Publish or refresh one or a few free-AI-credit offers from screenshots or text — official sources win, unverifiable offers dropped, validates, diffs, commits on approval. Don't use for catalog-wide re-checks, scraping, or bulk imports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
암묵적 가정(null 아님·범위·상태)을 Assert/Validate로 명시하여 가정 위반 시 즉시 발견. "assertion 추가", "전제 조건 명시", "가정을 코드로", "/introduce-assertion" 요청 시 사용. 단, 반복되는 null 검사를 객체로 대체하는 것은 /introduce-special-case가 적합. /introduce-assertion [commit-ref]로 호출.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Post-launch review of a shipped PRD against the brief's success metrics. Did we move the metric? What did the data actually show? Which assumptions held, which broke? Which accepted-gap decisions resolved (confirmed vs. invalidated)? What would we do differently? Triggers on "outcome review", "did it work", "post-launch review", "did we move the metric", "retro the feature", "was it worth it". Produces a Confluence outcome-review page and updates the brief + linked decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。