「does」の検索結果

Capture a solved, verified problem as a durable learning in `docs/solutions/` so the next agent or engineer does not repeat the mistake or redo the investigation, and keep the `CONCEPTS.md` glossary in step. Use after a fix, debugging session, or design decision whose reasoning is not readable from the final code, tests, or existing docs — "document this", "write up what we learned", "capture this learning", "add it to solutions", "that worked, save it for next time". Writes nothing for routine fixes the code already explains. For auditing or cleaning up existing learnings, use `learn-with-docs-refresh`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply these opinionated JavaScript conventions whenever writing or reviewing JS or Node: ESM-first packaging, choosing between Promise combinators, error handling that doesn't swallow failures, AbortController for cancellation, keeping the event loop unblocked, and reaching for platform APIs before dependencies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose a dygo Business App that does not validate, boot, route, render, authorize, migrate, or execute background work correctly. Use for evidence-first investigation rather than feature implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides systematic root-cause debugging. Use when tests fail, builds break, behavior doesn't match expectations, or you encounter any unexpected error. Use when you need a systematic approach to finding and fixing the root cause rather than guessing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Council — 5 independent AI perspectives + mutual critique + synthesis (adapted from karpathy/llm-council for Claude Code). For high-stakes decisions where the answer does NOT follow unambiguously from the data — go/no-go before real consequences, critiquing a methodology, choosing between competing approaches, pressure-testing a conclusion you're attached to, designing risk controls. NOT for log/data analysis (the council has no data access) and not for factual lookups. Triggers — "convene the council", "run it past the council", "go/no-go", "pressure-test this".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One-sentence description of what this skill does. Shown as a tooltip on the chip.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger when: (1) the user mentions "manim", "scene", "video", "EN/KO render", "GEODE_HERO_LANG", "1080p60", or (2) editing files under `scripts/visualizations/` ending in `.py`, or (3) the user asks to render, re-render, or extend any of the four validated scenes (`geode_hero.py`, `autoresearch_filewalk.py`, `autoresearch_compare.py`, `critical_floor.py`). GEODE Manim Scene authoring standard. Locks the patterns the four validated scenes already share — Anthropic-style palette, Helvetica Neue + Pretendard font pairing with weight=NORMAL, EN/KO multilingual lang via `GEODE_HERO_LANG` env, `_dashed_arrow_with_head` stage-coupled tinting, `verify_hero_layout.py` ratchet — so the next scene does not re-discover the kerning / padding / transition regressions catalogued in [[viz-frame-audit]].

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

欧盟 AI 法案知识引擎——以 70 份官方欧盟来源文件为基础的权威监管问答（包括 2026 年委员会关于 Art. 6 高风险分类的指南草稿——一般原则、附件 I、附件 III）。基于完整条例文本、委员会指南、EDPB/EDPS 意见、《实践守则》、协调标准、FRIA 指南、事件模板和行业特定指引，以条款级引用回答关于 AI 法案的任何问题。当用户询问"EU AI Act"、"AI Act regulation"、"Regulation 2024/1689"、"KI-Verordnung"、要求"explain an AI Act article"、"what does Article X say"、"AI Act requirements"、"AI Act penalties"、"AI Act timeline"、"GPAI obligations"、"high-risk AI"、"prohibited AI practices"、"AI Act and GDPR"、"fundamental rights impact assessment"、"AI Act standards"、"AI Act national implementation"、"AI literacy"、"serious incident reporting"、"Digital Omnibus"、"AI regulatory sandbox"，或任何关于欧盟人工智能监管的问题时，应使用本技能。德语术语同样触发："KI-Gesetz"、"KI-Verordnung"、"Hochrisiko-KI"、"KI-Kompetenz"、"Grundrechte-Folgenabschaetzung"、"GPAI-Verhaltenskodex"。对于产出分类决定而非知识答案的评估工作流，提议在会话内运行结构化风险等级分类。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI compliance analysis for EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, GDPR, OECD, financial services regulations (SEC, FCA, FINRA, DORA, MiFID II), and other frameworks. Use when asked to generate a compliance checklist for an AI tool or use case, determine if a risk assessment is required, score an AI tool's risk level, identify where an AI tool or use case could run afoul of regulatory requirements, perform a gap analysis, recommend remediation steps, assess a vendor, draft an acceptable use policy, map training requirements, or review jurisdiction-specific AI rules. Triggers on phrases like "compliance checklist", "risk assessment", "risk score", "does this comply", "EU AI Act", "ISO 42001", "NIST AI RMF", "AI governance", "gap analysis", "vendor assessment", "acceptable use policy", "MNPI", "AI training requirements", or any request to evaluate an AI tool or use case for regulatory compliance or risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

What you can build and do with an always-on AI agent that has episodic memory. Covers concrete product ideas, workflows, emergent capabilities from persistence plus memory, and real-world examples of deployed persistent agents. Helps you go from "I have the architecture" to "here's what it actually does for me." Activate on: "what can an always-on agent do", "persistent agent use cases", "agent applications", "proactive agent ideas", "what to build with episodic memory", "always-on agent product", "personal AI assistant ideas", "/always-on-agent-applications". NOT for: building the architecture (use always-on-agent-architecture), designing inputs (use always-on-agent-inputs), safety and privacy (use always-on-agent-safety).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choosing and operating an HTTP API versioning strategy that doesn't break clients — Stripe's date-based pinned versions, the Deprecation/Sunset header pair (RFC 9745 + RFC 8594), URI vs header vs media-type approaches, and the version-transformer pattern. Grounded in Stripe's published architecture and IETF RFCs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and implement infrastructure, container, CI/CD, deployment-safety, observability, and rollback changes. Does not read dotenv files or approve/release deployments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for Vue 3 testing best-practices review and recommendations — designing and auditing Vitest + Vue Test Utils tests for components, composables, Pinia stores, Vue Router, async/Suspense, Teleport, forms, and accessibility, plus Playwright E2E test-design strategy. Advisory/review only — recommends patterns and flags test smells; does not run tests. Complements mk:vue-best-practices (feature code). Invoke for "review my Vue tests", "how should I test this component/composable/store", or "Vue test best practices".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Experimental/manual harness canary procedure. It records benchmark manifests and scores but does not provide a fully automated runner.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Proactively suggest when the user says a feature is ready for testing or asks "does this work?". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrieve up-to-date library, framework, and project documentation using scripts + MCP tools (Context7, Context Hub) with intelligent fallback. Use this skill whenever the user or agent needs documentation for any library, framework, API, SDK, or internal project spec. Triggers on "docs for [X]", "how does [library] work", "find documentation", "API reference for", "look up [feature] in [library]", "latest docs", "what's the API for", "find our [internal spec]", or any request that requires current, accurate documentation rather than relying on training data. Always prefer this skill over raw WebSearch for documentation retrieval — it returns structured, context-efficient results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Experimental/manual harness canary procedure. It records benchmark manifests and scores but does not provide a fully automated runner.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and implement infrastructure, containers, CI/CD, deployment safety, observability, and rollback changes. Use for Docker, IaC, cloud runtime, Kubernetes, pipeline, deployment, or operational reliability work. Does not read dotenv files or approve/release deployments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep spec analysis on a Confluence page. Reads page (+ children) via the confluence-as wrapper, produces a structured Spec Research Report with requirements, acceptance criteria, gaps, ambiguities, and suggested user stories for human review. Read-only — does NOT create Jira tickets. Triggers: 'analyze spec for PAGE-ID', 'extract requirements from confluence page', 'spec research on URL'. NOT for raw page CRUD (mk:confluence-page); NOT for ticket complexity scoring (mk:planning-engine).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collect and submit developer feedback to the LiveAvatar team. Use when: (1) A LiveAvatar integration is done, working, finished, or complete, (2) The user says "it works", "we're done", "that's it", "ship it", (3) The user is frustrated, stuck, or giving up — "this is broken", "this doesn't work", "I'm stuck", "I give up", "this is frustrating", "I want to report an issue", (4) The user explicitly asks to give feedback, report a bug, file an issue, or share a suggestion about LiveAvatar, (5) You've seen 3+ failed attempts at the same integration step, (6) You just finished writing or generating LiveAvatar integration code for the user.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Initialize or safely upgrade a processor project's root AGENTS.md from a maintained baseline. Use when starting a processor project, adding project-level Agent collaboration rules, or comparing an existing AGENTS.md with the package baseline. This skill only handles AGENTS.md; it does not scaffold documentation, inspect or configure environments, install tools, or modify processor source.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill for ANY of the following — do not skip it even if the query seems simple: strategic decisions, business analysis, thesis building, complex problem solving, geopolitical analysis (non-market), philosophical reasoning, academic research, system design, decision under uncertainty, long-form thinking, or any question that benefits from First Principle deconstruction and multi-agent reasoning. ALWAYS use this skill when the user asks about: why something works the way it does, whether a decision is correct, how to think about a complex problem, what could go wrong, analyzing a situation from multiple angles, or any "should I..." question involving real-world trade-offs. This is NOT a market/trading skill — for financial markets, BTC, gold, stocks, forex, macro economics, use money-atlas-intelligence-os instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check a prototype against its original design direction and requirements before shipping. Compares implementation to the mockup/spec/context, flags drift in layout, spacing, type, color, states, and behavior, and reports a pass/fix list. Use when the user says "design QA", "does it match the design", "check against the spec", "conformance check", or before sharing/handing off a prototype. Part of the Product Design set. Uses a browser tool for visual comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fallback for general coding work that does not match any specific sextant sub-skill. Use for lightweight tasks: config changes, style fixes, utility functions, one-off scripts, or tasks too small to warrant a dedicated workflow. All dedicated sub-skills take priority over this one — check these first: sextant:fix-bug (broken behavior), sextant:debug (unknown bug location), sextant:add-feature (new functionality), sextant:modify-feature (changing existing behavior), sextant:review-code (evaluating code), sextant:write-tests (test coverage), sextant:refine-requirements (ambiguous scope), sextant:plan (multi-step sequencing), sextant:ship (release prep), sextant:migrate (cross-module upgrade), sextant:security (vulnerability audit). Only use this skill when none of the above match.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。