3,487 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Turn acceptance criteria into an executable test plan (scenarios, seed, selector gaps) before generating E2E code. Use when ACs exist but no runnable test plan does yet.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write PHP following PSR coding standards, SOLID principles, and code-quality guidelines. Use for PHP style, design, refactoring, naming, and guard clauses—not Composer/PSR-4 project configuration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates Playwright page objects from an executable test plan, one class per screen with ladder-compliant locators and no assertions, wired into a shared fixture. Use when a web scenario needs a page object that does not exist yet, or when locators drift and the page object must be rebuilt.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-stack selector and test-id policy for web and mobile automation. Use when writing or reviewing E2E/UI test locators, or adding data-testid/accessibility identifiers to components.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit test coverage health, gaps, and QE debt for Jira stories or epics. Produces coverage_analysis_report.md with AC-to-TC heatmap, risk scores, and prioritized action plan. Use when assessing coverage percentage, pre-release readiness, sprint readiness, or identifying missing test cases. Do NOT use for TC creation — use zephyr-test-generation instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quarantines an intermittently failing test behind a ticket with an owner and expiry, assigns a root-cause bucket from isolated reruns, and defines when the test leaves quarantine. Use when a test is a QUARANTINE_CANDIDATE or fails without a code change; not for deterministic failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configure Maven, Gradle, and static analysis for Java projects. Use for Java-only build and quality tooling such as Spotless, Checkstyle, SpotBugs, SonarLint, JDK versions, and Java service Dockerfiles; defer Kotlin, Android, Flutter, and GitHub Actions-specific configuration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides quality-first TDD for new behavior, bug fixes, and test changes. Selects the smallest test layer, proves a distinct regression risk, and runs bounded RED-GREEN-REFACTOR verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Standardize SRS and FRS specifications for technical behavior, interfaces, data contracts, quality constraints, and verification mapping. Use when writing SRS, functional specification, system behavior requirements, API/data contracts, or non-functional thresholds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dart code quality conventions: naming, const/final/var hierarchy, single quotes, trailing commas, collection idioms, tear-offs, and import organization. Use only for Dart style-focused changes or reviews; never activate for configuration-only lint setup, unrelated feature work, or widget tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze Elixir/Phoenix technical debt — duplicates, refactoring; Use when asked about code quality, cleanup, or what…
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze Elixir/Phoenix technical debt — duplicates, refactoring opportunities, credo issues. Use when asked about code quality, cleanup, or what to improve.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze Elixir/Phoenix technical debt — duplicates, refactoring opportunities, credo issues. Use when asked about code quality, cleanup, or what to improve.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Project health audit and health check — architecture, performance, tests, dependencies, code quality. Use when assessing overall project health, before releases, or after refactors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Project health audit and health check — architecture, performance, tests, dependencies, code quality. Use when assessing overall project health, before releases, or after refactors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic experimental results analysis workflow for ML/AI research papers. Connects experimental data to publication-ready Results sections with statistical validation, visualizations, and quality checks. Triggers on "analyze experimental results", "generate results section", "statistical analysis of experiments", "compare model performance", "create results visualization".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews lyrics against a quality checklist before Suno generation. Use before generating tracks to catch rhyme, prosody, pronunciation, and structural issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes or reviews lyrics with professional prosody, rhyme craft, and quality checks. Use when writing new lyrics, revising existing lyrics, or when the user says 'let's work on a track.'
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs quality control, citation validation, and fact-checking before human review. Use after research is complete to verify all sources and claims before production.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes a codebase's modularity imbalances using the Balanced Coupling model and produces a review of design issues. Use when reviewing existing code for coupling problems, assessing architecture quality, identifying distributed monolith risks, or finding areas where changes are unexpectedly expensive.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "verify a fix", "reproduce failure", "diagnose issue", "check BEFORE/AFTER state", "VF task", "reality check", "check test quality", "mock-only tests", or needs guidance on verifying fixes by reproducing failures before and after implementation, or detecting mock-heavy test anti-patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrates implementation of a plan file by delegating work to subagents in parallel. Verifies git branch state, tracks progress, and ensures high-quality implementation. Invoke with a plan file path and optional model override: /implement plans/my-plan.md [--model sonnet]
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to review or clean up R code for tidyverse style, standardize formatting or names, remove redundant comments or wrappers, or make a behavior-preserving style pass. Also use when writing substantial new R package code if the user requests tidyverse style or the package already follows it. Not for routine small edits or general correctness, security, or test-quality reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
质量标识字段检测工具。检查数据表是否配置质量标识字段，验证标识字段的存在性、值规范性 （是否为预定义合法值）、非空完整性，标记不合格数据。 当用户提到质量标识检查、QC字段检测、标识字段合规等需求时使用此skill。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。