「validate」の検索結果

Validate bugs and features that depend on local hosts, localhost, filesystem home state, auth, polling, installed apps, real conversations, or signed native helpers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define, validate, run, resume, and audit repo-local multi-step automations with current `asc workflow` and `.asc/workflow.json`, including step outputs and safe release/TestFlight workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sync, validate, and apply App Store metadata with the current asc canonical metadata workflow. Use when updating metadata, localizations, keywords, or migrating legacy fastlane metadata.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resize and validate App Store screenshots with current asc screenshot-size data and macOS sips. Use when preparing or fixing screenshots for App Store Connect submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate App Store submission readiness, submit prepared versions, and monitor review status with current asc commands. Use when shipping or troubleshooting review submissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full type inference philosophy (never cast, never annotate inferred values), Register module declaration, from narrowing on hooks and Link, strict:false for shared components, getRouteApi for code-split typed access, addChildren with object syntax for TS perf, LinkProps and ValidateLinkOptions type utilities, as const satisfies pattern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route loader option, loaderDeps for cache keys, staleTime/gcTime/ defaultPreloadStaleTime SWR caching, pendingComponent/pendingMs/ pendingMinMs, errorComponent/onError/onCatch, beforeLoad, router context and createRootRouteWithContext DI pattern, router.invalidate, Await component, deferred data loading with unawaited promises.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

validateSearch, search param validation with Zod/Valibot/ArkType adapters, fallback(), search middlewares (retainSearchParams, stripSearchParams), custom serialization (parseSearch, stringifySearch), search param inheritance, loaderDeps for cache keys, reading and writing search params.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end data pipeline for empirical research: fetch economic data from APIs (FRED, World Bank, IMF, BLS, OECD, Yahoo Finance), clean and transform raw data, construct strategy-specific variables, and validate panel structure. Use when asked to fetch data, download data, clean data, merge datasets, prepare analysis-ready data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA AMS Lifecycle V&V Guidelines (verification and validation), Version 3.0, dated April 2017. Use for applying verification and validation across the FAA Acquisition Management System (AMS) lifecycle: the verify-vs-validate distinction (built right vs. right thing), the work-product/component/product tiers, the nine V&V planning elements, the four method catalogs (Appendix C), decision-point-gated V&V (SASP, CRD, Investment Analysis, Solution Implementation, In-Service Management), the Appendix B document checklists (PRD/APB/ISPD/PMP), and the DT/OT/IOA test triad. Scope limits: this is an FAA acquisition-V&V doctrine, NOT a general SE process model, requirements-engineering manual, or test-design textbook. It borrows its core V&V definitions from CMMI v1.2 (SEI, paraphrased) and presumes the surrounding AMS lifecycle (see the FAA SEM pack); its phase tables are policy snapshots as of April 2017 and it is thin on detailed test methods, tool specifics, and anything outside FAA acquisition governance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews one SKILL.md against the format rules and returns a findings table: strict YAML front matter with exactly name and description, name equal to the folder, description as the trigger, the eight-heading skeleton, capability-neutral wording, safety boundaries. Each finding carries severity, rule identifier, location, quoted evidence and replacement text; the verdict READY, REVISE or BLOCKED is an apparent state and the owner decides. Use when the user asks to "review this SKILL.md", "check my skill file before upload", "lint this skill description", "validate the front matter of this skill" or "score this skill folder". Do not use to write an agent's instructions field, use agent-instructions-drafter instead; for injection or leakage exposures use agent-instructions-red-team; for launch tests use agent-evaluation-plan. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns an engineer's notes, a ticket history or a chat thread into a draft step-by-step runbook with preconditions, stop conditions, numbered steps with checks, verification, rollback and escalation, for the team to validate before use. Commands verbatim, placeholders marked, every gap UNKNOWN; never executes a step or fills a gap from general knowledge. Use when the user asks to "write a runbook from these notes", "turn this resolved ticket into a runbook", "document the steps we ran" or "check this runbook for gaps". Do not use for a business process without commands, use sop-drafter instead; for a knowledge article or known-error record, use knowledge-article-drafter; for the post-incident review, use incident-postmortem-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and repair a kohya-style LoRA dataset before training. Use when the user asks to check, validate, inspect, fix, clean, 体检, or 修 a dataset, captions, or tags. Inspect image count, repeats and step budget, resolution and aspect buckets, duplicates, corrupt or non-RGB images, missing or empty captions, trigger consistency, and tag-frequency hygiene. Return a structural PASS, WARN, or FAIL report and apply only confirmed fix_dataset.py actions, dry-run first with displaced originals quarantined.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds high-value SEO and GEO keywords using web search, AI analysis, and optionally paid tools like Ahrefs or Semrush. Produces a validated keywords.csv file with a fixed schema for downstream pipeline consumption.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify SIPS proof surfaces before reporting completion. Use when asked to scan, verify, validate, prove, audit, or check whether a repo or SIPS install is coherent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author and validate nvoos-chart fenced-JSON chart blocks for NV oOS chat surfaces — 29 chart types across distribution, part-to-whole, ranking, change, special and grid families. Covers type selection, the v2 schema (values/series/data.items, mode, sort, direction, unit, animate, table, target), data-shape rules, the create_chart_fence server validator, the a11y checklist, and copy-paste JSON templates. Use when writing chart fences in assistant responses, choosing a chart type for data, validating chart JSON, or deciding between nvoos-chart, create_chart, generate_chart and generate_mermaid.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Per-toolkit hardening audit loop for NV oOS Pro tools. Systematically scans each addons/pro/includes/tools/<toolkit> (and its plugins/nvoos-content-graph-pro mirror) for the four recurring production failure classes — unguarded shell calls that fatal on exec-disabled hosts, calls to nonexistent client methods, string-assuming parsing of provider responses that may be arrays, and provider enum/service mismatches — then fixes, tests (Docker PHPUnit), and validates (phpcs both standards) before moving to the next toolkit. Use when asked to audit a toolkit, review the X tools for similar issues, do the same for the other toolkits, or continue the toolkit audit loop. The first case study (document-generation) found 3 fatal bugs + 1 broken regex.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handle UTF-8 and text encoding safely in WordPress plugins, especially on WP 6.9+ where wp_is_valid_utf8(), wp_scrub_utf8(), and noncharacter helpers replace older seems_utf8-style checks. Covers when to validate, scrub, reject, or preserve invalid bytes; wp_check_invalid_utf8 behavior; XML/JSON/feed/export boundaries; and avoiding data loss from premature replacement. Use when processing imported text, CSV, XML, feeds, email, REST payloads, AI prompts, logs, filenames, or external API data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffolds and reviews custom WordPress REST API endpoints registered via register_rest_route on rest_api_init — namespace and version slug, permission_callback authorization (NEVER __return_true on state-changing routes, which is the most common plugin-side vulnerability on wp.org), args schema with validate_callback / sanitize_callback / type / enum, object-level capability checks via current_user_can with object ID, responses with WP_REST_Response and WP_Error carrying an HTTP status, no raw DB rows / sensitive columns in responses, cookie auth via X-WP-Nonce, REST vs admin-ajax decision. Recommends the better-route library when the plugin grows past a few endpoints. Use when scaffolding or reviewing a REST endpoint, or migrating from admin-ajax. Triggers on register_rest_route, rest_api_init, permission_callback, WP_REST_Request, WP_REST_Response, WP_Error, X-WP-Nonce, rest_ensure_response, register_rest_field, or any file path containing /rest/ or /api/ in a WP plugin or theme.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates whether an API request is correct based on provided inputs (method, URL, headers, body, auth, query params).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, edit, validate, and run Agent QA tests, suites, and hooks through MCP or CLI while preserving canonical IDs and schema contracts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Preserve the coding agent's explicit AAS skill selection as a validated stack and optional evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "optimize meta tags", "write title tags / meta descriptions", "add Open Graph or Twitter cards", or "generate schema / JSON-LD" for FAQ, HowTo, Article, Product, or LocalBusiness rich-result candidates. Produces title/description options, an OG+Twitter block, and validated JSON-LD for the document head. Not for body copy — use content-writer; not for crawl/index technical issues — use technical-seo-checker. 标题优化/元描述/Schema标记/结构化数据

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "track our share of voice", "what share of the conversation do we own vs competitors", or "trend our SOV this quarter"; computes SOV% = brand mentions ÷ (brand + competitor panel mentions) per platform per period on a LOCKED competitor panel — a panel switch invalidates the trend (restart the series and log the break; the ECHO O3 rule) — plus a sentiment-weighted SOV variant (sentiment labeled Estimated unless human-coded) and a Wikipedia-pageviews attention-share alternative; built from keyless listening connectors, gdelt.py news echo, and user exports — public counts only, closed platforms are never scraped. Not for backlink or offsite SEO signals — use offsite-signal-analyzer. 声量份额/竞品声量对比/提及份额/注意力份额

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。