「uat」の検索結果

Design a Funhouse Mirror activity where students use their own domain expertise to detect AI distortions, omissions, and overconfidence. Use when students know a subject well enough to evaluate AI claims about it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit an AI agent skill before installing it. Use proactively whenever the user is about to add, install, enable, or evaluate an unfamiliar skill — including phrases like "audit this skill", "is this skill safe", "scan skill before install", "check skill for malicious code", "review this plugin", or any pre-install gate on an untrusted, third-party, or community-distributed skill bundle. Runs ten categories of static checks (code execution, network exfiltration, credential harvesting, persistence, prompt injection, supply-chain hooks, obfuscation, destructive filesystem ops, secrets, Trojan Source / homoglyphs) and emits a PASS / WARN / FAIL verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess, report, and manage serious incidents involving high-risk AI systems under Article 73 EU AI Act. Covers incident qualification, deadline buckets (2/10/15 days), authority notification, deployer duties (Art. 26(5)), cross-regulation mapping (GDPR/NIS2/MDR), corrective measures, and DACH-specific routing. Use when asked to evaluate whether an AI incident is reportable, draft an Article 73 notification, identify the right authority, or build an AI incident response process.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and quote statutory and regulatory law with the LibreJustice MCP tools — French codes at any date, EU law, treaties and bilateral accords, foreign codes (59 countries), collective agreements, BOFiP, circulaires. Use whenever the user asks what a text says or said at a given date, which version or which text applies to a situation, needs the exact wording of a provision for a brief, or works with foreign or international law in French litigation, even if they never mention LibreJustice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Edit mathematically, empirically, or technically dense papers for readers outside the author’s specialty, including empirical legal scholarship, law-and-economics models, and legal-technology research. Clarifies terminology, antecedents, study design, and claim–statistic relationships while checking equations, numbers, quotations, and citations against the source. Use to clarify exposition or de-jargonize a technical draft; not to rewrite briefs or doctrinal arguments. Produces an edited draft and audit memo. Full integrity checks and original-format rendering require suitable extraction, code execution, and document tools; otherwise provides proposed edits with verification limits disclosed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate completed mediation-competition problems consisting of general information and confidential packets for both sides. Use when asked to validate, audit, score, quality-control, or assess competition readiness; identify factual, numerical, chronological, authority, commercial-logic, or confidentiality defects; test mediation usefulness, BATNAs, settlement corridors, information asymmetry, and opportunities for firmness, cooperation, imagination, and clarification; or produce an author-only validation report. Perform a qualified partial review when packets are missing. Diagnose by default; do not generate a new problem or edit source packets unless repairs are expressly requested. Requires access to all supplied files and a host capable of reading their formats; otherwise disclose the unreviewed material and resulting limits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Panel structure design, firm selection criteria, right-sourcing analysis, and coverage gap assessment for in-house legal teams. Build panel frameworks from scratch or formalise existing informal arrangements. Define weighted selection criteria for firm evaluation. Run right-sourcing analysis (ABC tiering) to identify work sent to expensive providers that doesn't require that level of resource. Assess existing panels for practice area, geographic, and capability gaps. Trigger on: 'design our panel', 'how many firms do we need', 'panel structure', 'firm selection criteria', 'which firms should we use', 'right-sourcing', 'are we sending work to the right firms', 'panel gaps', 'too many firms', 'consolidate our panel', 'we need a firm for', 'preferred provider', 'panel tiers', 'do we need BigLaw for this', 'convergence', 'D&I panel targets', 'how do we choose firms'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Navigate privacy regulations (GDPR, CCPA), review DPAs, and handle data subject requests. Use when reviewing data processing agreements, responding to data subject access or deletion requests, assessing cross-border data transfer requirements, or evaluating privacy compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-assisted generation of MCQs (multiple-choice questionnaires) with export to Moodle (GIFT, XML), Wooclap (Excel), Kahoot!, and Word. Supports light MCQs (gamified) and in-depth MCQs (evaluative), with single-answer and multiple-answer formats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess whether Government of India approval is required for foreign investment in an Indian company under Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and the Non-Debt Instruments Rules, 2019. The skill systematically gathers transaction details, evaluates sectoral entry routes and caps, assesses land border country restrictions under applicable laws, and delivers a preliminary compliance note. Produces clear guidance on whether the investment falls within Automatic Route or requires Government approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GDPR Legitimate Interest Assessment (LIA) — Guided assessment for Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR using the EDPB three-step test. Based on EDPB Guidelines 1/2024, EDPB Opinion 28/2024 (AI models), the OSS Case Digest on Legitimate Interest (McIntyre 2026), CNIL AI guidance (June 2025), ICO guidance, and key CJEU case law. Use when: (1) user needs to assess whether legitimate interest is appropriate, (2) user asks about Art. 6(1)(f), "Interessenabwägung", "berechtigtes Interesse", "balancing test", or "LIA", (3) user wants to document a legitimate interest assessment, (4) user mentions the three-step test, (5) user evaluates necessity or proportionality under Art. 6(1)(f), (6) user discusses direct marketing, fraud prevention, IT security, employee monitoring, AI training, web scraping, or credit checks in context of legal basis, (7) user handles a right to object (Art. 21), (8) user asks about children's data, profiling, or cross-border data sharing under legitimate interest, (9) user compares legitimate interest against other legal bases. Do NOT use for: consent assessments (Art. 6(1)(a)), contract performance (Art. 6(1)(b)), DPIA workflows, or pure ePrivacy/cookie compliance questions — though the skill does address the ePrivacy/GDPR overlap where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess whether a Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) is required under Article 27 EU AI Act, and structure or draft that assessment for a specific high-risk AI deployment. Covers deployer scope gating (public bodies and private entities providing public services), affected group mapping, Charter rights analysis, proportionality, safeguards evaluation, residual risk, DPIA/FRIA cross-referencing under the amended Article 27(4), the unconditional notification duty under Article 27(3), and DACH-specific considerations. Use when asked about FRIA obligations, Article 27 scope, fundamental rights and AI, or deployer assessment duties.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes how multiple regulations interact for a specific product, service, or business model. Identifies where obligations overlap, reinforce, complement, duplicate, or conflict; builds a priority matrix; produces an integrated compliance timeline; and estimates the total compliance burden. Use when (1) scoping a new product or service against the full regulatory landscape before launch, (2) conducting M&A due diligence on a target's multi-regulation exposure, (3) building a strategic compliance roadmap where single-regulation analyses miss the interactions, (4) advising on complex situations where regulations touch the same conduct from different angles, or (5) estimating budget and resourcing for multi-regulation compliance. Primary coverage of EU digital regulation (GDPR, Data Act, AI Act, CRA, NIS2, DORA, DMA, DSA, ePrivacy) and national implementations; the framework extends to any jurisdiction where overlapping regulatory regimes apply to the same activity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate templated responses for common legal inquiries and identify when situations require individualized attention. Use when responding to routine legal questions — data subject requests, vendor inquiries, NDA requests, discovery holds — or when managing response templates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When a solution seems impossible and the path forward is blocked. Refuses to take no for an answer: classifies what kind of "no" you hit, then runs lateral-thinking techniques (assumption autopsy, inversion, first principles, constraint toggling, analogical transfer, and more) until the wall cracks or is proven load-bearing. Generates at least 10 angles before evaluating any. AGENTS: use this on yourself when an API doesn't support what you need, an approach has failed twice, or a "that's not possible" sentence is forming — run the fast path BEFORE reporting a dead end. Archives walls to ~/.config/makerskills/unstuck/archive/. Sits upstream of decide. Triggers on "/unstuck," "I'm stuck," "this seems impossible," "we hit a wall," "there's no way to," "they said no," "dead end," "out of options," "I've tried everything," "work around this."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Godot Expert Analyst: Anara. Visionary project scoring and certification for Godot 4.7+ architecture. Use when evaluating project health, modernity, scalability, dependency graphs, or generating Visionary Certificates. Keywords: analyst, Anara, scoring, certification, architecture audit, ResourceLoader.get_dependencies, typed Dictionary, folder-by-feature, Visionary Certificate, Godot 4.7.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Formal evaluation framework for Claude Code sessions implementing eval-driven development (EDD) principles

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, evaluate, implement, or review image and video generation connectors for Timeline Studio. Use when adding a provider plugin, extracting the generation plugin host or registry, or checking a connector against Timeline Studio's authentication, output, localization, and My assets contract. Do not use for ordinary video editing or Codex plugin packaging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze images, video, speech, motion, products, and websites; route local vision, audio, depth, tracking, matting, identity, and restoration models; auto-edit, replicate, enhance, caption, voice, assemble, annotate, validate, and export editable Timeline Studio projects and videos. Use for reference-video remakes, filter and repeated-shot reconstruction, subject-aware reframing, clip splitting, source-time speed curves, Color Wheels grading, ramps and holds, person or product cutout, person or object outline, authorized face swap, shot and timing reconstruction, timeline markers, chapters, beat cues, review notes and ranges, supplied or web-sourced footage, AI video platform selection, cleanup, highlights, product promotion, website walkthroughs, image-to-video assisted edits, optical-flow editing, depth-assisted relighting, grayscale depth-video conversion, depth/2.5D/transition finishing, AI voiceover, subtitles, short-form production, .timeline automation, or editor evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Godot Expert Analyst: Anara. Visionary project scoring and certification for Godot 4.7+ architecture. Use when evaluating project health, modernity, scalability, dependency graphs, or generating Visionary Certificates. Keywords: analyst, Anara, scoring, certification, architecture audit, ResourceLoader.get_dependencies, typed Dictionary, folder-by-feature, Visionary Certificate, Godot 4.7.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover and evaluate potential A-share investment opportunities for China-focused private equity and investment strategies. Adapted from the original deal-sourcing skill for Chinese market structure, data sources, and business practices. Triggers on "A股项目挖掘", "投资项目发现", "deal sourcing China", "find A-share deals", "sourcing opportunities China", or "discover investment targets".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。