2,382 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when a task needs the judgment of an airfield operations specialist — running a Part 139 self-inspection of the movement area, assigning a Runway Condition Code (RwyCC) after snow/ice contamination, deciding whether a discovered hazard needs an immediate NOTAM, triggering a Wildlife Hazard Assessment after a strike or sighting, or judging a FOD find as immediate-closure versus scheduled removal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Adult ESL/Basic Education Instructor — placing a new adult learner using standardized assessment scores, designing life-context-relevant lesson content for working adults, tracking NRS-reportable level gains, addressing attendance/retention barriers, or preparing a learner for GED/HSE or workplace English benchmarks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate ENCODE experiment quality using standard metrics and audit flags. Use when the user asks about data quality, wants to filter for high-quality experiments, needs to interpret quality metrics (FRiP, NSC, RSC, NRF, IDR, TSS enrichment, fragment size), wants to understand ENCODE audit warnings, needs to compare quality across experiments, or is deciding whether data is usable for their analysis. Also use when the user mentions QC, quality control, or data filtering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for annotating ENCODE regulatory variants with ClinVar clinical significance. Use when users need to check if variants in ENCODE peaks have clinical associations, find pathogenic variants in regulatory regions, or assess variant clinical impact. Trigger on: ClinVar, clinical significance, pathogenic variant, variant classification, clinical variant, disease variant, VUS, benign, likely pathogenic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Annotate genetic variants (GWAS hits, eQTLs, rare variants) with ENCODE functional data to interpret non-coding variation. Use when the user has variants of interest and wants to understand their regulatory context, identify causal variants from GWAS loci, assess variant impact on regulatory elements, perform enrichment testing of variant sets in tissue-specific annotations, or link variants to target genes through enhancer-gene maps. Handles the full post-GWAS workflow from variant set → tissue mapping → functional annotation → fine-mapping awareness → enrichment → variant-to-gene → prioritization. Use this skill for ANY variant interpretation task involving ENCODE chromatin, accessibility, TF binding, or 3D genome data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query gnomAD (Genome Aggregation Database) for population allele frequencies, gene constraint scores, and variant annotations to interpret ENCODE regulatory variants. Use when the user needs allele frequencies for variants in ENCODE regulatory elements, wants to assess gene constraint (pLI, LOEUF) for ENCODE target genes, needs population-specific frequencies for GWAS variants overlapping cCREs, wants to filter variants by rarity before functional annotation, or is interpreting ENCODE CRISPR/MPRA results in the context of population genetics. Also use when the user mentions gnomAD, allele frequency, pLI, LOEUF, constraint, rare variants, population frequency, ExAC, or variant filtering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesize project documentation and codebase into comprehensive roadmap status, gaps analysis, and blockers. Use when assessing project health, identifying blockers, tracking progress, comparing plan vs reality, documenting risks, or planning next milestones. Triggers: "roadmap", "project status", "blockers", "risks", "progress", "next milestone", "gaps", "what's done".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Holistic page-experience self-assessment mirroring Google's own question list: Core Web Vitals, HTTPS, intrusive interstitials, mobile usability, content prominence, and ad distinguishability. Use when user says "page experience", "UX signals", "interstitials", "mobile friendly", or "HTTPS check".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze a domain's anchor text distribution from Ahrefs: see the breakdown of anchor text used across all backlinks and assess link profile health. Use when user says "anchor text", "anchor analysis", "anchor distribution", "link anchors", or "anchor text profile".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Content quality and E-E-A-T analysis with AI citation readiness assessment. Enhanced with live Ahrefs (actual keyword rankings, positions) and GSC (search query performance) data to validate static E-E-A-T analysis with real user behavior. Use when user says "content quality", "E-E-A-T", "content analysis", "readability check", "thin content", or "content audit".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic technical debt analysis across architecture, testing, documentation, and infrastructure. Investigates the codebase, scores findings by impact and effort, and generates a prioritized TECH_DEBT.md remediation plan. Delegates to specialized skills for code quality (scout) and linting (lint-fix). Use when assessing overall project health, planning cleanup sprints, or onboarding to an unfamiliar codebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a codebase against well-known software design principles: SOLID, DRY, YAGNI, KISS, Law of Demeter, Separation of Concerns, Composition over Inheritance, and the code-relevant 12-Factor subset. Scores findings by impact and effort, runs adversarial debate on contested violations, and generates a prioritized DESIGN_AUDIT.md. Use when reviewing code quality beyond what linters catch, assessing design health before a refactor, or onboarding to an unfamiliar codebase. Can be invoked standalone or delegated from tech-debt.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive security audit covering OWASP Top 10, secrets detection, supply chain security, threat modeling, and language-specific vulnerability patterns. Investigates actual code paths rather than grep-matching keywords. Generates a scored SECURITY_AUDIT.md with prioritized remediation. Use when assessing application security, preparing for a security review, or onboarding to a codebase with security concerns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code comment accuracy verification, documentation completeness assessment, comment rot detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit your project's documentation health and identify gaps. Scans for README, changelog, API docs, ADRs, runbooks, onboarding guides, and diagrams. Triggers: you need a documentation audit, want to check doc coverage, find missing documentation, or assess documentation quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze vendor management systems for performance scorecards, third-party risk assessment, SLA enforcement, vendor rationalization, and relationship governance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full nonprofit operational health analysis: validate impact measurement methodology and theory of change, optimize fundraising channels and campaign ROI, audit grant management for compliance and proposal quality, and assess donor retention with churn prediction and stewardship workflows..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess supply chain risk exposure and resilience posture. Analyzes supplier dependency mapping (Tier 1/2/3), geographic concentration risk, single-source vulnerability, disruption scenario modeling (pandemic, trade war, port closure), Monte Carlo simulation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze vendor and contractor coordination systems for performance scoring, competitive bid evaluation, SLA compliance tracking, and vendor risk assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze insurance underwriting systems for risk assessment accuracy, pricing adequacy, and portfolio exposure management.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep game design health assessment across five dimensions: review core loop and progression systems, analyze in-game economy for inflation and sink/source balance, mathematically simulate combat balance and drop rates, audit analytics event coverage, and evaluate monetization ethics..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze cybersecurity threat intelligence, triage security alerts, classify IOCs, map attacks to MITRE ATT&CK kill chain, reduce false positives, and attribute threat actors. Covers SIEM tuning, threat feed quality, detection coverage gaps, Diamond Model analysis, and strategic threat assessments for SOC and incident response teams.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit workplace risk scoring systems and occupational safety programs -- evaluate job hazard analysis (JHA/JSA) methodology and task-level hazard identification, risk matrix calibration for likelihood and consequence scales, exposure assessment accuracy for chemical, noise, vibration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。