2,693 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Audit documentation claims against implementation and authoritative repository evidence. Use when checking whether README, architecture, configuration, API, usage, or feature documentation is stale, incomplete, contradicted by code, missing implemented behavior, or inconsistent with a normative contract.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews LLM integration, prompt templates, model selection, token/cost budgets, evaluation harnesses, structured outputs, retries, and streaming. Checks trust boundaries and task evidence against the selected provider/model contract rather than prescribing universal model tiers or sampling settings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research community usage patterns, real-world gotchas, and client compatibility for a specific known library, tool, or protocol feature. Use when a technical-researcher orchestrator needs community-sourced evidence about a named library or feature — bug reports, workarounds, compatibility gaps, and patterns from issue trackers and discussions. Distinct from the broad ecosystem-researcher agent — this skill targets a KNOWN entity and mines what real users have actually experienced, not what exists in a domain.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for a hypothetical walkthrough of a system to expose tensions, frictions, gaps, or contradictions between its expected and evidenced flow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transforms validated /linear-walkthrough artifacts into one presentation-ready deck outline per major codebase component. Use when the user asks to create a presentation, prepare a walkthrough deck, build an onboarding deck, produce an architecture review deck, or summarize a codebase for a technical audience. Requires walkthrough directory output -- reads unified walkthrough, per-section files, validation reports, coverage maps, entry points, and open questions -- then orchestrates four parallel agent phases to produce slide outlines with speaker notes, evidence references, and suggested visuals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verifies claims in backlog items, skill documentation, or plugin content against primary sources using web lookups. Spawns parallel verification agents that must use WebFetch/WebSearch/gh — training data recall is explicitly rejected as evidence. Produces VERIFIED/REFUTED/INCONCLUSIVE verdicts with citations. Use when items are marked UNVERIFIED or when verifying tool API claims, CLI flags, or documented software behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when discovering niche signals, auditing ICP or won/lost evidence, rescoring accounts, or building account and lead scoring Plays. Triggers on fit scoring, engagement scoring, external proxies, and scoring leakage. Skip pure outreach copy or contributor skill installation tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants a last30days-style pre-research pass in Deepline: discover the critical public, private, CRM, workflow, social, and web data sources for a research/enrichment job; compare provider coverage; estimate Deepline credit cost; recommend the source plan before building or running the workflow; or build custom language/messaging from buyer, competitor, community, and CRM evidence. Triggers: pre-research, source discovery, provider strategy, research data sources, ScrapeCreators, X/Twitter data, Reddit comments, public and private datasets, CRM data, workflow data, custom language, messaging language, pain language.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns raw captures (dictated braindumps in a deliverable's inbox/, or recent macwhspr dictation-log entries) into proposed planning-wiki changes, shown as one unified diff. Classifies each statement as a decision, evidence claim, question, task, or dropped item, traces it to its capture paragraph, tags unconfirmed names, numbers, and citations UNRESOLVED, and writes decisions only with the author's assent. Edits only the planning wiki, never source files. Use when asked to intake, absorb notes, or process the inbox, or after dictating notes from a talk, meeting, or reading session.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when an exact ChatGPT/Codex Plugin artifact has passed local package, brand, and listing gates and you need reviewer-ready submission evidence without confusing preparation, submission, approval, and publication states.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts or audits a scientific paper’s introduction and framing — the real-world "why", an evidence audit, the funnel from theory to a falsifiable if-then with a named estimand, bridges across experiments, and a contribution list matched to the design. Use when the user asks to write, restructure, or critique an introduction, motivate or frame a paper, repair a gap-in-the-literature opening, sharpen or calibrate a contribution claim, or connect experiments into one argument. Sentence-level flow and wording are out of scope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds or audits a literature review, producing an evidence map, the closest prior work, source clusters, a gap verdict, and a synthesis plan for the introduction. Use when the user asks whether a contribution is novel, who has studied a question, what the literature establishes, or how to organize a review, or wants a reading list, Zotero export, or pile of papers turned into one. For systematic reviews or meta-analyses it produces the protocol scaffold and routes registration (PROSPERO or OSF) and screening to dedicated tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts or audits a scientific paper's introduction: real-world motivation, evidence audit, theory-to-if-then funnel with a named estimand, bridges across experiments, and calibrated contributions. Use to write, frame, or critique an introduction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds or audits a literature review: evidence map, closest prior work, gap verdict, and synthesis plan. Use to check whether a contribution is novel, map what a literature establishes, or organize a review; systematic reviews get a protocol scaffold.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
An AI analyst for buying B2B software. Investigates what vendors claim, checks the evidence, surfaces contradictions and unanswered questions, and produces a shareable Decision Brief with the questions to ask before you buy. Quick Eval by default; Deep Eval on request. Use when asked to evaluate, compare, vet, or research B2B software vendors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-source deep research using firecrawl and exa MCPs. Searches the web, synthesizes findings, and delivers cited reports with source attribution. Use when the user wants thorough research on any topic with evidence and citations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deterministic Software Graph analysis via Ontoly CLI and MCP. Use when: (1) Codebase architecture, dependency, route, service, module, configuration, or impact questions need graph evidence, (2) A repository should be analyzed before source search, (3) You need a persistent SoftwareGraph.json for validation, MCP, or agent workflows. Triggers: "build software graph", "trace route", "impact analysis", "architecture summary", "dependency graph", "what uses this", "Ontoly".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and safely clean Xcode-related developer storage on macOS. Use whenever a developer mentions low disk space, Xcode storage, DerivedData, simulator devices or runtimes, stale beta platforms in Xcode Settings, DeviceSupport, archives, dSYMs, CocoaPods caches, simulator dyld caches, project .build folders, downloaded Xcode DMGs/XIPs, duplicate Xcode installers, or old Xcode applications. Also use this skill proactively when you hit low storage during other work, such as a build, download, or install failing with an out-of-disk-space error. Always measure first, report recoverable GiB with evidence, and obtain explicit itemized approval before any mutation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a product messaging library from your positioning, your website and customer evidence: a description, the status quo and alternatives, pain points with their knock-on consequences, capabilities, functional, emotional and social benefits, branded features, the cost of doing nothing, common objections with responses, and core messaging blocks (tagline, elevator pitch, value props, proof, per-audience lines). Every claim sourced. Triggers: "product messaging", "messaging library", "messaging framework", "value props", "capabilities and benefits", "what are our differentiators in words". Run after /positioning. Not for choosing the position itself (use /positioning).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Develops B2B SaaS positioning from your ICP, competitor and win-loss evidence. Maps what buyers compare you to, chooses between leading with a category or a problem, picks a primary and secondary anchor and up to three defensible differentiators, lays out 2 to 4 worked positioning options with a comparison canvas so you can decide, then locks the chosen one and tests it (clarity ladder, guarantee test). Triggers: "positioning", "how do we position", "what category are we in", "how do we differentiate from", "our homepage is confusing", "positioning options". Run before /messaging. Not for taglines or a messaging library (use /messaging).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds an ideal customer profile from evidence: case studies, testimonials, customer logos, solutions pages, reviews and any sales notes you have. Produces market sizing layers, firmographic segments, a champion and an economic buyer persona, a negative ICP, intent signals, customer proof points and a voice-of-customer section in the buyers' own words, every claim sourced. Triggers: "ICP research", "ideal customer profile", "who are our customers", "customer segments", "buyer personas", "who should we target". Run after /company-context. Not for competitor analysis (use /competitor-research) or call transcript patterns (use /win-loss).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create/update .agent/constitution.md. Use when commands/boundaries/constraints must be confirmed before baseline or code changes. Draft v0 from repo evidence, then interview user.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze sales-call transcripts to extract why deals are won and lost across six dimensions — product, messaging, GTM/sales, pricing, competition, and customer context. Produces aggregated patterns with verbatim buyer quotes, frequencies, and recommendations. Writes to marketing/win-loss/win-loss.md as the evidence base under positioning, messaging, and ICP. Triggers - "win loss analysis", "why are we losing deals", "why do we win", "analyze sales calls", "churn analysis", "deal review"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the Anabasis v2 improvement loop, the Super Loop: find the one link that holds the climb, choose one change against it, prove its path, put a prediction on record, launch, watch, read the log, decide the next move. Use when the operator asks to keep a campaign going, to run a pass of the loop, what to launch next, why a campaign is not climbing, or what a finished round means for the next one. Owns the choice of experiment and the reading of its evidence; the operator owns promotion, a freeze, a stop, spend and the solve's condition.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。