「codex review」の検索結果

ALIGN-video for Codex. Create or revise a video through agent-authored code, rendering, editing and fresh-context audiovisual review, without image, video or music generation models. Use for reference-led animation, procedural films, motion design, explainers, construction replays, and continuing an existing coded-video project. Carries the work from reference study and animatic through a finished, reproducible film; supports explicitly requested self-review when appropriate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the operating health of a one-person company using lightweight metrics, bottleneck analysis, and stop-loss logic. Use when Codex needs to explain review concepts when needed, verify available outputs, ask one question at a time, present multiple bottleneck hypotheses, and write user-confirmed outputs into `opc-doc/`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning, drafting, revising, compressing, or auditing conference rebuttals and author responses in OpenReview Markdown or PDF. Supports exact reviewer mapping, evidence and experiment integration, guided risk decisions, venue-format validation, and blind reviewer/AC audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Facilitate monthly S&OP or integrated business planning cycles by aligning demand, supply, inventory, capacity, and executive decisions with a standard meeting rhythm and decision log. Use when operations teams need a demand review, supply review, pre-S&OP reconciliation, or executive S&OP pack. Do not use for single-SKU replenishment math only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze CSAT, NPS comments, reviews, and support feedback for sentiment, recurring themes, customer pain, and service improvement actions. Use for customer support and CX feedback reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft commercial contracts from scratch by contract type — NDAs, service agreements, vendor contracts, employment agreements, and licensing deals. Follow a clause library approach with risk-balanced terms. Use when creating new contracts. Do not replace legal counsel sign-off on finalized agreements. For reviewing existing contracts, use contract-risk-review instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review changes with a risk-first mindset that prioritizes bugs, regressions, missing tests, and operational gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare customer or executive business reviews with outcome tracking, adoption health, ROI narrative, risks, commitments, and next-quarter plan using customer success and CX frameworks. Use when teams need QBRs, success plans, churn-risk conversations, or executive account reviews. Do not use for generic slide beautification or cold outreach prospecting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep watching open PRs so fresh review feedback is surfaced promptly. Use when the user asks Codex to monitor a PR, watch CI, handle review comments, or keep an eye on failures and feedback on an open PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate implementation to Codex, grok, or cursor-agent, then review the diff, send it back to iterate, gate on the full test suite, and ship it as a PR. Use this whenever the user wants Codex, the grok 后端, or cursor-agent to write code, mentions handing off / delegating implementation to one of those backends, asks to work through a plan or spec unit-by-unit with an implementation backend doing the coding, or wants a review-and-merge loop wrapped around delegated output — and also when resuming such a loop ("keep going", "next unit", "继续下一个"). It encodes constraints that are expensive to rediscover: the implementer runs in the real environment behind backend-specific git and publication boundaries, must not be pointed at a full test suite by default, and its self-report is a claim rather than evidence. This loop expects an approved plan or an equivalently precise spec; settle an unsolved high-level goal into a plan first, using the engineering-mode skill when it is installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use an available Codex MCP integration as a read-only second-opinion verifier for GEODE code reviews, GAP audits, and contract checks. Use only when the user requests Codex cross-checking and the current tool inventory exposes the required MCP tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply or adapt a dual-theme soft-neumorphic UI board for dashboards, workspaces, settings panels, admin tools, and design-system previews. Use when Codex should build or restyle interface work in a tactile soft-neumorphic style with both light and dark themes, shared semantic tokens, large radii, raised surfaces, inset fields, restrained accent states, and a complete preview board covering foundations, controls, navigation, data display, and feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code changes for correctness defects, regressions, security risks, data-integrity problems, concurrency hazards, and missing meaningful tests. Use for pull requests, branches, commits, patches, or working-tree reviews; do not use for implementation unless the user separately requests fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a small code or documentation change and return only evidence-backed correctness findings. Use in the Codex How To local plugin lab; do not modify files or post remote comments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

仕様書/実装計画書をもとに、計画を見出し単位のステップへ分解し、各ステップで「テスト作成→レビュー→収束ならコミット」「実装→レビュー→収束ならコミット」(必要なら「ドキュメント修正→レビュー→収束ならコミット」)を自律反復する。ユーザーから自律進行(止まらず最後まで進める・ステップを自動で回す等)の明示的な指示があったときだけ使う。単に計画に沿って実装してほしいだけの依頼(自律進行の指示を伴わない)では使わない。レビューは codex-review-loop、コミットは commit に委譲し、仕様整合(参照の記法・用語規約)はエージェントが直接確認する。

codex:rescueにレビューさせ、各指摘を実コードで検証して修正/反証/受容/保留に仕分け、再レビューを反復する。未解決ゼロ・千日手・要ユーザー判断のいずれかで終了。コードレビューを回したいときに使う。

Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep watching open PRs so fresh review feedback is surfaced promptly. Use when the user asks Codex to monitor a PR, watch CI, handle review comments, or keep an eye on failures and feedback on an open PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

planモードの計画に基づいて実装を開始する。planファイルからタスクリスト作成→タスク順次実行→各タスク完了時にコミット→最後にcodex-reviewを実行する。

コードレビューを依頼された際に使用。Codex CLIを使ってplanファイルと開発日誌（コンテキストにある場合）を参照し、実装が計画に沿っているかをレビューし、指摘をタスクリスト化して収束するまで繰り返します。

planファイルのレビューを依頼された際に使用。Codex CLIを使ってplanファイル自体の実現可能性・技術的妥当性・抜け漏れをレビューし、指摘をタスクリスト化して収束するまで繰り返します。

Analyze, design, write, revise, translate, and review empirical or technical research papers through an evidence-bounded dialectical workflow. Use when Codex must develop a research question, integrate reference papers with a user's ideas, build phenomenon-mechanism-conditions reasoning, design methods or experiments, restructure or edit a manuscript, translate Chinese academic text into restrained English, answer reviewers, or run multi-round peer-review convergence without fabricating evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GStack review method for pre-landing code, diff, PR, or implementation review focused on bugs, regressions, missing tests, and release risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GStack design-review method for reviewing rendered UI, landing pages, decks, or visual artifacts for hierarchy, layout, accessibility, and polish.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design original, scalable logos and production-ready asset sets for a specific usage context. Use when Codex needs to create or refine a logo, symbol, wordmark, app icon, repository identity, CLI mark, website brand, social preview, or Codex skill/plugin icon; adapt concepts, formats, dimensions, variants, and delivery checks to the target platform instead of producing a context-free image.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。