「concrete」の検索結果

Helps find, inspect, and compare (at a high level) .NET project templates. Resolves natural-language project descriptions to ranked template matches with pre-filled parameters. USE FOR: finding the right dotnet new template for a task, inspecting a template's parameters and constraints, understanding what a template produces before creating a project, resolving intent like "web API with auth" to concrete template + parameters. DO NOT USE FOR: actually creating projects (use template-instantiation), authoring custom templates (use template-authoring), producing a detailed side-by-side comparison (use template-comparison), choosing cross-parameter defaults during creation (use template-smart-defaults), MSBuild or build issues (use dotnet-msbuild plugin), NuGet package management unrelated to template packages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grade a curated list of individual tests for readiness, A-F quality, and concrete improvements. ALWAYS USE FOR: grade tests, review only a named test, per-test readiness decisions, or quality bands for supplied methods, bodies, file spans, or bounded PR diffs, including existing tests. Produce a PR-ready Pass, Failed, Uncertain, or Not applicable table; unresolved or empty scopes omit the grade. Compose read-only per-test mutation evidence when available. Polyglot: .NET, Python, TS/JS, Java, Go, Ruby, Rust, Swift, Kotlin, PowerShell, C++. DO NOT USE FOR: suite-wide audits (test-engineer or test-anti-patterns), writing or fixing tests, or measuring coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects duplicate boilerplate, copy-paste tests, and structural maintainability issues across .NET test suites. Use when the user asks to reduce repetition, consolidate similar test methods, convert copy-paste tests to data-driven parameterized tests, suggest a better test structure, or identify refactoring opportunities. Identifies repeated construction, assertion patterns, copy-paste methods convertible to DataRow/Theory/TestCase, redundant setup/teardown, and shared infrastructure. Produces an analysis report with concrete before/after suggestions. Works with MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, and TUnit. DO NOT USE FOR: writing new tests (use writing-mstest-tests), reviewing test quality or anti-patterns (use test-anti-patterns), or deep mock auditing (use exp-mock-usage-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, modify, debug, or review Windows Forms applications only when the request contains a concrete Windows Forms marker. USE FOR: WinForms, Windows Forms, System.Windows.Forms, WinForms Form or UserControl designer files (*.Designer.cs or *.Designer.vb), Visual Studio WinForms Designer, TableLayoutPanel, BindingSource, DataGridView, Control.InvokeAsync, component-tray ownership, or custom control serialization. DO NOT USE FOR: WPF or WPF XAML, including Window.InputBindings, KeyBinding, commands, or DataContext; .NET MAUI; Avalonia; or any request where none of the listed Windows Forms markers is present.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search places, resolve addresses, compare routes, inspect neighborhoods, and retrieve geographic or environmental facts through the standalone @cablate/mcp-google-map CLI. Use for concrete location questions; use the travel-planning or local-seo Skill for those specialized outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Java change needs independent Behavior-Driven Development guidance from trusted behavior facts through concrete examples and observable scenarios, with focused clarification when behavior is pending or ambiguous. This should trigger for requests such as Apply BDD; Facilitate behavior examples; Discover scenarios with Given When Then; Review these examples for shared domain language; Complete BDD discovery as a self-contained interaction. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get one actionable improvement for your AI product based on the latest GenAI PM briefs. Fetch the last 5 days of curated AI PM insights from genaipm.com, analyze the current repo/project, find synergy between trending topics and the user's work, then research the source material and apply a concrete improvement. Use when the user wants to improve their AI product, get coaching on AI PM best practices, apply the latest industry insights to their codebase, or run "/one-step-better-ai-pm". Requires a GenAI PM subscriber email (set GENAIPM_EMAIL env var or provide when prompted).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design React interfaces with the full shadcn/ui catalog. The agent writes a brief, Jev picks components and a style recipe from bounded catalogs, then the agent implements, renders, and reviews against concrete checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a user-provided Chinese mathematical-modeling abstract without requiring the problem statement or full paper, identify concrete writing defects, and prioritize revisions. Use when the user asks to check, diagnose, or improve a modeling-paper abstract; do not claim coverage or factual consistency that cannot be verified without the problem or paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a broad project request into a small actionable plan with concrete deliverables, dependencies and acceptance checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track progress across work sessions using SESSION.md with git checkpoints and concrete next actions. Converts IMPLEMENTATION_PHASES.md into trackable session state with phase status, progress markers, and recovery points. Use when: starting projects after planning phase, resuming work after context clears, managing multi-phase implementations, or troubleshooting lost context, missing progress tracking, or unclear next steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate ATLAS pattern recognition mode. Identify repeated patterns, extract essential characteristics, and create reusable abstractions from concrete examples.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help authors learn from exemplary ICLR, ICML, and NeurIPS papers through source-linked manuscript comparisons, concrete writing and experiment suggestions, and guided reflection. Use for research storytelling, contribution framing, paper comparison, figure planning, or research retrospectives. Not an acceptance predictor or a routine grammar/citation formatter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarially fact-check DOCS.md files against the actual source code, verifying every concrete claim rather than trusting structure checks. Use when the user asks to audit docs, verify documentation accuracy, check whether docs are still true, or on a scheduled documentation review. This is the semantic layer the mechanical checkers cannot cover.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have an approved research question and need a concrete analysis plan, before touching outcome data or fitting any model

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-powered construction defect detection using computer vision. Identify cracks, spalling, corrosion, and other defects in concrete, steel, and building components from images and video.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design the UX of custom-code Databricks Apps (AppKit/React) data screens — KPI/overview pages, reports, charts, tables, and Genie/chat data assistants — mapped to concrete AppKit components. Use when BUILDING or reviewing the UI of an AppKit/React app that displays data or answers data questions: choosing genre, layout, charts, KPIs, semantic color, required states (loading/empty/error), IBCS notation, and AI-result trust (showing generated SQL/sources for Genie/chat). A plain "create a dashboard" request means a managed AI/BI (Lakeview) dashboard → use databricks-aibi-dashboards, NOT this skill. Also NOT for non-data frontend (forms, settings, auth, marketing) or scaffolding/build/deploy (→ databricks-apps). Complements databricks-apps; use it alongside whenever a custom app has a chart, table, KPI, report, or Genie/chat/AI surface.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate Databricks workloads from classic compute to serverless compute. Use when migrating notebooks, jobs, pipelines, or Scala JARs (`spark_jar_task`) from classic clusters to serverless, checking if existing code is serverless-compatible, or writing new serverless-compatible code. Provides concrete fixes for the serverless Spark Connect architecture and guides the full migration. Not for classic DBR version upgrades or cluster configuration changes within classic compute.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies NIST/CWE security hardening to Python and Rust code. Use when auditing code for vulnerabilities or proposing concrete security remediations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a deep code review of files, modules, a diff, or a branch - finding security vulnerabilities (mapped to OWASP Top 10:2025), correctness bugs, performance problems, and maintainability issues - and returns severity-ranked findings with evidence and concrete fixes. Use when the user asks to review, audit, or sanity-check code, asks "is this safe", "what's wrong with this", "find bugs", or wants a security or performance pass before shipping. For posting line comments on a GitHub pull request, use git-pr-reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when choosing the model for a medical-imaging study. Picks a paper-grounded architecture family (CNN/ViT, U-Net/nnU-Net, detection, SAM/foundation, GNN), then vets the concrete repo or checkpoint for licence, version pin, weight provenance and benchmark overlap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Blender PBR and stylized material creation for metal, wood, concrete, fabric, glass, dirt, rust, and procedural shaders. Use for look development, material reuse, and production shading in Blender via MCP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Surfaces Han's shared standard for explaining technical work to a reader who will not implement it into the calling skill's own context, so the caller writes its escalations, confirmation turns, and stops as a concrete outcome the reader could observe rather than as a mechanism. Use when a skill is about to ask a person a question, stop for an input, or explain a technical consequence to someone who will not open the code. Governs what a run says to a person in a turn, where readability-guidance governs the shape of a written deliverable. Runs in the caller's context and hands control straight back; it does not produce a deliverable of its own, rewrite anything, or judge the caller's work. Carries guidance only and adds no self-check step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Researches an open-ended question — options, possible solutions, prior art, trade-offs, or how something works — and produces a durable, evidence-backed, adversarially-validated report that recommends an option without committing the team to any artifact. Use when you want to research approaches, weigh options, survey prior art or the state of the art, or understand how something works before committing to a direction. Does not diagnose a bug, failure, or root cause — use investigate. Does not specify a feature — use plan-a-feature. Does not create or update a coding standard — use coding-standard. Does not compare two concrete artifacts for gaps — use gap-analysis. Does not assess an existing module's architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。