600 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
You are a workflow automation expert specializing in creating efficient CI/CD pipelines, GitHub Actions workflows, and automated development processes. Design automation that reduces manual work, improves consistency, and accelerates delivery while maintaining quality and security.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate bibliography entries against citations in all lecture files. Structural checks (missing/unused entries, malformed fields) by default; `--semantic` adds citation-drift detection, DOI verification, and style-consistency checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial visual-layout audit of a Quarto `.qmd` or Beamer `.tex` deck. Flags overflow, font inconsistency, box fatigue, spacing, and alignment issues. Use when user says "visual audit", "check the layout", "does this overflow?", "look for visual issues", "audit the slides", or after reworking a deck's appearance. Does NOT check writing or pedagogy — pair with `/proofread` or `/pedagogy-review`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read-only proofreading pass over lecture `.tex` or `.qmd` files. Checks grammar, typos, overflow, terminology consistency, and academic writing quality; produces a report without editing. Use when user says "proofread", "check for typos", "look for grammar issues", "copy-edit this", "any writing errors?", or before a lecture release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a new Beamer lecture `.tex` from source papers and materials, with notation consistency checks and the project's preamble wired in. Use when user says "create a lecture on X", "new lecture from these papers", "start a deck on topic Y", "scaffold a new Beamer file", "build me a lecture from these PDFs". Scaffolds the full deck — NOT for compiling existing `.tex` (use `/compile-latex`).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Commit the current work — runs the quality, consistency and passport gates, branches off main if needed, stages specific files, and writes a commit whose subject states what is now true. Pushes and opens a pull request only with --pr or when the user asks; never merges — a merge happens only when the user explicitly says to merge. Use ONLY on explicit commit intent — user says "commit", "let's commit this", "open a PR", or prefixes with `/commit`. Do NOT auto-invoke on vague end-of-task phrases ("we're done", "wrap up") — those require explicit confirmation first. Never force-pushes or skips hooks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Gate a prompt universe for schema and provenance completeness, target or campaign contamination, evidence entailment, naturalness, one-concept clarity, architecture consistency, aided status, answer leakage, and semantic duplicates. Use after realistic prompt generation and before human panel selection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Health-check your meeting knowledge for contradictions, stale commitments, and decision conflicts. Use when the user asks "any conflicts in my meetings", "check for stale action items", "lint my meetings", "consistency check", "are there contradictions", or wants to audit their decision history.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintenance orchestrator for the brooks-lint plugin itself. Runs a sequential subagent pipeline — author → eval → QA → trigger-audit → release — to add or edit a skill, refresh the eval suite, keep the four manifests + all README translations + CHANGELOG + AGENTS/GEMINI in sync, audit trigger boundaries, and cut releases. Drives the five agents in .claude/agents/ (skill-author, eval-curator, consistency-qa, trigger-boundary-auditor, release-manager). Triggers when the maintainer asks to work ON brooks-lint itself: "add a new skill", "edit the brooks-debt guide", "update the eval suite", "fix the trigger descriptions", "make this change and validate it", "release brooks-lint", "bump and publish", and follow-ups: "re-run", "re-validate", "update that skill", "redo the audit", "do the X part again". Do NOT trigger for: USING the brooks-lint analysis skills on some target codebase (that's brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test / brooks-health / brooks-sweep); generic questions about brooks-lint that don't ask to change it; or maintenance of a different plugin.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked 出口报关需要什么单证, 报关资料清单, 申报要素怎么填, 报关单和发票对不上, 出口退税需要的单证, 进口清关资料, or prepare customs documents for an export or import shipment in mainland China. Produces a document checklist for this shipment (报关单 data, 商业发票, 装箱单, 合同, 委托书, licences and certificates), a cross-document consistency check, the 申报要素 to prepare for the HS code, inspection and licence flags, the timeline with the customs broker, and the records to keep for the export rebate, all marked to confirm with the broker and customs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a matched Chinese and English CV (中英文简历) from one set of facts: each version follows its own conventions rather than a literal translation, with names, titles, dates, education and company names rendered correctly in both. Use when asked for a Chinese and English resume, translate my CV into Chinese, 中英文简历, 英文简历, or apply to a foreign company in China or a Chinese company abroad. Produces the Chinese CV, the English CV, a consistency table proving the facts match, and a glossary of the terms chosen.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides Typer templates, handles registration, and ensures consistency. ALWAYS use this skill when adding or modifying CLI commands. Use when user requests to add/create/implement/build/write a new command (e.g., "add edit command", "create search feature") OR update/modify/change/edit an existing command.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a YouTube channel end to end - packaging, consistency, the first fifteen seconds, and what to fix first. Use for "audit my channel", "why isn't my channel growing", "review my videos", or a pasted channel URL.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a source-derived writing style profile from real posts, essays, launch notes, docs, or site copy, then reuse that profile across content, outreach, and social workflows. Use when the user wants voice consistency without generic AI writing tropes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write articles, guides, blog posts, tutorials, newsletter issues, and other long-form content in a distinctive voice derived from supplied examples or brand guidance. Use when the user wants polished written content longer than a paragraph, especially when voice consistency, structure, and credibility matter.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when strengthening AISTATS reproducibility evidence, including the official reproducibility checklist, statistical assumptions, proofs, datasets, hyperparameters, random seeds, compute, uncertainty estimates, baselines, code/data release statements, and checklist-to-claim consistency audits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when strengthening reproducibility evidence for an ACL paper reviewed through ACL Rolling Review, covering the Responsible NLP checklist end to end, hyperparameter and compute reporting, prompt and decoding disclosure for LLM experiments, data contamination auditing, variance across runs, and checklist-to-paper consistency.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when strengthening AAMAS reproducibility evidence for interaction claims, including proofs and game definitions, opponent and population sets, self-play protocols, random seeds, compute, uncertainty on strategic outcomes, baselines, and consistency between what the paper claims about agents and what the artifact can actually show.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Final QC gate for a rendered 9:16 video ad, run before it is published. One script checks what a machine can decide — exact 1080x1920 size, a hook that moves and speaks in the first second, no frozen stretches, no dead air, no black frames, the brand's real logo on the end card (never a favicon, never a redrawn or wrong logo), end-card colours near the brand palette — and builds one contact sheet (frames with the TikTok/Reels UI safe zones shaded, beside the logo, product images and a font specimen) for the checks that need eyes — font, product likeness, product consistency across scenes, safe zones. A declared silent-text profile covers silent, text-led formats such as kinetic text (no audio track needed, short blank beats between text beats allowed within fixed bounds). Exit 0 PASS / 2 FAIL / 3 ERROR. Use on every finished video master before pinning it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a Simulink model is incompatible with Simulink Design Verifier (sldvcompat returns false, or an SLDV analysis errors out on an unsupported construct) and needs to be made analyzable. Diagnoses the incompatibility, applies the matching fix to a copy, and confirms the copy is compatible; optionally raises confidence the fix preserved behavior via a back-to-back consistency replay (agreement on the generated tests, not a proof of equivalence). Do NOT use for running test generation, design error detection, or requirement verification themselves — only for making a model compatible so those can proceed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses the quality and completeness of a genome annotation with BUSCO (conserved single-copy ortholog recovery), OMArk (proteome completeness, consistency, and contamination), CheckM2 (prokaryotic completeness/contamination), and a gene-set sanity panel (gene count, mono-exonic fraction, protein-length distribution, mRNA:gene ratio, coding density). Covers the assembly-BUSCO-vs-proteome-BUSCO diagnostic, what BUSCO-Duplicated really means, why gene count is a vanity metric, and the QC of transferred annotations. Use when judging whether an annotation is good enough to publish or submit, diagnosing a suspect annotation, or comparing annotation completeness across pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive quality control for CLIP-seq libraries (eCLIP, iCLIP, iCLIP2, PAR-CLIP) covering library complexity (preseq), FRiP, IDR replicate reproducibility, read-distribution metagene, SMInput vs IgG control rationale, rRNA / snoRNA contamination, fragment-length distribution, and ENCODE-compliance thresholds. Use when assessing whether a CLIP library passed, deciding lenient vs stringent peak thresholds, comparing replicates with IDR rescue and self-consistency ratios, or distinguishing failed IP from over-amplified library.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a differential-ready consensus peakset from per-replicate ATAC-seq peaks using iterative overlap removal, fixed-width re-centering, and majority-rule overlap. Use when generating a stable peak coordinate system for downstream differential accessibility, ML feature engineering, cross-sample comparison, or fixed-width peak counts; covers Corces 2018 iterative overlap (501 bp), DiffBind summit re-centering, and ENCODE consistency rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。