8,320 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Validate protein designs using AlphaFold2 structure prediction. Use this skill when: (1) Validating designed sequences fold correctly, (2) Predicting binder-target complex structures, (3) Calculating confidence metrics (pLDDT, pTM, ipTM), (4) Self-consistency validation of designs, (5) Multi-chain complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement API schema validation using OpenAPI specifications and JSON Schema to enforce input/output contracts and prevent injection, data exposure, and mass assignment attacks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Control LLM output with regex and grammars, guarantee valid JSON/XML/code generation, enforce structured formats, and build multi-step workflows with Guidance - Microsoft Research's constrained generation framework
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Next.js App Router 専用 API リファレンス（Pages Router / getStaticProps 等は非対応）。 Server Components, Server Actions, layout/page/loading/error ファイル規約, dynamic routes, parallel/intercepting routes, Metadata API (generateMetadata), use cache, revalidatePath/revalidateTag, next/image・next/font・next/link, cookies/headers, useRouter, next.config.js, proxy（旧 middleware）。 プラットフォーム実行基盤・CDN・ISR インフラは vercel スキル参照。
Debrief a finished Otameshi Tenshoku trial from the employer's side: set the observed facts against the completion criteria agreed before the start, keep expectations added afterwards, second-hand or off-the-job observations and the company's own late or missing support apart, settle the hours actually worked separately from any evaluation, and draft feedback to the candidate that states facts, support gaps and what happens next without promising a hire or continuation the company has not decided. Use when a hiring manager, recruiter or small-business owner wants to review a trial, decide what to tell the candidate, or work out the settlement after a shortfall; do not use to judge the candidate's aptitude or predict a hire, to cut pay or demand unpaid rework because of dissatisfaction, to compare candidates, or to send the feedback, pay, or update records on the user's behalf.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Nominates and assesses CRISPR off-target sites genome-wide. Enumerates candidate sites by mismatch and bulge tolerance with Cas-OFFinder/CRISPRitz, ranks them with the published CFD score (SpCas9-only, relative ranker) or MIT/CRISTA/energy models, runs variant-aware screening against gnomAD/individual genomes (CRISPRme), and frames the empirical genome-wide discovery assays (GUIDE-seq, CIRCLE-seq, CHANGE-seq, DISCOVER-seq, Digenome-seq) and high-fidelity nuclease choice (HiFi Cas9, Sniper-Cas9, eSpCas9, SpCas9-HF1). Use when assessing guide RNA specificity, choosing among candidate guides, screening a therapeutic guide against population variation, or planning empirical off-target validation. Distinguishes predicted vs detected vs validated. On-target activity scoring and deaminase (Cas-independent) base/prime-editor off-targets are separate skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Mom Test–style customer-discovery interviews to validate or kill an unbuilt idea — generate a non-leading interview guide, conduct or coach the conversations, and synthesize signal vs compliments. Load when the user asks to do customer discovery, run problem interviews, validate an idea with users, run a Mom Test, design an interview guide, or says "talk to customers", "validate the problem", "interview users", "Mom Test this", "did real users want it", "synthesize my interviews", "I just talked to N people". Sub-skill of `venture-exploration`. Hard-bans "would you use this?", solution-pitching, friend/family-only ICP, and treating compliments as validation. Calls `secure-*` before synthesizing any pasted external transcripts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Nominates and assesses CRISPR off-target sites genome-wide. Enumerates candidate sites by mismatch and bulge tolerance with Cas-OFFinder/CRISPRitz, ranks them with the published CFD score (SpCas9-only, relative ranker) or MIT/CRISTA/energy models, runs variant-aware screening against gnomAD/individual genomes (CRISPRme), and frames the empirical genome-wide discovery assays (GUIDE-seq, CIRCLE-seq, CHANGE-seq, DISCOVER-seq, Digenome-seq) and high-fidelity nuclease choice (HiFi Cas9, Sniper-Cas9, eSpCas9, SpCas9-HF1). Use when assessing guide RNA specificity, choosing among candidate guides, screening a therapeutic guide against population variation, or planning empirical off-target validation. Distinguishes predicted vs detected vs validated. On-target activity scoring and deaminase (Cas-independent) base/prime-editor off-targets are separate skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user wants to "stress-test a design", "challenge an idea", "red team a proposal", "get critical feedback on a design", "validate a design", "adversarial architecture review", "risk assessment", "設計を検証して", "反論をもらいたい", "設計を批判的にレビュー", "デビルズアドボケート", "ストレステスト", "弱点を指摘して", "穴を見つけて", "この設計で良いか", "リスク評価", "設計のアーキテクチャレビュー", or mentions structured adversarial review of a proposal or design. NOTE: Use this for validating PROPOSALS and DESIGNS through adversarial debate, NOT for generic code review, PR review, or normal review requests (use /codex:review or /codex:adversarial-review for those). Also NOT for investigating unknown bugs (use /agent-dialectics:strong-inference for that).
This skill should be used when the user wants to "test a claim against data", "validate an empirical hypothesis", "refine a model/theory with evidence", "characterize a pattern and verify it", "演繹と帰納で検証", "仮説をデータで検証して更新", "実例と反例で確かめる", "弁証法ループ", "主張を現物で裏取り", "傾向分析を検証して精緻化", or mentions iteratively updating a hypothesis by deriving predictions and testing them against a real corpus. NOTE: Use this for VALIDATING/REFINING an empirical claim or model against real data through a derive→test→update loop. Use strong-inference for debugging an UNKNOWN cause, and devils-advocate for adversarially stress-testing a DESIGN proposal.
Use this skill when building analytics dashboards with nuxt-ui-tools as a package consumer. Covers schema and view functions (defineDashboardSchema, defineDashboardView) that take their context as typed params, useDashboard with a getter that rebuilds on input change, typed injection (useDashboardView, injectDashboard, InferDashboard, InferDashboardView), filters declared inline with the f builder and synced with the URL, memory, or an external store (one value per key across views), headless filters, filter controls and the shipped UI (UiDashboardPage, UiDashboardFilters, UiDashboardFilter, UiDashboardViewTabs) with slot overrides, remote paginated pickers and remoteTableOptions, staged queries (essential / background / deferred) with select and dependent requires, lazy enabled conditions on views, queries, and filters (blocks of disabled queries hidden, grids closing up), derived values, views (tabs), query-scoped filters, number formats (presets, Intl options, useDashboardFormat), and the dashboard blocks (stats with trends, goals, and comparisons, stat groups, gauges, unovis charts with highlights, value labels, and totals, lists with progress rings, bars, funnel, alerts, activity feeds, sortable tables, custom widgets) with their automatic loading, error, empty, and refresh states, card menus, header and footer actions, row actions, drill-down and selected state, card tabs, split cards, comparison periods, auto-refresh, and data freshness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Replicate and validate a GitHub issue by spinning up Archon, analyzing the issue, and systematically testing all described symptoms using browser automation. Use when: User wants to reproduce a bug, validate a GitHub issue, confirm a reported problem, or investigate whether an issue is real before working on a fix. Triggers: "replicate issue", "reproduce issue", "validate issue", "confirm bug", "test issue", "can you reproduce", "try to replicate", "verify the bug". Capability: Checks out main, pulls latest, starts Archon, reads the GitHub issue, then uses agent-browser to systematically test every symptom and produce a findings report. NOT for: Fixing issues (use /archon or /exp-piv-loop:fix-issue), general UI testing (use /validate-ui).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Control LLM output with regex and grammars, guarantee valid JSON/XML/code generation, enforce structured formats, and build multi-step workflows with Guidance - Microsoft Research's constrained generation framework
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates models and IOptions. DataAnnotations, IValidatableObject, IValidateOptions<T>.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates HTTP request inputs. .NET 10 AddValidation, FluentValidation, ProblemDetails.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesizes evidence-linked feedback from validation results, confidence evidence, and iteration triggers. Proposes bounded revision guidance for a stated acceptance failure. Activate on 'synthesize feedback', 'improvement suggestions', 'actionable feedback', 'iteration guidance', 'feedback generation'. NOT for iteration detection (use dag-iteration-detector) or convergence tracking (use dag-convergence-monitor).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architecture-level decisions for putting a CDN in front of a web app's static assets, API responses, and file/media delivery: provider selection (hyperscaler vs. specialist $/GB), signed-URL / tokenized access for gating private content at the edge, cache invalidation strategy (versioned URLs vs. purge APIs), origin shield / tiered caching for high-miss-rate content, and CDN-layer geo-restriction. Use when deciding which CDN to put in front of a new or growing service, when private/paywalled files need edge delivery without an origin round-trip per request, or when purge/invalidation behavior is being designed rather than debugged. NOT for HTTP cache-control header syntax, Vary, stale-while-revalidate, or surrogate-key purge mechanics (see `cdn-cache-control-headers`); NOT for Cloudflare-specific product configuration once Cloudflare is already chosen (see `cloudflare`); NOT for video-specific transcoding, adaptive bitrate ladders, or streaming-protocol packaging (see `managed-video-streaming-pipeline`).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OpenClawのリリース候補に対するCIを実行・監視し、実際のプロバイダー接続やインストール・更新を検証して、失敗の原因と結果を整理するスキルです。
OpenClawのリリース情報を確認し、Discord向けの告知文を作成します。版ごとの更新手順や利用者に試してほしい点を整理し、投稿にも対応します。
Slackの返信を見出しや表、ボタン、選択メニューで整理し、結果の確認や次の操作につなげます。Slackアプリ向けのBlock Kit JSONの作成・検証も扱います。
OpenClawのリリース候補を人が試すために、隔離コピーなどの検証環境を準備し、テストの進行とフィードバック整理を支援します。公開前の報告確認も扱います。
エージェント向けスキルの新規作成や修正を支援し、呼び出し条件、作業手順、付属ファイルの配置を整理して、設定や参照先、補助スクリプトを検証します。
本格的な開発に進む前に小さな試作品を動かし、アイデアの実現性や方式の違いを検証して、実行結果を根拠に採用・調整・見送りの判断をまとめるスキル。
変数や関数の命名、読みやすさ、データの更新方法、エラー処理を共通の基準で見直します。新規開発やコードレビューで、保守しやすい書き方をそろえるスキル。