3,051 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Implement WCAG 2.2 AA/AAA compliance with automated testing, keyboard navigation, screen reader support, and focus management. Activate on: accessibility audit, WCAG compliance, keyboard navigation, screen reader, aria attributes, axe-core, focus trap. NOT for: design-level accessibility review (use design-accessibility-auditor), color contrast only (use css-in-js-architect).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
調査、裏取り、検証、コードリーディング、外部URL確認、GitHub PRやIssue確認、BigQueryなどのコマンドやクエリ実行を行う際に自動的に使用。清書用ドキュメントとは分離して、.agent_work/investigations/ にエージェント向けの内部調査ログを根拠URL、実行コマンド、クエリ、結果、未確認事項つきで残します。
Control and interact with a live browser session on any scraped page — click buttons, fill forms, navigate flows, and extract data using natural language prompts or code. Use when the user needs to interact with a webpage beyond simple scraping: logging into a site, submitting forms, clicking through pagination, handling infinite scroll, navigating multi-step checkout or wizard flows, or when a regular scrape failed because content is behind JavaScript interaction. Also useful for authenticated scraping via profiles. Triggers on "interact", "click", "fill out the form", "log in to", "sign in", "submit", "paginated", "next page", "infinite scroll", "interact with the page", "navigate to", "open a session", or "scrape failed".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Leverages Splunk Enterprise Security and SPL (Search Processing Language) to investigate security incidents through log correlation, timeline reconstruction, and anomaly detection. Covers Windows event logs, firewall logs, proxy logs, and authentication data analysis. Activates for requests involving Splunk investigation, SPL queries, SIEM log analysis, security event correlation, or log-based incident investigation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze advanced persistent threat (APT) group techniques using MITRE ATT&CK Navigator to create layered heatmaps of adversary TTPs for detection gap analysis and threat-informed defense.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a live investigation as an operator-driven query loop: the operator runs each query on the live system and pastes the result back, and you guide the investigation one labelled query at a time. Use alongside support-assist (which covers what to investigate) whenever someone is pasting query or command output back from a deployment, especially during an incident. Covers labelling, pacing, making each query decide the next step, version-grounding, and keeping queries cheap and correctly classified.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a support investigation as a suggest-and-interpret loop, never executing anything yourself — orient to the product's support pack and follow the signal with judgment. Use when someone asks for help triaging, investigating, or resolving an operational or support issue on a deployment. Not for feature-development cards (see investigate-and-fix and implement-this).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GitHub Actions の CI 失敗を調査するスキル。失敗した run / PR / job の URL（例: https://github.com/OWNER/REPO/actions/runs/RUNID、…/pull/PR、…/job/JOBID）や run_id・PR 番号を貼られて「このCIが失敗している、原因を調査して」「ビルド/テストがコケた、なぜ落ちたか調べて」「workflow が failed、修正案を出して」「job のログを見て」と頼まれたら必ず使う。WebFetch では github.com のログは取れない（PreToolUse hook が差し戻し、HTML しか返らない）ため、gh（`gh run view --log-failed` / `gh run view --job` / `gh pr checks` / `gh api`）で失敗ジョブ・ステップと失敗ステップのログだけを決定論スクリプトで収集し、失敗原因を特定して修正案を提示する。GitHub Actions 以外（GitLab CI 等）や、URL がログではなくソース閲覧目的のときは対象外。GitHub(gh) 前提。`/gh-ci-investigate` で明示起動も可。
When the user wants to plan, map, or restructure their website's page hierarchy, navigation, URL structure, or internal linking. Also use when the user mentions "sitemap," "site map," "visual sitemap," "site structure," "page hierarchy," "information architecture," "IA," "navigation design," "URL structure," "breadcrumbs," "internal linking strategy," "website planning," "what pages do I need," "how should I organize my site," or "site navigation." Use this whenever someone is planning what pages a website should have and how they connect. NOT for XML sitemaps (that's technical SEO — see seo-audit). For SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data, see schema.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when changing routes, tabs, guards, back-button behavior, or any navigation flow including notification-tap navigation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive investigation of complex multi-domain narratives (technology, theology, policy, finance). Systematically decouples factual claims from speculation through iterative verification, multi-source comparison, and contradiction resolution. Use for investigations requiring institutional knowledge, historical context, and handling of conflicting incentives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when: investigating a legacy, inherited, third-party-built, or otherwise newly-unfamiliar codebase before scoping a migration or major refactor. Formalizes a repeatable five-step investigation pass — entry-point census, business-rule classification, side-effect/idempotency cataloging, implicit-contract discovery, semantic-duplication detection — plus a canonical per-project Open Questions document. Requires checkable signals: ticket keywords or prior documentation gaps. Not a mandatory gate;
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
システム調査エージェント - コードベースの構造・技術スタック・問題点・DDD適合性を調査。/system-investigation [対象パス] で呼び出し。
Leverages Splunk Enterprise Security and SPL (Search Processing Language) to investigate security incidents through log correlation, timeline reconstruction, and anomaly detection. Covers Windows event logs, firewall logs, proxy logs, and authentication data analysis. Activates for requests involving Splunk investigation, SPL queries, SIEM log analysis, security event correlation, or log-based incident investigation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze advanced persistent threat (APT) group techniques using MITRE ATT&CK Navigator to create layered heatmaps of adversary TTPs for detection gap analysis and threat-informed defense.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs ML-based protein-ligand pose prediction and scoring using DiffDock-L (diffusion-based), Boltz-1 / Boltz-2 (foundation model with affinity), Chai-1, AlphaFold3 ligand, EquiBind, TANKBind, NeuralPLexer, and hybrid workflows (DiffDock pose + GNINA rescore + PoseBusters QC). Explicit handling of when ML beats classical docking, when classical beats ML, the PB-invalid pose problem, and rescoring as the standard production hybrid. Use when modern docking is needed: foundation-model ligand-pose prediction, AI rescoring of classical poses, or scaffold-hopping in cross-docking scenarios.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate errors, incidents, or product ideas using both internet research and repo-wide codebase research, then propose a concrete changeset plan with clarifying questions before any implementation. Use when a user asks to investigate, root-cause, or plan changes, or when an Issue or PR is referenced and needs a plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Forensic case investigation with evidence-graded findings, calibrated to the input. Use when the user asks to investigate a bug, trace what caused an incident, walk through unfamiliar code, or build a mental model of a code area before working on it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Visualises and validates a map's pedestrian navigation mesh by sampling walkable locations (get_random_location_from_navigation) and drawing them as debug points. Use when the user asks to "show/visualise the pedestrian navmesh", "check walkable areas", "validate pedestrian navigation after a map import", or "why won't my walkers move". Confirms the navmesh loaded and how far it covers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drives a vehicle to a destination autonomously using CARLA's navigation agents (BasicAgent/BehaviorAgent/ConstantVelocityAgent), or plans a route between two points with GlobalRoutePlanner. The agent handles routing, obstacle avoidance and traffic-light obedience. Use when the user asks to "drive the ego to (x,y,z)", "navigate to the junction", "go to that location", "plan a route from A to B", or "make the car drive itself somewhere specific". Manual control is control-vehicle; autopilot roaming is control-traffic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs ML-based protein-ligand pose prediction and scoring using DiffDock-L (diffusion-based), Boltz-1 / Boltz-2 (foundation model with affinity), Chai-1, AlphaFold3 ligand, EquiBind, TANKBind, NeuralPLexer, and hybrid workflows (DiffDock pose + GNINA rescore + PoseBusters QC). Explicit handling of when ML beats classical docking, when classical beats ML, the PB-invalid pose problem, and rescoring as the standard production hybrid. Use when modern docking is needed: foundation-model ligand-pose prediction, AI rescoring of classical poses, or scaffold-hopping in cross-docking scenarios.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sidebar layouts: AdwNavigationSplitView vs OverlaySplitView, sidebar widths, collapse breakpoints, navigation-sidebar styling. Use when adding a sidebar or master-detail layout to a GNOME app.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to plan, map, or restructure their website's page hierarchy, navigation, URL structure, or internal linking. Also use when the user mentions "sitemap," "site map," "visual sitemap," "site structure," "page hierarchy," "information architecture," "IA," "navigation design," "URL structure," "breadcrumbs," "internal linking strategy," "website planning," "what pages do I need," "how should I organize my site," or "site navigation." Use this whenever someone is planning what pages a website should have and how they connect. NOT for XML sitemaps (that's technical SEO — see seo-audit). For SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data, see schema-markup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs ML-based protein-ligand pose prediction and scoring using DiffDock-L (diffusion-based), Boltz-1 / Boltz-2 (foundation model with affinity), Chai-1, AlphaFold3 ligand, EquiBind, TANKBind, NeuralPLexer, and hybrid workflows (DiffDock pose + GNINA rescore + PoseBusters QC). Explicit handling of when ML beats classical docking, when classical beats ML, the PB-invalid pose problem, and rescoring as the standard production hybrid. Use when modern docking is needed: foundation-model ligand-pose prediction, AI rescoring of classical poses, or scaffold-hopping in cross-docking scenarios.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。