「investigate」の検索結果

Refines broad, vague, or aspirational biomedical research objectives into clear, bounded, measurable, executable, and downstream-ready study objective statements. Always use this skill when a user has a general aim such as “explore a mechanism,” “study prognosis,” “investigate biomarkers,” or “look at treatment response,” but the objective is still too broad, non-operational, or too ambiguous to support protocol framing, design selection, analysis planning, or hypothesis design. Never assume that polished wording alone means the objective is actionable. Focus first on objective type, missing operational elements, scope discipline, and downstream-ready formulation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research-first development methodology that investigates existing solutions, brainstorms alternatives, and evaluates trade-offs before any implementation begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "find skills in the wild", "assimilate popular workflows", "discover SKILL.md files in repos", "research external skills", "find workflow patterns", "survey the skill landscape", "what skills exist out there", or wants to investigate public repositories for extractable processes, babysitter plugins, and reusable procedural insights. Searches GitHub for SKILL.md files, classifies repos by archetype, and maintains structured research under docs/reference-repos/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session or facing 3+ independent issues that can be investigated without shared state or dependencies - dispatches fresh subagent for each task with code review between tasks, enabling fast iteration with quality gates

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn student course evaluations (free-text + numeric) into an actionable teaching-improvement plan — the teaching analogue of /respond-to-referees. Clusters comments into themes, separates signal from noise, classifies each theme Keep / Change / Investigate / Out-of-scope, and drafts concrete changes mapped to the syllabus and slide decks. Use when user says "respond to my evals", "what do these course evaluations tell me", "turn my teaching feedback into a plan", or after a semester's evals arrive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug live Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) incidents with a read-only, evidence-first investigation. WHEN: pod crashes or Pending, CrashLoopBackOff, OOMKilled, ImagePullBackOff, node NotReady, DNS or ingress failure, connectivity timeout, network policy, SNAT exhaustion, node-pool scaling blocked by QuotaExceeded or InsufficientVCPUQuota, upgrade stuck, spot or zone disruption, a bare VMExtensionProvisioningError or AllocationFailed wrapper, an uncataloged capacity symptom, or 'investigate my AKS cluster'. DO NOT USE FOR: packet capture (use aks-network-capture); GPU or model-serving issues (use aks-gpu-inference); cluster creation or provisioning (use azure-kubernetes); cost (use cost-analysis from the optional azure-cost plugin); pod rightsizing (use azure-kubernetes); a fully qualified documented AKS signature with every required nested qualifier (use aks-known-issues); standalone failures on non-AKS Azure resources (use azure-diagnostics). Unqualified errors and open-ended incidents stay here only for AKS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs systematic root cause analysis to identify the true source of bugs, errors, and unexpected behavior through structured investigation phases — not just treating symptoms. Use when a user reports a bug, crash, error, or broken behavior and needs to debug, troubleshoot, or investigate why something is not working; especially for complex or intermittent issues across multiple components. Applies the Five Whys method, hypothesis-driven testing, stack trace analysis, git blame/log evidence gathering, and causal chain documentation to isolate and confirm root causes before applying any fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigates network, streaming and protocol failures with falsification-first layered experiments, the general fallback for unknown root causes. Use for ECONNRESET / RST_STREAM / SSE stalls, CDN/CGNAT timeouts or certificate errors, throughput collapse where everything returns 200 but transfers crawl, or LAN identity/topology mysteries. Not for known Tailscale/TUN/DNS/proxy-path conflicts (use tunnel-doctor).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate and resolve Cloudflare configuration issues using API-driven evidence gathering. Use when troubleshooting ERR_TOO_MANY_REDIRECTS, SSL errors, DNS issues, or any Cloudflare-related problems. Focus on systematic investigation using Cloudflare API to examine actual configuration rather than making assumptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reconcile controlled-substance records and prepare for an inspection — the count against the register, the discrepancy investigation, the documentation an inspector asks for, and the reporting obligations a shortfall triggers. Use when asked to reconcile controlled drugs, prepare for a DEA or controlled-drug inspection, investigate a discrepancy or suspected diversion, or audit the CD register. Produces the reconciliation, the discrepancy investigation record, the inspection-readiness checklist, and the escalation and reporting decision tree. A process framework only; reporting thresholds, timelines and obligations are set by law in your jurisdiction and must be verified there.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a structured budget variance analysis from actual vs budget figures. Use when asked to analyse budget variances, explain underspend or overspend, write a variance commentary, or investigate why actuals differ from plan. Produces a categorised variance table with root cause analysis and management commentary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and prioritize performance work through bounded-work and forward-progress checks. Use when asked to find performance issues, investigate freezes/500s/OOMs, review retries or polling for no-progress loops, rank a performance backlog, or implement the next simple performance fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only after explicit Codex `$superloopy:superloopy-research` or Claude Code `/superloopy:superloopy-research` invocation, a research task started with a leading `loopy` or `루피` (such as `loopy research`), or an active Superloopy loop explicitly routing a research deliverable here. Evidence-backed Superloopy research orchestration with automatic advisory usage targets, parallel read-only lanes, per-retrieval verdicts, graded and dated sources, empirical verification, a priced claim ledger, cited synthesis, and optional reports. Do not activate from research, investigate, look-up, summarize, deep-dive, report, or similar vocabulary alone, in any language; ordinary questions, debugging, and implementation context-gathering stay with their primary workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codex-native multi-keyword Amazon opportunity scan using LaunchFast MCP. Use when the user wants to research 1-10 keywords, compare niches, or decide whether a product idea is a GO, INVESTIGATE, or PASS. Requires the LaunchFast MCP tool `research_products`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate AI traces, observations, exceptions, latency, sessions, prompts, datasets, annotation queues, and scores through Langfuse MCP. Use when the request names Langfuse or asks to diagnose recorded AI behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a feature or initiative through a computed route: the conductor derives the canon delta and assembles the document package — from a zero-document null route for small fixes to an umbrella PRD with one spec per capability for large initiatives. Modes, named as the first word: sdd (full package), sources (MRD → BRD → URD) for market research, customer discovery, and business or user requirements, iso (BRS → StRS → SyRS → SRS) for ISO 29148 and regulated work, research for a technical investigation — never market research — that the research instrument closes either by scope coverage (a research document) or by a recommendation (an rnd). Explicit form: plan research <topic>. Use for 'plan the X redesign', 'create a roadmap', 'plan a new feature', 'I need market research before we plan', 'we're regulated — start the ISO requirements cascade', 'investigate X before we plan', 'compare the alternatives for Y' — a new investigation, not a finished report already in hand. Not for recording a decision or documenting existing code — use /archcore:document. Not for checking docs against code — use /archcore:review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold a one-command `dev-local` launcher for ANY codebase. Investigates the repo to find its services, ports, and infra dependencies, then generates a single `scripts/dev-local.sh` (up/down/status/logs/restart) that runs every dev server in one tmux session, plus a short skill doc describing it. Use when someone says "set up dev-local", "make a one-command dev launcher", "I want one script to start this repo", "scaffold dev-local for this project".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set a repo up to prove engineering-task work actually works before it ships. Investigates the repo, ensures a one-command dev stack (`dev-local`) exists, asks whether verification runs locally or in a sandbox (crabbox), confirms/installs the driver (the `playwright-cli` skill for web by default). Outputs three artifacts: a committed `/verify` skill (per-task verification SOP — spawn a verifier sub-agent → drive the app → screenshot/video proof → open a PR with the proof embedded), the `/dev-local` skill + script, and the installed driver skill. Use when someone says "set up verification", "make this repo verifiable", "scaffold a verify skill", "set up the verifier".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

For paid lead-gen and participant-recruitment ads, replaces vanity CPA with true CAC per qualified lead by joining ad-platform data with downstream funnel events, surfaces tracking gaps, and classifies every creative into Scale / Keep / Investigate / Cut.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a standalone bug report that another developer can use to reproduce, investigate, and fix an issue. Use when the user says 'file a bug', 'write a bug report', 'report this issue', or asks to document a defect for handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clipboard-ready handoff prompt for another agent to investigate or continue a task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep research and discovery before building something new. Explores local projects for reusable code, researches competitors, reads forums and reviews, analyses plugin ecosystems, investigates technical options, and produces a comprehensive research brief. Three depths: focused (30 min), wide (1-2 hours), deep (3-6 hours). Triggers: 'research this', 'discovery', 'explore the space', 'what should I build', 'competitive analysis', 'before I start building', 'research before coding'. Not for cited fact-checking research reports (a separate harness does those); this is pre-build product discovery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or review source-backed descriptive, diagnostic, predictive, and prescriptive analysis for consequential decisions. Use when an agent must profile and safely prepare uploaded data, turn a real dataset or research question into a reproducible study, investigate drivers without overstating causality, validate a model, compare feasible actions under dependent uncertainty and tail risk, trace every parameter to evidence and approval, or produce an answer-first analytical report across health, business, finance, policy, engineering, operations, behavioral science, AI, or planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a broad Process Mining business question, observed pattern or competing explanation needs investigation across analytical perspectives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。